Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 52. (Read 845591 times)

You mean the "proof" that has been handed down 30-50 years of oral passing on before being written down?
The mis-quoted, mis-translated to the umteenth time, copy of a copy so called "inerrent" word of god?

That proof??

I believe in god

It all depend whether you believe in them or not. For me in a neutral party. Its yes or no from me. But if he really exist then why is there unbalance in society?

There is a reason it is called "faith".  It cannot be scientifically proven.

You don't need faith or belief to be a good person.  Just empathy.

People are basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend.

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

Faith itself is not bad as long as the person does good. It is a like a comfy blanket or pacifier for adults.

The hypothesis is a contradiction. Science and religion do not speak the same language..
A believer in God does not use scientific rules/empirical evidence to validate assumptions or test a hypothesis. Atheists/scientists do.
Sure, there are people that claim certain historical artifacts from religious books are proof that religion exists, but that doesn't proof a non-scientific reality.

To be critical, both parties should be aware of their paradigms and limitations.

Interestingly, atheism is increasing. Several reasons for this trend from my pov:
- there is more information (internet etc.). so people have a better understanding of their world and solutions to their problems.
- society is more dynamic and religion has difficulty to adapt. nowadays young people's main concerns in western countries are where do they offer free wifi (!) and how do i get likes on my instagram. reading a book that's 2000 years old isn't very appealing to a lot of young people.
- values change. nowadays people want to maximize their potential and enjoy life. it's not a priority anymore for most people devote a large part of your life to God and/or the reward of a life in heaven.

It is a far more knowledgeable and complex for the human to do so because we are not equipped to have supernatural powers that's why we couldn't find a scientific proof that it is true. Me as a Christian, relies on the bible alone. And also, it is contradicting for religion and science.

Religion and science do not go along because religion is based solely on revelation and faith. Yes, religious people have no choice but to admit scientific discoveries, but however, what they do with it is take it for granted and use it in their advantage by claiming 'that is another evidence of how majestic is God'.

As for me I don't belive in God, neither in any esoteric nonsense. But I fully understand the conception of a religon that's based on the faith alone and requires no evidence or proves. 

What a good question, i have a question too for you, do you know who make this world? It so small example scientific that god is exist, Do not think weird weird just think about where we are from where it can be created if your logic can achieve that?

The proof is the fact that the religion started among a group of illiterate cave dwellers that were afraid of everything that they couldn’t comprehend. It has to be true if Bedouin tribesmen believe it. Also the proof of gods love is everywhere. Just last week I was complaining that there were too many school children in Texas so god sent a kid to school with a gun to kill some of them.

http://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/father-of-accused-texas-shooter-believes-bullying-was-behind-rampage-1526920563

Humans, animals, plants, and all the contents of life are scientific proof that God exists, we exist because God created us. About the theory of human origins has been mentioned in some Bibles that man comes from one father and one mother, but everything is back to your beliefs. You also have the right not to believe.

I think God does not exist because he does not help me in many severe cases.

There is a lot of scientific evidence about God in many forums as well as on YouTube; now there are many worship god because they believe he exists.

SBB, Im bad mouthing you cos you are just too easy.  Anything and everything you say is meant to prove that you are supposedly of such high intellect that only you can understand the science needed to prove your ridiculous god.

And so I stand by my previous statement: You are assuming things based on your beliefs and views. Your basic science is collective and coloured with YOUR opinion. I'm not badmouthing science, I love science. I refuse to refute your so called science purely because your putting your beliefs in certain scientific fields that YOU believe means god. Do you understand SBB? I have always been talking about the root cause of WHY and HOW you put your faith in your so called science-which-explains-god....not the actual science.

People could believe that the square root of the angle of the sun divided by the length of a bird's wings could mean god.....any of these things individually exists. Put them together and to THEM it means god. As does your collection of so called science mean god to YOU. None of these proves the scientific existence of god.

See SBB? Probably not....your prolly gonna come back with some witty comment about not talking science in a science thread when your JUST TOO DENSE to understand what I'm actually saying. Sorry I'm talking over your head, its that pesky cognitive dissonance again.

  

There are quite a few videos that are back in the camera image of God, but scientists do not accept those images, and I do not believe in gods.

Water is not invisible, you can also touch water and you can do thousands of experiments with it, your argument is garbage.

Anyone is unlikely to prove the existence of a god. But almost everyone believes that God exists, because sometimes we have to believe that something invisible really exists. For example, water is invisible and not formed, but it really exists. also god is invisible and shapeless but really there. and I believe it.

If a friend told you that there was this one rock in India, a rock that was a beautiful, towering rock, you might believe him. But if he showed you places on the Internet where other people talked about the rock, you would believe him more. If he showed you pictures that he had taken of the rock on his last visit to India, you would believe him even more strongly.

We will always need/have some faith without evidence. But we need evidence to keep some of our faith strong.

''Complexity is generally used to characterize something with many parts where those parts interact with each other in multiple ways'' No, badecker, humans don't use ''complexity'' to design things, they use science. You might have another definition for complexity, though, feel free to state it.

''The fact that man is even greater complexity'' Man is greater complexity? Greater than what, what does this phrase even mean? There is nothing that indicates that you need to be more complex than the object you are making. If that was the case then god would need to be created by an even more complex being.

Proof or not god existence is purely a matter of belief.

My question is how life and space were made?

It is made by big bang ,it is a phenomena of nature laws some would say and who made nature please ?