Topic: [self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source - page 33. (Read 53253 times)

Topics I prepared for beginners in the Turkish section.

What is Quality Writing?
Description : Suggestions that I think may be useful to new members
Category : {guide, opinion}
Section :

Forum Jargon / Crypto Terminology / Blockchain Glossary
Category : {Glossary}
Section :

Bitcoin Whitepaper - Year 11 - Articles and Comments in Turkish
Section :

[Guide] What is a Signature Campaign / Terms / Selection
Category : {guide}
Section :

What is Quality Writing?
Description : Suggestions that I think may be useful to new members
Category : {guide, opinion}
Section :

Don't want to poop on this thread again, but I'd just like to say that you could also PM me a link to your posts that you think might deserve merits as long as they're in English.  I don't often check this thread, and it looks like the last list of posts are all in Russian. 

Anyway, it's no bother to me if you or anyone else PMs me with links.  I'll be happy to check them out, and if they're merit-worthy I'll give them merits.  If not, I won't.  It can't hurt, right?

Yes.

Can i post  my own posts here too if i think it is left unmerited despite being good ?

Hello,

After being encouraged by LoyceV, I decided to mention here 1 post of mine.

"The Satoshi Revolution", by Wendy McElroy, translated in Romanian
Description : after working more than 1 year, I could proudly present the book, fully translated in Romanian, with the writer's approval and encouragement do so
Category : crypto literature
Section : Local > Română (Romanian) > Presa

Regarding
I tried to assure myself I won't break any rule by posting this here, this is why I asked LoyceV first, and I was told to try and see what happens.
I understood there shouldn't be "a translation of another topic or website", and my post is not a translation of a topic, nor of a website, but it is indeed a translation. But it is a translation of a book. Considering the extremely low amount of Romanian crypto literature (either with Romanian authors or just foreign books translations) which, as far as I know, it is 0 (ZERO), I think this book may help a lot of Romanians, in case they decide to read it, to understand the real nature of Bitcoin and private money. The lack of technical writing, together with the crypto-anarchic ideas expressed by the author will help any reader to understand the principles behind Bitcoin.

Thank you.

Correct link is https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dikkat-ctrl-c-ctrl-v-ile-coinlerinizi-nasl-kaybedersiniz-5196316

correct the post, you have the same links


DeFi - ETH Financial Ecosystem (September 2019)
Category : article
Section : Altcoin Discussion
User: zasad@

📖 🌟 Trader's Golden Rules Book 📖 🌟
Description : I will share my experiences, my slogans and rules.
Category : trading, guide,

Dikkat: CTRL-C CTRL-V ile Coinlerinizi Nasıl Kaybedersiniz?  
Description : "How to lose your Bitcoins with CTRL-C CTRL-V" I translated @LoyceV topic into Turkish.
Category :  Beginners & Help

Did you know bitcoin uses 6 different ways to represent integers
Category : article
Section : Bitcoin
User: zasad@

The Stock To Flow Model: Modeling Bitcoin Value Based on Their Deficit
Category : article
Section : Bitcoin
User: zasad@

Bitcoin and Mises Regression Theorem
Category : article
Section : Bitcoin
User: zasad@

Bitcoin Governance
Category : article
Section : Bitcoin
User: zasad@

Some strong political and historical insights on this message by Carlton Banks, I'm out of merits at the moment so sharing it here for your consideration:

Category: Other / Politics & Society
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52763525

I waited to see how the campaign goes under yahoo for a few days. Then I decided to go for it because of their pay per post system without any minimum requirement. It has been almost a year since I got into any signature campaign for longer than a week because almost all of them need you to be active in Gambling, which I am not and which I have not been able to will myself to despite trying.

So even though, i'd consider myself a non-spammer, I decided to wear the signature. A lot of people give the "Money on the table" argument and after much consternation, i decided to give up too. In my defense, this time around, this campaign is for another forum. Would this be considered counter-marketing? If we consider it to be a competition on forum hegemony then probably, but in the wider interest of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, having another widely used forum shouldn't be all that bad.

Senior members who ranked up with merit have now become a dime a dozen..lol..I think I was among the relatively quicker ones to reach Senior. It has been uphill since. I wish more people followed Theymos' advice though.

Don't worry about it

I still have 400+ sMerit to give to worthy users.

Lol

You are absolutely right, I didn't even think for a moment that this post can be taken that way  .

Sorry, but truly that wasn't what I was thinking of when I was writing this post.

Thank you very much Loycev for support, this is so far the biggest amount of merits I got in one time from a single member.

Of course, I do my best to spread these merits to other quality posters.

PS
Funny thing because first I saw was the first sentence of your comment, which starts a little scary and just after I turned my eyes into merits, where I have seen a significant change and first I thought, that there is something on the screen and tried to wipe it out with my finger but luckily couldn't  . Not only to wipe out but also to believe what I see.

Yeah, you make a big smile on my face with this rain of merits. Thanks again Loycev.

Merit "begging" from someone who isn't a spammer? I approve!
But there's a risk: with "Merit: 932" (by now "Merit: 972"), you're one of the few obvious non-spammers wearing the CryptoTalk signature. If you reach 1000 Merit, you'll look like a spammer who didn't earn any Merit.

Can I ask you to do this same for me?

I am very close to the Legendary rank and from almost 7 years with this account on Bitcointalk because my first one was hacked after over a year of use when passwords leaked for the first time.

I will say honestly and completely immodestly, that in my opinion, all of my posts deserve to be merited at least with one merit (maybe without those in sections like Games and Rounds, etc.) because from the time when merit system was introduced I promised myself to never spam again (even with a single post) and I think, that I fulfilled my promise. I think, that I have enough knowledge about BTC, forum, cryptocurrencies as a whole and constantly keep learning something new every day. Especially, because I am frequently very active on the forum.

I try to avoid mega spam threads and am not listed on any of your lists with megathreads spammers. Constantly keep helping other members, answer questions and provide suggestions.
Do my best to encourage people to discussions and frequently start new, not (already) reviewed threads, which I find sometimes not so easy to do, taking into consideration how big the number of published articles on Bitcointalk during all these years is.

In our local section, we have agreed to not merit ourselves anymore (despite we have exchanged only max 50 merits during the time) because our local is small and we want to avoid to be accused of merits exchange. From 600 merits disturbed monthly in our local section, we go down (like alts  ) to 60 in a month and the amounts are still dropping very quickly. Because of this, there are a lot of very good posts without single merit. I am sure that with Google translator everybody will be able to understand these posts. I try to publish equal amounts of posts on local boards and in English sections, it is easy to find my posts that don't need to be translated if this is a problem.

I will be very happy if you will be so kind to evaluate my account on the quality level, accept my profile and recommend to merit sources or simply reject me if you will find a single spammy post in the last 2 years of my post history.

Coins.ph Official Thread
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas
User: harizen

Coins.ph Official Thread
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas
User: harizen

Coins.ph Official Thread
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas
User: jhenfelipe

Coins.ph Official Thread
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas
User: harizen

Re: [DISCUSSION] Posting Interval at Burst Posting
Category: Useful Answer
Section: Pilipinas
User: cabalism13

[DISCUSSION] Learn about Patent and Intellectual Property. /BITCOIN/
Category: Educational
Section: Pilipinas
User: finaleshot2016

---

I’d like to add mine as well
   
Re: Question for coins.ph account owners
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Re: LENDING SECTION HERE (Funds Available - BTC0.0475) Wanted Borrowers!
Category: Useful Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Re: LENDING SECTION HERE (Funds Available - BTC0.0475) Wanted Borrowers!
Category: Useful Answer
Section:  Pilipinas

Re: [DISCUSSION] Lightning Network Explained by finaleshot2016. ⚡
Category: Useful Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Coins.ph Official Thread
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Coins.ph Official Thread
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Re: [DISCUSSION] Candidate for the next Merit Source.
Category: Useful Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Re: [DISCUSSION] Candidate for the next Merit Source.
Category: Useful Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Re: Best way BTC>PHP?
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Re: [Paliwanag] Kahalagahan ng Custom Trust List
Category: Useful Answer
Section: Pilipinas

Coins.ph Official Thread
Category: Technical Answer
Section: Pilipinas

My rarely weekly updates topic
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/updated-oct-29-pilipinas-smerit-distribution-summary-5169636
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/stats-local-board-pilipinas-statistics-center-updated-10042019-5150375

Russian Local board

BTC futures on BUKKIT and CME exchanges.
Category : guide
Section : Trading
User: zasad@

Timejacking and Bitcoin  
Category : article
Section : Bitcoin Discussion
User: zasad@

Cypherpunk and their role in bitcoin creation  
Category : article
Section : Bitcoin Discussion
User: zasad@

I believe, the following topics, made by me, deserve merit...

September 01, 2015: How do I create raw Tx using PHP ?

May 31, 2016: How random the last digit of a block hash really is?

July 31, 2016: How secure is this process to generate an address offline?

August 18, 2016: Are multisig addresses generated by same private key set secure?

January 28, 2019: Can we convert a HEX private key to RSA private key?

Since it's my topic, I think I can bend the rules a bit I stumbled upon MrFreeDragon, who created his account last month.
I think he's one of the rare knowledgeable new users who should not be restricted by the Merit system, but deserves to Rank up as quickly as Activity allows. So, please just check his post history.

Fixed. I forgot to edit the link from the sample format. Sorry about that.