If I were to say to you that our sun is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me? NO.
This is most likely because there is no (scientific) evidence..
If I were to say that Sirius is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me, YES, 'cause the Dogon tribe of Mali says so..
But the dogon also point out that the binary sirius is a mirror of our own sun.. meaning ours is a binary star.
But our sun is not a binary star according to science.
So how anyone expects to prove the existance of god when all possible science explaining the truth above is..
?
Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 204. (Read 845650 times)
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!
Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.
Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA
Quote from: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html
The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.
P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.
You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?
That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.
I feel so sad for you
My heart breaks for you and your problems
I'll even pray for you
P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.
If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?
The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.
And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.
God is proven:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Thanks for all your talk against me. God has seen it, and will bless me extra because of it. You still have a chance to change. Do so, before it is too late for you.
God hardens the hearts of people into the way that they want to be. If you don't change soon, He will harden your heart into being against Him in a way that you won't be able to get out of once you realize He exists.
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!
Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.
Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA
Quote from: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html
The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.
P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.
You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?
That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.
I feel so sad for you
My heart breaks for you and your problems
I'll even pray for you
P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.
If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?
The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.
And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.
If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?
The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.
And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!
Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.
Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA
Quote from: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html
The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.
P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.
You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?
That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.
I feel so sad for you
My heart breaks for you and your problems
I'll even pray for you
If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?
The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.
If you like I'll tell you about my supernatural encounters. Though this would be derailing the thread as it's not relevant.
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!
Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.
Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA
Quote from: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html
The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.
P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!
Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.
Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA
Quote from: http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html
The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.
But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.
Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!
As much fun as you are having by trying to get smart with me, you've just taken a huge shit on your whole god proof provided in your links. Congratulations, you're a bigger retard than we actually thought you would be. You might actually be the most stupid human being I have ever heard of and believe me, I've heard some tremendous stupid shit in my life. Don't forget to breathe, dumbass. Or wait, you can forget to, no loss at all.
Oh, dear. I am so hurt and ashamed. LOL!
Isn't it about time you stop talking off topic, and start examining the proof that God exists?:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Oh, that's right. You DO have trouble thinking, don't you?
The definition for God is simple: Almighty. You can see it in the scientific facts in the above links.
What does religion have to do with it? Since God has been proven to exist, and since you are so religious as to always bring religion up, prove your religion, that God doesn't exist.
Since you not only have not been able to come up with scientific rebuttal to the God proof, yet you keep on talking like the proof doesn't exist, you are scientifically inept.
You poor, little, mentally deficient baby. Will you ever grow out of your whiny infancy? (Are we having fun, yet?
)
How did you determine God's sex? That is what I am talking about. You personified the 'unknown' and you think it is a male.
You are just making conjectures based on the Bible stories.
Have you ever thought of using a dictionary?
Quote from: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/father?s=t
father
[fah-th er]
noun
...
5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.
...
10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.
...
12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.
[fah-th er]
noun
...
5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.
...
10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.
...
12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.
Or is it that you don't have dictionaries where you are at?
Ok, so I was right. You don't know what God is. You said he is the 'undefined', 'unknown', yet you personified HIM, as a fertile male based on what someone WROTE in the book.
So in your world, Bible is all you need to know, Bible has all the proofs you need for the existence of God. After all, someone (God) wrote it, right.
You are a retard. Don't you see the problem? 'Undefined' cannot be a 'father'.
If you say HE is the father, then you anthropomorphized the 'unknown', 'undefined'. You created HIM in your head.
You asked how I determined God's sex. The answer is that the dictionary and the Bible say it.
In science, God is essentially undefined.
Go cry in the corner.
Ok, so we agree that God is 'undefined'.
Now let's talk about why you believe it is a HE.
Basically you believe it is a HE because the Bible and the Christian dictionary says God is a fertile he (aka father).
How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a HE if we know now that God is 'undefined'?
Well. Your retardedness is kinda humorous, even if yur position is life should be pitied.
Like stats, you seem to be having a difficult time simply looking up at the string of posts you just replied to, above. However, not to be unexpected. Anybody who can't go outside and see God in nature, isn't going to be smart enough to look up... even if it is only at previous posts.
And, I do apologize if you are blind, or have no way to get outside because you don't have any legs. Since you are on the Internet, it would do well for you to Google pictures of the world and nature... even the simple countryside. If you are blind, get someone to describe the pictures to you in detail.
So checkmate then. You cannot answer my last question: How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a male if we know now that God is 'undefined'?
I think you are a broken toy, aren't you?
Go easy on the Christian salvation myth....it will get you to nowhere fast...
As much fun as you are having by trying to get smart with me, you've just taken a huge shit on your whole god proof provided in your links. Congratulations, you're a bigger retard than we actually thought you would be. You might actually be the most stupid human being I have ever heard of and believe me, I've heard some tremendous stupid shit in my life. Don't forget to breathe, dumbass. Or wait, you can forget to, no loss at all.
Oh, dear. I am so hurt and ashamed. LOL!
Isn't it about time you stop talking off topic, and start examining the proof that God exists?:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
Oh, that's right. You DO have trouble thinking, don't you?
The definition for God is simple: Almighty. You can see it in the scientific facts in the above links.
What does religion have to do with it? Since God has been proven to exist, and since you are so religious as to always bring religion up, prove your religion, that God doesn't exist.
Since you not only have not been able to come up with scientific rebuttal to the God proof, yet you keep on talking like the proof doesn't exist, you are scientifically inept.
You poor, little, mentally deficient baby. Will you ever grow out of your whiny infancy? (Are we having fun, yet?
) I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380.
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.
The vastness of the universe is designed is proof enough of an all powerful creator that has no end and beginning. Mind blown, cannot comprehend.
Believing or not believing is related to genes (hormones). It can not be explained by science.
God does not require proof, you just need to believe in him and he will help if you do not sin.
How did you determine God's sex? That is what I am talking about. You personified the 'unknown' and you think it is a male.
You are just making conjectures based on the Bible stories.
Have you ever thought of using a dictionary?
Quote from: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/father?s=t
father
[fah-th er]
noun
...
5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.
...
10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.
...
12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.
[fah-th er]
noun
...
5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.
...
10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.
...
12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.
Or is it that you don't have dictionaries where you are at?
Ok, so I was right. You don't know what God is. You said he is the 'undefined', 'unknown', yet you personified HIM, as a fertile male based on what someone WROTE in the book.
So in your world, Bible is all you need to know, Bible has all the proofs you need for the existence of God. After all, someone (God) wrote it, right.
You are a retard. Don't you see the problem? 'Undefined' cannot be a 'father'.
If you say HE is the father, then you anthropomorphized the 'unknown', 'undefined'. You created HIM in your head.
You asked how I determined God's sex. The answer is that the dictionary and the Bible say it.
In science, God is essentially undefined.
Go cry in the corner.
Ok, so we agree that God is 'undefined'.
Now let's talk about why you believe it is a HE.
Basically you believe it is a HE because the Bible and the Christian dictionary says God is a fertile he (aka father).
How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a HE if we know now that God is 'undefined'?
I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.
Jump to: