Topic: Safe Bounty hunters - page 19. (Read 2369 times)
I still wanna agree to this. I believe if the moderators can step up their game, there should a way to actually still fish this nonsense projects out. However, the fact still remain that much of the works goes to the bounty manager and probably the bounty team.
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example 
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess notI guess soon you'll have the moderators work and submit bounty proofs for you while sit back and get paid ? The very least you could is to do your own research follow your guts after complete analysis of what the project and its team is offering, that shouldn't take you long. Oh, sorry why does the forum has moderators whose hands are filled with cleaning the tons of shitposts folks like you make every second. The fact the forum allows member to earn from it is a BIG ADDED BENEFIT, and the forum literally has nothing to lose if it stop allowing it.
I think KYC should be for the investors not bounty hunters ,we help spread the news that's our job and we should get paid for it with no KYC ,I don't think bitcointalk forum can do that ,that's why we have many bounty platforms out there ,jut find yourself a trusty bounty manager and follow him for awhile
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
I really think this is where the moderators need to step in. Anyone shouldn't just put up a bounty campaign without having a form of thorough scrutiny from the moderators and approval if the project is actually real. The Bounty Managers should be compelled to provide proof of the legitimacy of the project they are managing its bounty. Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
You have a point but there are even projects that success in providing KYC in rating sites but still ended up scam project . I like your idea actually but I don't think it can minimize scam projects .
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess notThere is no need to do that. Bitcointalk moderators have no obligation to moderate the ICO bounty projects.
What we can do as bounty hunter is doing deep research about the project we want to participate, just like investors.
If you think the ICO is not real, just not doing any bounties and wait for a good project so you won't wasting your efforts later.
Oh its left for one to do his or her research very well before joining any campaign but its true that no matter how smart you are you will still get scammed of your time by joining a fake project that looks almost original
forum moderators do not have to select the right projects or not. but bounty managers should do this. so you need to choose the right managers.
I was participating in Desico. and i was thinking that this is a good project. I hope they will go to the prison
I was participating in Desico. and i was thinking that this is a good project. I hope they will go to the prison
But even bounty managers are having difficulty in selecting which ICO is real, some others are turns out to be scam even if it looks so good. Well, I guess we should not blame managers if the project is scam.
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess noti think a new moderator can't solve this problem. we don't know some projects are good or bad. even a moderator. i ever join some projects which have rating over 4.5 of 5. and they have very good documents to read and have a good vision too. but still, they've scammed me. so, i think the only one who can prevent us from scam project is ourself. we must extremely careful before join some bounties.
In addition to the foregoing, it is identified it is not easy to do and if there should be a new moderator then it's not a solution in this settlement. will be back again on each of the research about how to choose a bounty.
The biggest question is, who is people that want to take responsibility like that?
The scam is always coming everyday in the crypto world, you should try to survive by yourself from scammers. Research the project first before participating their bounty to minimize the opportunity to be scammed...
The scam is always coming everyday in the crypto world, you should try to survive by yourself from scammers. Research the project first before participating their bounty to minimize the opportunity to be scammed...
its not moderator job to decide the project scam or not, its fully bounty manager take care of the project. For scam prject, its hard to look the project scam or not. trust me.
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess notyah, and by doing so we can be able to avoid getting red trust from joining scam projects. Because it does not make sense to join a bounty which we dont know is a scam project and we get red trust for it. We can't really avoid that sometimes because sometimes a project that looks like not a scam will turn out a scam and we bounty hunters are just caught off guard. Of course in the first place, we bounty hunters needs to also review the projects that we are getting into. That is what i am doing right now, its okay to join fewer projects that i know are real projects than joining a bunch of scam projects that will just give you a red trust which is awful.
I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not
Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess notIt is difficult to know if the project is a scam at first.
But you can prevent of having them if you will review the project and make some research though you will not be a hundred percent safe still.
Kyc is okay if the project is a success and if they will ask for it at the end of ICO or before the distribution.
But i will never do KYC at the start of work.
Bitcointalk moderators and officers will also have a hard time to detect even they will run in the project.
You can do a few things right now. Choose good bounty managers to before start your works. The next thing is your own research. The research is helping to find good and to rated projects.
It is not the duty of to act in such capacity and they are not compelled to do that, except they choose to act in that capacity.
It's a good idea. I also think that is necessary. Bitcointalk forum needs to verify information from the team of projects to ensure safety.
KYC and a call (video call) to make sure they are real.
KYC and a call (video call) to make sure they are real.
There are threads posted in the beginners and help board that explains different ways to check if an ico you're promoting is legit or not example. The scam accusation board is another place to look for icos that are fake. The information is already out there you just have to spend more time browsing the forum and try not to rush yourself when you see a good paying bounty campaign.
Are you kidding!! Desico scammed? If it is real then I just can't believe it. I thought this project will be good if they reach enough cap from the token sale! But I never thought it can be a scam! That's why I am supporting STO, because I guess crypto needs regulation now to save people from these types of scam!
After they've moved from ICO to STO they decided not to pay the bounty participants instead they gave out an apology. Here's the discussion thread few days ago.
I think that Bitcointalk has helped us as the bounty hunter by providing so many bounty programs that we can select to follow, However, to hope that they can help us to be safe in joining in the bounty I don't think that it will happen. This forum includes more discussion and we can seek for the recommendation and discussion about certain projects. We can see how the people are interested in a bounty or investing in ICO. Using the KYC is one of the requirements. So why should we hope this forum to make us safer? We ourselves the one who can make us safe.
In my opinion, sometimes it is not easy to know that the project is scam. People are losing thousands of dollars in some of them. If you search for Bitconnect, you will know how the noble scam should be. 
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
Are you kidding!! Desico scammed? If it is real then I just can't believe it. I thought this project will be good if they reach enough cap from the token sale! But I never thought it can be a scam! That's why I am supporting STO, because I guess crypto needs regulation now to save people from these types of scam!
And, Your proposal is the demand of time, but I think bitcointalk won't follow that! Because no one can ensure you which project will give you profit and which not! Like Centra coin and Desico! So, that will destroy bitcointalk's reputation!
And, Your proposal is the demand of time, but I think bitcointalk won't follow that! Because no one can ensure you which project will give you profit and which not! Like Centra coin and Desico! So, that will destroy bitcointalk's reputation!
Jump to: