This is entirely the work of managers. Forum moderators should not keep track of the company's bounty. Except that the block threads with an already proven fraud. Everything else is the responsibility of the Manager of the bounty of the company.
Topic: Safe Bounty hunters (Read 2369 times)
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example 
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess notBitcointalk can not do this because it is akin to choosing an investment option for the individual as well and when things don't go as planned some people will then use the opportunity to attack Bitcointalk. So they will not buy this your idea bro. You have to read, learn, research and relearn
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
I don't think the moderator has time for that but I like your idea, we can do KYC on forum and get verified KYC badge, so the bounty manager doesn't need to ask us to do the KYC anymore. Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess notBut then who will pay the forum managers to verify those KYCs? And I realize that the forum really doesn't want to disseminate bounty because it makes bitcointalk more junk posts
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
I don't think the moderator has time for that but I like your idea, we can do KYC on forum and get verified KYC badge, so the bounty manager doesn't need to ask us to do the KYC anymore. Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
It's hard cause every project always come almost everyday. And to be honest it's not moderator job to do that. It's manager job to filter which one is real and scam project. It's not easy to filter so many project that come to your table.
The agreement between the bounty manager and they will get a payment in the form of bitcoin or ethereum, not tokens. so the possibility to filter is very small. we ourselves must be more observant in choosing 
This is a Decentralised platform and i dont think thr admin can control the project being advertised here. Every Hunter should take responsibility for that, they should take out time to research the project they want to advertise and determine its credibility
It's hard cause every project always come almost everyday. And to be honest it's not moderator job to do that. It's manager job to filter which one is real and scam project. It's not easy to filter so many project that come to your table.
I think that in 2017 there are a lot of fraud cases.
but the ico project is sometimes not deceptive but does not reach the target or fails so for bounty hunters not to get what is normal.
but the effects of the ico scam can make a big influence on the crypto world.
in 2017 there were many good projects and made money for bounty hunters. if you speak in 2018 it is the truth that almost all existing projects do not give money to bounty hunters. even though the project is successful in sales they do not have a decent value after entering the market. but the ico project is sometimes not deceptive but does not reach the target or fails so for bounty hunters not to get what is normal.
but the effects of the ico scam can make a big influence on the crypto world.
I think that in 2017 there are a lot of fraud cases.
but the ico project is sometimes not deceptive but does not reach the target or fails so for bounty hunters not to get what is normal.
but the effects of the ico scam can make a big influence on the crypto world.
but the ico project is sometimes not deceptive but does not reach the target or fails so for bounty hunters not to get what is normal.
but the effects of the ico scam can make a big influence on the crypto world.
Its left of we hunters to choose only solid projects ,what you are asking for will never happen because it will require lots of work to wipe out all scam projects and keep the forum clean from such projects
every ecosystem is full of scammers, specially these that are unregulated
but we need to fight them with information regarding scam projects, and share them in-between to avoid those projects
but we need to fight them with information regarding scam projects, and share them in-between to avoid those projects
It will be nice if that is taking in to consideration but the ecosystem itself is full of undecide things like hacker , scammer and I dont think that can be eradicate in this space of crypto we are .
We that participate should always do our research as well before we join any project and always hope for winning and there is probability of losing some and win some we can't win all .
We that participate should always do our research as well before we join any project and always hope for winning and there is probability of losing some and win some we can't win all .
This topic have been discussed before so many time and as admins said they will not implement KYC in this forum as most of the people here wants to remain anonymous, in terms of the scam bounties its your choice so you cant blame anyone if you got scammed by a campaign.
There have been fewer and fewer good bounty companies lately. Even with a good Manager, she can be a fraud. And from the forum moderators here do not depend. We are responsible for the chosen company, no one forces us to participate in it.
you are 100% correct. it all depends on us to be able to choose a project that is truly worth choosing. and when we have chosen to join the project, we must accept the consequences. scam, cut allocation, pending distribution, token locked, and no distribution I think it's a risk of our choice to join the campaign. we must be aware and still develop ourselves. it is the best choice.
There have been fewer and fewer good bounty companies lately. Even with a good Manager, she can be a fraud. And from the forum moderators here do not depend. We are responsible for the chosen company, no one forces us to participate in it.
its really hard to do your main request, but it still possible. comparing which project are scam to other are depends on your proper research, even famous and experienced bounty managar cant decide it in the first time he promote the project...learning and knowing every detail of one project is a must, like what i always said bounty hunter are cryptocurrency investor in the other way, thry invest their time, energy and effort to do some research and promoting the project.
For the mean time the one who needs to investigate about bounty is us, let's ask ourself first if it is really necessary to give them our information or are we just giving them somethings that we gonna regret it later. I think doing KYC on any bounty is too much risky I don't want to get involve in any of that even it means to get some money I don't give them my precious information.
Finding Scam projects isn't responsibility of this forum but there are few members of this forum are trying to find out scam projects, scammers regularly. Their hard work also saves investors from losing funds, and hunters from wasting time in scam projects.
this is not task of moderator and this is the task of bounty manager to determine projects that will be handled and we as bounty hunters also have to choose and study the projects we will follow, if you only depend on the moderator then when you will develop to know about crypto ? don't be lazy to read and don't just expect a lot of money but keep learning
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess notProviding protection to bounty hunters is very important. There are many projects that fail and this makes bounty hunters lose their time. Even investors also suffer losses and they are reluctant to invest again. So it is very important to make very strict regulations to protect bounty hunters and investors.
Jump to: