Brda is a criminal and, consequently, his reputation deserves little respect. But we want to excel on our numbers and we will prove we are doing no defamation. So, we are here wasting more time (he will pay for that too) in order to justify our accusations and numbers.
Brda says that from the 1,200,000 shares to be sold at the IPO at 2 lindens each he didn't sold 60,000, but only 1,140,000 and that "only" received 2,280,000L.
The only evidence presented for these unsold 60,000 shares is a so-called email from the owner of Capex. A simple copy that can be fabricated easily. Besides, after this long, even the owner might be mistaken.
Moreover, he says he gave that shares to his employees. That is, he used them as mean of payment at the expenses of all shareholders.
But even if we accepted that, we wrote he made 2,400,000 from the IPO and he is saying he "only" made 2,280,000L. Clearly, he won't escape to the accusation that he is a liar and a criminal because of this small difference.
Then he converts the lindens amount to USD at a rate of 261 per USD. That is not the current rate. The current official rate is about 251 (
http://gridsurvey.com/lindex.php). He received lindens, he has to pay them back now and their value most be determined at current rates. So, the math can't be done at 261, but at 251 per USD.
But he claims much more about the SPO.
He omits completely that the SPO was made at 6L per share and that the amount of shares for sale were 1,500,000 (
https://www.onlinecapex.com/home/story/ADS/4030 ;
http://www.secondads.com/ADS_SPO_Prospectus.pdf )
To make that round amount, it looks like the SPO sold out. But to receive only 3,000,000 lindens, the amount of shares sold had to be only 500,000 (x 6L=3 Mil). But his own prospect says the amount to sell was 1500,000 shares, not 500,000.
And by the way, we don't care about the Capex fees. Brda paid those fees with shareholder money. Money he received from them. He has to answer for all the money he received from shareholders, the expenses are his problem.
Faced with the prospectus, the declaration of Capex's owner isn't evidence enough. We would like to see a copy of some document saying that the original amount of 1,500,000 shares to be sold at the SPO was reduced to 500,000. We are not scammers and liars like him. If he presents evidence, will change this number immediately.
We presented his own declarations, as Wili Clip, and his own prospectus (no use to delete it, we have a copy) as evidence for our numbers.
But even if he received only the amounts he claims, even so, he would had received 5,280,000L. But he only paid back in dividends 5,252,364L (including 2600 this month, since 2500 were from Capex) and about half of them went directly to his pockets! So, he only paid to the shareholders that financed him about 2,625,000 lindens.
And let's not forget all the stolen dividends. He should paid them every month. Let's accept as good the middle amount he paid each month in 2011, even if since that he expanded business, with more games and customers. He paid during 2011 in dividends about 2,742,000L in round numbers. Divided for the 9 months where he paid dividends, we get a middle amount of 304,666L per month. Let's make it 300,000.
Well, he didn't pay dividends or paid ridiculous amounts in about 36 months (it's more than that, but to make it simple). So, he didn't pay in dividends 10,800,000L that he had a duty to pay. Half of that belongs to the other shareholders. Therefore, he stole more 5,400,000L in dividends. That is, 21,513 USD.
He received at least 2,280,000L in the IPO (if we buy the story of the unsold 60,000 shares) and, accordingly to his own prospectus and declarations about the price, he received more 9,000,000L in the SPO. And stole 5,400,000L in dividends. That is 16,680,000; or 66,454 USDs.
But even if the amount 3,000,000L received by the SPO is true, even so, he would have stolen 2,280,00 (IPO)+3,000,000 (SPO)+5,400,000 (dividends)=10,680,000 lindens. That is, 42549 USD. Therefore, our current amount of about 45,000 USD stolen is more or less correct, in ANY CASE.
In any case, this makes Andrej Brda a liar, a scammer and a criminal! 
