As far as the legal ramifications of his testimony is concerned, well I'm no lawyer but I don't think he would have said what he did if he didn't think he could get away with it.
I think all this is proving that his understanding of legal processes is largely non existent.
If you accuse a person of drug dealing and child pornography you're slightly better off doing it when they're already in prison and convicted of it. If they're not then that's a teensy weensy problem.
Anything said in court is covered by absolute privilege. It means it cannot be used in defamation proceedings. It can also be reported.
However the trick is to get CSW to REPEAT the accusations outside of court. Preferably while he is in the UK where they have good libel laws.
I haven't read the full transcripts and haven't been paying much attention but perjury for a start (assuming theymos isn't actually one of the many DPR's
). I'm really hoping the court actually goes after him for these lies. Asking for any sort of proof of half of what he's saying would be enough. He basically just keeps lying to get himself out of another lie and he's going to slip up under pressure and contradict himself if he hasn't already.
I was thinking more of what's the endgame here for him? A small fine? A huge fine? Prison? The latter two? He doesn't seem to be planning more than several weeks ahead...
Don't forget CSW has a masters of laws. He also endured a substantial investigation by the Australian tax office.
https://bitsonline.com/wright-supercomputing-liquidated/So he is not unfamiliar with legal problems and legal strategy. He also has plenty of
misguided fools supporters to spread his rhetoric and
shit tokens crypto to exchange for money to pay for legal costs.
I personally believe his untruths will eventually catch up with him. I don't think the US judge will have endless patience with him.
Taking legal action should only be done as a last resort - but if you do - throw all your resources at it.
I wouldn't recommend anyone to take him to task unless you have ample time and deep pockets. But if he sues you - give him WW3
If he repeats it outside of court he cannot claim absolute privilege. His supporters can quote the court testimony but CSW can potentially be seud for libel or defamation if he repeats it outside of the courtroom.
But Martti had the best reply: