So how is it that the atheist can recognize evil in the Bible but the fundamentalist Christian cannot?
It is Only because the fundamentalist chooses obedience to a Bible story over their own moral conscience.
These moral norms do, in fact, come from God, and the existence of such objective moral norms provides strong evidence for the existence of a moral, personal God. But one does not need to believe in God or appeal to Holy Scripture to know that certain moral precepts are genuine moral absolutes.4 Again, these basic principles of moral obligation are absolutes that are knowable (at least in principle) by all people everywhere without the aid of Scripture. What is meant by an absolute here? An absolute is an objectively true moral principle that is unchanging and cross-cultural. It is true whether or not anyone believes it to be true. Natural moral law theory implies that we discover morality — we do not invent it.
"Do not torture" is a moral obligation which is absolute, that means that GOD does not torture. The Biblical story about GOD torturing an innocent child cannot be taken seriously.
Why do fundamentalist Christians deny the wisdom of the heart when they choose to accept the evil behavior of YHWH throughout the OT? The moral principle that the innocent should not suffer is lost on some believers.
Why do you use manipulation here? Does your wisdom of the heart tell you that its ok to manipulate people?
Yeah my wisdom of heart tell me:
"15Beware of false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.16By their fruit you will recognize them."
Your fruits are manipulation. No sincere man would do that. You manipulate meaning of words. You manipulate Causes and effect. You tell half lies, you use moral terror, you use false dichotomy, you claim being a victim, etc etc.
Yes. Reformation church doctrine was, that every man have to read and choose for their own, what they think about the Bible. So why do you assume that every reformation agent should believe that Bible is bad? Maybe some believe in their wisdom of heart that it is not?
You are knocking to the wrong door. Your "doctrine" was aimed to catholics thats why my assumptions that you are being led by French masonry (catholic country). You had proven that masonry is fake reformation.
Your point is - you will be a free thinking if you would accept OT and NT (almost) are bad. You just contradicted yourself. The truth is - someone would be a free thinker, if he would think on his own.
The Trinity was an invention of Paul, and
the Bible is evil because there is consistent suffering of innocent people brought about by YHWH,
in the NT the epistles of Paul are presented as though they relate the teaching of Jesus
when in fact Paul corrupted his teachings,
not to mention the factual errors in the text of the OT (check the evilbible site).
You have to decide. If Paul corrupted the evil NT that would mean he made it correct. Or if NT was not bad, which would mean you contradict yourself(again). And if NT is good and is based on OT is OT bad? Correct answer would be that Jesus has purified the meaning of OT and its no longer controversial. Thats why satanists and pharisee of today hate him so much. They have to invent so many stupid doctrines to hide that fact.
I doubt that you will understand my process of thinking. But there could be only one non-contradictory statement about you. You are a cryptocatholic. You both hate bible, because Bible tells truth about both of you, that you would like to hide. Catholic strongly discourage from reading OT. And softly discourage from reading NT. What they mostly read on their masses are talking about money and going to church, prefferably going to church to give them money.
No. Trinity was invented by Catholic church in 4th century. You again want to fake a reformation movement. You want to make a fake divide. Catholics vs fake reformation. Its the two sides of the same coin.
And yes catholic church abuses the words of Paul. Possibly Paul makes his own interpretation. But a true bible scholar takes into account 2 or 3 witnesses to truely believe something. Paul sometimes tells something what he thinks something is and sometimes he tells like he is inspired.
Yes, corruption started from the weakest link in the fence - Paul. That does not mean we should condamn the works of Paul all together. He was a victim taken hostage spiritualy imho. But you contradict yourself. You tell people to not listen to catholic church while in other hand you gave them your own interpretation. Im not sure if you are kidding, dishonest or a hipocrite.
Again. Yes. Everyone should read their Bible and make up their own minds. WIthout assumptions its good or bad.
Honest read of the Bible - what you discourage, would make obvious that you AND catholic church are frauds that claims to be christians while being wolfs.
"15Beware of false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves."
