Should ICOs be regulated - page 44. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Avri Susanto

jr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 6

Quote from: Ranly123 on December 03, 2018, 10:07:29 AM

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

I think it should remain as it was, an anonymous kind of investment. In this way ICO can keep the privacy of their coins and the customer on whoever invest in their platform. If it was to be regulated, then investors would hesitate to join their project as to taxes is applied if regulated.

if their funds can be safe, in my opinion they will not question tax. the problem that we are facing right now is the high ICO scammers, and one way is indeed there must be a regulation if you want ico to survive.

Furious 7

hero member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 644

https://duelbits.com/

investors should get protection from fraud and various ico scams. very detrimental if this continues to be left, I am sure that slowly ico will disappear and investors are reluctant to invest in any project in the future.

Ranly123

full member

Activity: 952

Merit: 104

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

I think it should remain as it was, an anonymous kind of investment. In this way ICO can keep the privacy of their coins and the customer on whoever invest in their platform. If it was to be regulated, then investors would hesitate to join their project as to taxes is applied if regulated.

Benarand

full member

Activity: 773

Merit: 100

To some extent, regulation of the ICO market should be. The fact is that no one guarantees that after collecting funds the company simply will not disappear from cryptocurrency spaces. Therefore, minimal ICO regulation would be in place, even for the same bounty hunters.

No Pain No blood

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 13

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

yes, ICO should be regulated by a regulation that can provide guarantees to investors for every fund invested.

and have read about STO, in my opinion this method is indeed the right choice to avoid fraud. The SEC that regulates all regulations makes investors safer. so I support STO.

aldencio

jr. member

Activity: 218

Merit: 1

Quote from: Thomas-s on December 03, 2018, 06:07:38 AM

Of course, the ICO must be regulated and I hope this will happen very soon. This will give a new life to this ICO market.

well yes there would be a more secure world here if the icos were regulated by common people and i hope that will happen quite soon

Sanford

jr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 1

There are difficulties with this. We want a high income and regulated palette. I think these two things are not related in place. Of course it is necessary to bring fraudsters to justice. But centralized coins will not give us much profit.

It is difficult to find the right solution in this situation.

jaywizzy

jr. member

Activity: 510

Merit: 2

Yes! That will be the best option now if we wish to stop the scam most ICOs are causing these days.

aldencio

jr. member

Activity: 218

Merit: 1

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

tjat is a contraversary thing as there are many advantategies on the one hand but on the other hand there are many minuses about it

expekto

jr. member

Activity: 255

Merit: 1

W12 – Blockchain protocol

Quote from: Jamesdila1 on December 03, 2018, 09:17:18 AM

thats what we want to make ico industry more legit and secure. lot of scams are happening daily. so regulating ico is great thing for investors. i hope that will happen for all icos from any country.

hut there are always two sides of the medal amd we should think of bad consequences of the letting peopel regulate icos

expekto

jr. member

Activity: 255

Merit: 1

W12 – Blockchain protocol

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

i believe that yes tjis is true and peopel should regulate soem icos as there are so many scammers right now an dthis is dangerous

Jamesdila1

member

Activity: 686

Merit: 10

thats what we want to make ico industry more legit and secure. lot of scams are happening daily. so regulating ico is great thing for investors. i hope that will happen for all icos from any country.

testadimerlo

sr. member

Activity: 826

Merit: 263

You've already answered your question and I agree with you. I hope that some news is going to come in the next months.

henlity87

newbie

Activity: 72

Merit: 0

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

Regulations may give better results in short-term but we can be sure about what will happen in long term as this may kill core concept of entire crypto-currency world; decentralization. The high level of scam you have mentioned could be avoided if you do your own research and analysis. Hence, asking for regulation is not good in my opinion.

Emilyp

member

Activity: 546

Merit: 10

Regulation is so much needed, it would have prevented a number of scam ICOs we've seen in the past from going on to scam people if there's a regulatory body overseeing ICOs.

joelsamuya

member

Activity: 532

Merit: 41

https://emirex.com

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

If we based on facts and recent happenings in the market, i could say that government regulation is needed for ICO's in order to prevent future scams and frauds when it comes to ICO's because there are new coins and tokens which are introduced everyday.

vova.andreyan.94

jr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 1

It seems to me that regulation is necessary in this market, but if regulators set too rigid limits, then this market will no longer be promising!

nicster551

sr. member

Activity: 896

Merit: 253

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

Yes, they should since many people do invest in ICO which they think that it may give them a lot of profits after that, but some of them turned to scams.

giletto

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 250

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

It is too late to take measures to prevent fraudulent ICOs. Now nobody cares about the ICO because the market is constantly falling and everyone buys cheap altcoin. Investing ICOs is too risky at the moment and they will not do that. Also the ICO project is actually a scammer, I have not seen any ICO really well because they never give out a complete product

bitcoindusts

sr. member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 269

Quote from: Ngoziwealth on December 02, 2018, 09:36:36 AM

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

I fully agree, ICO must be regulated. This is to protect investors from scammers. This project is collecting money to fund their idea, so it should follow government rules regarding fund collection. They must be registered and acknowledge by the government. Meaning they need to have license or patent to their idea if needed.

Topic: Should ICOs be regulated - page 44. (Read 24186 times)