Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1646.

plasmoske

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 251

The realist

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

And since KnC is supposedly delivering 2.5PH/s in 12 days, the difficulty change after that will be something like 200% ... that will make the recent 30%+ figures seem tiny
If it is 5PH/s then we could hit the limit of a 400% difficulty change in less than 20 days

Man I'd really like to see that happen. Will be massive news/shock to the bitcoin world especially the miners Cheesy

200% increase will make people shit bricks I tell ya

creativex

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

5000*500 = ______

or there's this maths if you like

Quote

1,000,000+(5,000x250) = 2,250,000 GH/s

baloo_kiev

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: baloo_kiev on September 18, 2013, 09:11:43 AM

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

And since KnC is supposedly delivering 2.5PH/s in 12 days

Source?

Try reading back, oh, all of about 10 messages or so...

Read 2 pages. Still can't get how he derived the "2.5PH/s"

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: baloo_kiev on September 18, 2013, 09:11:43 AM

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

And since KnC is supposedly delivering 2.5PH/s in 12 days

Source?

Tomato

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: weaknesswaran on September 18, 2013, 09:01:45 AM

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

Lets just hope they don't put 50% of the bitcoin network into a single data centre.
I'd wonder if the bitcoin devs would take action over that ...

Change algorithm to bring back fpga and gpu mining?

... shhhh don't tell them that Cheesy

baloo_kiev

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

And since KnC is supposedly delivering 2.5PH/s in 12 days

Source?

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

No, block finding is random - that's why it rises and falls.

Any estimate using only a day of block data is pretty unreliable.
A week is usually pretty good.

donch

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Updated ironic image.

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

If it is 5PH/s then we could hit the limit of a 400% difficulty change in less than 20 days

Whatever way you look at the numbers, it's going to be an interesting few weeks...

The thing I find interesting is the way the network hash rate rises then falls. The only explanation that jumps to my mind is BFL mining on it's stock and then doing a big delivery and the fall is the stock in transit. Just because I'm a conspiracy theorist doesn't mean I'm wrong

I do feel sorry for all the BFL customers who haven't received their orders yet. Their ROI is going to horrific. All I can say is get a PayPal refund quick....

blastbob

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

You do realise that the bitcoin rules do allow a difficulty jump on a single difficulty, to be up to 400% ...

Current difficulty hash rate = 800TH/s

If you think the network hash rate is 1000TH/s already then that immediately implies that the next difficulty jump will be 25% or more ... so not really slowing down much ...

And since KnC is supposedly delivering 2.5PH/s in 12 days, the difficulty change after that will be something like 200% ... that will make the recent 30%+ figures seem tiny
If it is 5PH/s then we could hit the limit of a 400% difficulty change in less than 20 days

Though that is all assuming they start delivering when they say they will and do deliver what they say they will ...

Lets just hope they don't put 50% of the bitcoin network into a single data centre.
I'd wonder if the bitcoin devs would take action over that ...

Dont worry, someone will ddos that location.

weaknesswaran

hero member

Activity: 964

Merit: 509

Quote from: kano on September 18, 2013, 08:53:48 AM

Lets just hope they don't put 50% of the bitcoin network into a single data centre.
I'd wonder if the bitcoin devs would take action over that ...

Change algorithm to bring back fpga and gpu mining?

Gyrsur

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

Quote from: Xialla on September 18, 2013, 08:55:25 AM

Quote from: Gyrsur on September 18, 2013, 08:52:14 AM

if you have a paid order somewhere status of order is usually "Processing". within KNC order system it is only "Paid (Payed)". anybody here with the same experience?

yep, same here:

Order #9XX Paid (Payed)

thank you! so I'm not alone!

Xialla

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1001

/dev/null

Quote from: Gyrsur on September 18, 2013, 08:52:14 AM

if you have a paid order somewhere status of order is usually "Processing". within KNC order system it is only "Paid (Payed)". anybody here with the same experience?

yep, same here:

Order #9XX Paid (Payed)

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

You do realise that the bitcoin rules do allow a difficulty jump on a single difficulty, to be up to 400% ...

Current difficulty hash rate = 800TH/s

If you think the network hash rate is 1000TH/s already then that immediately implies that the next difficulty jump will be 25% or more ... so not really slowing down much ...

And since KnC is supposedly delivering 2.5PH/s in 12 days, the difficulty change after that will be something like 200% ... that will make the recent 30%+ figures seem tiny
If it is 5PH/s then we could hit the limit of a 400% difficulty change in less than 20 days

Though that is all assuming they start delivering when they say they will and do deliver what they say they will ...

Lets just hope they don't put 50% of the bitcoin network into a single data centre.
I'd wonder if the bitcoin devs would take action over that ...

Gyrsur

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 1520

Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206

if you have a paid order somewhere status of order is usually "Processing". within KNC order system it is only "Paid (Payed)". anybody here with the same experience?

vesperwillow

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: Xialla on September 18, 2013, 08:35:25 AM

Quote from: vesperwillow on September 18, 2013, 08:30:48 AM

EPIC!, cg.)

Lol thanks

Quote from: Bitcoinorama on September 18, 2013, 08:37:30 AM

Arrrgh, and again!!!!

I've been waiting for many pages for that spot.. lol. Mental milestone.

Quote from: donch on September 18, 2013, 08:41:39 AM

Just trying to do some rough calculations on what the (increasingly likely looking) bulk KNC delivery will do to the total network hash rate and therefore difficulty. All figures are approximate

Current network hash rate: 1,000,000 GH/s
Possible number of September/October orders: 5,000 (based on my August order number)
Predicted hash rate of Jupiter: 500 GH/s
Average hash rate of KNC products: 250GH/s (assuming even split between Jupiter/Saturn/Mercury)

Hash rate after KNC delivers September/October batch: 1,000,000+(5,000x250) = 2,250,000 GH/s

Which will do wonders for existing BFL products' ROI :-) In the interests of transparency, it would be a fantastic move if KNC were to release accurate figures of their order book's future effect on the hash rate, rather than my rather simplistic "guesstimates"...

I overheard that KNC was delivering ~5 PH the first batch. I guess we'll see!

donch

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Updated ironic image.

Just trying to do some rough calculations on what the (increasingly likely looking) bulk KNC delivery will do to the total network hash rate and therefore difficulty. All figures are approximate

Current network hash rate: 1,000,000 GH/s
Possible number of September/October orders: 5,000 (based on my August order number)
Predicted hash rate of Jupiter: 500 GH/s
Average hash rate of KNC products: 250GH/s (assuming even split between Jupiter/Saturn/Mercury)

Hash rate after KNC delivers September/October batch: 1,000,000+(5,000x250) = 2,250,000 GH/s

Which will do wonders for existing BFL products' ROI :-) In the interests of transparency, it would be a fantastic move if KNC were to release accurate figures of their order book's future effect on the hash rate, rather than my rather simplistic "guesstimates"...

-Redacted-

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 501

Even "this user is currently ignored" beat you out this time...

Bitcoinorama

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Arrrgh, and again!!!!

Xialla

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1001

/dev/null

Quote from: vesperwillow on September 18, 2013, 08:30:48 AM

EPIC!, cg.)

vesperwillow

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1646. (Read 3049501 times)