https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwBdenyI7VgFunny to see that it comes out now that actually the game you bet on is under investigation globally, not only by stake.
I followed the Jontay Porter betting "scandal" the past days but didn't remember your bet was exactly on this guy. So now all of this does look a little suspicious actually.
I know I supported your claim first but seeing this under these new circumstances you must admit your bet looks a bit off and stake was right doing this investigation and holding out on the money.
Your bets we are much smaller until this particular bet where you suddenly bet 7.6k on the under 3.5 rebounds and also a big parley with under 3.5 points on high odds.
So now the question is, did you have insider info or did you just follow the trend? Apparently many accounts on many bookies bet on these exact number.
The DraftKings day-after report said Porter’s under wagers were the night’s biggest money-earners for bettors.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/mar/26/nba-investigating-raptors-jontay-porter-betting-irregularitiesMight happen that they will void the winnings from these 2 bets (30k$ sayonara). Hopefully only doing this and not say you are part of a "betting syndicate". If this happens you can say goodbye to all your funds and the account.
Of course this will only happen if they actually the NBA will find him guilty of doing this intentionally. Guess this case is far from being over now.
Yea i understand the integrity of the investigation but stake and their sports book partners are very misleading on complaint forum and email.
As much as I would love to have insider information and kill all these sports books unfortunately I was just following trend. Also for the bets in question one of them yes was a prop under 3.5 rebounds combined with the 3.5 point under. The other one was just the under on rebounds. In that game he had 3 rebounds. Not so much of an easy win but very much a nail biter in this situation for me.
Very strange things happening here though as the investigation wasn't brought on by NBA but at request of a sports book. While everyone would love to paint the narrative of a " bet syndicate " that is just very hard to believe. If every time a sports book lost large sums of money they can just claim an investigation and delay pay out that's a very big cause for concern
Another weird example is like yesterdays game with the 76ers and clippers " Officials admit to missed call on final play of Clippers win over 76ers " These things raise even more red flags for me as a sports bettor.
Calls like this were the official admits to missing calls and costing games it really raises the question of where is the information on loosing bets that night for that call. If the sports book feels like they lost a lot of money and will just call for an NBA investigation where is the investigation into these "missed" calls by officials at the gain of a sports book.
While i understand it is a long shot to say the sports books could have some play in games. It also raises the red flags of on big sweep days for the books the only way for a investigation to happen on a team is for a broad public complaint in which will never lead back to the actual books themselves. For the book itself all they have to do is say we lost a lot this is weird.
Meanwhile just like their is calculated odds makers making the odds their are calculated sports cappers picking the correct bets. I'm sure the days that the books are cashing in crazy amounts due to weird irregularities in games nothing is being disclosed about the amount they profited that day.
Anyway back to the point as far as this NBA investigation it really can only go 2 ways. They find him guilty and it completely destroys the integrity of the game and sports betting even more and they void these bets. Or calculated odds where taken on this and the book is being a sore looser and not wanting to pay out. Either way my money has been held for over 2 months. Glad to finally get some answers tho and with these articles coming out it should be a quick resolution as the player is barred from playing until end of investigation.
Also a lot of these sports news sites are sponsored by draft kings ( the book who opened investigation ) so its very hard to get the real perception it seems like a lot of the articles are pretty much smear campaigns. I wonder how much the books really lost on this..
Response time doesn't matter on AG because after time is up they can comment at any time to refresh the clock " reopen " and AG will still honor the complaint as active. AG is pretty much a forum and a lot of their casino rankings are obviously sponsored. I've talked with AG customer service to see what the problem here is with their claim of casino response times and things of that sort like stake running out the clock and giving the same generated response to every complaint ( very weird ) and they just hit me with the " we just want to see you receive your funds back " and the only real way for a complaint to go un resolved is making a case to gaming authority and proving AG with all the information from gaming. I really don't understand where they get their rankings from... Hell even recently via email a customer service rep for AG told me " It is on you not to play off your funds until the issue is resolved." On a suspended account. That has no option of any of that. After asking for them to be a 3rd party verifier on my identification...
Anyway after 2 months and all the run around. ( I'm guessing for "integrity" reasons) Finally getting the real answer here after the news broke about betting investigation. My bet in question was a Jontay Porter prop bet that has since surfaced that there is a real investigation conducted by the NBA. Don't know why the weird games played by stake with the verification thing maybe just a thing to keep me happy.. and why it took 2 months for the article to finally surface but here we are. Will expect once these investigations are over my funds released thankfully.
To many people win it becomes an investigation, to many people lose with obvious referee interference and its just another tough day for gamblers...
I am sorry for being a little bit unclear about response time and probably caused you some confusion. I was talking about and advising you to stop making rather pointless post, because when I think when you made a new post on your complaint page, their timer gets resetted to full. So, when they previously only have 24 hours left to respond, by you "bumping" the thread with your post, it goes back to (IIRC) 90 hours, effectively dragging the case by giving them more time to delay an answer.
As for the AG will just reset a timer, yes they usually will give another chance for casino [and player] to give their response once the timer runs out, but they'll only give it once or twice instead of repetitively. And, still related to above, bumping the thread with a post before the ball goes into your court will just give them an even longer response time.
Now, regarding them being paid [sponsored], it's been brought numerous times by many complainants, how arbitrators at the very least should be supporting the casinos on their platform, given they donned the casino's referral link. But it's also been repetitively explained here, as well as on their FAQs page, the profit gained from referral link was used to help with the operation cost. Mind that arbitrators [much like us here] are not getting paid to mediate a case.
Actually its quite opposite. They are given as many responses and times to run out. Again pretty unprofessional to be going back and forth on a complaint sight when they have a direct contact to me as a client.
Here is todays response from AG in regards to stake running out the time on numerous occasions.
"While we understand your frustration and agree that the process is going on too long, with the casino not responding immediately to your post, the casino is still working on your case and is giving you detailed explanations of the process.
The avg response is calculated on a large number of cases and is updated periodically."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwBdenyI7VgFunny to see that it comes out now that actually the game you bet on is under investigation globally, not only by stake.
I followed the Jontay Porter betting "scandal" the past days but didn't remember your bet was exactly on this guy. So now all of this does look a little suspicious actually.
I know I supported your claim first but seeing this under these new circumstances you must admit your bet looks a bit off and stake was right doing this investigation and holding out on the money.
Your bets we are much smaller until this particular bet where you suddenly bet 7.6k on the under 3.5 rebounds and also a big parley with under 3.5 points on high odds.
So now the question is, did you have insider info or did you just follow the trend? Apparently many accounts on many bookies bet on these exact number.
The DraftKings day-after report said Porter’s under wagers were the night’s biggest money-earners for bettors.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/mar/26/nba-investigating-raptors-jontay-porter-betting-irregularitiesMight happen that they will void the winnings from these 2 bets (30k$ sayonara). Hopefully only doing this and not say you are part of a "betting syndicate". If this happens you can say goodbye to all your funds and the account.
Of course this will only happen if they actually the NBA will find him guilty of doing this intentionally. Guess this case is far from being over now.
Also if you read the article here you can see that it was an easily secured bet. " In the first game against the Clippers, Sportsbooks had Porter’s props set at over/under 5.5 points, 4.5 rebounds, 1.5 assists and 0.5 three-pointers. At the time, Porter had per game averages of 4.9 points, 3.4 rebounds, 2.2 assists and 0.7 three-pointers. "
The under's on this game if you are a professional capper you can clearly see an advantage here and maybe a mistake from the odds makers that they now are trying to come back on. As well as multiple people not in the game so the thought of his game play was greater then actually played.
Say everyone would have bet this over and lost to the under. Do you think there would be an investigation in the biggest losses for the day.
Honestly all this isn't sitting very well with me on the whole sports betting topic.
Sports Book looses big. Private investigation. Sports book wins big. Swept under the rug no real public knowledge.