Topic: Share trusted VPN Friendly crypto casinos - page 5. (Read 3964 times)

Well, you've already added the first question I would have asked you which is about the ISP you are using, it could be problematic at times with no definitive suspicion to the issue, still, I urge you to observe it for more days to be able to conclude on it. The second question is whether you've tested the same internet connection and VPN on similar platforms like the casino. Because, at times, some programs behave differently on our gadgets in relation to some platforms, especially when we just upgraded them.

Lastly, you might want to contact your VPN provider and/or casino if the issue persists after several efforts to resolve it. I am sure they will have one or two to say. In my view though, I don't think casinos will deliberately slow down your VPN, they will rather warn you or block the account if they do not allow it.

All VPNs are going to somewhat slow the speed of your connection to any site because that is how the system works and it requires firstly a greater amount of data transfer from point to point and it requires the computing effort of deciphering the encrypted point to point messaging.

Sites have to have the right resources to accept VPN traffic and somehow understand this is more expensive and has to make business sense.

Would it be possible to try it without VPN so you can compare the speeds? or with another VPN if not possible-- for instance, I've gotten decent speeds even with windscribe free servers in the past.


Keep in mind that playing with a VPN in stake.com is against their terms of service. In general, VPNs can be a hit or miss and there are def cases of players getting away with it despite being prohibited in a particular platform though personally, I'd rather not risk it as it's likely there are repercussion/s once caught unless you can bear such risk.

i used to play on stake.com with vpn it worked

I understand that some casinos may set the connection speed to slow down in cases where the client is accessing via a VPN.  But to slow down the VPN, of course, the sites responding to you can use other methods, for example, slowing down or completely denying access to both your communication service provider and the input filters of the site itself where you want to enter.  So the reason can be varied. 

By the way, I would like to read in this topic about real cases of users of gambling sites and online casinos when they had difficulties using a VPN.  Especially, of course, if this somehow significantly influenced the most important issue for any player about withdrawing the money they have won to their wallet.

Has anyone used Mullvad to access gambling websites nowadays? I feel like my speed has gone down significantly in the last few days or so even though I've changed servers many times. Not sure if this is exclusive to gambling websites or not since I can't reproduce it consistently, which is a bit weird considering nothing changed on my end. My ISP also shows no signs of problems, although I'm not confident with their stats at all.

If we reason a little based on the postulates of the general psychology of a person and a gambler as well, of course, then it should be stated that any person has committed some kind of action in relation to other people or to various services, or even to the state as a whole, always wonders:  In this case, should I introduce myself completely, or is it better to remain anonymous. 
And you will be surprised to discover that in many cases a person will choose to remain anonymous.  This desire of his may be caused by fear and modesty and a number of other individual reasons.  And this behavior and personal choice is an integral part of individual freedom.  Thus, if we talk about VPN in a broad sense, it turns out that this is simply the implementation on the Internet of such a basic human need to maintain anonymity and realize one’s own desire to introduce oneself to a person or not. 
And the fact that the option of VPN communications with services is sometimes prohibited by a number of business structures, this, of course, can be considered a violation of human rights in their classical sense.

You're right, its not everyone making the use of VPN that stand the chance of making cheat on the gambling platform, however, we also need to consider one thing that the gambling platforms will always detect for any of these if used don their platform in case of any attempt to bridge on their security, now its something we can assume from the gamblers end that we are not using VPN to cheat but the platform may see such as a threat from us trying to do so, now how to we make the balance or create an establishment on these two facts and be justified.

You have a very good point and if I started stating the reasons why gamblers might need to use VPN, I might still be numbering 7 or so. Can we now say those gamblers with varied reasons why they use it are not for any good but to cheat the casinos? Definitely No. Each case has to be treated differently. What I see here is that most casinos are overbearing about this, the excesses are too much. Some are not even stating it in their terms and conditions but will enforce it nonetheless, these are not just fair.

What I realise is that they've seen it as a means to cheat their customers to make more money unquestioned, so they often use it whether it is done ignorantly by the customer or not, which is bad. This is also happening elsewhere and let me use Binance for an example, initially, if you use a VPN with them, you are free, but now, if you use it, your account could be banned immediately. Why is still so difficult for them if not for using the opportunity to confiscate people's money?

Till today with my traditional forex brokers, they do not care about the use of the VPN, do you know why? They have been in the business for so long and since it was well-planned and strictly regulated, they tread carefully. This is not the same with exchanges and casinos, this is why they are doing as they like. However, as it is now, their customers are just like voiceless people at their mercy, so it is better we avoid the use of VPN and stop claiming fairness with them which will never get us anywhere since they are the Boss, except for a few among them who just have integrity.

It is not flawed my friend but a well-thought-out point. Fine, Windows Defender and others from other operating systems can be viable, but I've seen many flaws when researching them. Needless to say, good anti-virus these days do more than the work of antivirus as the name denotes but also have the function of VPN and many more. Some will be light in such a way that the casino will know it is an antivirus, but will protect your identity which could be the reason why some people are using VPN, even if they do not want to use the VPN for obvious reasons.

Wait a minute, if we are sincere to ourselves, you who are using a VPN to secure your identity with a casino but have registered and completed the KYC with, what are you still securing? In this case, no need to protect who you are from them with a VPN anymore. Thus, the antivirus can do the remaining protection for you if need be to avoid the VPN issue with the casino.

In general, clients of cryptocurrency casinos may have a huge number of reasons why they are forced to use a VPN.  The reasons may, in a large number of cases, not even be that the person himself, the player, seeks to maintain his confidentiality.  Often, many casino clients simply cannot access the casino website at all without using a VPN for reasons of a general political nature.  At the same time, the player does not even have the goal of keeping his identity a secret.  So it is worth taking into account the interests of such players.  And it would be right for the casino not to be too strict about the use of VPN by players.  As I understand it, most casinos do just that. 
And in any case, a strict ban on the use of VPNs immediately and significantly reduces the number of casino players who decide to restrict entry to their site by prohibiting the use of VPNs.

I think the comparison is a bit flawed since the nature of those things is quite different. Not to mention everyone values their money and what things to buy differently. If you use Windows buying anti-virus software is a bit redundant since Windows Defender is quite effective, though discussing this further would probably derail the thread. But I agree that you should not use a VPN if the website states they don't allow it in the first place. I'm pretty sure this is probably my third or fourth time saying the same thing in this thread.

of course, there are a large number of gambling sites which allow users from my region. I have an account on many of them from before and everything still works without problems or the need for a VPN.
That's not a problem, I'm just used to Sportsbet in many ways, so I'm a little bit sad to have to leave them. 

There's always a chance gambling platforms could be lenient in some cases. IIRC, I even saw a platform who let a player-- from a prohibited place-- kept his winnings. But if the platform ends up going with their fine print, I don't think communities would back you in order to get your winnings.

I'm not sure if @examplens has any other alternative gambling platforms that allows their place to play on, though. If you're okay with telling us your country, maybe some folks may know a one or two casino/sportsbook @examplens.


I'm not familiar TBH.

But if you mean going after them through legal means, I doubt most gambling platforms would risk their resources unless we're talking about life changing amounts.

I think this clause could be of use on cases where the player has withdrawn more than their balance hence it would nullify what the casino owed to the caught player -- their balance. 🤔 Honestly speaking, such players would probably not return lol.

You quite make a whole lot of sense, but all the same, the best way to go about this is to avoid using VPN entirely. The gambles who who are not using any VPN are still being alleged of multiple accounts talkless of the person with the VPN. What you said is good and if it is a good VPN that you uniquely paid for the IP with a verifiable location and that no one will use it apart from you, it is fine. But still, in casinos even if you are not discovered as a customer with multiple accounts, they still have their means to try to detect it's a VPN and could be a serious issue.

For me, I would rather like to spend more money on the installation of a very good anti-virus with multiple protection purposes than risk using a VPN with casinos. This is especially risky if they clearly state in their terms and conditions that they forbid it. Is that not looking for trouble? Using my local IP anywhere I go in the world puts my mind at rest, and with anti-virus, I am secured pretty fine, which was what I was looking for with a VPN.

This is quite scary if the casinos would really pursue it, but I doubt they will unless the amount involved is too significant to resist.

Some casinos might even forfeit all your balance, but it's good that Sportsbet's policy states they'll return the money, which I presume is the amount you deposited. But honestly, I'm quite confused. If you have been using a VPN to evade the ban from your country and you keep winning, has it ever happened in a real situation where a casino goes after the gambler to enforce this rule?

Yeah, I'm probably better off staying away from them.
I will ask again through their partner page, but there is probably nothing to do with cooperation with them. 

I myself have not read such articles, but simply heard from technical specialists about various methods of filtering traffic.  And of course, I have no doubt that the methods can be varied, including those that the developers may consider innovative and, therefore, classified.  And of course, in accordance with the fashionable tradition of the present time, AI will definitely be involved here. 

As for information about which casinos make it really difficult for users to play when they use a VPN to access their site  then this is really valuable information for other players.  Therefore, I would like the players who have suffered from such requirements to write here in the topic what happened during contacts with support and in the case when the player is forced to use a VPN.  But as we previously argued, it turned out that, speaking strictly according to the law, in any case, playing in a casino via a VPN is still a violation of the current rules.  It turns out that this is so.     

My general advise is, if you're from a prohibited region you either have to give up or bear the risk. They typically tell you what happens when you get caught, on their TOS.

This is what's on sportsbet, BTW

Does anyone have any experience with Sportsbet.io and VPN access?

I already have a partner account with them, but for that, you also need a player account. In the meantime, the region where I come from is no longer acceptable at Sportsbet (and several other casinos). Now I don't know if I should continue with the account via VPN or give up everything related to Sportsbet.