Also, it's always better to use VPN with dedicated IP to not get in trouble with false claim of having multiple accounts.
Make sure to double-check if the dedicated IP is really dedicated or not. I remember using a VPN that claims they offer dedicated IP but later found out that they simply limit the registered user's access to that IP depending on their plan. So essentially some people still share the same IP, just goes from 1000 users to 100 or lower. Not sure if this is the norm for cheap VPNs, or that VPN is just terrible.
Topic: Share trusted VPN Friendly crypto casinos - page 7. (Read 2336 times)
Also, it's always better to use VPN with dedicated IP to not get in trouble with false claim of having multiple accounts.
Make sure to double-check if the dedicated IP is really dedicated or not. I remember using a VPN that claims they offer dedicated IP but later found out that they simply limit the registered user's access to that IP depending on their plan. So essentially some people still share the same IP, just goes from 1000 users to 100 or lower. Not sure if this is the norm for cheap VPNs, or that VPN is just terrible.
I don't know why some gamblers oftentimes like the use of VPN if not for something fishy that they may want to perform in which no one knows about than themselves alone, so many crypto gambling casinos go against such, because allowing for it may render them to any form of attack some fraudulent gamblers may launch against their system and such could be to escape the security measures and attack.
There's nothing wrong with using a VPN, we are in the crypto world and the main thing it promotes is privacy. VPN is just one thing that will add privacy to what we are doing online, and I like to also say this, I don't know why people think that using a VPN is an automatic violation to the TOS of a gambling site. I guess we need to read first their TOS and decide whether we will use a VPN or not. If it's written that "Using VPN will result to account closure", then that's automatic a no for using a VPN, however if it goes like this "using VPN to bypass casino restrictions", then be wary that anytime the account could be block since you are attempting to break the TOS which the casino has the right to implement their rules.
You're right and i got your own scope of view as well, what should be done as expected from every gambler is to take time in reading through the ToS of the gambling platform and see if such permits for the use of VPN or not, of which i know that many of them do not, also we may need to go for our privacy demands while gambling, but not when we are seeking for privacy where none is permitted as in the case of a kyc gambling casino and if you make use of VPN then you have gone against their rules, the best one can do is in looking for the one that does not require kyc.
in regarding to this because usually i do see that every platform would really be having a different set of countries on which they are really that prohibited and shouldnt really be accessed
by users who do reside such country on which it would really be normal that they would really be making out those restrictions.
On the time that someone would really be accessing it via VPN then this is a breach of rules or simply a violation and on the time that they would be locking up the account
then there's nothing you can do since its been stated on the rules. There's no way that you could really be able to have those appeal once you've been caught.
I don't know why some gamblers oftentimes like the use of VPN if not for something fishy that they may want to perform in which no one knows about than themselves alone, so many crypto gambling casinos go against such, because allowing for it may render them to any form of attack some fraudulent gamblers may launch against their system and such could be to escape the security measures and attack.
There's nothing wrong with using a VPN, we are in the crypto world and the main thing it promotes is privacy. VPN is just one thing that will add privacy to what we are doing online, and I like to also say this, I don't know why people think that using a VPN is an automatic violation to the TOS of a gambling site. I guess we need to read first their TOS and decide whether we will use a VPN or not. If it's written that "Using VPN will result to account closure", then that's automatic a no for using a VPN, however if it goes like this "using VPN to bypass casino restrictions", then be wary that anytime the account could be block since you are attempting to break the TOS which the casino has the right to implement their rules.
You're right and i got your own scope of view as well, what should be done as expected from every gambler is to take time in reading through the ToS of the gambling platform and see if such permits for the use of VPN or not, of which i know that many of them do not, also we may need to go for our privacy demands while gambling, but not when we are seeking for privacy where none is permitted as in the case of a kyc gambling casino and if you make use of VPN then you have gone against their rules, the best one can do is in looking for the one that does not require kyc.
Also, it's always better to use VPN with dedicated IP to not get in trouble with false claim of having multiple accounts.
Make sure to double-check if the dedicated IP is really dedicated or not. I remember using a VPN that claims they offer dedicated IP but later found out that they simply limit the registered user's access to that IP depending on their plan. So essentially some people still share the same IP, just goes from 1000 users to 100 or lower. Not sure if this is the norm for cheap VPNs, or that VPN is just terrible.Why would we talk about "not being able to withdraw"? Does it automatically means that when you use VPN you lose your balance in the casino?
I believe that's the risk you need to accept if you decide to do that, especially if a casino explicitly bans VPN. If they are friendly to it, the worst case scenario is they ask for personal details if you make it big as mentioned above, so it is better to be prepared from the beginning. CMIIW. 
There's nothing wrong with using a VPN, we are in the crypto world and the main thing it promotes is privacy. VPN is just one thing that will add privacy to what we are doing online, and I like to also say this, I don't know why people think that using a VPN is an automatic violation to the TOS of a gambling site.
How exactly privacy is matter when you're gamble on a centralized casino? sooner or later they will ask your KYC, when they know your KYC, it means you have no privacy anymore. You can do anything, but they already hold your identity.That's what I meant......
VPN could increase your privacy if you're nothing to lose gambler i.e. someone who can accept to not withdraw the winnings regardless how small or big the money, because you value your privacy more than your winnings.
Why would we talk about "not being able to withdraw"? Does it automatically means that when you use VPN you lose your balance in the casino?
This is the exact reason why most casinos do not tolerate the use of VPNs. You were lucky that they didn't lock your account and confiscate your money.
Using VPNs isn't supposed to be a problem if done for legitimate purposes such as increasing privacy and/or security. The problem is that most gamblers do it to circumvent restrictions or abuse bonuses.. So casinos just ban it to avoid unnecessary headaches.
I'm not sure about that, sometimes third party providers are blocking locations with no reason while the casino using them allow people from this location to fully register and play there, that's boring and unfair for those customers, so using VPNs let them circumvent those illegitimate restrictions from faddy providers. I'm not aware of a reputed casino having banned or even warned a customer doing that. In addition, in most countries people are free to use VPNs as they want, especially for their privacy like you said, so people are free to not willing to share their IP addresses with such tedious providers.Using VPNs isn't supposed to be a problem if done for legitimate purposes such as increasing privacy and/or security. The problem is that most gamblers do it to circumvent restrictions or abuse bonuses.. So casinos just ban it to avoid unnecessary headaches.
Some casinos allow customers to use VPN for protecting their privacy and hiding their activity from their ISP. It's prohibited to use VPN for bypassing country restrictions and for abusing promotions. Also, it's always better to use VPN with dedicated IP to not get in trouble with false claim of having multiple accounts.
There's nothing wrong with using a VPN, we are in the crypto world and the main thing it promotes is privacy. VPN is just one thing that will add privacy to what we are doing online, and I like to also say this, I don't know why people think that using a VPN is an automatic violation to the TOS of a gambling site.
How exactly privacy is matter when you're gamble on a centralized casino? sooner or later they will ask your KYC, when they know your KYC, it means you have no privacy anymore. You can do anything, but they already hold your identity.VPN could increase your privacy if you're nothing to lose gambler i.e. someone who can accept to not withdraw the winnings regardless how small or big the money, because you value your privacy more than your winnings.
I don't know why some gamblers oftentimes like the use of VPN if not for something fishy that they may want to perform in which no one knows about than themselves alone, so many crypto gambling casinos go against such, because allowing for it may render them to any form of attack some fraudulent gamblers may launch against their system and such could be to escape the security measures and attack.
Probably with the belief that it masks their identity when they literally haven't even used any kind of software besides the VPN that's the equivalent of script kiddies saying they can hack your account because they can install a keylogger in your computer. Another thing that I can think why it's a thing is probably because of the belief that the Internet is much faster on the other countries when that's not the case. Maybe some people just don't love the idea that they're gambling in their country and that they want to mask it or that it's such a good time to play in that casino that you just have to bypass the restrictions to get there, or the worse one, they're using gambling as a means to launder money, if the casino is blocked in their country then there's no way that they're playing there so the money sent to them from that blocked casino must be a mistake.
I don't know why some gamblers oftentimes like the use of VPN if not for something fishy that they may want to perform in which no one knows about than themselves alone, so many crypto gambling casinos go against such, because allowing for it may render them to any form of attack some fraudulent gamblers may launch against their system and such could be to escape the security measures and attack.
Probably with the belief that it masks their identity when they literally haven't even used any kind of software besides the VPN that's the equivalent of script kiddies saying they can hack your account because they can install a keylogger in your computer. Another thing that I can think why it's a thing is probably because of the belief that the Internet is much faster on the other countries when that's not the case. Maybe some people just don't love the idea that they're gambling in their country and that they want to mask it or that it's such a good time to play in that casino that you just have to bypass the restrictions to get there, or the worse one, they're using gambling as a means to launder money, if the casino is blocked in their country then there's no way that they're playing there so the money sent to them from that blocked casino must be a mistake. 
I've experienced in some casinos such as duelbits, rollbits and stake. FYI, some providers are not available to be played from my country due to mentioned reason above and I used VPN to play the games from those providers. In fact, there is no issue at all by bypassing the restrictions from the providers.
I believe you but am sure you agree with me that this doesn't make sense and things shouldn't work this way, right!Because if it was OK to bypass restrictions (using VPNs or any other mean) then why have the restriction in first place. It doesn't make sense, right!
I'll leave here few quotes from the ToS of the casino's you mentioned:
Stake:
Quote from: https://stake.com/policies/terms
Also, certain third party product providers may require You to agree to additional terms and conditions governing the use of their products that are available on or through the Website. If You do not accept those third party terms and conditions, do not use the relevant third party software. Stake does not accept any liability in respect of any third party software.
Rollbit and duelbits (have almost the same tos):Quote from: https://rollbit.com/terms-and-conditions
The Company has no control over, and assumes no responsibility for, the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third party web sites or services. You further acknowledge and agree that the Company shall not be responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss..
I don't know why some gamblers oftentimes like the use of VPN if not for something fishy that they may want to perform in which no one knows about than themselves alone, so many crypto gambling casinos go against such, because allowing for it may render them to any form of attack some fraudulent gamblers may launch against their system and such could be to escape the security measures and attack.
There's nothing wrong with using a VPN, we are in the crypto world and the main thing it promotes is privacy. VPN is just one thing that will add privacy to what we are doing online, and I like to also say this, I don't know why people think that using a VPN is an automatic violation to the TOS of a gambling site. I guess we need to read first their TOS and decide whether we will use a VPN or not. If it's written that "Using VPN will result to account closure", then that's automatic a no for using a VPN, however if it goes like this "using VPN to bypass casino restrictions", then be wary that anytime the account could be block since you are attempting to break the TOS which the casino has the right to implement their rules.
I don't know why some gamblers oftentimes like the use of VPN if not for something fishy that they may want to perform in which no one knows about than themselves alone, so many crypto gambling casinos go against such, because allowing for it may render them to any form of attack some fraudulent gamblers may launch against their system and such could be to escape the security measures and attack.
I'm not sure about that, sometimes third party providers are blocking locations with no reason while the casino using them allow people from this location to fully register and play there, that's boring and unfair for those customers, so using VPNs let them circumvent those illegitimate restrictions from faddy providers. I'm not aware of a reputed casino having banned or even warned a customer doing that.
I have to disagree. Casinos have to comply with their game providers' own terms and have to enforce those terms on their customers.If a game provider prohibits players from a certain country from playing some of their games then using a VPN to circumvent this restriction is automatically a breach of the casino's rules and you may get banned because of it.
If you read casinos ToS, you will see that they state which countries are prohibited from using all their services alongside with countries prohibited from playing certain games according to game providers terms.
I've experienced in some casinos such as duelbits, rollbits and stake. FYI, some providers are not available to be played from my country due to mentioned reason above and I used VPN to play the games from those providers. In fact, there is no issue at all by bypassing the restrictions from the providers. Interesting fact, there are even some casinos that have a system to make the game by providers can be played without restriction from the providers. In the past, when I could not play Push Gaming and Relax Gaming in most casinos but there is one casino namely chips.gg where I can play them without VPN. I have even asked support from few casinos about it and most of them said that it is fine to use VPN to bypass the restriction by providers but not to bypass the restriction by the casino's general term.
I'm not sure about that, sometimes third party providers are blocking locations with no reason while the casino using them allow people from this location to fully register and play there, that's boring and unfair for those customers, so using VPNs let them circumvent those illegitimate restrictions from faddy providers. I'm not aware of a reputed casino having banned or even warned a customer doing that.
I have to disagree. Casinos have to comply with their game providers' own terms and have to enforce those terms on their customers.If a game provider prohibits players from a certain country from playing some of their games then using a VPN to circumvent this restriction is automatically a breach of the casino's rules and you may get banned because of it.
If you read casinos ToS, you will see that they state which countries are prohibited from using all their services alongside with countries prohibited from playing certain games according to game providers terms.
But I think that the gain from such total de-anonymization is not too great. But the loss of anonymity is theoretically a huge violation of the human right to privacy, which, of course, cannot be completely ignored by the legislators of a civilized country. Therefore, I still have hope that the issue of the absolute legality of anonymous payments in cryptocurrencies will still be resolved somehow.
Well, I guess it is a matter of perspective then. I think you put too much credit on the government, most of them don't care about users' privacy unless they can utilize the same thing that privacy enthusiasts are looking for such as TOR. With the gambling business, or crypto payments that you mentioned above, their priority by nature is different. Most businesses would either follow the requirement, or try to launch overseas where they can also stay anonymous, but then it will be problematic for the users if they decide to scam and so on. At the end of the day, I believe the cost to maintain and filter out people who abuse VPN probably isn't worth the cost, especially if the market for privacy-enthusiast gamblers is small (this is not about allowing payments in crypto to begin with). Even if the government somehow mandates businesses to accept VPN users', I'm pretty sure it will come with other KYC tools in hand. CMIIW.But we should all pay attention that among the flow of information from legislators, those who determine the functioning of financial systems in the world, some progressive positive applause still comes. For example, I know that a group of congressmen is strongly opposed to the introduction of a digital dollar. And it is quite possible that the introduction of such a CBDC will still be postponed for some time. The option of cash (that is, involving anonymous payments) circulation of dollars in some countries, for example, El Salvador, Ecuador or Panama, is also retained. Legislation on personal data and its preservation has also been adopted. In Europe this is a Decree called "GDPD".
There are laws regarding a person's right to privacy.
So the issue of anonymity still faces legislators and they will somehow resolve it.
But everything fundamentally depends on the general vector of development of civilization. For now, this vector is directed and does not go in the direction that the masses of people want.
Unfortunately.
But I think that the gain from such total de-anonymization is not too great. But the loss of anonymity is theoretically a huge violation of the human right to privacy, which, of course, cannot be completely ignored by the legislators of a civilized country. Therefore, I still have hope that the issue of the absolute legality of anonymous payments in cryptocurrencies will still be resolved somehow.
Well, I guess it is a matter of perspective then. I think you put too much credit on the government, most of them don't care about users' privacy unless they can utilize the same thing that privacy enthusiasts are looking for such as TOR. With the gambling business, or crypto payments that you mentioned above, their priority by nature is different. Most businesses would either follow the requirement, or try to launch overseas where they can also stay anonymous, but then it will be problematic for the users if they decide to scam and so on. At the end of the day, I believe the cost to maintain and filter out people who abuse VPN probably isn't worth the cost, especially if the market for privacy-enthusiast gamblers is small (this is not about allowing payments in crypto to begin with). Even if the government somehow mandates businesses to accept VPN users', I'm pretty sure it will come with other KYC tools in hand. CMIIW. 
If we are to even consider the replies on this thread on recommendations for the platforms that accept the use of VPN, I don't think there are suggestions made and if any at all, they are not many, gambling platforms don't usually demand or take in the use of VPN for their website, but Incase we see some that allows for that, maybe they are just new in the business or doesn't have enough resources to employ for the measures that take care on that.
Most of the new casino is the one that very strict on VPN users because they are strictly complying with their license and at the same time to protect their casino from multiple account abuse.
To date, only a less countries like Iran, Turkmenistan, North Korea and Belarus, which are not even popular with casinos thought it to be illegal. Many casinos allow the use of it but for the issues of mistaking it for many accounts by the same person when the IPs generated by it clash. That is the only downside to the use of VPN in my opinion. Regardless, we should ensure to avoid it if our casinos specifically forbid it.
In general, it turns out that gambling players who want to remain anonymous for various reasons are left to choose casinos that are not very reliable and not too well-known, which indeed increases the likelihood for such players to encounter fraudulent casino sites. In this I see clear discrimination against anonymous players. And for some reason everyone thinks that non-anonymous players are somehow “more correct” than anonymous players.
But this is completely wrong and this discrimination against people based on the principle of anonymity/non-anonymity, in my opinion, should be stopped.
Moreover, this must be done at the legislative level.
What kind of law can achieve what you propose though? So you will allow anonymous/VPN users to register multiple times, but make sure there is adequate cheating protection that somehow must be able to detect that one account is connected to the other through chain analysis? Wouldn't that mean they don't fully respect the users' privacy too? I've never heard people suggest that anonymous players are "wrong" or something similar, but you need to realize that these businesses probably don't want to spend more on filtering accounts so they just ban tools like VPNs. If you still risk it and win it big, there is a high chance thy will just "scam" you. I doubt a government cares about users' privacy so hoping they make a different license for that is kinda cope.But this is completely wrong and this discrimination against people based on the principle of anonymity/non-anonymity, in my opinion, should be stopped.
Moreover, this must be done at the legislative level.
But I think that the gain from such total de-anonymization is not too great. But the loss of anonymity is theoretically a huge violation of the human right to privacy, which, of course, cannot be completely ignored by the legislators of a civilized country. Therefore, I still have hope that the issue of the absolute legality of anonymous payments in cryptocurrencies will still be resolved somehow. Perhaps this will not happen in the coming years, but after many years. But humanity, having had enough of accurate digital personal identification in necessary cases and in generally completely unnecessary cases, that is, almost always, will still return to the issue of the need for anonymity and maintaining the secret of private life.
And now, apparently, it is too early to update this issue at the legislative level, even in civilized countries.
I used a VPN few times there in order to be able to play to some games not available from my country and I didn't get bad surprises.
This is the exact reason why most casinos do not tolerate the use of VPNs. You were lucky that they didn't lock your account and confiscate your money.Using VPNs isn't supposed to be a problem if done for legitimate purposes such as increasing privacy and/or security. The problem is that most gamblers do it to circumvent restrictions or abuse bonuses.. So casinos just ban it to avoid unnecessary headaches.
Yes that is true, I remember during the ban on my nation in the use of X formally called Twitter VPN was introduced for us citizens to access the network, I think it main purpose is to hide some identity.
One of the challenge I face with one casinos game because of the VPN I was finding it difficult to run the game which I never know it's the VPN that is coursing the issue I realized when I have losses on the process.
Although some casinos allow the usage of vpns since casinos could be banned in their country so there will be a need to get be hind the mask of a VPN in their country.
Jump to: