Cause and effect is standard, basic science. Ignoring it like you do is a simple sign that you want science fiction rather than the truth.
I don't ignore cause and effect.
I simply accept science as being true - as you do when you use technology.
Science is not anti-God. Phony science is. Like the ones that give you no technology. For example a prediction of mass driven world in the universe(materialism), or evolution. And those are the only "sciences" that are anti-God. They do not even meet your own cirteria of science (they do not give you any useful in day to day life inventions). All of the rest knowingly or unknowingly support the monotheism.
I believe that our knowledge about science is still far too little thats why we are not able to find any scientific proof that God really exist. Come to think of it, humans can only use 10% of our brains and I think if we are able to fully use 100% of our brains then maybe we can find solid proofs that God do really exist.
It's a myth that people use 10% of their brains. It was long since refuted to be completly not true. Its easy to say its total fraud. How? Science states that unused organs are disappearing. Have 90% of people brain dissapeared? No. That means they use it. Sometimes we use 10% at the time (at amphetamine brain is triggered randomly hence more brain usage). Brain need to rest, different parts are used for different things etc etc. In other words its a myth. Like its a myth that science is anti-religious. We have evidences, quite a lot for monotheism - look up 13 posts above, I have given a biiig ass list of how science supports monotheistic world view.
But yeah... congratulations for you guys that you base your world view on disproven myths.
Special price is for qwik2learn that is not only basing his world view on myth, but he build whole theology around it. Thats seriously weird.
Some training is needed to make fuller use of the brain. One adept was able to train his mind to move objects at a distance and was tested on camera for a television show.
These data have documented an asymmetrical change in brainwave function of the mentalist as he appeared to move a pen into a glass without touching it.
http://eegym.com/can-eeg-tell-if-telekinesis-is-a-magicians-trick-2/The idea that the personality can survive physical death has also been observed in many instances. All of the evidence points to a cyclical form of consciousness. It is important to inquire about these ideas because the typical atheist will make the claim that consciousness arises from nothing and ends in nothing but will oddly deny that consciousness is cyclical.
Btw Pheonix is a "special" state. whoopinh 15% of mormons there - wow. You can say that so many mormons would result in believing in magic, ufos, and other silly stuff. and 45% catholics (15% on average in states). And catholics believe that they have their special saint slave that they pray to and give them gifts. No wonder they would believe in silly stuff.
You can only understand that phenomen given that mormons believe human to be Gods and have godlike powers to move objects with their mind etc etc. This quick2learn guy is just copy pasting mormon bs. And catholics obsession with death. Connect obsession in death + telekinesis of mormons = pheonix journal.
Good job with placing you journals in Pheonix, a lot of potential weird people there, believing in magic (mormons), and spirits of grandma talking to them (catholics).
You will just disbelieve the camera and the EEG? How convenient! Skeptics in this thread will agree with you that this evidence means nothing and that TK is just "too crazy" to believe. So much for science and evidence-based reasoning!
You have no rational objection to the evidence I presented! Your attacks are similar to the way that skeptics use misdirection to ignore the scientific basis of parapsychology.
You try to argue about these books but you cannot bear to hear the WORD from the Phoenix Journals then how can you call yourself rational? You just pretend to have knowledge but one cannot acquire knowledge of the content by not reading.
The main myth is to believe any one thing "too much", that means you should look at multiple sources. If you can claim that GOD wrote the Bible then I can claim that there is better evidence that GOD wrote the Phoenix Journals, as evidence for this I cite how the clarity and content of the two texts are starkly different, but you obviously have not made this type of reasoned comparison for yourself.
