1- Its resolved, BCCI already bend the knee for the right reasons and working with the NADA
2- BCCI-ECB-CA-PCB-CSA /ICC all are against it.
3- ICC and cricket boards has 3-4 year window to reschedule any Bilateral or ICC tournament. Olympics only need 12-20 days.
** Last 2 points has some merits.
Thanks for this. My information was not up to date. If BCCI is working with NADA, it is great news. Cricket should be free from performance enhancing drugs, and I hope that we are moving in that direction. Yes.. none of the cricket boards will favor qualifying tournaments. I should have said all the 11 test boards plus ICC, rather than saying BCCI/ICC.
Regarding your last point: If cricket is included in the 2028 Olympic games, then I guess it will be similar to football. Only 2-3 regular players will be allowed and the remainder will be U-23 players. So I am not sure whether the ICC tournaments needs to be rescheduled or not. It may affect only a few players. Yeah on 6 month trial. i covered this in last page.
Not much excited if it happens with the cricket too (Similar to football), already mentioned in the last page...
snip
if they include cricket then they can follow the same path as football with qualification tournaments and 16 teams with a group stage of 4 group and then a knockout stage. Even if cricket is accepted i do not think that the top teams will send their best team to represent as it will clash with the regular schedule and at best they will send a second string team.
As far as i know football in the Olympic is not big thing per se because majority of the players are required to be under 23 age. if this happens with cricket then its not real deal IMO. Schedule and dividing groups are open to discussion, they are more than capable of handling this issue so its not a big deal.
~snip~
If you are including cricket in Olympics, it is best to introduce T20 than any other format, i am not a fan of the T10 format as you are not able to see the skills of the batsman, just slogging will be the key selection criteria which will not help the game in the long run, Test match is a dying breed because majority of the players like the shorter format and
if you introduce cricket to the Olympics then it should be T20.Well if our target is skill then we have clear winner "Test Format".
About T-20, i feel that we are repeating same thing again n again
i suggest please check discussion on last page. got nothing new to add.