Safe Bounty hunters - page 15. | Bitcointalksearch.org

guoyu78

hero member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 541

Quote from: Stanlo on January 09, 2019, 06:56:40 AM

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters

Scammers are getting wise everyday, but still if you do your research and look it up you will get some hints that shows you that it’s a scam. Not everyone can be able to tell when they are falling for a scam, some scammers are wise and it takes someone who is wise to find out when they are pulling some tricks. But you’re still right, something should be done to prevent scammers from scamming bounty hunters, but I don’t think this is what the bitcointalk.org mods can do, it’s way too above them as per decentralization concepts; we only should take care of ourselves.

Quote from: riska hanissa on January 15, 2019, 09:55:30 AM

I have participated in 4 project scams, this has disappointed my heart
and I don't like bounty which obliges to do kyc

In all 4 projects, you got scammed for the same reason of clearing KYC ? Why not you just go for clearing KYC with the fourth one by submitting your documents. I am just trying to find out other reasons for bounty hunters getting scammed. I guess KYC is an easy option for ICO operators now a days.

riska hanissa

full member

Activity: 504

Merit: 104

I really agree with this!
I hope this becomes a reality, especially in the project scam
in the past year, I have participated in 4 project scams, this has disappointed my heart
and I don't like bounty which obliges to do kyc

HanaTenun

sr. member

Activity: 817

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bairbe on January 15, 2019, 09:11:47 AM

I think that not a forum should deal with this, but bounty managers who choose a project for a company!

if like that, there must be a penalty for the bounty manager who manages the project scam. the fact is that there are still many scam projects and it is very detrimental to the bounty hunter. there should be a rule for procurement of ico and campaigns, to minimize fraud.

HK88

jr. member

Activity: 193

Merit: 3

those who don't like KYC because they don't keep their promises at the end of the campaign. they always cheat for various reasons such as reasons that are not in accordance with KYC procedures etc. . even though they have carried out the procedure correctly.

Bairbe

jr. member

Activity: 185

Merit: 2

I think that not a forum should deal with this, but bounty managers who choose a project for a company!

Nekoma2018

copper member

Activity: 493

Merit: 13

Lol... the purpose of bitcointalk thread is bitcoin specifically and other alternative coins... not for bounty hunting or any form of promotion... you hunt at your own risk

gabmen

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 529

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: terrific on January 15, 2019, 12:49:02 AM

Quote from: marcbitcoins on January 15, 2019, 12:47:46 AM

The forum is more on Bitcoin and crypto currency sharing of knowledges so i think they are not obliged to check and review if the certain ICO is a scam or not as this is the job of the bounty managers as their reputations is at stake. Anyway, the forum did not ignore any project that are proven scam as they really imposed punishment to those involved.

There are volunteers who are looking for those scam projects.
They work freely and voluntarily for the sake fo the community.
But choosing a project that you'll join with its bounty, it's our choice and we should have standards.

Yeah, our volunteers could only do so much like to warn people or give significant information but it'll still be up to us if we want to gamble on a pretty looking project that promises a lot. Your money, your risk.

Vit83

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 100

IMHO there must be some moderation in bounty and strict rules. If someone didn't pay or changed rules during the company, they must be banned forever. There must be the rule that ICO can't change time terms or payments during ICO or they must go to the blacklist.

terrific

hero member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 517

Catalog Websites

Quote from: marcbitcoins on January 15, 2019, 12:47:46 AM

The forum is more on Bitcoin and crypto currency sharing of knowledges so i think they are not obliged to check and review if the certain ICO is a scam or not as this is the job of the bounty managers as their reputations is at stake. Anyway, the forum did not ignore any project that are proven scam as they really imposed punishment to those involved.

There are volunteers who are looking for those scam projects.
They work freely and voluntarily for the sake fo the community.
But choosing a project that you'll join with its bounty, it's our choice and we should have standards.

marcbitcoins

full member

Activity: 854

Merit: 108

The forum is more on Bitcoin and crypto currency sharing of knowledges so i think they are not oblige to check and review if the certain ICO is a scam or not as this is the job of the bounty managers because their reputations is at stake. Anyway, the forum did not ignore any project that are proven scam as they really imposed punishment to those involved.

ujinice

member

Activity: 574

Merit: 15

Quote from: Stanlo on January 09, 2019, 06:56:40 AM

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Shocked

Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

Maybe moderators should participate in good bounty campaigns and indicate the address of your wallet? Get used to work with own head, no one will work instead of you for free.

a4illusionist

jr. member

Activity: 365

Merit: 1

Well there is something that can be done. I mean Bitcointalk can set a few people group to be some kind of sherifs role here. And projects that do contact to that group and answer their questions, that project should be given some kind of rating and the rest should be unrated letting the bounty hunters know which projects have been inspected by the team making it easier for them to pick.

kewlc3s

full member

Activity: 672

Merit: 140

Would be really nice and like in a dream. But, unfortunately it won't ever happen.
Probably only way to avoid scams in bounty campaigns - participate in campaigns from "big" bounty managers, who are responsible and do not scam hunters.
Forum but it self can´t control all the scams Roll Eyes

JeBro

member

Activity: 714

Merit: 10

Living is easy with eyes closed ...

Numerous frauds from ICO projects and deception of bounty-hunters is the other side of decentralization of the crypto market. The absence of a centralized governing and control body to the fact that no one in crypto world can be insured against fraud from their partners. Therefore, the SEC and the governments of many countries are delaying the issuance of permits for cryptocurrency turnover.

Nurma.A

full member

Activity: 286

Merit: 100

StableDex | Decentralized, Secure & Cost Effective

Bitcointalk moderators have a lot of work. not taking care of KYC. the ones who bear the kyc are ourselves. if you find a bounty that is a scam. and you have given your KYC, you cannot do anything. You must be careful about submitting your personal data. because there is nothing you can rely on.

djuragan

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 250

I think bounty hunter doesn't need that, As a bounty hunter we need to be able to select the project for ourself. Being a bounty hunter means that is our own responsibility to find and select a good project for ourself.

smyslov

sr. member

Activity: 2030

Merit: 269

Quote from: Stanlo on January 09, 2019, 06:56:40 AM

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Shocked

Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

If I am the forum administrator I will delete this thread and ban this guy, asking too much in exchange for nothing, if investors cannot analyze a good project and investment with so many ICO ongoing that will be to much load for moderators, so ungrateful do your assignment.

libert19

hero member

Activity: 2520

Merit: 952

I think it's not bitcointalk's job to find scammy projects rather it's our own duty for the work we choose. Once those scammy projects won't get any bounty hunters they will slowly vanish.

Saisher

full member

Activity: 2324

Merit: 175

Like all posters here, we all agree that it is not the job of moderators and administrator to check the legitimacy of the projects here, it's your own money and time, do your own research we are so lucky we have this kind of forum you are ungrateful if you want to do this job for you.

Whaletale

copper member

Activity: 154

Merit: 0

CurioInvest [IEO Live]

I don't think bitcointalk moderators are to select good bounty for hunters but themselves, also you need to know which manager to follow on every bounty but at time they also fall victim for such bad project has no one can tell the inner mind of those crazy developer who are only to scam until it happen so just be focus and pray not to fall for such bad project again but definitely we can't avoid it .

Topic: Safe Bounty hunters - page 15. (Read 2369 times)