he realizes that attacks only win games and defenses win trophies.
If this analogy is true, then Guardiola should be one of the top managers with the least trophies, while Simeone should have at least 2 Uefa Champions League trophies.
Attacking is more often than not the best way to defend.
It doesn't change the fact that he has spent over
€1 billion on transfers since joining Manchester City,
I beg to disagree because your analogy is still either bias or it is just flawed;
Here are the top 6 teams expenditure since Guardiola arrived at Man City.
Chelsea: €132.80m + €260.50m + €208.80m + €45.00m + €247.20m + €118.00 = Over €1 Billion
Man Utd: €185.00m + €198.40m + €82.70m + €234.80m + €83.80m + €140.00m = €924m
Arsenal: €113.00m + €152.85m + €80.15m + €160.80m + €86.00m + €167.42m = €762
Liverpool: €79.90m + €173.65m + €182.20m + €10.40m + €82.65m + €87.00m = €615m
Tottenham: €83.50m + €123.50m + 0 + €148.50m + €110.50m + €95.90m = €561.9
NB: Excluding the current transfer window.Only Arsenal, Liverpool, and Tottenham have spent significantly lower than Guardiola's Man City but all 5 clubs have a combined 12 Major trophies, while Guardiola's City alone can boast of 9 Majors.
Claudio Bravo (€18m), Ederson Moraes (€40m)
Bravo and Ederson aren't outfield players and basically every coach needs a Goalkeeper right ? and How many Goalkeeper has Chelsea gotten since Guardiola joined Man City ? Kepa (€80.00m) Mendy (€24.00m), Liverpool ? Karius and Alisson were significantly cheaper.
He doesn't know when to switch to a more defensive game, which has been a problem for him since his time at Bayarn. Chelsea won the Champions League in 2012 and 2020 because they were the most defensively compact team.
Firstly, Guardiola wasn't at City in 2012, while in 20/21 Chelsea finished 4th in the league scoring and conceding 58:36 respectively, while City finished 1st position scoring 83 goals scored and 32 conceded, you could argue Tuchel didn't start the 20/21 season with Chelsea but his first full season at Chelsea, they more attacking minded scoring 76 and conceded just 33 goals.
This is Manchester City's defensive business under Pep;
John Stones (€55.6m) Aymeric Laporte (€65m) Benjamin Mendy (€57.5m) Kyle Walker (€52.7m) Danilo (€30m)Joao Cancelo (€65m) Rodri (€62.7m)Ruben Dias (€68m) Nathan AKe (€45.3m) = €556m.
Of all the listed players above, most people would agree with me that only perhaps John Stones, Dias, Laporte and Nathan Ake were purchased for their defensive capabilities innit ? Walker, Mendy, Danilo, Cancelo were literally just attacking reinforcements and were purchased for their attacking abilities rather than what they can offer defensively.
Simone does not spend money on defense.
However, Simeone has spent €426m on Strikers alone since Guardiola's arrival at Man City, why
If my analogy is wrong why do you think Pep and Klopp are spending more on the defensive department?
Spending more on the most vulnerable part of your system is not the same thing as spending more specifically on your defense, Man City and Liverpool have arguably the best attack in the premier league over the last 5 seasons, and still Man City didn't spend a dime on defense last season, but spent over €130m on strikers, and Klopp despite his team's attacking prowess, over the last 3 seasons have spent almost 3 times more strikers than defense.
My point at the end of the day is; if a team plays 0-0 all through a calendar season, the only record they'd have is defensive team of the year, while they'd be at the top 5 bottom of the table, that's if they don't even get relegated, however, if a team wins 5-4 every single game of the season, they'd end up with worse goal conceding record but would have won every trophy.
Logically, to not lose a game you need not to concede any goal, but to stand a chance of winning a game you need to score at least a goal, i.e
Outscoring your opponent is what wins you a game and trophies not defense...Stats source:
https://www.transfermarkt.com