Here are the top 6 teams expenditure since Guardiola arrived at Man City.
Chelsea: €132.80m + €260.50m + €208.80m + €45.00m + €247.20m + €118.00 = Over €1 Billion
Man Utd: €185.00m + €198.40m + €82.70m + €234.80m + €83.80m + €140.00m = €924m
Arsenal: €113.00m + €152.85m + €80.15m + €160.80m + €86.00m + €167.42m = €762
Liverpool: €79.90m + €173.65m + €182.20m + €10.40m + €82.65m + €87.00m = €615m
Tottenham: €83.50m + €123.50m + 0 + €148.50m + €110.50m + €95.90m = €561.9
NB: Excluding the current transfer window.
Only Arsenal, Liverpool, and Tottenham have spent significantly lower than Guardiola's Man City but all 5 clubs have a combined 12 Major trophies, while Guardiola's City alone can boast of 9 Majors.
Man I'm certain you have no idea what you just wrote, man! I'm willing to bet my life that you're wrong about Chelsea, Manchester United, and Manchester City's spending; I don't have time to look at the other clubs. (net spending not included) As previously stated, Manchester City has spent more than €1 billion under Pep.
These are pep spending since he came;
2016-2017: €215m, 2017-2018: €317.50m, 2018-2019: €78.59m, 2019-2020: €159.52m, 2020-2021: €172.30m, 2021-2022: 134.50, 2022-2023: still on. = €1.07b.
Chelsea are no where above €1bn... Haha
+ transfer ban. I won't bring other clubs into this now as we are only talking about Pep.
Claudio Bravo (€18m), Ederson Moraes (€40m)
Bravo and Ederson aren't outfield players and basically every coach needs a Goalkeeper right ? and How many Goalkeeper has Chelsea gotten since Guardiola joined Man City ? Kepa (€80.00m) Mendy (€24.00m), Liverpool ? Karius and Alisson were significantly cheaper.
Wtf! Both are still under Pep's purchase! Manchester City had three keepers before he arrived. Before Kepa arrived, Alisson was the most expensive goalkeeper. Conduct thorough research.
He doesn't know when to switch to a more defensive game, which has been a problem for him since his time at Bayarn. Chelsea won the Champions League in 2012 and 2020 because they were the most defensively compact team.
Firstly, Guardiola wasn't at City in 2012, while in 20/21 Chelsea finished 4th in the league scoring and conceding 58:36 respectively.
Man I only use Chelsea as an example of what defensive game can yield.
This is Manchester City's defensive business under Pep;
John Stones (€55.6m) Aymeric Laporte (€65m) Benjamin Mendy (€57.5m) Kyle Walker (€52.7m) Danilo (€30m)Joao Cancelo (€65m) Rodri (€62.7m)Ruben Dias (€68m) Nathan AKe (€45.3m) = €556m.
Of all the listed players above, most people would agree with me that only perhaps John Stones, Dias, Laporte and Nathan Ake were purchased for their defensive capabilities innit ? Walker, Mendy, Danilo, Cancelo were literally just attacking reinforcements and were purchased for their attacking abilities rather than what they can offer defensively.
You have no point, man! They are all defenders, and their first task is to keep the ball out of the net. Other skills are bonus to the team. He didn't pay for them to come and score or assist.
Simone does not spend money on defense.
However, Simeone has spent €426m on Strikers alone since Guardiola's arrival at Man City, why
How much did he spend on defense? That's the debate right?
If my analogy is wrong why do you think Pep and Klopp are spending more on the defensive department?
Spending more on the most vulnerable part of your system is not the same thing as spending more specifically on your defense, Man City and Liverpool have arguably the best attack in the premier league over the last 5 seasons, and still Man City didn't spend a dime on defense last season but spent over €130m on strikers
Yes, because he was only concerned with a midfielder and a striker last season, as Aguero and Jesus were nearing the end of their ManCity careers. Man spent over €500+m over the last five years building his defensive line. You are twerking for him for not spending a dime last season?
and Klopp despite his team's attacking prowess, over the last 3 seasons have spent almost 3 times more strikers than defense.
You only fill where you are lacking.. Defense is okay.
My point at the end of the day is; if a team plays 0-0 all through a calendar season, the only record they'd have is defensive team of the year, while they'd be at the top 5 bottom of the table, that's if they don't even get relegated, however, if a team wins 5-4 every single game of the season, they'd end up with worse goal conceding record but would have won every trophy.
Scoring 5 and concerning 5 is still a draw + zero goal diff.
A shaky defensive line cannot win a game. In order to win a game, the goal post must be protected. Did you see Barcelona and Chelsea's final ten games of the season? They were scoring for fun while also conceding. When your defensive line is weak, your entire team suffers. Possession is created from the back, not the front.
Man I had some coaching experience!
Logically, to not lose a game you need not to concede any goal, but to stand a chance of winning a game you need to score at least a goal, i.e Outscoring your opponent is what wins you a game and trophies not defense...
You can't control a game without a good defensive line, and you can't score a goal if you don't control the game.