More scientific proof that God exists:
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23796852
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KP1vWkQ6Y
3. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html
4. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/
1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23796852
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KP1vWkQ6Y
3. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html
4. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/
The consensus response is that Gödel's incompleteness theorem applies only to axiomatic formal systems (e.g. mathematics). Theology is not a formal system.
Therefore, Gödel's incompleteness theorem cannot be applied to theology.
Of course religious people would apply it because that's what you do with every single ''proof'' of god which always turns out to be false.
Any rebuttal to Gödel's incompleteness theorem essentially nullifies all science. What does that leave us with? Religion... and God.
I don't know if you have reading comprehension problems,
I didn't say anything about any rebuttals.
Ah! You recognize a little of what you didn't say! Good work.I said that you cannot apply godel's theorem to theology.
Ah! You recognize a little of what you DID say. Good work.
Perhaps sometime you will move on to even greater work, by recognizing that, "Any rebuttal to Gödel's incompleteness theorem essentially nullifies all science."
Could be true yet my point has nothing to do with the godel's theorem being wrong or right, my point was about applying the theorem to theology which is just not possible. You have had this kind of problem before with entropy, applying it incorrectly because you didn't know the definition.
