There is no scientific proof of any god.
Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 72. (Read 845801 times)
Not everything has a cause.
There is no scientific proof of any god.
There is no scientific proof of any god.
Unfortunately newtons 3rd law never states that everything has causes. I explained that in the other thread:
'It is sufficient to show that all the motions have causes, which is something that Newton proved with his 3rd law.'' No it's not. Where does newton 3rd law say that all motions have causes? You don't even know what the law says, do you? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. (FOR EVERY ACTION) meaning that IF there is an action or cause then there is a reaction or effect. Thats only IF not that everything has a cause, nowhere in the law it says that everything has a cause. You are a dishonest liar.
Still wrong.
Not only will you not find a motion in the universe that doesn't have a cause or that isn't a cause, even the idea of it is absurd. Ale there is, is cause and effect, action and reaction.
Ok since you are going to say the same thing over and over again I will try to make a final statement and if you don't agree with this either I don't think there is a point in continuing the conversation. The idea of everything having causes is just as absurd as something with no cause. Right now, quantum mechanics state that almost all quantum processes are random. This is not me claiming this like you, these are bright minds, far smarter than me and you together that ahve studied this for years and this is what they have come up with. Quantum theory is the best we have, do you understand that? All scientific theories are the best we have right now and I'm not claiming they are 100% true, no one is, when a better theory is known then we use that one but RIGHT NOW, quantum theory just like evolution theory is the best we have, whether you like it or not, it is the best. Can you show us the cause of those quantum processes like radioactive decay? If you can, go ahead, right a paper, get a nobel prize and you will be able to rewrite quantum theory but until you do that you have to accept it as it is. Period.
All except the tiny few quantum processes are random. But they are random from the standpoint that we can't follow the cause and effect processes because of our weak abilities. None of them are pure random, where there are effects that don't have any cause at all.
Here is the proof that cause and effect is universal:
Everything has motion. Even if absolute zero were found somewhere, everything has motion in its subatomic particles or wave (electromagnetic) movement. Can there even be a logical theory for something without motion?
Newton's 3rd Law essentially says C&E with a little more added.
The words "action" and reaction" in the 3rd Law are happening throughout the universe everywhere because there is nowhere in the universe where something is without motion.
Cause and effect is universal. This means that the supposed mutations of evolution have really been caused, rather than being actions without a cause. This changes the whole aspect of what evolution theory suggests evolution is. Evolution was started by whoever/whatever started cause and effect.
All cause and effect operates according to the laws of physics in the universe. Even the pandemonium in a hydrogen nuclear explosion doesn't break the laws of physics. This means that everything is programmed to act the way it does, according to the laws of physics, through universal cause and effect... was programmed right at the Beginning - which entropy shows us there had to be... a beginning.
That which the evolutionists call evolution is something that can't exist, according to the laws of physics, the actions of which are carried out through cause and effect.
Certainly there is change in the universe. Obviously there is a lot of change that we don't understand... we don't know the cause and effect processes that made that change. But we don't need to think about evolution to understand how limited our C&E thinking is. All we need do is watch the way a leaf sways in the breeze, and realize that we have no way of tracking any of the molecules that make it move like it does, all according to cause and effect.
Evolution is just a game that evolutionists and some anthropologists use to make money. When you consider the swaying leaf, the real kind of evolution (whatever we might call it) isn't even important, and won't be until we can track the natural flow of individual atoms and molecules and heat waves much better.
Newton's 3rd Law essentially says C&E with a little more added.
The words "action" and reaction" in the 3rd Law are happening throughout the universe everywhere because there is nowhere in the universe where something is without motion.
Cause and effect is universal. This means that the supposed mutations of evolution have really been caused, rather than being actions without a cause. This changes the whole aspect of what evolution theory suggests evolution is. Evolution was started by whoever/whatever started cause and effect.
All cause and effect operates according to the laws of physics in the universe. Even the pandemonium in a hydrogen nuclear explosion doesn't break the laws of physics. This means that everything is programmed to act the way it does, according to the laws of physics, through universal cause and effect... was programmed right at the Beginning - which entropy shows us there had to be... a beginning.
That which the evolutionists call evolution is something that can't exist, according to the laws of physics, the actions of which are carried out through cause and effect.
Certainly there is change in the universe. Obviously there is a lot of change that we don't understand... we don't know the cause and effect processes that made that change. But we don't need to think about evolution to understand how limited our C&E thinking is. All we need do is watch the way a leaf sways in the breeze, and realize that we have no way of tracking any of the molecules that make it move like it does, all according to cause and effect.
Evolution is just a game that evolutionists and some anthropologists use to make money. When you consider the swaying leaf, the real kind of evolution (whatever we might call it) isn't even important, and won't be until we can track the natural flow of individual atoms and molecules and heat waves much better.
Unfortunately newtons 3rd law never states that everything has causes. I explained that in the other thread:
'It is sufficient to show that all the motions have causes, which is something that Newton proved with his 3rd law.'' No it's not. Where does newton 3rd law say that all motions have causes? You don't even know what the law says, do you? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. (FOR EVERY ACTION) meaning that IF there is an action or cause then there is a reaction or effect. Thats only IF not that everything has a cause, nowhere in the law it says that everything has a cause. You are a dishonest liar.
Still wrong.
Not only will you not find a motion in the universe that doesn't have a cause or that isn't a cause, even the idea of it is absurd. Ale there is, is cause and effect, action and reaction.
Ok since you are going to say the same thing over and over again I will try to make a final statement and if you don't agree with this either I don't think there is a point in continuing the conversation. The idea of everything having causes is just as absurd as something with no cause. Right now, quantum mechanics state that almost all quantum processes are random. This is not me claiming this like you, these are bright minds, far smarter than me and you together that ahve studied this for years and this is what they have come up with. Quantum theory is the best we have, do you understand that? All scientific theories are the best we have right now and I'm not claiming they are 100% true, no one is, when a better theory is known then we use that one but RIGHT NOW, quantum theory just like evolution theory is the best we have, whether you like it or not, it is the best. Can you show us the cause of those quantum processes like radioactive decay? If you can, go ahead, right a paper, get a nobel prize and you will be able to rewrite quantum theory but until you do that you have to accept it as it is. Period.
Edit: Also, can I prove to an 100% degree that there are things with no cause? No, can you prove that everything has a cause? No. What do we do? We do what science does, and this is why it works so well, we go with what we have and what we have is what the quantum theory says right now, that's the best we have just like evolution or gravity theories are the best and they work, they are useful, they are applied to many different things. We still don't know what exactly causes gravity but that doesn't stop us from being able to use it and being able to form a theory that tries to explain it as best as it can and maybe in the future something better will come and we will ditch gravity theory but right now it's the best we can.
You can't just come here and claim that everything has a cause when you have no proof to then say that your god has no cause because what? Because he is outside the universe? How do you even know that there can be something outside the universe? And if that's the case then many things could be outside the universe and have no cause, right? Maybe there are infinite things with no cause outside the universe, your claim, even if it were true, which again you don't know, just proposes far more questions for no reason.
Can such evidence exist at all?
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, you need to show us this proof. And not links to garbage, either.
Provide absolute proof your fairy tale is real and people will listen to you.
Perhaps you are simply blind.
You mean every person in the world is blind, because you can't show us this proof. :/
If I had meant that, I would have written it. But you can't seem to even be able to read what I wrote.
Ok - so can you show us this proof, or just bullshit more?
You can look when I show it to a sincere person who asks.
And you choose who is sincere? So in other words, you never need to provide proof - you just want people to blindly believe you - which is how religion propagates. :/
There is no scientific explanation or formulas that can assure the existent of God due to the reason that science deals with curtain standard, such as numbers and papers, they deal it on that way so that they can get the precise and specific answer, so how can they do it with God when the actions of God is very, miraculous and out of this galaxy
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, you need to show us this proof. And not links to garbage, either.
Provide absolute proof your fairy tale is real and people will listen to you.
Perhaps you are simply blind.
You mean every person in the world is blind, because you can't show us this proof. :/
If I had meant that, I would have written it. But you can't seem to even be able to read what I wrote.
Ok - so can you show us this proof, or just bullshit more?
You can look when I show it to a sincere person who asks.
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, you need to show us this proof. And not links to garbage, either.
Provide absolute proof your fairy tale is real and people will listen to you.
Perhaps you are simply blind.
You mean every person in the world is blind, because you can't show us this proof. :/
If I had meant that, I would have written it. But you can't seem to even be able to read what I wrote.
Ok - so can you show us this proof, or just bullshit more?
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, you need to show us this proof. And not links to garbage, either.
Provide absolute proof your fairy tale is real and people will listen to you.
Perhaps you are simply blind.
You mean every person in the world is blind, because you can't show us this proof. :/
If I had meant that, I would have written it. But you can't seem to even be able to read what I wrote.
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, you need to show us this proof. And not links to garbage, either.
Provide absolute proof your fairy tale is real and people will listen to you.
Perhaps you are simply blind.
You mean every person in the world is blind, because you can't show us this proof. :/
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, you need to show us this proof. And not links to garbage, either.
Provide absolute proof your fairy tale is real and people will listen to you.
Perhaps you are simply blind.
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, you need to show us this proof. And not links to garbage, either.
Provide absolute proof your fairy tale is real and people will listen to you.
Well, if you don't believe in Him, why do you talk about Him like He exists?
I don't. There is no proof of any sky fairy.
But you talk about Him like you believe. See your post at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.26937043.
Ok - you are confused. I will straighten it out for you.
I am intelligent and curious. As a result, I cannot believe in a fairy tale.
Anybody who doesn't understand the scientific proof for the existence of God enough to prove it isn't proof, is not as smart as he thinks he is.
Well, if you don't believe in Him, why do you talk about Him like He exists?
I don't. There is no proof of any sky fairy.
But you talk about Him like you believe. See your post at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.26937043.
Ok - you are confused. I will straighten it out for you.
I am intelligent and curious. As a result, I cannot believe in a fairy tale.
Well, if you don't believe in Him, why do you talk about Him like He exists?
I don't. There is no proof of any sky fairy.
But you talk about Him like you believe. See your post at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.26937043.
But nobody can explain it. So I really wouldn't expect you to be able to.
No one can explain how life evolved without evolution.
That is why it is accepted as fact.
And evolution can't explain how life evolved WITH evolution.
Evolution theory is a story without any proof, and with evidence that fits creation better than it fits evolution. But science has proven that God exists.
Well, if you don't believe in Him, why do you talk about Him like He exists?
I don't. There is no proof of any sky fairy.
But nobody can explain it. So I really wouldn't expect you to be able to.
No one can explain how life evolved without evolution.
That is why it is accepted as fact.
Not only will you not find a motion in the universe that doesn't have a cause or that isn't a cause, even the idea of it is absurd. Ale there is, is cause and effect, action and reaction.
What caused your god to poof! into existance?
Now all of a sudden you believe in God!
I don't believe in your god. You can't even tell me what caused him to be.
Well, if you don't believe in Him, why do you talk about Him like He exists?
Show and explain some piece of proof for evolution.
Dogs.
That's such a great explanation. LOL!
Thank you - not a single brainwashed fool has yet to dispute it as proof of evolution.
But nobody can explain it. So I really wouldn't expect you to be able to.
Jump to: