Pages:
Author

Topic: rpietila Altcoin Observer - page 92. (Read 387551 times)

full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
August 14, 2014, 01:24:09 PM
Aminorex, i usually find your post eye openers, agree with them, or just like humor in them. OK, some of them i have problem reading without English dictionary, and few of them do not have time to try to understand just yet due to my lack of knowledge of economics. But some things i can understand, and i can not agree unconditionally with your argument of liquidity regarding Monero, simply because i do not think that CNs are used for real "purposes" - atm they are used mainly for speculation. "Real word" usage may turn tides on no 1. privacy currency, only time can tell which it will be imo.

... I am somewhat torn between the opposing considerations that lower prices now (which will probably be less volatile that would be higher prices at this early stage) aid in dispersion of the coin, and hence in the development of an organic economy, and the opposite consideration, that popularizing the investment potential will help focus capital formation in hands which are invested in XMR, and have an interest in seeing its economy grow....
That is exactly the reason i think Monero will be overtaken by BBR. Monero just has to steep curve to be properly distributed without large mining-marketing campain. Things would be different if it was released at a beginning of cryprocurrency hipe, but now Monero will spend large amount of life in time period that is skeptical to cryprocurrencies - which will affect its distribution to extent that will not reach satisfactory nettwork effect imo. Generally, comparing XMR to BTC is too far stretched. Bitcoin has whole industry behind it which will make it no 1 store of value for a long time to come. I used to think high of XMR, but now i think that shillers, and FUDsters of BBR, can not replace whole BTC industry. Further, XMR will not have army of GPU miners to come to support it in the near future, and BBR just might

Perhaps when BBR supporters start talking like that, on a sound basis, then BBR will exhibit more growth.  Frankly, I think that trying to convince a propdesk trader that his job will be safe if he buys more 'boolberries'  is a losing proposition.
Grin

"Things would be different if it was released at a beginning of cryprocurrency hipe, but now Monero will spend large amount of life in time period that is skeptical to cryprocurrencies"- That makes absolutely no sense. By following your reasoning, then no cryptocurrency(Bitcoin included) can be accepted by mainstream, since NO Cryptocurrency is mainstream yet. None. Your entire post makes no sense.
I'll explain. Adoption of cryptocurrencies comes in "waves" obviously. XMR was released in "downtrend" of  a cryptocurrency wave (i.e. after November 2013, and before new "uptrend"). XMR problem is that its curve is steep making a point of release more important to BBRs. Hope this makes it more clear
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
August 14, 2014, 01:20:04 PM
I'll separate this following things addressed to aminorex.

Generally, comparing XMR to BTC is too far stretched. Bitcoin has whole industry behind it which will make it no 1 store of value for a long time to come. I used to think high of XMR, but now i think that shillers, and FUDsters of BBR, can not replace whole BTC industry. Further, XMR will not have army of GPU miners to come to support it in the near future, and BBR just might
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
August 14, 2014, 01:17:17 PM
Aminorex, i usually find your post eye openers, agree with them, or just like humor in them. OK, some of them i have problem reading without English dictionary, and few of them do not have time to try to understand just yet due to my lack of knowledge of economics. But some things i can understand, and i can not agree unconditionally with your argument of liquidity regarding Monero, simply because i do not think that CNs are used for real "purposes" - atm they are used mainly for speculation. "Real word" usage may turn tides on no 1. privacy currency, only time can tell which it will be imo.

... I am somewhat torn between the opposing considerations that lower prices now (which will probably be less volatile that would be higher prices at this early stage) aid in dispersion of the coin, and hence in the development of an organic economy, and the opposite consideration, that popularizing the investment potential will help focus capital formation in hands which are invested in XMR, and have an interest in seeing its economy grow....
That is exactly the reason i think Monero will be overtaken by BBR. Monero just has to steep curve to be properly distributed without large mining-marketing campain. Things would be different if it was released at a beginning of cryprocurrency hipe, but now Monero will spend large amount of life in time period that is skeptical to cryprocurrencies - which will affect its distribution to extent that will not reach satisfactory nettwork effect imo. Generally, comparing XMR to BTC is too far stretched. Bitcoin has whole industry behind it which will make it no 1 store of value for a long time to come. I used to think high of XMR, but now i think that shillers, and FUDsters of BBR, can not replace whole BTC industry. Further, XMR will not have army of GPU miners to come to support it in the near future, and BBR just might

Perhaps when BBR supporters start talking like that, on a sound basis, then BBR will exhibit more growth.  Frankly, I think that trying to convince a propdesk trader that his job will be safe if he buys more 'boolberries'  is a losing proposition.
Grin

"Things would be different if it was released at a beginning of cryprocurrency hipe, but now Monero will spend large amount of life in time period that is skeptical to cryprocurrencies"- That makes absolutely no sense. By following your reasoning, then no cryptocurrency(Bitcoin included) can be accepted by mainstream, since NO Cryptocurrency is mainstream yet. None. Your entire post makes no sense.

Having a faster emission curve is Better, especially since the future of cryptocurrencies is unsure of, bitcoin could die off completely within the next 5 years, or reach astronomical heights. Boolberries slow emission curve makes its instamine all the more worse as well...
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
August 14, 2014, 01:14:21 PM
Aminorex, i usually find your post eye openers, agree with them, or just like humor in them. OK, some of them i have problem reading without English dictionary, and few of them do not have time to try to understand just yet due to my lack of knowledge of economics. But some things i can understand, and i can not agree unconditionally with your argument of liquidity regarding Monero, simply because i do not think that CNs are used for real "purposes" - atm they are used mainly for speculation. "Real word" usage may turn tides on no 1. privacy currency, only time can tell which it will be imo.

... I am somewhat torn between the opposing considerations that lower prices now (which will probably be less volatile that would be higher prices at this early stage) aid in dispersion of the coin, and hence in the development of an organic economy, and the opposite consideration, that popularizing the investment potential will help focus capital formation in hands which are invested in XMR, and have an interest in seeing its economy grow....
That is exactly the reason i think Monero will be overtaken by BBR. Monero just has to steep curve to be properly distributed without large mining-marketing campain (especially as large ammount of ppl do not have money or frictonless channels to buy it at exchanges). Things would be different if it was released at a beginning of cryprocurrency hipe, but now Monero will spend large amount of life in time period that is skeptical to cryprocurrencies - which will affect its distribution to extent that will not reach satisfactory nettwork effect imo.

Perhaps when BBR supporters start talking like that, on a sound basis, then BBR will exhibit more growth.  Frankly, I think that trying to convince a propdesk trader that his job will be safe if he buys more 'boolberries'  is a losing proposition.
Grin

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
August 14, 2014, 10:58:05 AM
A fair bit of Anotheranonlol's screed was derisory to me personally, so I will respond out of a sense of obligation to represent, but I can't take time to respond to the entirety, so I will hit the highlights, starting with the headline complaint about XMR, then moving on to the bits directly pertinent to my public face:

Nobody is making a cult around zoidberg, Ask for an objective, outsider perspective on XMR and BBR; which one seems more more cult-like, which one seems more like a forced meme. XMR has multiple threads consistently pushed to the front page, fireside chats, monero missives, Random sprinklings of TA, big secret news that can't be spoken about yet, continual references that this is the silver to Bitcoins gold, that it is the ONLY alt worth investing in, subtle reminders that 'it won't stay cheap for long'.

* Multiple threads consistently pushed to the front page

There are a lot of people interested in monero, and they specialize threads topically because otherwise the traffic would be overwhelming and the amount of stuff you're not interested in would obscure the stuff you're interested in.
There seem to be a couple of ditto head sock puppets which occasionally show up, but for the most part you're just complaining about the large user community and organic growth -- bullish characteristics, not cultish ones.

* Fireside chats, monero missives

So developers communicate well.  How is this a negative?  Openness, coherent vision, strong community support.  It is irrational to deride these, unless your agenda is to attack.  I'm not saying your agenda is to attack.  I am saying that if it is not, then you are irrational, and to be marginalized, while if it is, then you are on team FUD, and to be marginalized.  Hopefully, this dilemma is false.  It is entirely up to you to find a third way.

* Random sprinklings of TA

Some people try to use technical analysis to find buy and sell points.  Most people are interested in what the future holds.  I can't see how this makes the community cult-like.

* big secret news that can't be spoken about yet

Are you projecting p&d coin marketing behaviour onto the XMR community, where it doesn't exist?  (Well it does exist, but only among very marginal characters, few in number.)  Occasionally events are planned in advance.  If you want to know more about them, instead of regarding that as a sinister plan, why not just ask the planners?

* continual references that this is the silver to Bitcoins gold

Like litecoin in the past.  I strongly disagree.  I consider XMR to be the uranium to bitcoin's coal, undiscovered value, which technological advance will one day differentiate.  

People who like XMR don't want to seem delusional to those who don't understand the compelling fundamental case for XMR, so they give it the lesser role, following the model of litecoin promoters in times past.  It's a rational strategy, not a cultish behaviour, although I disagree with it.

* it is the ONLY alt worth investing in

It is the only alt which has a leadership position in competition for what may be the largest market opportunity in history:  Primary provider of global, instant, private liquidity.  That does discriminate it from all other coins.  That doesn't mean that other crypto is not investable.  It does mean that by far the largest potential gains are in XMR.  

Refute my logic, please.  Don't use smears and emotional blackmail.  Facts and logic, please.  I will defend my position as long as I consider it tenable, and change it once I consider it refuted, and thank you for it.  But if you use fallacious or sophistical persuations, I will consider you an enemy of truth itself, at least until you repent.

* subtle reminders that 'it won't stay cheap for long'

This is a direct consequence of the previous point.

As long as my credit is good, I am a buyer long past the point of despair.  When I start to feel the fear and depression, I cheer myself up by buying more.  I take some amphetamine and a shot of whiskey, if that's what it takes.  

Until people have obligations which can only be discharged in monero, there are no forced buyers, and volatility extremes will persist.  Just about the only thing that can give you a permanent loss is selling - especially forced sales from leverage.

Tell me what is irrational about my post, please?  I counsel against emotional investing.  I advocate an investment because I consider it beneficial.  I warn that it will be volatile.  I encourage discipline in holding to a long-term plan.  I counsel against excess leverage.  I do it in a colloquial style, with a dash of flourish, which may not be adapted to your humor, but these are sound, responsible positions.

I just got a new convert.  A rates trader at Metlife took a few thousand from me as a tail hedge.  A miniscule position, but I suspect he will become a repeat customer and tell his friends.

I will be meeting with an fx option market maker later, and a hedge fund manager when we can work out a mutual time.  Also looking into contacts with a rather largish fixed income fund for meetups the next time I hit nyc.

..snip...

I might line up a presentation on monero at one or more btc nyc meetups or at the nyc bitcoin center.  Not by me, but by a friend who is better suited to the task.

In future I may line up some seminar groups in London, Hong Kong, and or Shanghai.

Oh and I will be having beers tomorrow after work with an SVP from Two Sigma.  XMR will not be neglected.

Like Mr. Blankfein, I feel I am doing God' s work.


I didn't see any BBR supporters talking like that just yet.


So BBR supporters are not pro-actively seeking to introduce BBR to the investment community, but I am seeking to introduce XMR to the investment community.  I don't see this as a problem for XMR, personally.  I am somewhat torn between the opposing considerations that lower prices now (which will probably be less volatile that would be higher prices at this early stage) aid in dispersion of the coin, and hence in the development of an organic economy, and the opposite consideration, that popularizing the investment potential will help focus capital formation in hands which are invested in XMR, and have an interest in seeing its economy grow.  I am technical more than entreprenurial, so I see more leverage in sparking capital formation for investment in the XMR economy than I do in anything I am likely to initiate myself, directly, at least for the time-being.  Hence I have chosen the latter.

Perhaps when BBR supporters start talking like that, on a sound basis, then BBR will exhibit more growth.  Frankly, I think that trying to convince a propdesk trader that his job will be safe if he buys more 'boolberries'  is a losing proposition.

The "god's work" comment has two subtexts:  

1) Derision of Mr. Blankfein's comment, and hence a self-deprecating humor, and

2) Allusion to the win-win characteristic of spreading XMR.

Now that DOES make it cult-like in one superficial way, but with many critical differences:  Proselytizing XMR is a rational ploy, open and honest, based on facts and logic, and materially beneficial to all parties.  The only material similarity to classic examples of cults is that it involves proselytization.  All decent and commedable capitalism should be win-win, unlike today's negative-sum crapcoin fest, red in tooth and claw.  Yes, I see XMR as "god's work" in that sense.  Also in the sense of "for this purpose was the son of God manifest:  to destroy the work of the evil one".  Scamcoins created to steal from the gullible are very much a satanic playground, in my view.  Do you disagree?

Quote
Don't even think that's the worst of the bunch. Sure I heard someone saying they will ask their employer to get paid in XMR or quit.

Me again.  I haven't done it yet, but a little more FU money in the bank, and I may do it.  On the other hand, the permanent position is very appealling, and won't be paid in XMR under any circumstances, so it seems increasingly unlikely to happen.  It does appeal to my sense of whimsy.  It also appeals to my senses of personal integrity (to walk like I talk) and of self-interest (stacking XMR).

My reading of your rambling complaint is that you find facts, logic and humor to be offensive to your sensibilities.  I can't really object to that, but would warn you that retuning your sensibilities may be a desirable adaptation to reality, and a health-positive choice.

legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
August 14, 2014, 10:35:40 AM
monero is an exception and litecoin is the china bitcoin, thats not a myth

This is something new I'm hearing. They have alt for almost everything...

Google => Baidu

Twitter => Weibo

Facebook => Renren

Amazon => Alibaba

...and now

Bitcoin => Litecoin


Thats non sense, Litecoin adoption in china is nearly non existent except from speculative reason and some exchanges who added them.
If some coin gets really big in china except Bitcoin then it will be something that comes out of china directly.

And please...that Amazon and Alibaba comparison, i guess u never used Alibaba, its mainly a B2B channel like made-in-china, globalsources, doba, tradekey and dhgate.

If you want to compare Amazon to something you are better off with taobao (also owned by alibaba).

I'm not backing the opinion of Litecoin to be Chinese Bitcoin. Someone said it and hence I picked up the comparison.

Regarding Alibaba. No I have never used it. I have never used Amazon either. I have FlipKart, SnapDeal etc from my country to meet the huge demand Wink
sr. member
Activity: 427
Merit: 250
August 14, 2014, 10:09:45 AM
There is a coin called Credits (by now) being developed targeted for instant confirmations. It is said to be based on Proof of Consensus (which seems to be some kind of distributed voting for a block). I would like to ask someone knowledgeable in Game theory/statistics to take a look at the theory laying behind it. This message and the following discussion.

Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
August 14, 2014, 10:01:02 AM
Has a reason OKCoin is excluded from Coinmarketcap - people suppose that their volume is faked.

Well Charlie works for Coinbase, but what happens? nothing.
And they didnt even port the 0.9 Bitcoin branch; not sure what they are doing but it seems not much tbh.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
August 14, 2014, 09:43:09 AM
Litecoin adoption in china is nearly non existent except from speculative reason and some exchanges who added them.
Last December the Chinese government banned any use of cryptocurrencies, including both Bitcoin and Litecoin, except for speculative trade.

I haven't checked how the volumes are evolving, but  the largest exchanges (Huobi and OKCoin, much bigger than BTC-China and the western ones)  support both BTC/CNY and LTC/CNY.   

IIRC, Litecoin was started by Charlie Lee, brother of BTC-China's CEO Bobby Lee (who is now in the Board of Directors of The Shrem Karpelès & Friends Foundation).
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
August 14, 2014, 09:25:32 AM
monero is an exception and litecoin is the china bitcoin, thats not a myth

This is something new I'm hearing. They have alt for almost everything...

Google => Baidu

Twitter => Weibo

Facebook => Renren

Amazon => Alibaba

...and now

Bitcoin => Litecoin


Thats non sense, Litecoin adoption in china is nearly non existent except from speculative reason and some exchanges who added them.
If some coin gets really big in china except Bitcoin then it will be something that comes out of china directly.

And please...that Amazon and Alibaba comparison, i guess u never used Alibaba, its mainly a B2B channel like made-in-china, globalsources, doba, tradekey and dhgate.

If you want to compare Amazon to something you are better off with taobao (also owned by alibaba).
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1216
The revolution will be digital
August 14, 2014, 08:58:21 AM
monero is an exception and litecoin is the china bitcoin, thats not a myth

This is something new I'm hearing. They have alt for almost everything...

Google => Baidu

Twitter => Weibo

Facebook => Renren

Amazon => Alibaba

...and now

Bitcoin => Litecoin
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
August 14, 2014, 08:06:00 AM
I'm of the opinion that the biggest anonymous currency has a real chance of overtaking Bitcoin. Personally, I'll never use Bitcoin because it lacks privacy. It's a non-starter for me.
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
August 14, 2014, 08:01:00 AM
Monero makes me feel like Bitcoin in 2010, tons of potential and a $6MM market cap. I actually was there so I can compare the feeling. It will become really big, 1000x gain just to match what Bitcoin is now.

so, he says XMR market cap (1000x gain from todays prices, fully mined).. will be around 62,165,527.28 (sixty-two million) BTC (or about 3x as many BTC as will ever be created within the next 126 years).

Other parts of the post were either fully agreeable, or will be corrected by others. This one I wanted to correct myself. In that post I meant that Monero's marketcap ($5.8M) currently is only 1/1000 of Bitcoin's ($5.8B). Therefore, if Monero ever reaches the same adoption as Bitcoin has now, in dollar terms that is a 1000x gain.

That it overtakes Bitcoin and becomes worth BTC62M (or way more) is a possibility but not the point of the above. If such happens, pricing things in Bitcoin has already ended.
hero member
Activity: 976
Merit: 646
August 14, 2014, 07:28:29 AM
When I was choosing between the two, I personally felt that both the block interval and coin generation schedule were better in BBR. But unfortunately all the other things were worse, with legitimacy on the top of the list.

Why only pick one, and not both?  Since CryptoNote is very new, both coins have a chance to be the sector leader.  BBR may get stuck being Pepsi to XMR's Coke, or become the dominant CN coin if there is an XMR catastrophe.  Those are both winning outcomes.

BBR may be the next BetaMax (better tech killed by QWERTY effect) but that's why I only spent 10% as much on them.



But BBR isn't even the next BetaMax, what the hell are you talking about? This is so frustrating!

BBR's changes are only to make it separate from monero and to build a cult around zoidberg. BBR's changes are questionable at best, this is Litecoin all over again, the fact that people can't see this just shows how many idiots are in Crypto!

I get it, I used to be one of those idiots, and I lost a lot for it, but I feel that I am different now, losing hundreds of Bitcoin changes you, makes you research well and apply logic.

I've saw many sad things said about my work, but this is the first time i was blamed in building cult Smiley

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 504
August 14, 2014, 07:24:58 AM
Both were borne of the same womb and launched at very similar times. They were essentially horses that started at the same line - No 3 year difference here.

I don't disagree with some of the things you've said, although we certainly have no control over whether people wish to express interest in Monero in whatever way they see fit. That having been said, I think the "out the gate" bit is a key element here. Monero launched on 2014/04/18.Even though BBR was announced a few days later, it only launched a full month after Monero, on 2014/05/17. I know that in the grand scheme of things this may seem inconsequential, but in the rapidly moving altcoin space it meant a full month's lead on BBR. Whether that is the only element of Monero's current success...I don't know...but it certainly played a huge role at the outset.

I'm sure you might have pointed this out already, but I saw BBR (formerly Honeypenny) announcement was made April 20th. test-network was launched on April 26th. Monero thread was created April 25th, with main-net launched at same time . The 2014/04/18 date was when it was launched by TFT under BitMonero branding. Essentially the 'relaunch' by the new team was 25th.  It was mostly under the radar while under the BMR branding, and even under the radar when under XMR branding in early days, I had to buy some OTC via PM's, because it wasn't listed on any exchanges at that time (the same goes for BBR, and that was added to exchanges even later)

This thread was created towards the end of May, and as you can see from http://monerochain.info/charts/transactions
that's where it began to get a bit of traction. I agree this scene is so fast moving, and agree it definitely had an affect,  but it still doesn't seem such a huge gap, especially taking into account the lower price and less-steep emission curve of BBR
donator
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
August 14, 2014, 06:49:11 AM
Both were borne of the same womb and launched at very similar times. They were essentially horses that started at the same line - No 3 year difference here.

I don't disagree with some of the things you've said, although we certainly have no control over whether people wish to express interest in Monero in whatever way they see fit. That having been said, I think the "out the gate" bit is a key element here. Monero launched on 2014/04/18.Even though BBR was announced a few days later, it only launched a full month after Monero, on 2014/05/17. I know that in the grand scheme of things this may seem inconsequential, but in the rapidly moving altcoin space it meant a full month's lead on BBR. Whether that is the only element of Monero's current success...I don't know...but it certainly played a huge role at the outset.
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1002
amarha
August 14, 2014, 05:28:10 AM
litecoin is the china bitcoin, thats not a myth

Bitcoin isn't the China Bitcoin?

And wouldn't a CN coin be much more likely to succeed in China as they could clearly benefit from anonymity?

Why is Litecoin still on Bitcoin 8.x.x anyway? Why is the Github deadish?

300mil market cap going down the drain because of no one actually caring enough to do anything about it.
hero member
Activity: 1014
Merit: 1055
August 14, 2014, 05:15:07 AM
monero is an exception and litecoin is the china bitcoin, thats not a myth
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 504
August 14, 2014, 05:00:10 AM
When I was choosing between the two, I personally felt that both the block interval and coin generation schedule were better in BBR. But unfortunately all the other things were worse, with legitimacy on the top of the list.

Why only pick one, and not both?  Since CryptoNote is very new, both coins have a chance to be the sector leader.  BBR may get stuck being Pepsi to XMR's Coke, or become the dominant CN coin if there is an XMR catastrophe.  Those are both winning outcomes.

BBR may be the next BetaMax (better tech killed by QWERTY effect) but that's why I only spent 10% as much on them.

But BBR isn't even the next BetaMax, what the hell are you talking about? This is so frustrating!

BBR's changes are only to make it separate from monero and to build a cult around zoidberg. BBR's changes are questionable at best, this is Litecoin all over again, the fact that people can't see this just shows how many idiots are in Crypto!

I get it, I used to be one of those idiots, and I lost a lot for it, but I feel that I am different now, losing hundreds of Bitcoin changes you, makes you research well and apply logic.



Nobody is making a cult around zoidberg, Ask for an objective, outsider perspective on XMR and BBR; which one seems more more cult-like, which one seems more like a forced meme. XMR has multiple threads consistently pushed to the front page, fireside chats, monero missives, Random sprinklings of TA, big secret news that can't be spoken about yet, continual references that this is the silver to Bitcoins gold, that it is the ONLY alt worth investing in, subtle reminders that 'it won't stay cheap for long'.  Apparently there will never be a monero cabal but everyone seems pretty close-knit to me --  Mr Zoidberg is not turning up for smoked  salmon and a sancho panza at any investorwhales castles. (fwiw that's not necessarily a bad thing at all)  Even this so called 'altcoin-observer' seems to be pretty centric on observing XMR. You know yourself OP could probably turn around and say he's including CleanWaterCoin in his portfolio with some statistics and projections, before you know it clearwater coin rally starts with wall observer minions. He definitely had a big impact on making sure this snowball starts rolling smoothly.

I picked out a few quotes below.

As long as my credit is good, I am a buyer long past the point of despair.  When I start to feel the fear and depression, I cheer myself up by buying more.  I take some amphetamine and a shot of whiskey, if that's what it takes.  

Until people have obligations which can only be discharged in monero, there are no forced buyers, and volatility extremes will persist.  Just about the only thing that can give you a permanent loss is selling - especially forced sales from leverage.

I just got a new convert.  A rates trader at Metlife took a few thousand from me as a tail hedge.  A miniscule position, but I suspect he will become a repeat customer and tell his friends.

I will be meeting with an fx option market maker later, and a hedge fund manager when we can work out a mutual time.  Also looking into contacts with a rather largish fixed income fund for meetups the next time I hit nyc.

..snip...

I might line up a presentation on monero at one or more btc nyc meetups or at the nyc bitcoin center.  Not by me, but by a friend who is better suited to the task.

In future I may line up some seminar groups in London, Hong Kong, and or Shanghai.

Oh and I will be having beers tomorrow after work with an SVP from Two Sigma.  XMR will not be neglected.

Like Mr. Blankfein, I feel I am doing God' s work.


I didn't see any BBR supporters talking like that just yet. Don't even think that's the worst of the bunch. Sure I heard someone saying they will ask their employer to get paid in XMR or quit. I dread to read some posts by die-hard XMR supporters, the same way I dread a cold-call by someone convincing me I need new double glazing, or a knock from a jehovas witness'. because I know for sure all they want to do is plant that seed in my head I need to convert, I need to buy asap.

You show again this disturbing attitude that BBR is a direct copy-paste of XMR with marketing gimmicks - that XMR is the BTC and LTC (BBR) just adds a few bells and whistles.  

Newsflash, Monero was a copy-paste too. Both were borne of the same womb and launched at very similar times. They were essentially horses that started at the same line - No 3 year difference here. Secondly, as I've said before whilst it might be apparent that now LTC doesn't offer any tangible benefit over BTC, it was not always the case. In 2011- there were genuine reasons why one might want to invest in it. XMR was not 'the btc' because there never was a cryptonote BTC. Bytecoin was like the tenebrix. So we needed a fairbrix/ltc. Looks like XMR for now is taking the latter position.

There isn't a whole lot that needs, or could even be changed from the vanilla cryptonote base the coins have built on. There are downsides people are aware of with this technology with no easy fix in sight, so It's more gradual polishing, bolt-tightening and house-keeping from the point we are at now. An equitable launch and a good community was a great foundation to start with.

BBR decided to do a few things fundamentally differently to XMR from the get go. You talk about things like a tweaked emission curve to be a 'questionable change'.

With XMR- 15% mined already and 86% mined within 4 years, really? And that's supposed to be preferential to BBR? It's no small thing.  Why is XMR's emission curve kept the way it was? There could be a number of answers 1) lack of foresight with a smidgeon of greed. or 2) no need to fix what isn't broken. My opinion, the former. (Doesn't mean it's not possible to profit here - . We all know there has been much worse.)

Another example - BBR has described the methods they will use to trim the blockchain. I've heard a few times from XMR supporters that they believe it's a fast-fix, botch job etc and instead XMR will focus on embedding into a DB- doing it the 'proper way', - to me it seems compressed, not trimmed. BBR can trim then compress surely?

When BBR came out with a GUI, XMR supporters were mostly nonchalant. 'They rushed it', 'no regard for UI/UX' 'we'll spend weeks mocking up a beautiful cross-platform interface' 'gives us more time to accumulate, then the price will rocket' I agree the wallet mockup is certainly extremely sexy and looks like a lot of thought has been put into usability, but the launch should be somewhat priced into the market. Unless you are factoring in that bunch of noobs who couldn't figure out a command line will start buying in droves and a new higher floor will be set.

What XMR did in the beginning - Attracting high-profile backers, giving them a chance to accumulate, (or perhaps a little helping hand in building a stash) - having them announce they are taking a position- in fact the only position in alts they have ever taken, waiting for the fruit flies to show up and then gradually, slowly and methodologically building up an ecosystem is something that never happened with Boolberry community. Bringing liquidity, decent buy support to an exchange, then making the case for delisting the legacy LTC pairs for XMR was another intelligent step. XMR has eloquent, personable dev team with constant community interaction doing things slowly but surely, vs a perceived, reclusive, standoffish non native english speaking 'one man show' making a quick git clone- that's the kind of attitude I've heard from XMR proponents.

 The early posts by cbuchner regarding his BBR mining ventures was a big blight to that coin, despite it being debunked nicely by dga & christian himself it was still continuously used as ammo against the coin- the crippled hashing function left over from the bytecoin/bitmonero copy paste process in monero was also debunked by smooth or fluffpony.. i forget -- Both were proven to have had little real impact in the grand scheme of things, yet the difference is that little hiccup never really had an effect on XMR pricing to the same magnitude it did with BBR.

Anyway in terms of profit potential-  OP has said, in his own words:

Monero makes me feel like Bitcoin in 2010, tons of potential and a $6MM market cap. I actually was there so I can compare the feeling. It will become really big, 1000x gain just to match what Bitcoin is now.

so, he says XMR market cap (1000x gain from todays prices, fully mined).. will be around 62,165,527.28 (sixty-two million) BTC (or about 3x as many BTC as will ever be created within the next 126 years). I'm not so optimistic, to put it mildly so I will make some calculations on just a 10x increase

If XMR was to shoot up 1000% of todays current price overnight, to ~0.03 it would overtake all the fully-mined coins such as DRK, NXT, Ripple, by a significant margin, and sit just below LTC. despite only ~15% being distributed. If you were to buy after it shot up, god help you- you would need to expect it to reach a market cap of ~600,000 BTC,  or roughly 2x higher than LTC within a relatively short time period 4 years or so in order to not lose money if you were hodling. (just operating under the assumption none of the other coins move for simplicitys sake)

If you talk about expecting that same overnight 1000% increase for BBR,  it's market cap will be around the level of shitcoins such as marinecoin, monacoin, zetacoin. Can that happen? why the hell not. Will it happen in such inefficent markets- who knows. If you were to buy at the 10x increase, In the same 4 year emission period as XMR, you should expect it to rise around the level of  (23,700 BTC) - near maidsafe and dogecoin in order to not lose money. We are talking about a 576 thousand, three hundred BTC difference in that case!!  Would XMR warrant being valued that much more than BBR? Within a 10 year period, you should still expect it to rank below darkcoin with a market cap of ~37,363 btc or 16x lower than monero to stay in the black. STILL near enough five-hundred and sixty-three thousand BTC difference (again assuming the rest of the market stays static for simplicitys sake)

I think there is a place for at least one cryptonote coin in this scene for sure, I hold XMR and BBR. No denying XMR is the one with stickiness and it's the one I can feel more relaxed in parking money in knowing few BTC worth of sells or buys will have no impact on the market like it does with BBR, yet purely from a gambling perspective I know which one of those scenarios I consider more likely. And I absolutely believe BBR is undervalued- It's at less than half the cap of ducknote for god sake, and that coin has block halving every month, 80% mined within the year..
 
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
August 14, 2014, 03:20:32 AM
Could this be implemented in xmr? It looks like a solution for blockchain bloat.

http://bitscan.com/articles/anonymity-why-dark-is-the-new-black


Why does that link want to use my computer's location?  Never saw that warning message before.
I have no problem with the first link. Try this one:

http://virtualmining.com/anonymity-why-dark-is-the-new-black/
Pages:
Jump to: