Topic: T - page 13. (Read 41011 times)

Hi Goat, will PM you my BTC address, and thanks for looking out for my shares.   Long live the TyGrr !!!

STew

I was finally able to vote my shares.  I'll be expanding my position once the shares have the $3 floor so they're a bit cheaper, unless you reprice them before then.

Okay, bought in at 5 shares today thru GLBSE.

Seems a bit steep at 3.14 a share. Hoping to get a some good dividend returns in the future.

Big picture: see this as an investment in BTC mining community and the future of BTC.

Keep up the good work,
SJ

 

It can be done through GLBSE and I think atm that is the easiest way of doing it, The dividend is  payed to your GLBSE account every week, this is done by Goat it's semi automatic, Goat has to send the dividend but it's divided and sent to all the shareholders automatically. As a shareholder you only need to sit pack and wait for the dividends
If you decide to become a shareholder then welcome

Hi Goat,

Am looking to invest in shares of your IPO, do I do this through GLBSE? I just opened an account there.

And how do GLBSE members get dividends from you, is it automatically sent to their accounts?

I like what I see so far with your mining start-up, keep up the good work!

SJ

How long will this motion be open?

Also, I think GLBSE is down. I can open the web client, but it doesn't retrieve any data. The asset contracts link shows a server side application error.

That's a failing of the GLBSE system itself. It shouldn't be necessary for those creating a motion to specify the asset it is related to - that information is almost certainly part of the data associated with the motion already.

Raise it as a "feature request" with the GLBSE team.

Just a little personal pet peeve, if you will indulge me for a moment?

When listing a motion on GLBSE, it is very helpful if you identify the asset under consideration in the motion. I know this one we have been dicusssing and you announced it, but if I had just checked motions without reading this thread... I would be wondering who it was for.

Thanks.

 No worries. The info in the first post and reading one of the 'expected' dividend details on Dec. 10th lead me to ask.

  Cheers

Are dividends due out today? I am not clear on the current schedule.

Well, those who have not invested yet actually would not get hurt, because they can choose not to be investors if they don't like where the company is going. I support the value floor for the asset, although I was happy to get my last couple at 2.5, I understand and support having a floor value. Investors who are not around now will be buying shares of the asset without the dividends that we are receiving now, so they are buying whatever the share is valued at when they buy it, what has happened up to that point is not a factor, other than to make the investment an attractive one or not.

And my fan comments were tongue in cheek, I expect many of us have put together all kinds of elaborate air movement systems, and yours just brought a smile to my face.

So- 3btc/$10 USD value floor, thumbs up.

Set aside new investment designated as FPGA expansion money, thumbs up. Especially if there is announcement made if that is the direction so new investors can be aware of the full range of the company.

As to merged mining... it is pure found money. The extra i0c's and nmc's that I am pulling in with 2.25 Gh of mining while still operating my systems on a constant basis (non-dedicated) adds up to an extra .75 btc per day when dumped on the exchanges. I am also parking a browser on the java i0c pool for each machine, which is generating another 3,500 i0c per day. Why knot said the dominatrix?

Well, Goat has 90%+ of votes covered then.....

I would say until either 50% of the shareholders votes yes or no, because then even if people haven't voted yet the outcome will be the same, with a maximum of 7 days.I also support this decision, I think it will help to stabilize the share value and bring in new investors.
//DeaDTerra

As a first investor, I support this idea and I would be more willing to invest further knowing the value is protected a bit better.  I also like the idea of putting some of the profit towards purchase of FPGAs.

Nice response on the BIB.goat issue. I think you are spot on with how to proceed- designate the next X dollars of IPO revenue (61 shares each? not bad!). I support this idea, never hurts to diversify the means of production. And it might help with not having to buy so many fans! You should consider opening a subsidiary that provides wind tunnel facilities! Of course a lot of us are probably doing the same Rube Goldberg approach, I am sitting here with two windows wide open in 20 degree weather (F, -6.7 C) and 500 cfm worth of fans exchanging air.

Also- another thought- have you looked at pointing some of the mining at the new merged bitparking? With triple merge (btc/i0c/nmc) I have bumped my revenue by almost 25% with the same hashing power. Nothing wrong with Eclipse, and I am watching Project #2 closely, but a few cycles making a few extra baht? What's not to like about that?

Agree that a motion is a superior idea in terms of gauging how the asset holders feel about the addition. Given the exceptional track record of the first month or so, I can speak for 14% of the sold shares and say I would be in favor of diverting a portion of the revenues to expanding the mining equipment base with FPGA.

Just a quick thought- would buying an Icarus affect the payoff schedule for the BIB.goat issue, or is that staying on track?

I think it sounds like a good investment for the future, as they seem more stable and cheaper to maintained and run. As the cost for adding the boards is the board cost it's self I think it's a good idea instead of expanding to more rigs
I think putting up a motion on GLBSE is always a good idea to check what the stock holders want to do.

How many shares outstanding?

Any interest in FPGAs?

I think it would be (relatively) easy to use the spare USB ports and power cables on your GPU miners to run FPGAs.  Your electricity isn't too expensive at $.13/kWh, but FPGAs are more efficient than GPUs.

That's well within my skill set, but I won't promise I have time in my schedule to take it on.  If you want, go ahead and PM me the details and I will take a closer look.