Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching - page 295. (Read 237247 times)

sumo.fairpool.cloud (here all the powers)
A person, to talk about not working, was not, he automatically raises the difficulty up to, say, 1200 000, and the cards are beaten empty or nothing until the pool changes complexity, much is lost !!!!!
And in the post above, the creators of the pool say that the SRBMiner-CN error and it is necessary to use the other software !!!!

i don't really understand what we are talking about here?

Is the problem that the pool sets too high diff ?

I myself am mining sumo at https://pool.sumokoin.com and it works great .

I hope you are using it with SRBMiner

i use DevManView.exe for this.
and call with reset.bat like this

@echo off
SET "version=01"
SET "title=%~nx0 - version %version%"
TITLE %title%

SET device1="Radeon RX Vega"

echo.
echo Uredjaj: %device1%
timeout 2
DevManView.exe /disable %device1%
echo Uredjaj: %device1% disablan
timeout 5
DevManView.exe /enable %device1%
echo Uredjaj: %device1% enablan

echo.
echo THE END!!!
timeout 5


ALL Vega card in device menager have identicala name : "Radeon RX Vega"

Iff you have diferent card you must use more, SET device2= name card , SET device3= name card

not true
i have 3*vega 56 -
heavy and cast = 4400HR
heavy and SRB = 4500HR
SS heavy - 530W
https://image.prntscr.com/image/GNijU9AvQgaWTSSxzJo1Ig.jpg

v7 and cast = 5550HR
v7 and SRB = 5850HR
SS v7 - 565W
https://image.prntscr.com/image/IL1ZCdsdT4iEbgA8gfgmAQ.jpg

lite and cast = 11000HR
lite and SRB = 12000HR

On this pool there is no static diff, so you name the vorker.

Just set "ADD_Wallet.DIFF", i use always   H/S*40, if my h/s=1000 I will set "ADD_Wallet.40000". Try one that's good for you

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2079202.new#new


Кaк-тo пpoкoммeнтиpyeтe?
Somehow comment?

previously i set my intensity 72, I never though can set intensity that high. will try intensity 104 and 112. many thanks man.

Wowww!!! Amazing strap for 580 Hynix. I can get 1030 average (cryptonight-heavy), core clock 1200 and mem clock 2100.

Thank you, Dok!

Someone perhaps has great strap for 580 micron (cryptonight-heavy) that can be shared here?

Can you make the miner compatible with Claymore Remote Manager?

wow i never though intensity will be that high. thanks man.

I am running a reference 56 with stock BIOS. 950 mem clock. My best setting is below. I posted it earlier in this thread for people to try.

110.5/16 worksize/2 thread.

Should get ~1920 h/s. Maybe a bit less on your mem clock. Try it and post results.

In log file i see only this

[2018-04-28 13:10:22] miner_result: Sending user result to pool
[2018-04-28 13:10:22] json_send: {"method":"submit","params":{"id":"174cf176-de76-48d7-b5da-acd2ed4e3442","job_id":"gyiozdozVZLAhV25eCHd+cE1oFiv","nonce":"a79524c9","result":"31c0f025ec9ea375dd3b00a4b117d5b3a5f8061379a6f194267ae156d3130000"},"id":1}
[2018-04-28 13:10:22] json_receive: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"status":"OK"}}
[2018-04-28 13:10:22] miner_result: Pool accepted result 0x000013D3
[2018-04-28 13:10:25] switch_pool: Connected to devfee pool
[2018-04-28 14:46:26] Stopping miner process

What Int are you using? the one i posted is on Int 104, but after testing Int 112 gives even more, about 1025-1030h/s.
Still have to test things further, i have a feeling there is still room for improvement.

this is something i am already working on for the next version

you need to read the first page too, there is always fresh info about version updates.
Also it wasn't mining for me, it got stuck at pool change, so basically it wasn't doing anything.

@doktor83 wtf

After connect to deffee pool no any more connect to user pool!!! I mine for you more than one hour!!
Need version with disable devfee, i not greed bustard but...

Version 1.4.8


[2018-04-28 13:08:33] Total:   3527.0 H/S
[2018-04-28 13:09:11] Pool accepted result 0x00004F90
[2018-04-28 13:10:01] Pool accepted result 0x00006EBA
[2018-04-28 13:10:17] Pool difficulty: 94920
[2018-04-28 13:10:17] Pool sent a new job (ID: gyiozdozVZLAhV25eCHd+cE1oFiv)
[2018-04-28 13:10:22] Pool accepted result 0x000013D3
[2018-04-28 13:10:25] Connected to devfee pool
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] GPU0:    509.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 2181, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] GPU1:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2191, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] GPU2:    509.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] GPU3:    511.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2192, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] GPU4:    511.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2192, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] GPU5:    491.0 H/S [T: 64c, RPM: 2798, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1825 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] GPU6:    491.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:10:35] Total:   3532.0 H/S
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] GPU0:    510.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 2187, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] GPU1:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2198, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] GPU2:    509.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] GPU3:    511.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2195, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] GPU4:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2195, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] GPU5:    492.0 H/S [T: 64c, RPM: 2805, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1825 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] GPU6:    498.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:12:36] Total:   3540.0 H/S
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] GPU0:    510.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 2192, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] GPU1:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2196, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] GPU2:    509.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] GPU3:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2208, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] GPU4:    511.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2182, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] GPU5:    492.0 H/S [T: 64c, RPM: 2785, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1825 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] GPU6:    483.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:14:38] Total:   3525.0 H/S
[2018-04-28 13:16:40] GPU0:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2185, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:16:40] GPU1:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2188, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:16:40] GPU2:    509.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:16:40] GPU3:    511.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2205, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:16:40] GPU4:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2185, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:16:40] GPU5:    491.0 H/S [T: 64c, RPM: 2785, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1825 MHz]
[2018-04-28 13:16:40] GPU6:    495.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]

--------------

[2018-04-28 14:41:45] GPU0:    510.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 2178, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 14:41:45] GPU1:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2195, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 14:41:45] GPU2:    508.0 H/S [T: 56c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 14:41:45] GPU3:    511.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2195, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 14:41:45] GPU4:    510.0 H/S [T: 57c, RPM: 2192, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1960 MHz]
[2018-04-28 14:41:45] GPU5:    492.0 H/S [T: 64c, RPM: 2798, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1825 MHz]
[2018-04-28 14:41:45] GPU6:    491.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 0, CC: 1230 MHz, MC: 1920 MHz]
[2018-04-28 14:41:45] Total:   3532.0 H/S

Is there better timmings then the ones of PolarisEditor? Like that give good boosts.

I agree with your fee and i do belive you should force people for a fee, i just ask that you keep it down and low like you got now, we dont need greddy fees of 2%.
Continue the good work, i left xrm because of the hight fees, about hash rate i am getting around same thing in heavy algo but the hasrate sometimes isnt the same when i start, sometimes i start hashing just after restarted pc and my  2 rx 580 8gb dual tread doing around 950, other times they only start doing 850 and stick with it, i basicaly am always restarting pc till they do 950 h/s and they will hold. Its strange, you know why i am having this problem? I got loads of virtual memory and 8gb ram.