Pages:
Author

Topic: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper - page 68. (Read 25829 times)

legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1926
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide


interesting, but what is the average similarity index of any academic thesis ?

in this field, knowledge proceeds generally by continuous progression, naturally with remarkable exceptions.

I totally agree with your observations. Ideally it needs to be checked by a good plagiarism checker in its entirety and the results manually compared for relevance.

He has been accused of plagiarism previously: https://news.bitcoin.com/craig-wright-shrugs-off-plagiarism-accusations/
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
Wright lies proven, by his own words:
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1148646092017405952

With documents attached in the link

Note: ATO stands for Australia Tax Office

"ATO hearing Feb 18, 2014:

Mining throughout 2011, trusts in Singapore & Seychelles.

Court Florida 2019:

Mining till 2010, trusts in Panama & Seychelles."




"Jun 2019 Florida court: mined Bitcoins never moved & are permanently locked in whatever trust.

In Feb 2014 with the ATO hearing however:

"An exception is the bitcoin brought to Australia for the purpose of the Denariuz transaction"."


................................

I would be terribly surprised if Craig doesn't end up in jail.
hero member
Activity: 1923
Merit: 538
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1926
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide
I did a partial plagiarism check of Craig Wrights 2017 thesis for his PHD

His thesis is viewable here: https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/9319444/90504



It came back with a "high risk of plagiarism score" when I did a complete "free" check but it wanted  $47 for the full report.






https://wingify.com/information-security-policy
https://bus206.pressbooks.com/chapter/chapter-6-information-systems-security/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_development_life_cycle
https://www.processrenewal.com/the-top-10-best-practices-of-business-process-management/
https://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/equilibria/phaserule.html

Looking at some of the results it appears parts were obtained from a 2014 publication.

Information Systems for Business and Beyond
By David T. Bourgeois, Ph.D.

https://bus206.pressbooks.com/

These publications do not appear to be referenced in the thesis "notes".


NOTE: Only a partial check was done. I have not individually verified the results.
I also have no idea how much similarities are allowed before it becomes plagiarism.

Perhaps someone with access to professional plagiarism checking tools can run it through the system.

legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
Wright lies proven, by his own words:
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1148646092017405952

With documents attached in the link

Note: ATO stands for Australia Tax Office

"ATO hearing Feb 18, 2014:

Mining throughout 2011, trusts in Singapore & Seychelles.

Court Florida 2019:

Mining till 2010, trusts in Panama & Seychelles."




"Jun 2019 Florida court: mined Bitcoins never moved & are permanently locked in whatever trust.

In Feb 2014 with the ATO hearing however:

"An exception is the bitcoin brought to Australia for the purpose of the Denariuz transaction"."


................................

"The BSV peeps saying Craig great blockchain man, but obviously cannot do basic fraud-amental math"
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1926
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide
As far as the legal ramifications of his testimony is concerned, well I'm no lawyer but I don't think he would have said what he did if he didn't think he could get away with it.

I think all this is proving that his understanding of legal processes is largely non existent.

If you accuse a person of drug dealing and child pornography you're slightly better off doing it when they're already in prison and convicted of it. If they're not then that's a teensy weensy problem.

Anything said in court is covered by absolute privilege. It means it cannot be used in defamation proceedings. It can also be reported.

However the trick is to get CSW to REPEAT the accusations outside of court. Preferably while he is in the UK where they have good libel laws.


I haven't read the full transcripts and haven't been paying much attention but perjury for a start (assuming theymos isn't actually one of the many DPR's  Grin). I'm really hoping the court actually goes after him for these lies. Asking for any sort of proof of half of what he's saying would be enough. He basically just keeps lying to get himself out of another lie and he's going to slip up  under pressure and contradict himself if he hasn't already.

I was thinking more of what's the endgame here for him? A small fine? A huge fine? Prison? The latter two? He doesn't seem to be planning more than several weeks ahead...

Don't forget CSW has a masters of laws. He also endured a substantial investigation by the Australian tax office. https://bitsonline.com/wright-supercomputing-liquidated/

So he is not unfamiliar with legal problems and legal strategy. He also has plenty of misguided fools supporters to spread his rhetoric and shit tokens crypto to exchange for money to pay for legal costs.

I personally believe his untruths will eventually catch up with him. I don't think the US judge will have endless patience with him.

Taking legal action should only be done as a last resort - but if you do - throw all your resources at it.

I wouldn't recommend anyone to take him to task unless you have ample time and deep pockets. But if he sues you - give him WW3





If he repeats it outside of court he cannot claim absolute privilege. His supporters can quote the court testimony but CSW can potentially be seud for libel or defamation if he repeats it outside of the courtroom.

But Martti had the best reply:




full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 131
Wright lies proven, by his own words:
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1148646092017405952

With documents attached in the link

Note: ATO stands for Australia Tax Office

"ATO hearing Feb 18, 2014:

Mining throughout 2011, trusts in Singapore & Seychelles.

Court Florida 2019:

Mining till 2010, trusts in Panama & Seychelles."




"Jun 2019 Florida court: mined Bitcoins never moved & are permanently locked in whatever trust.

In Feb 2014 with the ATO hearing however:

"An exception is the bitcoin brought to Australia for the purpose of the Denariuz transaction"."


................................
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
My guess is he has a well-funded staff of lawyers at his disposal who are coaching him on his every move. They're telling him exactly what he can and can't get away with in whatever legal system he's dealing with.

I'd like their names so I never employ them myself. I don't see how anyone could conduct themselves in court the way he has if he's actually taking on board the advice given him.

I presume they're pocketing the money and keeping their own opinions to themselves. All he's produced so far is a string of lies and literally nothing else.
full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 131
I was thinking more of what's the endgame here for him? A small fine? A huge fine? Prison? The latter two? He doesn't seem to be planning more than several weeks ahead...


My guess is he has a well-funded staff of lawyers at his disposal who are coaching him on his every move. They're telling him exactly what he can and can't get away with in whatever legal system he's dealing with.

Eventually the house of cards will collapse, but when is anybody's guess. I'm kind of measuring the whole thing by the market cap of BSV.



They can not do much to counter the forgeries in court.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
I was thinking more of what's the endgame here for him? A small fine? A huge fine? Prison? The latter two? He doesn't seem to be planning more than several weeks ahead...


My guess is he has a well-funded staff of lawyers at his disposal who are coaching him on his every move. They're telling him exactly what he can and can't get away with in whatever legal system he's dealing with.

Eventually the house of cards will collapse, but when is anybody's guess. I'm kind of measuring the whole thing by the market cap of BSV.

legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 3158
I was thinking more of what's the endgame here for him? A small fine? A huge fine? Prison? The latter two? He doesn't seem to be planning more than several weeks ahead...

It looks like he still doesn't realize that his credibility has been severely damaged.
I believe he still wants to convince us, because this is all he has left. If he stops, it means he failed.

He's trapped in this given the insane amount of stuff that was made up.
This is the perfect exemple of why someone should not lie : at the end it becomes such a mess, that you lose yourself in it and start contradicting yourself.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 1722
I haven't read the full transcripts and haven't been paying much attention but perjury for a start (assuming theymos isn't actually one of the many DPR's  Grin). I'm really hoping the court actually goes after him for these lies. Asking for any sort of proof of half of what he's saying would be enough. He basically just keeps lying to get himself out of another lie and he's going to slip up  under pressure and contradict himself if he hasn't already.

I was thinking more of what's the endgame here for him? A small fine? A huge fine? Prison? The latter two? He doesn't seem to be planning more than several weeks ahead...
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

[size=5pt....]I admit I was a little tempted to troll the world by roleplaying CSW's allegations as totally true...[/size]

Yep, there can be human thoughts and temptations, yet likely many of us are glad that you did not act upon your temptation, however fleeting it may have been.

Ultimately, the costs of misinterpretation would be too great, even if it had been clearly a trolling effort and/or a joke that was later clarified.
full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 131
Again, it would be great to know if Wright's statements had truth behind them or not:

Of course not, do you really need to ask?

 - I was made a forum admin in 2011, after Satoshi left. (Silk Road also appeared after Satoshi left.) I didn't have any special access to bitcoin.org until around 2013, and in fact I didn't even have any access to the bitcointalk.org DNS until 2013.
 - I've never bought or sold anything on Silk Road, Hydra or similar sites; nor did I have anything whatsoever to do with their operation; nor AFAIK did I even have interactions with anyone involved in running these sites. While I am opposed to drug laws, I have never used illicit drugs, and in fact I also abstain from alcohol & nicotine. Furthermore, since the beginning I have warned over and over again that Tor is not secure against active government attacks: I wouldn't be found dead running one of these sites.
 - I never had any interaction with CSW. I don't have any keys related to CSW's (probably fictitious) SSS thing.

CSW's whole shtick is to just lie constantly. He's so brazen about it that some people think, "there must be some truth there," but really it's 100% nonsense.

I admit I was a little tempted to troll the world by roleplaying CSW's allegations as totally true...

Sue him, expose him, make him bleed bigtime.

He deserves to be crushed and jailed.

He would use your silence as an "evidence" to keep on with his act and his narrative.
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 11
Yes, absolutely drag this cunt through more courts, Martti.....

https://twitter.com/marttimalmi/status/1147485758971924480
hv_
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48272597

Oh yea, good reminder. Devs split, not Bitcoin  protocol

Who was trustworthy then? Would not Satoshi react that ranting way if he decides to come back an see the segregation shit?
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 169
What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger
Again, it would be great to know if Wright's statements had truth behind them or not:

Even though Theymos disagrees, I believe there's a possibility Craig was part of a team known today as Satoshi.
Was he 50% Satoshi? 20%? 5%? We don't know and since he seems to be spreading at least some lies we can't trust his words.

For me, it doesn't matter. It's obvious he's not a trustworthy person and therefore I'd stay away from whatever involves him. If hd helped in creating Bitcoin has no meaning at the moment since he's not controlling it.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
not anymore available.

If I remember rightly it's geoblocked for 'legal reasons' so try a VPN from another country. I got the same and I'm in the UK. Craigy runs this goddamn country now doncha know. He IS power.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 278
This guy actually deserves to be in jail

He will be there very soon.

What about weed? Because as we all know weed is a plant and not a drug  Grin.

It is legal in many countries.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 3060
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Again, it would be great to know if Wright's statements had truth behind them or not:

Of course not, do you really need to ask?

CSW's whole shtick is to just lie constantly. He's so brazen about it that some people think, "there must be some truth there," but really it's 100% nonsense.

Can't you sue this huge tool? I'm sure we could easily get that crowd-funded for you. I know you're probably against that too but this guy really needs to face some repercussions for his continued lies. It's absurd that he tries to sue anyone who even claims he isn't satoshi yet he is ok lying and completely slandering people. He's basically just told a court that you're a drug trafficker and child pornographer. Based on what evidence? Pretty sure you would have no problems in successfully suing him for that. This guy actually deserves to be in jail and I hope this court goes after him for perjury.

While I am opposed to drug laws, I have never used illicit drugs, and in fact I also abstain from alcohol & nicotine.

What about weed? Because as we all know weed is a plant and not a drug  Grin.

Realistically speaking, what sort of trouble csw got himself into this time? The transcripts are hilarious.

I haven't read the full transcripts and haven't been paying much attention but perjury for a start (assuming theymos isn't actually one of the many DPR's  Grin). I'm really hoping the court actually goes after him for these lies. Asking for any sort of proof of half of what he's saying would be enough. He basically just keeps lying to get himself out of another lie and he's going to slip up  under pressure and contradict himself if he hasn't already.
Pages:
Jump to: