Author

Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 148. (Read 82254 times)

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1152
It was back then, but every day is a new day for crypto casinos.  What is ok yesterday may not be ok today or what is ok today may change tomorrow.  The same goes for the implementation of KYC.  We really can't compare the rules of yesterday and today.  Years or months back, Roobet is ok with no KYC withdrawal even with a large sum of money but due to the changes in regulations and requirements of the authority regarding casinos, Roobet and other casinos have to adapt to the implemented regulations if they wanted to operate smoothly.
How are you so sure that every single crypto gambling site out there will make KYC mandatory like Roobet? Can you foresee the future or something? You clearly can't which is why you are simply assuming.

I am talking about the possibility, and I think it is reasonable to think that the day will come when every legal online Casino will require its player to undergo KYC.  With the current trend of Online Casinos today, asking for KYC when they actually started out not asking it for their players. And, I could have ask you the same question but then, let's just agree to disagree.Cheesy At the end of the day, we both prefer a legal Casino that does not implement mandatory KYC to their users.

hero member
Activity: 1974
Merit: 575
Yes its not really that necessary on making up discussion in related with KYC because if ever they would intend to add up further verification then pretty sure they would make out some announcement
and if not then users or gamblers would eventually find it and tell it to the public in related to this and this is where things would be changing when it comes to impression.
I agree on what Juggy777 had said that it would be better that we should stop on discussing about KYC but rather focused on the other topic in correlation with promotions and other related
stuffs which would be that much more relevant.

Whenever someone talks about "enough with KYC talk" that always scares me. That means you accept the decision and want to move on and thats not how you show your discontent with the situation at hand. I dislike the fact, and I keep on warning Roobet to not go along with this for a long time. I mean if they ask for more and more in the future, we should be here to stop that from happening. If we all rolled over and accepted level 1, then they would have asked for level 2, but many people left and many stayed but complained, so maybe that is the reason level 2 is not mandatory, maybe its not, but you never know. Hence, complaining about part of Roobet is not a trouble if you ask me, it should be done constantly to keep them in check.
sr. member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 324
Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.

True but I think the trend of Casino will be KYC implementation so it would be just a matter of time before those non-KYC Casinos start requiring their player to submit documents for KYC.
We have to be more ready for this, it is still good for a level 1 KYC with Roobet, but if they will start to ask for some proof or documents, that could be alarming and for sure many will not comply. Well, let’s just hope that they will make an announcement first before they implement this kind of changes, because for sure many are still not ok with KYC, and they will leave right away if the site started to require this.
On the time that they would be asking for some documents for the verification then this is where their revenue would took a bad hit considering that majority of players or even loyal ones would be staying away from

Roobet and since there are lots of options that we do have in the market then there's no doubt that they would really be jumping off into another place.Lets hope that they wont really be going into
that point which would surely be not a good sight for all people here on crypto space or on this forum itself.

I am bit baffled as to why are we discussing KYC again and again in Roobet thread, because I remember few user’s too had posted this before that we move on from KYC discussion and just accept it as it is. Furthermore moving forward let’s try and discuss about Roobet quest, or their sportsbook odd to see if they’re providing higher or lower odds in comparison to their peers.
Yes its not really that necessary on making up discussion in related with KYC because if ever they would intend to add up further verification then pretty sure they would make out some announcement
and if not then users or gamblers would eventually find it and tell it to the public in related to this and this is where things would be changing when it comes to impression.
I agree on what Juggy777 had said that it would be better that we should stop on discussing about KYC but rather focused on the other topic in correlation with promotions and other related
stuffs which would be that much more relevant.
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 969
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
It was back then, but every day is a new day for crypto casinos.  What is ok yesterday may not be ok today or what is ok today may change tomorrow.  The same goes for the implementation of KYC.  We really can't compare the rules of yesterday and today.  Years or months back, Roobet is ok with no KYC withdrawal even with a large sum of money but due to the changes in regulations and requirements of the authority regarding casinos, Roobet and other casinos have to adapt to the implemented regulations if they wanted to operate smoothly.
How are you so sure that every single crypto gambling site out there will make KYC mandatory like Roobet? Can you foresee the future or something? You clearly can't which is why you are simply assuming.

I am bit baffled as to why are we discussing KYC again and again in Roobet thread, because I remember few user’s too had posted this before that we move on from KYC discussion and just accept it as it is.
It's because someone mentioned that Roobet would make Level-2 verification mandatory soon sparking another KYC related debate.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 629
Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.

True but I think the trend of Casino will be KYC implementation so it would be just a matter of time before those non-KYC Casinos start requiring their player to submit documents for KYC.
We have to be more ready for this, it is still good for a level 1 KYC with Roobet, but if they will start to ask for some proof or documents, that could be alarming and for sure many will not comply. Well, let’s just hope that they will make an announcement first before they implement this kind of changes, because for sure many are still not ok with KYC, and they will leave right away if the site started to require this.
I dont think Roobet will ask for another level verification (and that is submitting documents for level 2) aside from the mandatory level 1 kyc. Unless if your account is suspicious or you exceeds the limit that need an additional identity verification. But if we're just an average gamblers, I dont think they will ask us for further verification. But as you have said gamblers who are not comfortable in kyc thing can always switch to other casino that dont require kyc. We have an option.
hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 686
Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.

True but I think the trend of Casino will be KYC implementation so it would be just a matter of time before those non-KYC Casinos start requiring their player to submit documents for KYC.
We have to be more ready for this, it is still good for a level 1 KYC with Roobet, but if they will start to ask for some proof or documents, that could be alarming and for sure many will not comply. Well, let’s just hope that they will make an announcement first before they implement this kind of changes, because for sure many are still not ok with KYC, and they will leave right away if the site started to require this.
On the time that they would be asking for some documents for the verification then this is where their revenue would took a bad hit considering that majority of players or even loyal ones would be staying away from

Roobet and since there are lots of options that we do have in the market then there's no doubt that they would really be jumping off into another place.Lets hope that they wont really be going into
that point which would surely be not a good sight for all people here on crypto space or on this forum itself.

I am bit baffled as to why are we discussing KYC again and again in Roobet thread, because I remember few user’s too had posted this before that we move on from KYC discussion and just accept it as it is. Furthermore moving forward let’s try and discuss about Roobet quest, or their sportsbook odd to see if they’re providing higher or lower odds in comparison to their peers.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 722
Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.

True but I think the trend of Casino will be KYC implementation so it would be just a matter of time before those non-KYC Casinos start requiring their player to submit documents for KYC.
We have to be more ready for this, it is still good for a level 1 KYC with Roobet, but if they will start to ask for some proof or documents, that could be alarming and for sure many will not comply. Well, let’s just hope that they will make an announcement first before they implement this kind of changes, because for sure many are still not ok with KYC, and they will leave right away if the site started to require this.
On the time that they would be asking for some documents for the verification then this is where their revenue would took a bad hit considering that majority of players or even loyal ones would be staying away from

Roobet and since there are lots of options that we do have in the market then there's no doubt that they would really be jumping off into another place.Lets hope that they wont really be going into
that point which would surely be not a good sight for all people here on crypto space or on this forum itself.
full member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 180
Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.

True but I think the trend of Casino will be KYC implementation so it would be just a matter of time before those non-KYC Casinos start requiring their player to submit documents for KYC.
We have to be more ready for this, it is still good for a level 1 KYC with Roobet, but if they will start to ask for some proof or documents, that could be alarming and for sure many will not comply. Well, let’s just hope that they will make an announcement first before they implement this kind of changes, because for sure many are still not ok with KYC, and they will leave right away if the site started to require this.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1152
I use a gambling site (bitsler) from several years and  they never asked me any kyc and they provided me telegram support. But while I have win few days ago they asked me to verify kyc and after verification they reduced my bet limit on cricket. So, those site which you are using obviously will do the same if you win any big amount. Also they may decrease your bet limit.
Hate to break it to you, but I did win big amounts(0.5 BTC) from a crypto gambling site sometime back and they never asked me KYC. I never won consistently anywhere which is why my bet limits were never reduced so far.


It was back then, but every day is a new day for crypto casinos.  What is ok yesterday may not be ok today or what is ok today may change tomorrow.  The same goes for the implementation of KYC.  We really can't compare the rules of yesterday and today.  Years or months back, Roobet is ok with no KYC withdrawal even with a large sum of money but due to the changes in regulations and requirements of the authority regarding casinos, Roobet and other casinos have to adapt to the implemented regulations if they wanted to operate smoothly.

Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.

True but I think the trend of Casino will be KYC implementation so it would be just a matter of time before those non-KYC Casinos start requiring their player to submit documents for KYC.
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 969
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
I use a gambling site (bitsler) from several years and  they never asked me any kyc and they provided me telegram support. But while I have win few days ago they asked me to verify kyc and after verification they reduced my bet limit on cricket. So, those site which you are using obviously will do the same if you win any big amount. Also they may decrease your bet limit.
Hate to break it to you, but I did win big amounts(0.5 BTC) from a crypto gambling site sometime back and they never asked me KYC. I never won consistently anywhere which is why my bet limits were never reduced so far.

Overall, it's still possible to withdraw your winnings from some crypto gambling sites without providing KYC.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1152

When did he updated the thread as "Resolved"? Was it only today? Was it yesterday or few days ago already?
I am assuming that it was only updated today, first of September 2022 since his last post referring the company that he is being scammed was August 31.
It will be nice if he will make another post to that of his thread that the case has already been resolved, but we can't make him do it if he do not want.

For sure it was updated on Sept 1, the same date you asked when it was updated and marked resolved. Hovering the mouse on the dotted line under the date will show when the post is edited.



That guy is indeed impatient.  The worst is that he is threatening Roobet to kill himself and put the blame on the casino.  This kind of player should be outright banned from the casino because it would do no good and only put the casino in trouble if the same thing happens again even no matter who is at fault the next time.
sr. member
Activity: 1750
Merit: 260
Binance #SWGT and CERTIK Audited

There are many such cases where gamblers don't wait long enough and open up scam accusations thread against the casino but they need to realise that if the team has contacted them and there's some technical issues then legit casinos like Roobet would refund the money as we have seen earlier also.So he also need to give heads up for this and update his post.
It's great that the issue about his account has been resolved by Roobet team.
Now since it has already been resolved, I don't think the user care much of editing/updating posts that might threaten Roobet's reputation (somehow). The user has not even been active for 2 days since the first of September, the time that the issue has been sort out. I think he doesn't care anymore as he already received his money. I can understand him since he only joined the forum for that sole reason.
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124

Roobet had been sendingi money on campaign and art contest and I was very sure that the team will never take anything from gamblers about him that was posting on the Roobet signature campaign thread of the team not listening to his lamentation.
Everything is patience in this life and I don't know why op was not that patient enough to allow the team to respond to his problem before going tough. Now that everything had been resolved, he needed to go clear and delete every bad words he had written about Roobet.
There are many such cases where gamblers don't wait long enough and open up scam accusations thread against the casino but they need to realise that if the team has contacted them and there's some technical issues then legit casinos like Roobet would refund the money as we have seen earlier also.So he also need to give heads up for this and update his post.
full member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 193
I disagree. It's possible to withdraw amounts from many crypto gambling sites(Licensed ones) without submitting any form of KYC unless the team finds something shady which I already mentioned in my earlier posts.
I agree with you and you are right at the first stage but all time you will be right that is not true. I use a gambling site (bitsler) from several years and  they never asked me any kyc and they provided me telegram support. But while I have win few days ago they asked me to verify kyc and after verification they reduced my bet limit on cricket. So, those site which you are using obviously will do the same if you win any big amount. Also they may decrease your bet limit.
Reducing the limit is still possible though not all site will implement this one since KYC doesn't asked for any proof of income and I've been dealing with some site already with KYC so far they didn't reduce my limit. If you're into Roobet, you can just ask their support for the reason and if you are betting big maybe you can also request for the limit increase, KYC is a thing now almost the top site are already asking for this, regulations push them to ask  KYC.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 2588
Top Crypto Casino
I disagree. It's possible to withdraw amounts from many crypto gambling sites(Licensed ones) without submitting any form of KYC unless the team finds something shady which I already mentioned in my earlier posts.
I agree with you and you are right at the first stage but all time you will be right that is not true. I use a gambling site (bitsler) from several years and  they never asked me any kyc and they provided me telegram support. But while I have win few days ago they asked me to verify kyc and after verification they reduced my bet limit on cricket. So, those site which you are using obviously will do the same if you win any big amount. Also they may decrease your bet limit.

How is that obvious? You generalize and draw a conclusion based on your experience at one casino that the same rules apply at all casinos. That doesn't have to be true. What has been obvious so far is that each gambling provider has its own approach to AML regulations and implements its own KYC procedures. While some allow withdrawal without in-depth KYC verification up to certain amounts, others will request the same on the first withdrawal, regardless of the amount. Also, there are those who claim to conduct KYC verification by random selection (although I personally don't think this is true).
copper member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1241
Need a Bounty Manager? t.me/shasan32
I disagree. It's possible to withdraw amounts from many crypto gambling sites(Licensed ones) without submitting any form of KYC unless the team finds something shady which I already mentioned in my earlier posts.
I agree with you and you are right at the first stage but all time you will be right that is not true. I use a gambling site (bitsler) from several years and  they never asked me any kyc and they provided me telegram support. But while I have win few days ago they asked me to verify kyc and after verification they reduced my bet limit on cricket. So, those site which you are using obviously will do the same if you win any big amount. Also they may decrease your bet limit.
hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 625
From his accusation thread, he already revised the subject to (Resolved) ROobet so it's high likely the problem has been resolved.

It's just funny how he make this thread and the signature campaign mess due to his problem, after it's already resolved, he didn't confirm and thankfully to Roobet since they're hear his demand to complete it before the next 4 hours, if not he will committing suicide.

The drama already ended and everyone are correct saying Roobet wouldn't scam their gamblers.
Roobet had been sendingi money on campaign and art contest and I was very sure that the team will never take anything from gamblers about him that was posting on the Roobet signature campaign thread of the team not listening to his lamentation.
Everything is patience in this life and I don't know why op was not that patient enough to allow the team to respond to his problem before going tough. Now that everything had been resolved, he needed to go clear and delete every bad words he had written about Roobet.
For a company or casino which do spent up thousands of dollars per week on their marketing  then its really hard to believe that they would really be not able to pay some winnings or hold up some withdrawal
with those sheer amounts.There might be some delays or something but it wont be directly be talking about scamming attempt or behavior.Cant really just believe that Roobet would really be doing
something like this and since its been resolved then that complainant should really be minding on closing up the thread so that everything would be cleared and wont really be
creating some bad impression towards the site.
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 519
fillippone - Winner contest Pizza 2022
From his accusation thread, he already revised the subject to (Resolved) ROobet so it's high likely the problem has been resolved.

It's just funny how he make this thread and the signature campaign mess due to his problem, after it's already resolved, he didn't confirm and thankfully to Roobet since they're hear his demand to complete it before the next 4 hours, if not he will committing suicide.

The drama already ended and everyone are correct saying Roobet wouldn't scam their gamblers.
Roobet had been sendingi money on campaign and art contest and I was very sure that the team will never take anything from gamblers about him that was posting on the Roobet signature campaign thread of the team not listening to his lamentation.
Everything is patience in this life and I don't know why op was not that patient enough to allow the team to respond to his problem before going tough. Now that everything had been resolved, he needed to go clear and delete every bad words he had written about Roobet.
hero member
Activity: 3038
Merit: 969
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
maybe this kind of gambler should be banned from continuing his gambling on roobet because he is very likely to spread his anger again when things don't go as his expected.
They won't ban him since they would lose a customer. Instead, he should take advantage of self-exclusion protocols in order to control his gambling addiction.

Now how does KYC appear? Answer: when the customer wins at the casino, they ask for KYC which usually takes days to approve and then it takes even more hours to release the withdrawal. but when depositing everything is fast and when the customer loses everything they don't remember to ask for KYC

and that's what makes people frustrated and sad
Agreed. This is a major issue with many crypto casinos. Some of them use this tactic in order to stall expecting the gambler to utilise and lose some of his/her winnings which is a cheap tactic, but it does work now and then.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 728
Now how does KYC appear? Answer: when the customer wins at the casino, they ask for KYC which usually takes days to approve and then it takes even more hours to release the withdrawal. but when depositing everything is fast and when the customer loses everything they don't remember to ask for KYC

and that's what makes people frustrated and sad
That's what almost casinos in this forum did, of course why the team need to ask the KYC of an account who lose? they wouldn't withdraw their money. The reason why the team ask the KYC is to prove if the account is controlled by a different person, who knows there's a limitation for gamblers who very lucky, after that he will create alt account in order to avoid this limitation.

Quote
But the fact that he talked about suicide and that he urgently needed the money to pay his bills so this is a sign that if he keeps playing and he loses he will commit suicide. i hope he urgently stop playing
He should use money from the casino to pay his bills is a sign if he have a poor money management, maybe he use 50% of his income to gamble.
Jump to: