Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 111. (Read 845809 times)

''Entropy has destroyed the intelligence of people'' It destroyed so much that we are able to explore the universe, fucking stupid people am I right? We were definitely smarter thousands of years ago.

comedy gold
frikkin priceless my friend!!

If you could provide proof your fairy tale exists, scientists and people would be all over that shit.

if we can really! proof this one day this will be the last day for all of us

science and Theology is of different field, so science should never do things such as proving that God exist because it is all about beliefs and faith. even if it seems so hard to understand only those who believe will do.

Well, we know actually a lot about outer space and unseeable stuff like air, different types of gas.

Because stuff exists, means god exists? That is not scientific in any way ^^. It is just an assumption. I could also say ... everything exists because of Chuck Norris.

You think they do because you are religious and you are trying to find proof for something you think already exists, that's how you guys always go about it, you take something and then you try to find evidence for it.

By your reckoning, there can never be any proof that outer space exists. After all, we can't see it. We can't analyze it. We can't do chemical analysis of it. It isn't there. Even Einstein said that space is nothing. How do you analyze nothing? Don't you do it through watching how things operate through and in it? Same with God.

We don't have a clue about how things came about. But the "stuff" that exists shows us that it was God. We determine this by analyzing complexity, entropy, and cause and effect.

Am I saying that nothing is God? Absolutely not. We don't see nothing spontaneously making anything. But if it did, then it would be God.

When you look up the white papers of the original scientists behind the dating of the earth, and the notes about their white papers, you will find that they state that they set the dates of things arbitrarily, so that there would be order in the scientific investigation. In other words, the scientific dating of the earth and universe is an arbitrary thing. Later scientists simply continued this practice. Standard scientific dating is make-believe.

The Bible is eye witness accounts. There are no talking snakes listed in the Bible. There is only one, who was controlled by the devil, Satan.

People teach chimpanzees to talk. Even dogs can be taught to talk, even though it is difficult to understand what they are saying.

Look at the vast numbers of fossilized life from the past. The fossil record shows that there were 2 or 3 times as many forms of life in the past as there are now. This shows the job that entropy has been doing on the earth.

We don't have a clue about how healthy things where in the Beginning. The point is that they were extremely healthier than they are now. Adam and Eve were almost super-humans compared to people who live now. And snakes were so healthy that they could talk. Entropy has destroyed the intelligence of people so that now days there are many folks who ain't even smart enough to understand that God exists.

Why are atheists rejecting the evidence and falling for the skeptical misdirection? The skeptical narrative of the evidence I presented does not add up, there are too many anomalies and eminent researchers. It is not so esoteric if it is being explained well, atheists should undertake a study of the trans-survival hypothesis website and other sources I have cited. I believe that to affirm the survival hypothesis would indicate that the likeliest answer to the god (s) question is "yes", even though there are many collateral assumptions with survival, it is better at explaining the facts.

There can never be any scientific proof any god exists.

A belief because your parents told you is not proof.  But science works "differently" in fairy tale land, I suppose.  :/

This being a science thread, one of the things you would have to show is which Adam and Eve you are talking about. If you are talking about Adam and Eve of the Bible, you would have to scientifically prove the Bible is accurate, and is the Word of God. This can be done. But doing it might take a few pages in the forum. It will also take a lot of scientific knowledge about how the Bible came about, the nation of Israel, the fulfilled prophesies, and many more things, some of which I have touched on in various threads.

The universe is here. The 3 laws that I have been stating, prove that God exists. They don't explain much of anything about Him. But there is no way this universe could exist with those 3 laws intact as they are, if it weren't for the existence of God, and His making of the universe.

Now don't misunderstand. I use the word "God." I am not talking about the God/god of any religion. If you don't like the word "God," find a different word that you like better. Perhaps "The Great First Cause." How about "Prime Mover." Maybe "Absolute Being."

After all, God is way more intelligent and capable than we are. And since we have identity, His identity must be tremendously great.

I guess my only question about this is, aren't there huge factions of people who are against the entire idea of genetic evolution? say it's scientifically proven that an Adam and Eve exists ... doesn't that blow a lot of people's arguments out of the water?

i like to scroll this thread to see how many times my buddy BADecker
posts these links....


 everytime he does... i drink..
dude!! it's been 10 pages or so!!  come on man  WTF??... i got a six pack waiting!!

The point isn't "some god." The point is a Something that is so extremely great and intelligent, that our word "God" doesn't even approach the strength and greatness of that "Something."

And space, being emptiness, doesn't do anything. So, it was God that did it all.

Part of the reason science keeps on looking for random happenings in the universe, is because they want to prove God doesn't exist. They all know He exists. They simply are not saying it.

When you talk about religion failing, according to the definition of religion at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/religion?s=t, you are simply stating part of your religion. This being a science thread, your religious talk is off-topic.

Some of the flaws in what you say are:

1. Did you explore space, especially outer space?

2. Who is the "we?" You know it because you did the exploration? What about the rest of the people? Don't tell me your great scientists all explored outer space.

3. Einstein says that space is emptiness... nothing there. How do you see something that is not there?

4. But you don't really know what you are seeing when you see the stars. Electric universe has some points to it that are far better explanations than nuclear reactions in stars.


5. Many police forensic operations prove that there was a crime committed, without the criminal having been found. Science proves God exists, even if we can't see Jim, or lay hands on Him.

6. If we set the police forensics department to examining the issue of your invisible toaster, they just might prove it exists. But they might prove it doesn't exist, as well.

ok!   I'll get right on that...