OP wouldn't have been complaining if he only won his bets. But the sad thing is that he lost them and he lost his money. That's the only reason why he is now crying foul of the failure of Stake to ban him from the site. But if we take a look at the whole situation, Stake is not the reason why this person is losing. This gambler asked to be banned but still decided to deposit money and gambled the money. What is he doing? I thought he was trying to avoid gambling?
that is the problem with someone who has an addiction, even if they are trying to stop/avoid their addiction they can easily be tempted and fall back into their old habit. like I said before stake.com is somewhat liable for what happened. if they actually banned the account when they were asked, OP would not have been able to deposit on the account he asked to be banned. Yes, I now think Stake.com is also partially liable but the final decision is on the part of the gambler. Because even if Stake.com has already blocked him from playing, during that time when the gambler thought it was a good time to make a deposit and play, he could have ended up doing the same on another site. But again Stake.com has received OP's request but failed to act on it. That's their only fault. The acts of depositing and playing and losing are all to be blamed to the gambler.
. Let's say an excluded player could win but it is still not right because they already decided to exclude their self before to stop gambling. That only shows that they are not ready yet and better if they cancel the exclusion so that they can gamble on their main accounts again. Gambling using their main accounts is beneficial than a new account IMO.