Author

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 204. (Read 845809 times)

legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
April 28, 2017, 06:27:26 PM

Additionally, scientific evaluation of evolution, using probability math, shows that evolution is completely impossible. Cause and effect show that there is no random effect, randomness that would be necessary for mutations to exist as evolution. Irreducible complexity shows that critical stages of the evolution idea are missing, thereby moving evolution into the realm of never being able to be proven.


you really need to
1. educate yourself beyond your  bubble of pious biblical fairy tale nonsense
2. read up on some real evolutionary science. your above statement shows your complete and utter ignorance of it.
   but no surprise there.
and 3. jeezus dude...take a break from these troll fest threads once in awhile.
          unless that is you don't mind being seen as rather obsessed






You have been played, son... you and all the people who think that evolution is possible or real. You've been suckered into an evolution religion. Scientists are getting rich off you jokers by getting grant money to continue experimenting, or by teaching evolution foolishness in universities. And you support it with your taxes.

Cool

ok, 1st of all, I'm not your son, you arrogant bastard
You are not a son or a daughter? You were born bi?  Cheesy


Denying evolution in the face of 200 years of peer reviewed science and evidence eh?
Yeah all that silly stuff that modern evolutionary biology is based on? Its all a big lie folks!
We've all been suckered. BADecker says so right here in this bitcoin thread and
he even knows about Newtons 3rd law and cause and effect so he must speak be the truth!
Are you trying to say that scientists are so pure that they wouldn't have an agenda? How could they even be scientists if that were the case.

Did you ever look at the term, "the Theory of Evolution?" Why is it a theory? Because the same evidence suggests other things that are not evolution, as well.

Two hundred years of evidence, and they still haven't proven evolution. It should really be dropped from theory status into a simple science fiction idea.



 I'm not gonna argue with ya bud.  You're too far over the cliff and its a waste of time.
But try this for starters
Its one of thousands and unlike your stupid merry go round links back to yourself
 it actually links to an outside reputable site.
Thanks for this Scientific American article/site. It helps to prove that evolution does not even belong in the category/class of theory status. How does it prove this? It shows a bunch of rebutted rebuttals.

As you say, let interested people do their own research.



 I just like coming here to troll you because I can always count on you to quote me with a good Sunday morning
laughable reply like the one above.
So anyway, be seein ya next Sunday for my quote and another good belly laugh.


              
                     https://i.imgur.com/UrCSU2u.jpg

Is that why you seldom reply directly to my posts. You have a hard time finding anything wrong with them to talk against. Rather, you simply show how ignorant you are by not recognizing that God exists.


Cool

my apologies for not waiting till Sunday ...  had some free time so thought I'd check in early....

YO DUDE !!!! you didn't let me down !!!  ROFLMFAO!!!

also sorry I don't reply to all your delusional posts on a timely basis..you see I have a life outside this thread.
You know, like going to work, writing programs for 11 hours a day, coming home  and spending time with
family... you know that sort of thing...oh wait a minute... you wouldn't know about that would you now?
I forgot, you're  too busy on this thread 24/7 trying to prove some magic invisible sky fairy exists up the sky... my bad.

legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 28, 2017, 03:23:48 PM
How can it be possible that people are still stuck between religion and science? If there was a proof of it, everybody would be religious right? You can not find any scientific answer about religion. It is funny to searching for such a thing.

One of the scientific proofs of religion in people is the psychiatric proof that all people are religious, one way or another. Even if a person seems to NOT be religious, his personal religion is a religion of non-religion. See, at least, #6 at the definition of religion at http://www.dictionary.com/browse/religion?s=t:
Quote
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 910
Merit: 255
April 28, 2017, 02:10:30 PM
How can it be possible that people are still stuck between religion and science? If there was a proof of it, everybody would be religious right? You can not find any scientific answer about religion. It is funny to searching for such a thing.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 28, 2017, 06:09:52 AM
Zeitgeist is so stupid that I can't even take the time to start watching.    Cool
member
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
April 27, 2017, 01:03:03 AM
watch zeitgeist...then ask the topic question again... Wink
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
April 25, 2017, 05:38:15 PM
It is a simple answer, scientifically or not. You are one of the most beautiful creature in this world. Science is basing all facts in the bible.

The earth free-floats in space (Job 26:7), affected only by gravity. While other sources declared the earth sat on the back of an elephant or turtle, or was held up by Atlas, the Bible alone states what we now know to be true – “He hangs the earth on nothing.”
Creation is made of particles, indiscernible to our eyes (Hebrews 11:3). Not until the 19th century was it discovered that all visible matter consists of invisible elements.

Oceans contain springs (Job 38:16). The ocean is very deep. Almost all the ocean floor is in total darkness and the pressure there is enormous. It would have been impossible for Job to have explored the "springs of the sea." Until recently, it was thought that oceans were fed only by rivers and rain. Yet in the 1970s, with the help of deep diving research submarines that were constructed to withstand 6,000 pounds-per-square-inch pressure, oceanographers discovered springs on the ocean floors!

Sanitation industry birthed (Deuteronomy 23:12-13). Some 3,500 years ago God commanded His people to have a place outside the camp where they could relieve themselves. They were to each carry a shovel so that they could dig a hole (latrine) and cover their waste. Up until World War I, more soldiers died from disease than war because they did not isolate human waste.

The First Law of Thermodynamics established (Genesis 2:1-2). The First Law states that the total quantity of energy and matter in the universe is a constant. One form of energy or matter may be converted into another, but the total quantity always remains the same. Therefore the creation is finished, exactly as God said way back in Genesis.

The universe had a beginning (Genesis 1:1; Hebrews 1:10-12). Starting with the studies of Albert Einstein in the early 1900s and continuing today, science has confirmed the biblical view that the universe had a beginning. When the Bible was written most people believed the universe was eternal. Science has proven them wrong, but the Bible correct.

Someone would not believe in God but there is no peace without God in your life. Stephen Hawking have a great mind and his great mind and his unfortunate life changing physical disability makes him think of why God does not exist. For people who does not believe in God just do not spit unto his name. If he is not real for you then that is only in you, God motivates people to be good and be better. Countless of lives changed because of him and his love. Not scientifically proven but it is proven based on peoples experiences that he can change us. Many facts about Science that was predicted in the bible. Some might be false because it was passed and was rewritten by many people. God Is With You, He will give you what you want if it is good and in the right time and he will only give it to you if you believe in him.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 25, 2017, 02:05:38 AM

How did you determine God's sex?  That is what I am talking about.  You personified the 'unknown' and you think it is a male.

You are just making conjectures based on the Bible stories.


Have you ever thought of using a dictionary?
father
[fah-th er]

noun

...

5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.

...

10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.

...

12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.


Or is it that you don't have dictionaries where you are at?

Cool

Ok, so I was right.  You don't know what God is.  You said he is the 'undefined', 'unknown', yet you personified HIM, as a fertile male based on what someone WROTE in the book.

So in your world, Bible is all you need to know, Bible has all the proofs you need for the existence of God.  After all, someone (God) wrote it, right.

You are a retard.  Don't you see the problem?  'Undefined' cannot be a 'father'.

If you say HE is the father, then you anthropomorphized the 'unknown', 'undefined'.  You created HIM in your head.


You asked how I determined God's sex. The answer is  that the dictionary and the Bible say it.

In science, God is essentially undefined.

Go cry in the corner.

Cool

Ok, so we agree that God is 'undefined'. 

Now let's talk about why you believe it is a HE.
Basically you believe it is a HE because the Bible and the Christian dictionary says God is a fertile he (aka father).

How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a HE if we know now that God is 'undefined'?


Well. Your retardedness is kinda humorous, even if yur position is life should be pitied.

Like stats, you seem to be having a difficult time simply looking up at the string of posts you just replied to, above. However, not to be unexpected. Anybody who can't go outside and see God in nature, isn't going to be smart enough to look up... even if it is only at previous posts.

And, I do apologize if you are blind, or have no way to get outside because you don't have any legs. Since you are on the Internet, it would do well for you to Google pictures of the world and nature... even the simple countryside. If you are blind, get someone to describe the pictures to you in detail.

Cool

So checkmate then.  You cannot answer my last question: How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a male if we know now that God is 'undefined'?
You checkmate yourself with that little word "if" in your question. IF you want to ask all kinds of hypothetical questions, why don't you start a topic about them?

The word "father" isn't something that simply popped into existence last year. Rather, it is one of the major, basic words in multitudes of ancient languages around the world. It has always had as its meaning (in part, at least) the creator or maker or designer of something. It fits, and has always fit, God perfectly.



I think you are a broken toy, aren't you?

Go easy on the Christian salvation myth....it will get you to nowhere fast...


There isn't any Christian salvation myth. Rather, there are only people who misunderstand Christianity. And at worst, people who work for the devil.

Cool
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
April 25, 2017, 01:52:52 AM

How did you determine God's sex?  That is what I am talking about.  You personified the 'unknown' and you think it is a male.

You are just making conjectures based on the Bible stories.


Have you ever thought of using a dictionary?
father
[fah-th er]

noun

...

5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.

...

10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.

...

12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.


Or is it that you don't have dictionaries where you are at?

Cool

Ok, so I was right.  You don't know what God is.  You said he is the 'undefined', 'unknown', yet you personified HIM, as a fertile male based on what someone WROTE in the book.

So in your world, Bible is all you need to know, Bible has all the proofs you need for the existence of God.  After all, someone (God) wrote it, right.

You are a retard.  Don't you see the problem?  'Undefined' cannot be a 'father'.

If you say HE is the father, then you anthropomorphized the 'unknown', 'undefined'.  You created HIM in your head.


You asked how I determined God's sex. The answer is  that the dictionary and the Bible say it.

In science, God is essentially undefined.

Go cry in the corner.

Cool

Ok, so we agree that God is 'undefined'. 

Now let's talk about why you believe it is a HE.
Basically you believe it is a HE because the Bible and the Christian dictionary says God is a fertile he (aka father).

How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a HE if we know now that God is 'undefined'?


Well. Your retardedness is kinda humorous, even if yur position is life should be pitied.

Like stats, you seem to be having a difficult time simply looking up at the string of posts you just replied to, above. However, not to be unexpected. Anybody who can't go outside and see God in nature, isn't going to be smart enough to look up... even if it is only at previous posts.

And, I do apologize if you are blind, or have no way to get outside because you don't have any legs. Since you are on the Internet, it would do well for you to Google pictures of the world and nature... even the simple countryside. If you are blind, get someone to describe the pictures to you in detail.

Cool

So checkmate then.  You cannot answer my last question: How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a male if we know now that God is 'undefined'?

I think you are a broken toy, aren't you?

Go easy on the Christian salvation myth....it will get you to nowhere fast...



I'm sure that scientists will never prove the existence of God. What's the point of this? Faith in God (or atheism) has been brought up since childhood. And the Scientists' Report can not change this
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1043
April 25, 2017, 01:33:20 AM
There is too much money in deluding people. The media wouldn't show the proof of God if they were ordered to by Government.

See my post directly above to see why our best guess about where life came from is that it was created by God.

Believers in evolution have more of a religion than believers in God. You can see why in my, above, post. But you won't find the media talking about it much.

Cool

I agree, but who are the ones deluding the people to make money?

How many other CEO's operate from a golden throne lol

full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 103
https://primedice.com/?c=WINFREEBTC
April 25, 2017, 01:26:46 AM
There is no need for proof for this, we just need to know what made us, after all, we are not ourselves, we all think like a set toy, we come together and come to earth.


Someone has said that there is no need to do anything except die.

We don't have an absolute need to do the things we do. We do them because we want to. Finding proof is a thing we want to do. Albeit, those who don't want proof, certainly don't have to find it, or look at it if it exists already.

Cool

I had a break for a few days and here you are, unchained and acting wise on this topic. I'm back to hitchslap the shitgod out of your brainless body. Every thing that you do in your life is an absolute necesity in that moment. This is just another proof that you are completely clueless and you should stop listening to Bob Dutko cds. As for your proof of God, I shall come again: you have no such thing, those links are absolute bullshit interpretations of scientific laws. Once again, fuck off and stop trying to impress people with the ideas of a fat retard who thinks interpreting natural laws means you are a scientist, you braindead apologist trash, Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 24, 2017, 04:38:23 PM
There is no need for proof for this, we just need to know what made us, after all, we are not ourselves, we all think like a set toy, we come together and come to earth.


Someone has said that there is no need to do anything except die.

We don't have an absolute need to do the things we do. We do them because we want to. Finding proof is a thing we want to do. Albeit, those who don't want proof, certainly don't have to find it, or look at it if it exists already.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 507
April 24, 2017, 04:35:47 PM
There is no need for proof for this, we just need to know what made us, after all, we are not ourselves, we all think like a set toy, we come together and come to earth.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 24, 2017, 04:35:34 PM
I read some articles about this. It's all based on what you give a name for it.
If there are aliens who created us - did the christs say god to them anymore?

The idea of creation by aliens is simply a subterfuge. The questions then would be, who created the aliens? Who gave them life? Where did they learn about life? Do they have any controls outside of cause and effect?

God proof simply bypasses all that, a thing which would have to be done anyway, to get to the bottom of things.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 252
April 24, 2017, 04:27:54 PM
I read some articles about this. It's all based on what you give a name for it.
If there are aliens who created us - did the christs say god to them anymore?
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 24, 2017, 04:24:11 PM

How did you determine God's sex?  That is what I am talking about.  You personified the 'unknown' and you think it is a male.

You are just making conjectures based on the Bible stories.


Have you ever thought of using a dictionary?
father
[fah-th er]

noun

...

5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.

...

10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.

...

12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.


Or is it that you don't have dictionaries where you are at?

Cool

Ok, so I was right.  You don't know what God is.  You said he is the 'undefined', 'unknown', yet you personified HIM, as a fertile male based on what someone WROTE in the book.

So in your world, Bible is all you need to know, Bible has all the proofs you need for the existence of God.  After all, someone (God) wrote it, right.

You are a retard.  Don't you see the problem?  'Undefined' cannot be a 'father'.

If you say HE is the father, then you anthropomorphized the 'unknown', 'undefined'.  You created HIM in your head.


You asked how I determined God's sex. The answer is  that the dictionary and the Bible say it.

In science, God is essentially undefined.

Go cry in the corner.

Cool

Ok, so we agree that God is 'undefined'. 

Now let's talk about why you believe it is a HE.
Basically you believe it is a HE because the Bible and the Christian dictionary says God is a fertile he (aka father).

How did people who wrote the Bible know God was a HE if we know now that God is 'undefined'?


Well. Your retardedness is kinda humorous, even if yur position is life should be pitied.

Like stats, you seem to be having a difficult time simply looking up at the string of posts you just replied to, above. However, not to be unexpected. Anybody who can't go outside and see God in nature, isn't going to be smart enough to look up... even if it is only at previous posts.

And, I do apologize if you are blind, or have no way to get outside because you don't have any legs. Since you are on the Internet, it would do well for you to Google pictures of the world and nature... even the simple countryside. If you are blind, get someone to describe the pictures to you in detail.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 23, 2017, 10:32:54 PM

How did you determine God's sex?  That is what I am talking about.  You personified the 'unknown' and you think it is a male.

You are just making conjectures based on the Bible stories.


Have you ever thought of using a dictionary?
father
[fah-th er]

noun

...

5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.

...

10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.

...

12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.


Or is it that you don't have dictionaries where you are at?

Cool

Ok, so I was right.  You don't know what God is.  You said he is the 'undefined', 'unknown', yet you personified HIM, as a fertile male based on what someone WROTE in the book.

So in your world, Bible is all you need to know, Bible has all the proofs you need for the existence of God.  After all, someone (God) wrote it, right.

You are a retard.  Don't you see the problem?  'Undefined' cannot be a 'father'.

If you say HE is the father, then you anthropomorphized the 'unknown', 'undefined'.  You created HIM in your head.


You asked how I determined God's sex. The answer is  that the dictionary and the Bible say it.

In science, God is essentially undefined.

Go cry in the corner.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 23, 2017, 07:21:03 PM

How did you determine God's sex?  That is what I am talking about.  You personified the 'unknown' and you think it is a male.

You are just making conjectures based on the Bible stories.


Have you ever thought of using a dictionary?
father
[fah-th er]

noun

...

5. a person who has originated or established something:
the father of modern psychology; the founding fathers.

...

10. (initial capital letter) Theology. the Supreme Being and Creator; God.

...

12. the Father, Theology. the first person of the Trinity.


Or is it that you don't have dictionaries where you are at?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 23, 2017, 11:03:04 AM

Additionally, scientific evaluation of evolution, using probability math, shows that evolution is completely impossible. Cause and effect show that there is no random effect, randomness that would be necessary for mutations to exist as evolution. Irreducible complexity shows that critical stages of the evolution idea are missing, thereby moving evolution into the realm of never being able to be proven.


you really need to
1. educate yourself beyond your  bubble of pious biblical fairy tale nonsense
2. read up on some real evolutionary science. your above statement shows your complete and utter ignorance of it.
   but no surprise there.
and 3. jeezus dude...take a break from these troll fest threads once in awhile.
          unless that is you don't mind being seen as rather obsessed






You have been played, son... you and all the people who think that evolution is possible or real. You've been suckered into an evolution religion. Scientists are getting rich off you jokers by getting grant money to continue experimenting, or by teaching evolution foolishness in universities. And you support it with your taxes.

Cool

ok, 1st of all, I'm not your son, you arrogant bastard
You are not a son or a daughter? You were born bi?  Cheesy


Denying evolution in the face of 200 years of peer reviewed science and evidence eh?
Yeah all that silly stuff that modern evolutionary biology is based on? Its all a big lie folks!
We've all been suckered. BADecker says so right here in this bitcoin thread and
he even knows about Newtons 3rd law and cause and effect so he must speak be the truth!
Are you trying to say that scientists are so pure that they wouldn't have an agenda? How could they even be scientists if that were the case.

Did you ever look at the term, "the Theory of Evolution?" Why is it a theory? Because the same evidence suggests other things that are not evolution, as well.

Two hundred years of evidence, and they still haven't proven evolution. It should really be dropped from theory status into a simple science fiction idea.



 I'm not gonna argue with ya bud.  You're too far over the cliff and its a waste of time.
But try this for starters
Its one of thousands and unlike your stupid merry go round links back to yourself
 it actually links to an outside reputable site.
Thanks for this Scientific American article/site. It helps to prove that evolution does not even belong in the category/class of theory status. How does it prove this? It shows a bunch of rebutted rebuttals.

As you say, let interested people do their own research.



 I just like coming here to troll you because I can always count on you to quote me with a good Sunday morning
laughable reply like the one above.
So anyway, be seein ya next Sunday for my quote and another good belly laugh.


              
                     https://i.imgur.com/UrCSU2u.jpg

Is that why you seldom reply directly to my posts. You have a hard time finding anything wrong with them to talk against. Rather, you simply show how ignorant you are by not recognizing that God exists.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 3514
born once atheist
April 23, 2017, 10:13:09 AM

Additionally, scientific evaluation of evolution, using probability math, shows that evolution is completely impossible. Cause and effect show that there is no random effect, randomness that would be necessary for mutations to exist as evolution. Irreducible complexity shows that critical stages of the evolution idea are missing, thereby moving evolution into the realm of never being able to be proven.


you really need to
1. educate yourself beyond your  bubble of pious biblical fairy tale nonsense
2. read up on some real evolutionary science. your above statement shows your complete and utter ignorance of it.
   but no surprise there.
and 3. jeezus dude...take a break from these troll fest threads once in awhile.
          unless that is you don't mind being seen as rather obsessed






You have been played, son... you and all the people who think that evolution is possible or real. You've been suckered into an evolution religion. Scientists are getting rich off you jokers by getting grant money to continue experimenting, or by teaching evolution foolishness in universities. And you support it with your taxes.

Cool

ok, 1st of all, I'm not your son, you arrogant bastard
 Denying evolution in the face of 200 years of peer reviewed science and evidence eh?
Yeah all that silly stuff that modern evolutionary biology is based on? Its all a big lie folks!
We've all been suckered. BADecker says so right here in this bitcoin thread and
he even knows about Newtons 3rd law and cause and effect so he must speak be the truth!

 I'm not gonna argue with ya bud.  You're too far over the cliff and its a waste of time.
But try this for starters
Its one of thousands and unlike your stupid merry go round links back to yourself
 it actually links to an outside reputable site.

 I just like coming here to troll you because I can always count on you to quote me with a good Sunday morning
laughable reply like the one above.
So anyway, be seein ya next Sunday for my quote and another good belly laugh.


             
                     
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
April 23, 2017, 09:39:01 AM

Additionally, scientific evaluation of evolution, using probability math, shows that evolution is completely impossible. Cause and effect show that there is no random effect, randomness that would be necessary for mutations to exist as evolution. Irreducible complexity shows that critical stages of the evolution idea are missing, thereby moving evolution into the realm of never being able to be proven.


you really need to
1. educate yourself beyond your  bubble of pious biblical fairy tale nonsense
2. read up on some real evolutionary science. your above statement shows your complete and utter ignorance of it.
   but no surprise there.
and 3. jeezus dude...take a break from these troll fest threads once in awhile.
          unless that is you don't mind being seen as rather obsessed


You sound kinda dense. In what way? Newton's 3rd Law is still a law. Just because there has been a bunch of theory that scientists try to use to destroy Newton's 3rd Law, doesn't mean they have succeeded at all.

Talk about educating one's self, you need to educate yourself that Newton's 3rd law upholds cause and effect, and that cause and effect exists in everything, and that there is not even one example of true randomness because of cause and effect, and that mutations are programmed into the universe because of this, and that there is not even one for-a-fact example of a beneficial mutation.

Regarding the idea of a living cell coming into being by the odds of nature simply falling into place in ways that make life, consider a simple, 200 element/molecule cell. What are the odds that these parts are going to fall into place in just the right way so that they would exist where they would have to exist for the cell to be alive. The odds are tremendously high against... so high that it impossible for it to happen.

But if it happened once, then the parts would have to be kicked into motion in just the right way for the cell to become alive. Another impossibility by the odds.

Even if this happened, the surrounding nature would destroy the life as instantly as the life appeared.

Now, if you want to get away from this idea by saying that evolution doesn't include abiogenesis, great. But, it is more improbable that a living cell, or other forms of life can gain atoms and molecules in the correct places so that they could change, simply by randomness. It simply isn't in the odds according to any probability math that we have that matches nature.

Besides. Even if we were talking about non-abiogenesis evolution, abiogenesis is so extremely impossible that it couldn't happen under any circumstances that we can almost imagine. See https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-mathematical-impossibility-of-evolution-1454732 for starters. Then research it, and you will find that I am right.

You have been played, son... you and all the people who think that evolution is possible or real. You've been suckered into an evolution religion. Scientists are getting rich off you jokers by getting grant money to continue experimenting, or by teaching evolution foolishness in universities. And you support it with your taxes.

Cool

Oh Puddleduck...... you silly sausage.

You claim Newtons third law (cause and effect) upholds your evidence of a god........ however, you fail to answer who made your god?

You have never been able to answer this using the same laws with which you claim proves your own god, but instead apply your own assumptions. That is where you fail.

In order to proof A, you have to define what A is.

He does not even know what God is.  Yet he is determined to 'prove it scientifically' that his undefined agent or entity exist.

Talk about a faulty logic.

God is a being Who is fantastically powerful. Yet from the scientific proof, He is simply defined as something undefinable. So God has been defined.

Cool

So you can prove something that is undefinable.  I think you can expect a call from Nobel Price committee anytime soon...

Take out your velvet suit and oil your Mossberg 500, you are going to Sweden.  Yee-ya!!!


Okay. Let's see YOU define something that is so great that it acts on all the particles, energies, and dimensions of the universe, in the same way, but way better than, a pool shark manipulates the pool balls on a pool table during a game of pool. That is God.

Cool

Most religious people identify God as the "God of the gaps".  When they don't know something, when they see the complexity of the world they do not understand, they feel they need to explain it with something.  That something (the unknown and the unexplained) becomes God.  Now that is what pantheists do.

The Abramaic religions take this unknown concept further, assigning human qualities to it, adding moral codes and ethics, in some cases defining a whole legal system and create a religion.  Creating a deity/entity/independent agent out of the 'unknown'.

The worst part is the moral, ethical and legal systems created based on the God concept (the gaps in our human knowledge).  The end result is nonsense.

That is why Christian God ends up caring about what you wear, which testicles you touch, where you put your dick, what you eat and who you marry.   Muslim God also cares how many times you pray, and which direction you are facing while you are praying.  Not to mention his obsession with what women wear or who they talk to.

Atheists and agnostics leave the unknown, unknown.  The only logical way to discover the unknown is to study it.  Science has been proven as one of the best ways to learn about how the world works.
And in my opinion, it is the best way to unpeel the unknown like an onion, layer by layer.  The 'God of the gaps' gets smaller and smaller as science makes new discoveries and proves its theories with direct observations.


Yet, God exists as has been shown by the scientific proof, and by nature. Just because people don't understand what God is, doesn't have anything to do with WHAT HE IS.

God, Himself, gave the Abrahamic people through Isaac, possible the best form of religion. The Abrahamic people through Ishmael contradict the good religion of Isaac. This is not deity creation. This is acknowledging the Deity in both the right way, and a wrong way.

God cares about everything, because He is intimately in contact with every subatomic particle and wave of energy through cause and effect, right from the beginning to the present.

Since science has proven that God exists, because scientists won't study it when they study everything else, shows that they are against God.

Cool
Jump to: