SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching - page 292.

Bulitt

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 11

Im curious if anyone is going to mine MoneroV? I dont even know if it will just work with regular CryptonightV7 or it needs specific compatibility...

Lunga Chung

member

Activity: 277

Merit: 23

Quote from: mutual.consent on April 29, 2018, 05:47:01 PM

How far away is the API implementation? Having a JSON API would make me switch to SRB.

+1

I'm pretty bound to use Awesome Miner by my investors and Patrick promised it would add SRBMiner soon as API gets out.

Atomicc

member

Activity: 301

Merit: 31

excelent job... this miner is over all competition...
Do You plan to implement some API(JSON) remote/distance control - management?
Compatibility with Claymore remote manager will be great.

mutual.consent

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

How far away is the API implementation? Having a JSON API would make me switch to SRB.

lncm

member

Activity: 388

Merit: 13

5% faster than XMR-Stak. Well worth the dev fee.

bruslie

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Quote from: doktor83 on April 29, 2018, 02:59:26 PM

Quote from: ALEX_RAA on April 29, 2018, 12:28:54 PM

Will SRB support new algo of ALLOY (xao)? https://github.com/alloyproject/alloy-gui/releases

Sure it will Wink

Also if you guys know some forks that im not aware of, just write it here i will add it.

today

doktor83

hero member

Activity: 2548

Merit: 626

Quote from: ALEX_RAA on April 29, 2018, 12:28:54 PM

Will SRB support new algo of ALLOY (xao)? https://github.com/alloyproject/alloy-gui/releases

Sure it will Wink

Also if you guys know some forks that im not aware of, just write it here i will add it.

doktor83

hero member

Activity: 2548

Merit: 626

Quote from: wertert on April 29, 2018, 11:04:11 AM

Hi Doktor.

Very happy I found SRBminer. Much better than the other XMR miners i've tried.

Very stable and I'm getting 5660H/s on 6 x RX580 @ ~ 704W which I think this is quite good ?

One question / feature request if you have any spare time ;-)

I'm using --logfile file.txt. Would it be possible to automatically dump into this file the H/s summary ( i.e same as pressing 'h' ) every 20-30 mins or so ?

I'm scraping this file into a web page so it would be really useful to see the H/s rate for each card and a total.

Thanks very much.

Of course, i will add this info to the log too

doktor83

hero member

Activity: 2548

Merit: 626

Quote from: ivakar on April 29, 2018, 02:14:19 PM

it is actually strange situation
but on my rig stable version which is working as a clock is 1.4.3 ..
the other version with greater number creates strange situation - all share becomes invalid...
do not know what is the problem.. I'm mining monero with a rig of mixed one vega and five rx480...

share your config and pools file so we can help you

doktor83

hero member

Activity: 2548

Merit: 626

Quote from: brutalfish on April 29, 2018, 02:15:01 PM

SRBMiner-CN-V1-4-9
Чтo cлyчилocь,пoчeмy я нe мoгy мaйнить nicehash??? SRBMiner-CN-V1-4-9
[2018-04-29 01:09:09] Connecting to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:10] Connected!
[2018-04-29 01:09:11] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:17] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.jp.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.usa.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Switching to next pool from pools config

ocтaльныe мoнeты мaйнит нa нaйcxeшe,a этoт aлгopитм никaк нe xoчeт.Ктo мaйнит нa нaйce мoнepo7,ecть пpoблeмы?

config.txt:

{
"cryptonight_type" : "normalv7",
"intensity" : 0,
"double_threads" : true
}

pools.txt:

{
"pools" :
[
{"pool_use_tls" : false, "pool" : "cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363", "wallet" : "your_btc_wallet", "password" : "x"}
]
}

[2018-04-29 20:48:06] Connecting to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 20:48:06] Connected!
[2018-04-29 20:48:07] User logged in
[2018-04-29 20:48:07] Pool difficulty: 100001
[2018-04-29 20:48:07] Pool sent a new job (ID: 0000004c9caf56c6)

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: brutalfish on April 29, 2018, 02:15:01 PM

SRBMiner-CN-V1-4-9
Чтo cлyчилocь,пoчeмy я нe мoгy мaйнить nicehash??? SRBMiner-CN-V1-4-9
[2018-04-29 01:09:09] Connecting to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:10] Connected!
[2018-04-29 01:09:11] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:17] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.jp.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.usa.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Switching to next pool from pools config

ocтaльныe мoнeты мaйнит нa нaйcxeшe,a этoт aлгopитм никaк нe xoчeт.Ктo мaйнит нa нaйce мoнepo7,ecть пpoблeмы?

Я мaйню, вcё нopмaльнo. Пpaвдa, я иcпoльзyю SSL coeдинeниe и пopт 33363 пoэтoмy.

brutalfish

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

SRBMiner-CN-V1-4-9
Чтo cлyчилocь,пoчeмy я нe мoгy мaйнить nicehash??? SRBMiner-CN-V1-4-9
[2018-04-29 01:09:09] Connecting to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:10] Connected!
[2018-04-29 01:09:11] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:17] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:23] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.jp.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:29] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.usa.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:35] Switching to next pool from pools config
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Could not login user to pool
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Can't connect to cryptonightv7.in.nicehash.com:3363
[2018-04-29 01:09:41] Switching to next pool from pools config

ocтaльныe мoнeты мaйнит нa нaйcxeшe,a этoт aлгopитм никaк нe xoчeт.Ктo мaйнит нa нaйce мoнepo7,ecть пpoблeмы?

ivakar

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 507

it is actually strange situation
but on my rig stable version which is working as a clock is 1.4.3 ..
the other version with greater number creates strange situation - all share becomes invalid...
do not know what is the problem.. I'm mining monero with a rig of mixed one vega and five rx480...

doktor83

hero member

Activity: 2548

Merit: 626

Quote from: micax1 on April 29, 2018, 10:50:30 AM

Quote from: doktor83 on April 28, 2018, 01:24:42 AM

Quote from: micax1 on April 28, 2018, 12:15:04 AM

Quote from: doktor83 on April 27, 2018, 05:05:45 PM

old bug on old drivers. On blockchain and newer (18.3.4) its working as its supposed to.
The easiest fix is to update your drivers

will try today )

i hope it helps, if not i will look into it.

checked 18.3.4 today.

Code:

[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU0: 465.0 H/S [T: 52c, RPM: 0, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU1: 435.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 904, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1800 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU2: 499.0 H/S [T: 60c, RPM: 860, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU3: 499.0 H/S [T: 59c, RPM: 813, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU4: 460.0 H/S [T: 60c, RPM: 870, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU5: 449.0 H/S [T: 53c, RPM: 0, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU6: 397.0 H/S [T: 61c, RPM: 863, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU7: 437.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 815, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU8: 496.0 H/S [T: 59c, RPM: 0, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU9: 492.0 H/S [T: 61c, RPM: 1061, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU10: 452.0 H/S [T: 52c, RPM: 0, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:41:59] GPU11: 499.0 H/S [T: 62c, RPM: 924, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]

however config includes following:

"target_temperature" : 55,
"target_fan_speed" : 3300,

in general section

target fan speed basically not set?

here is the same drivers w your miner, but with 3-rd party overdrive util:

Code:

[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU0: 495.0 H/S [T: 49c, RPM: 3083, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU1: 457.0 H/S [T: 52c, RPM: 3196, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1800 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU2: 411.0 H/S [T: 49c, RPM: 3297, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU3: 464.0 H/S [T: 50c, RPM: 3384, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU4: 461.0 H/S [T: 51c, RPM: 3305, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU5: 494.0 H/S [T: 52c, RPM: 3378, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU6: 494.0 H/S [T: 52c, RPM: 3354, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU7: 458.0 H/S [T: 53c, RPM: 3229, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU8: 499.0 H/S [T: 50c, RPM: 3393, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU9: 499.0 H/S [T: 53c, RPM: 3234, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU10: 493.0 H/S [T: 50c, RPM: 3116, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] GPU11: 461.0 H/S [T: 52c, RPM: 3295, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 1900 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:49:59] Total: 5686.0 H/S

From the first page :

V1.4.8
- Added support for new ArtoCash algo
- Added fast pool switching when pressing P
- Added target_temperature setting to gpu_conf too, if this option is used on top of config (value is > 0), gpu_conf setting is IGNORED
- Added target_fan_speed setting to gpu_conf, atm must set it in RPM, not in percent, sorry Smiley
- Minor bug fixes

Bixbitecoin

jr. member

Activity: 119

Merit: 3

I hope the developer will work with algo heavy

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: eduardooaz on April 29, 2018, 06:09:17 AM

Quote from: doktor83 on April 26, 2018, 06:35:20 PM

For H5GQ8H24MJR try this folks:

999000000000000022339D00CEDD6B4470551414B80D960B0040C400750314204A8900A00200000 018123745B92B3A16

Wink

I tried this and got a boost in my hynix, from 950 to 1050, do you got a good timming for micron and samsung?
My rx 580 8gb micron sometimes runs at 950h/s but is mostly always starting at 850h/s, very rarly stats at 950h/s.

What your card manufacter and what intensity you're use?

ALEX_RAA

newbie

Activity: 78

Merit: 0

Will SRB support new algo of ALLOY (xao)? https://github.com/alloyproject/alloy-gui/releases

inv1s1bl3

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

Hey guys, I know that this is not the thread for my question, but can anyone tell me what type of timings do I need to choose for cryptonight-heavy? I have looked around, but sadly I was not able to find much information...
I am mining on RX580 Sapphire Nitro Special Editions.

bluspirit

jr. member

Activity: 70

Merit: 3

Hi Dok,
my H5GQ8H24MJR thanks you! Grin

Code:

[2018-04-29 17:46:09] GPU0: 932.0 H/S [T: 59c, RPM: 1022, CC: 1150 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz]
[2018-04-29 17:46:09] Total: 932.0 H/S
[2018-04-29 17:46:33] Pool accepted result 0x00003408

Chuonguong

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: fanisk21 on April 21, 2018, 05:47:23 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on April 21, 2018, 05:42:34 AM

Quote from: fanisk21 on April 21, 2018, 05:33:01 AM

Let it run for a while! On rx580 the difference is 950 Claymore to 1050 SRB

Have you tried use T= 1/2? and W=8/16?

I runned for several minutes. How much it must be run to achieve max speed?
T - 1 slower, W=16 didn't tried, but I don't think that worksize on 270X gives any difference.

On RX 580 8Gb I use GGS - it gives much more than Claymore.
What parameters is best for 580 for SRB?

Well, yeah, i don't know, because i don't have a 270x card xD.

It deppends i'm using I=58 , W=16, T=2 on 6 MSI ARMOR 580 8G (Micron) and got 1050+ on each.

I have xfx 580 8g ss and i get false when run with w=16, t=2, when i run with i=62, w=8,t=1 got 650 on each with 620w total. Help me to do better

Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching - page 292. (Read 237247 times)