Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 147. (Read 82180 times)

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

If that is a reality, of course, I know that there are many people who always seek to take care of their data and be the most anonymous so that no one knows anything about them, in fact on many occasions I have been in some threads where they talk about how would be the impact if Monero enters a casino? what would that acceptance be like and what would become of the other casinos seeing that they have an almost entirely anonymous currency, it is well known that Bitcoin is more universal and in all people what is heard most for the first time is Bitcoin, and then What is read or something is that altcoins and their functions are known, then this would be a great different option.

Well the truth is that this is something that many people avoid, first of all KYC, and when talking about various levels of KYC it is much more panic, this is something that has been going on for a long time, but because the current requirements are very strong, the casino is almost not to blame, it must comply with the laws that carry out this procedure implies, I know that the casino risks losing many customers, but that is preferable to having to wait and have the casino closed totlam,nte that is something much worse, I know that we as players hate KYC, but somehow things are done better by following these rules.

Even loyal or long time players too will surely be having doubts on complying those verification specially on level 2..Level 1 might really be that considerable and still not enough for people not to stay away
but if they would really be turning out to be that strict when it comes to compliance then pretty much sure it would heavily affect the numbers that would be playing on their site.
We cant tell though or make out some conclusions yet but its true  that they do make out sudden decisions without making any announcement which they should at least do know the community
on whats up their plans whether they would be integrating these things or not.

Level 2 means providing other documents like Valid ID right? I think many will start to panic again once they asked for this KYC though of course this can still happen since Roobet requirement is quiet unpredictable and they made no announcements before making any changes. If that will be required, I also doubt that I can provide such documents, this can be a big problem to some gamblers too.

You can't guarantee that for the future. I mean they may or may not ask that, we didn't know they would ask the current one neither, and even though the kyc level 1 is not asking for many things, they are still asking for some stuff and you have to be legit about it. On the other hand, we are talking about a situation where we need to realize that it hurts roobet, so why would they ask it right?

Well, it would not be a smart decision by roobet to make mandatory kyc where you show your ID and face and everything else. Hence I think it will "probably" not happen but just like I said first, we really do not know what is going to be happening and what is going to surprise us.

@Slow death,

Are only 30 days enough?

Personally, I don't really like sharing KYC documents. A few days ago I noticed that STAKE does not allow any gambler to deposit on their website without completing KYC (both existing users and newcomers). Although there are restrictions on deposits, the site has no withdrawal restrictions. Users can gamble without KYC and they can make withdrawals too, but only deposits are terminated.

I think this system should be followed by all the casinos then the gamblers will be spared unnecessary hassles and the reputation of the casino will remain intact.

As you mentioned, we both would prefer a legal casino that doesn't enforce mandatory KYC which is why I agree to simply disagree on this matter.

Good points. The biggest issue with how they enforced mandatory KYC level-1 is that they never informed their gamblers in advance about it which stunned many of them since it was completely unexpected.

That's the problem with people who come here and complain, we should stop with that already. We should be able to delete ALL complaints on casino topics because if we keep on focusing on those then we are not going to end up with anything good at all, it is not going to be good. Because, we are talking about something that is constantly here and never gets removed even when solved, and that's not going to be a good thing.

This is why I believe that we should be removing them here, put them on scam accusations, if they are good then they are good, if not then they are not bothering people here and complaining about stuff that are already resolved.

I keep asking myself:

I believe that there must be many people who are using the casino to make large deposits like more than 10K and manage to lose all that money, but let's suppose there are many people with more than 1000$ in the casino, these people keep making plans to go later withdraw their money, when they arrive at the casino they are faced with KYC, even though it is level 1 KYC it is still KYC, and these people are afraid to reveal their identity on the internet so they will be forced to lose their money.

so I ask myself:

what does it cost casio to put KYC but give 30 days for all people who don't like and don't want to comply with KYC to withdraw their money and close their account?

That measure would be the fairest! now when the casino doesn't do that then it is creating an unpleasant and unfair situation and it can be understood as a way to withhold people's funds


It is true that casinos have the right to ask for KYC because they are respecting the laws, I also did KYC, what I just think should be done was to be sincere and honest with people and say:

Look, in this casino do not create an account if you do not want to comply with KYC and before any customer makes a deposit they could ask for KYC and if they also want to change something in the TOS to make everyone comply with KYC level 2 they could inform everyone in advance and give people 30 days to withdraw their money and close their accounts. It doesn't cost anything to have common sense and do this!

As per the current gambling policies many casinos have accepted the AML guidelines and introduced KYC for the players and in future the government regulations could become more strict putting pressure on the casino owners to implement these norms but these are assumptions at this time so will see how they operate in future.

Losing a customer is expected when rules like KYC is implemented. It's the drawback to the casino but they need to comply since they are forced to do to maintain the legality of the casino. I understand the reasoning of KYC and I know casinos won't like to do it if they aren't required since it cost additional resources and manpower to maintain it. Though let's hope more and more casino who are planning to have KYC give their customer a chance to withdraw first before they implement the rule. Suddenly requiring and forcing their gamblers to submit KYC will give them bad reputation for sure.

There’s no doubt about the promotions of Roobet, they really know how to attract players to try their site and it’s very attractive. Well, some are just complaining about KYC implementation without announcement before, well this has been the issue and I’m still confuse why many can’t still move on about the KYC implementation of Roobet.

Roobet is very active, and they are just asking for a level 1 KYC, which is general information needed for you to withdraw some money. What I also like about Roobet is that, they are very active and even if they are already considered as one of the good site, they still continue to host many promotions here in the forum and also in social media. If many don’t want the level 1 KYC, you can just skip Roobet but I’m telling you, you will miss a lot especially with a great promotions and great games as well.

Yes, I understand what you are saying, I don't know how there are those types of people who can make good things look bad, what happens is that there are people who have different types of culautras, there are some who always want to take advantage of everything and invent anything to be able to have a profit at any rate, and this fun is not very clear to them, the people who dedicate themselves to looking for the 5 legs of the cat do not see the effort that a casino makes to guarantee the money that is deposited is safe, and that the money that each person risks playing becomes a total fun these things are what make a good casino.


It is that all the practices that have to do with KYC every casino knows that its genet will not like it, and Roobet for now has a good success, I know many friends who have roobet as one of the casinos that they frequent the most after SB, stake.com, they tell me that their slots are also very good and have an RTP that seems normal and good to them, or it is neither very high nor very low, so all these things attract people who like them a lot, besides, Roobet has a lot of relevance Today compared to other casinos, most do not invest much in their marketing, instead Robbet has an open signature campaign, they have art contests, all these things claim the success of the platform, so the KYC that players request Well, they do it and that's it.

I doubt that they will announce anything beforehand. They didn't do it last time, when they introduced mandatory KYC Level 1, which caught many players off guard. Not exactly the best business practice, if you ask me but I guess they had their reasons.

I am talking about the possibility, and I think it is reasonable to think that the day will come when every legal online Casino will require its player to undergo KYC.  With the current trend of Online Casinos today, asking for KYC when they actually started out not asking it for their players. And, I could have ask you the same question but then, let's just agree to disagree. At the end of the day, we both prefer a legal Casino that does not implement mandatory KYC to their users.

Whenever someone talks about "enough with KYC talk" that always scares me. That means you accept the decision and want to move on and thats not how you show your discontent with the situation at hand. I dislike the fact, and I keep on warning Roobet to not go along with this for a long time. I mean if they ask for more and more in the future, we should be here to stop that from happening. If we all rolled over and accepted level 1, then they would have asked for level 2, but many people left and many stayed but complained, so maybe that is the reason level 2 is not mandatory, maybe its not, but you never know. Hence, complaining about part of Roobet is not a trouble if you ask me, it should be done constantly to keep them in check.

Yes its not really that necessary on making up discussion in related with KYC because if ever they would intend to add up further verification then pretty sure they would make out some announcement
and if not then users or gamblers would eventually find it and tell it to the public in related to this and this is where things would be changing when it comes to impression.
I agree on what Juggy777 had said that it would be better that we should stop on discussing about KYC but rather focused on the other topic in correlation with promotions and other related
stuffs which would be that much more relevant.

How are you so sure that every single crypto gambling site out there will make KYC mandatory like Roobet? Can you foresee the future or something? You clearly can't which is why you are simply assuming.

It's because someone mentioned that Roobet would make Level-2 verification mandatory soon sparking another KYC related debate.

I dont think Roobet will ask for another level verification (and that is submitting documents for level 2) aside from the mandatory level 1 kyc. Unless if your account is suspicious or you exceeds the limit that need an additional identity verification. But if we're just an average gamblers, I dont think they will ask us for further verification. But as you have said gamblers who are not comfortable in kyc thing can always switch to other casino that dont require kyc. We have an option.