Pages:
Author

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 69. (Read 845654 times)

hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 29, 2017, 05:36:43 PM
Watch the scientists prove that the things of nature are machines. Machines have makers. God is the Maker of all things.

Progress to scalable Molecular Machines






This molecular robot can be programmed to stereoselectively produce, in a sequential one-pot operation, an excess of any one of four possible diastereoisomers from the addition of a thiol and an alkene to an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde in a tandem reaction process. The stereodivergent synthesis includes diastereoisomers that cannot be selectively synthesized through conventional iminium–enamine organocatalysis. They anticipate that future generations of programmable molecular machines may have significant roles in chemical synthesis and molecular manufacturing.

Depending on which side the substrate is held for each reaction, a different stereoisomer of the product is formed. The reaction sequences are carried out in one pot and the robot can be programmed to produce selectively each isomer of the product by controlling the switch-state prior to each reaction of the substrate. Each molecular robot manipulates a single substrate molecule, but the process is massively paralleled with more than a million trillion molecular robots operated simultaneously by the scientists.


Read more at https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/12/progress-to-scalable-molecular-machines.html.


Cool


But you never proved machines have makers, you can only prove that human made machines have human makers. Huh

Should I do that for you, now? Will you be able to take it?

Scientific topic, so, scientific proof, stated in the topic title.

Machines that have makers - millions.
Machines that don't have makers - unknown.

Millions:0

Scientifically proven.

Religion proven? - who knows?

Layman proven? - who knows?

Scientifically proven? - yes.

Cool

'' Machines that have makers - millions. ''

No, machines that have human makers - millions

Machines that don't have human makers and have others - unknown
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 29, 2017, 04:29:04 PM
Watch the scientists prove that the things of nature are machines. Machines have makers. God is the Maker of all things.

Progress to scalable Molecular Machines






This molecular robot can be programmed to stereoselectively produce, in a sequential one-pot operation, an excess of any one of four possible diastereoisomers from the addition of a thiol and an alkene to an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde in a tandem reaction process. The stereodivergent synthesis includes diastereoisomers that cannot be selectively synthesized through conventional iminium–enamine organocatalysis. They anticipate that future generations of programmable molecular machines may have significant roles in chemical synthesis and molecular manufacturing.

Depending on which side the substrate is held for each reaction, a different stereoisomer of the product is formed. The reaction sequences are carried out in one pot and the robot can be programmed to produce selectively each isomer of the product by controlling the switch-state prior to each reaction of the substrate. Each molecular robot manipulates a single substrate molecule, but the process is massively paralleled with more than a million trillion molecular robots operated simultaneously by the scientists.


Read more at https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/12/progress-to-scalable-molecular-machines.html.


Cool


But you never proved machines have makers, you can only prove that human made machines have human makers. Huh

Should I do that for you, now? Will you be able to take it?

Scientific topic, so, scientific proof, stated in the topic title.

Machines that have makers - millions.
Machines that don't have makers - unknown.

Millions:0

Scientifically proven.

Religion proven? - who knows?

Layman proven? - who knows?

Scientifically proven? - yes.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 29, 2017, 05:14:13 AM
Watch the scientists prove that the things of nature are machines. Machines have makers. God is the Maker of all things.

Progress to scalable Molecular Machines






This molecular robot can be programmed to stereoselectively produce, in a sequential one-pot operation, an excess of any one of four possible diastereoisomers from the addition of a thiol and an alkene to an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde in a tandem reaction process. The stereodivergent synthesis includes diastereoisomers that cannot be selectively synthesized through conventional iminium–enamine organocatalysis. They anticipate that future generations of programmable molecular machines may have significant roles in chemical synthesis and molecular manufacturing.

Depending on which side the substrate is held for each reaction, a different stereoisomer of the product is formed. The reaction sequences are carried out in one pot and the robot can be programmed to produce selectively each isomer of the product by controlling the switch-state prior to each reaction of the substrate. Each molecular robot manipulates a single substrate molecule, but the process is massively paralleled with more than a million trillion molecular robots operated simultaneously by the scientists.


Read more at https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/12/progress-to-scalable-molecular-machines.html.


Cool


But you never proved machines have makers, you can only prove that human made machines have human makers. Huh
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 28, 2017, 11:00:30 PM
Watch the scientists prove that the things of nature are machines. Machines have makers. God is the Maker of all things.

Progress to scalable Molecular Machines






This molecular robot can be programmed to stereoselectively produce, in a sequential one-pot operation, an excess of any one of four possible diastereoisomers from the addition of a thiol and an alkene to an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde in a tandem reaction process. The stereodivergent synthesis includes diastereoisomers that cannot be selectively synthesized through conventional iminium–enamine organocatalysis. They anticipate that future generations of programmable molecular machines may have significant roles in chemical synthesis and molecular manufacturing.

Depending on which side the substrate is held for each reaction, a different stereoisomer of the product is formed. The reaction sequences are carried out in one pot and the robot can be programmed to produce selectively each isomer of the product by controlling the switch-state prior to each reaction of the substrate. Each molecular robot manipulates a single substrate molecule, but the process is massively paralleled with more than a million trillion molecular robots operated simultaneously by the scientists.


Read more at https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/12/progress-to-scalable-molecular-machines.html.


Cool
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
December 28, 2017, 12:21:22 PM
What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

The existence of God is an incredible thing, but in every human being we have gods, God always watches us everywhere, always watching what we do and are wrong. No, I think being punished by God is real...
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 28, 2017, 12:07:04 PM
YES, GOD IS IT, MY PEOPLE MUSLIMS, AND I KNOW THE LORD IS THERE.
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
December 28, 2017, 09:45:55 AM
I believe that god exsists and he protect us to desctruction.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
December 28, 2017, 09:41:03 AM
there, you talk about god, I say god exists, and that is to my knowledge.

This is good, that people realize for one reason or another, that God exists.

Scientifically minded people have simply attempted to prove that God doesn't exist, through science. Often they don't realize that their science doesn't go far enough. That's why they think science has proven that God doesn't exist.

Keep up the good work, and remain in your faith. But if you can, please find some science that shows scientifically that God exists.

Cool
Well I think this is a big misunderstanding. Almost no one in science is actively trying to prove that God does not exist. The problem is that we know so much about the world already and have a very comprehensive theory of it and there is not God needed in these models. Which means even the God of the gaps can only be some god, quite different from what people think of, when they think of God.

Scientific theories is an important point. Scientific theories have little strength regarding what exists. They are only there to put forth ideas. The reason that they are not important regarding reality is, opposing theories can be made. In fact, this happens all the time.

If somebody wanted to make a literal scientific theory regarding God, that theory would destroy a whole bunch of other scientific theories, because it could be made to be way more logical. How? Anything that we didn't have an answer for could be attributed to God. A good portion of the reason why we have scientific theories is to get rid of God in our thinking, whether or not He is real.

Cool

I disagree with that for the following reasons:
Scientific theories do describe what exists so they have a very strong relation to reality. The important point is, that they describe observations and do not explain them in a sense that they answer "why" things are as they are.
A scientific theory of God is not really possible so far, since there are no observations that could be attributed to a God and since scientific theories do describe observations it is not really possible to make a scientific model of God. However, it is possible to point out where scientific knowledge opposes biblical or other religious viewpoints.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
December 28, 2017, 09:34:49 AM
Personally I have never seen such proofs or any other so I think there is no god!
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1756
Verified Bernie Bro - Feel The Bern!
December 28, 2017, 08:50:33 AM
What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

God exists only in our souls, there are many who believe that there is a god, for me it is not, I only believe in science, if science proves that God exists, then I will believe in it

You and several billion other people!!!

BADecker likes to make things up and pass them off as real!
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
December 28, 2017, 08:21:14 AM
What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

God exists only in our souls, there are many who believe that there is a god, for me it is not, I only believe in science, if science proves that God exists, then I will believe in it
member
Activity: 325
Merit: 10
December 28, 2017, 05:56:22 AM
What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html

There are many who believe in God, but for me God is not real because there is no practical scientific evidence that I believe that God exists.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 645
December 28, 2017, 05:43:06 AM
1) Everything has a cause. = Truth.

2) The Universe began to exist. = Truth.

3) Therefore, the Universe has a cause. = Truth. (except, maybe, the "therefore" part)

4) Conclusion: Therefore the cause behind the existence of the Universe was God = Truth. (except, maybe, the "therefore" part)


Cool

Can god create something from nothing?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
December 28, 2017, 04:57:35 AM
What do you think?
Please share your opinion about this article.


101 Proofs For God

A growing list of common sense Proofs for God.

Proof for God, #65 Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam

 Genetic scientists seem to be in general agreement that we are all descendants of one woman and one man. This research was fairly recent, starting about 1978. They, of course, do not believe in the creation story of Adam and Eve in the Bible, but their conclusions are getting closer and closer.

In case you have not heard about this, it makes very interesting reading. But I think it raises a number of profound challenges to the Theory of Evolution.

The scientists base the above conclusions on the known facts of human reproduction, specifically on properties of the sperm and egg. .....
Full article read here: http://101proofsforgod.blogspot.com/2014/07/65-mitochondial-eve-and-y-chromosome.html


I don't see the list to be accurate at all,  because these ain't sciencients ways of proving god existance.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 28, 2017, 04:55:44 AM
Same with the proof for God.

If you could provide proof of your god, we wouldn't need this thread.   

We debunked your proof, so you can keep mentioning it all you want - everyone knows it isn't true.

Cool

Im curious to know , do you believe in GOD ? in the almighty GOD ?

If someone could provide actual proof, EVERYONE would believe.

BD just keeps posting lies, and a debunked proof.  :/

If the so-called proof against God, or against the science that proves that God exists, was tweaked to focus on itself, it would prove that it wasn't accurate, as well. If you are looking to disprove science, that's the way to do it.

Cool
member
Activity: 135
Merit: 10
December 28, 2017, 01:55:03 AM
It seems like there's no scientific proof that God really exist.... but there's always the Bible in which you can refer that God really exist.
well trolled Grin
member
Activity: 135
Merit: 10
December 28, 2017, 01:54:18 AM
So far, it seems that there is no convincing scientific evidence that God exists.

You don't even need to read the entire thread.  Just read the last couple pages to see the mental stability of the one claiming he has proof.   Wink
exactly
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
December 27, 2017, 11:29:00 PM
OK guys you really made your points very well.
Thank you.
Still, I tend to agree with this blog author that either there is not much proofs for Darwin's theory as well.
It seems that Darwin's theory is the most logic but still the are some ''holes'' and unproven facts in this theory, isn't it?
member
Activity: 247
Merit: 10
December 27, 2017, 11:20:38 PM
It seems like there's no scientific proof that God really exist.... but there's always the Bible in which you can refer that God really exist.
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
December 27, 2017, 11:08:49 PM
Sure, there is no way to prove god doesn't exist; but if we can continually make progress in our quest for knowledge without such a concept, why bother with it?
Pages:
Jump to: