^ Yup... The site is spreading itself too thin by having too much variety imho. I think we just need to let everybody know there's a BTC poker site where they could play NLHE and PLO at for now.
I'd go as far as dropping the 9max and HU tables and go for 4 max and 6max tables. And have BBJ tables across all stakes (except no rake tables).
For what it's worth, I respectfully strongly disagree with this. One of the things that set SWC apart is the great variety of offerings, it's a strength they should lean into.
That being said, most of the weirder games don't do well in the tournament format (hence why NLHE became so popular), so I do think that until population grows to where all games can be reliably supported, you should focus your efforts to NLHE and PLO there.
I wholeheartedly believe that more people would reg any one tournament if they had the option to reg more. No one likes to log in for just one tournament. I understand there is the concept of cannibalization, but there's also the opposite where too few tournaments will starve the ones that are offered.
I gotta admit I made that comment based on what I saw at the site's browser play version. Seeing the site thru the installed version, I guess there's some argument to keep it the way things are.
But, I kindly request for the browser play version to have better filtering on what games, stakes, etc should appear in the lobby. I can only click one check box at a time, it should be multiple check boxes for better filtering.
