wallet looks great added it to the op and gave it a tweet, thanks Osmiumcoin!
Topic: [TEK] TEKcoin Hi-PoS hybrid pos/pow no premine/ipo/ico - page 23. (Read 446084 times)
wallet looks great added it to the op and gave it a tweet, thanks Osmiumcoin!
"Buy/Sell/Trade TEKcoin" - Is that button leading to an active exchange capability in the wallet, or is it simply a link to external exchanges? If it is an exchange within the wallet, ... now THAT's interesting!
I'm still wary of the Yobit fork even though Yobit is reported to be on the right fork. That needs double/triple checking.
I'm still wary of the Yobit fork even though Yobit is reported to be on the right fork. That needs double/triple checking.
Dev please update ANN + wallet
Wallet winqt GUI
https://mega.nz/#!vIYmxB7C!V5Qc72Vzydg4tRsVKqa2awKziu-uZdF57MHKSGzXRjc
SRC GUI [/size]
https://mega.nz/#!OBBxyabJ!qenZPabic3r4o2s-dgnepLdvjL2jyaJFc5d0cAb6vhM
Wallet winqt GUI
https://mega.nz/#!vIYmxB7C!V5Qc72Vzydg4tRsVKqa2awKziu-uZdF57MHKSGzXRjc
SRC GUI [/size]
https://mega.nz/#!OBBxyabJ!qenZPabic3r4o2s-dgnepLdvjL2jyaJFc5d0cAb6vhM
Today night upload for free new wallet gui TEK + new graphic for TEK for ANN watch Thread 
Now go to trade 40 sats now !
https://yobit.net/en/trade/TEK/BTC
Now go to trade 40 sats now !
https://yobit.net/en/trade/TEK/BTC
Good Good Good Good Good
Looks like Yobit is back on the right chain and allowing deposits and withdraws https://yobit.net/en/trade/TEK/BTC
It's great news for us. But for me i still choose cryptopiaFlyCoin and kicked me off because I am associated with the coin. So, I am glad Yobit is back on track
so I can do a little buying at these prices.
Looks like Yobit is back on the right chain and allowing deposits and withdraws https://yobit.net/en/trade/TEK/BTC
It's great news for us. But for me i still choose cryptopia
I fixed issue with mining. I invite to mine on my mining pool.
By the way, I recommend to update codebase to newer versions of Bitcoin, because it has some improvements on syncing.
By the way, I recommend to update codebase to newer versions of Bitcoin, because it has some improvements on syncing.
Looks like Yobit is back on the right chain and allowing deposits and withdraws https://yobit.net/en/trade/TEK/BTC
Amazing how long a ten minute job takes when you put it off, ain't it?
Looks like Yobit is back on the right chain and allowing deposits and withdraws https://yobit.net/en/trade/TEK/BTC
Mine this coin on http://pool.e-waluty.net.pl
Hi all looking to add this to our pool after spending days of block syncing it's no good. What is the proper wallet, source anything that the world is using or is this a dead project?
Haven't had a problem with syncing... although there was a spot way back when where the blocks wouldn't sync correctly... guess it wasn't corrected with the new wallet. I would suggest getting a bootstrap to get past that spot.
Hi all looking to add this to our pool after spending days of block syncing it's no good. What is the proper wallet, source anything that the world is using or is this a dead project?
...
Exchange-in-a-wallet: for a long time I've been aware of a chat capability in altcoin wallets. From this it occured to me that a simple exchange notice board could be possible offering coins for fiat and vice versa, which could then be developed into a simple exchange. This was all a pipe dream until I saw a recent Ethereum app which proclaims to do exactly that. Here's the link:
...
You mean in-wallet trading ?Exchange-in-a-wallet: for a long time I've been aware of a chat capability in altcoin wallets. From this it occured to me that a simple exchange notice board could be possible offering coins for fiat and vice versa, which could then be developed into a simple exchange. This was all a pipe dream until I saw a recent Ethereum app which proclaims to do exactly that. Here's the link:
...
If so that's not new and not so popular, too many security risks.
Quote
Incidentally, I believe that Tranz of HoboNickels holds a part key to solving the general blockchain bloat problem with an innovation of his, but I don't want to say too much about this at the moment - I'm sure he could be of great help with the exchange-in-a-wallet idea if he wanted to put his mind to it. Shhhh! Keep it to yourselves. I have an investment strategy to consider. 
VPNCoin has a real light wallet, it seems to operate like electrum/multibit.
Enough nodes that have a full chain and the Lite wallets only need to download a small piece of the chain.
Then I forget pruning.
- The exchange wallet could be kept separate from the main stash wallet and therefore less of a security risk.
- Lite mobile wallets - Osmiumcoin and all you Devs: Are you listening? Your coin needs you!
...
Exchange-in-a-wallet: for a long time I've been aware of a chat capability in altcoin wallets. From this it occured to me that a simple exchange notice board could be possible offering coins for fiat and vice versa, which could then be developed into a simple exchange. This was all a pipe dream until I saw a recent Ethereum app which proclaims to do exactly that. Here's the link:
...
You mean in-wallet trading ?Exchange-in-a-wallet: for a long time I've been aware of a chat capability in altcoin wallets. From this it occured to me that a simple exchange notice board could be possible offering coins for fiat and vice versa, which could then be developed into a simple exchange. This was all a pipe dream until I saw a recent Ethereum app which proclaims to do exactly that. Here's the link:
...
If so that's not new and not so popular, too many security risks.
Quote
Incidentally, I believe that Tranz of HoboNickels holds a part key to solving the general blockchain bloat problem with an innovation of his, but I don't want to say too much about this at the moment - I'm sure he could be of great help with the exchange-in-a-wallet idea if he wanted to put his mind to it. Shhhh! Keep it to yourselves. I have an investment strategy to consider.
VPNCoin has a real light wallet, it seems to operate like electrum/multibit.
Enough nodes that have a full chain and the Lite wallets only need to download a small piece of the chain.
Then I forget pruning.
Let's not spread the focus of previous comments too wide. Osmiumcoin offered a new wallet design which some of us didn't take to. There's no need to reprimand people for simply offering a valid opinion. I, personally think Osmiumcoin's efforts on wallet design are wasted on TEKcoin - our current design is very pleasing to the eye.
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
A mobile wallet would definitely encourage commerce. I can't recall where I read this, but some focus group predicted that there would be more mobile devices than home comuters by this year. I don't know if this came to pass, but I don't doubt it. EVERYBODY has a smartphone these days.
As for a mainframe wallet/exchange combo, can you elucidate on details? The idea intrigues me.
and yes, your comment was more constructive than mine. It wasn't meant as a reprimand, just that somebody besides the devs focusing on the coin makes for wider exposure, and shows that there is interest beyond just tekheads.
In private messages, Biomech knows of the high regard I have for him. Let it be known to all others that I regard him as a star contributor to this thread and to those of other coins that I invest in (understatement). My observations were meant as a comment on the general drift of the posts rather than his in particular. Now for the meat!
Exchange-in-a-wallet: for a long time I've been aware of a chat capability with altcoin wallets. From this it occured to me that a simple exchange notice board could be possible offering coins for fiat and vice versa, which could then be developed into a simple exchange. This was all a pipe dream until I saw a recent Ethereum app which proclaims to do exactly that. Here's the link:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/dev?id=6323083665621589806
Incidentally, I believe that Tranz of HoboNickels holds a part key to solving the general blockchain bloat problem with an innovation of his, but I don't want to say too much about that at the moment - I'm sure he could be of great help with the exchange-in-a-wallet idea if he wanted to put his mind to it. Shhhh! Keep it to yourselves. I have an investment strategy to consider.
Let's not spread the focus of previous comments too wide. Osmiumcoin offered a new wallet design which some of us didn't take to. There's no need to reprimand people for simply offering a valid opinion. I, personally think Osmiumcoin's efforts on wallet design are wasted on TEKcoin - our current design is very pleasing to the eye.
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
A mobile wallet would definitely encourage commerce. I can't recall where I read this, but some focus group predicted that there would be more mobile devices than home comuters by this year. I don't know if this came to pass, but I don't doubt it. EVERYBODY has a smartphone these days.
As for a mainframe wallet/exchange combo, can you elucidate on details? The idea intrigues me.
and yes, your comment was more constructive than mine. It wasn't meant as a reprimand, just that somebody besides the devs focusing on the coin makes for wider exposure, and shows that there is interest beyond just tekheads.
Let's not spread the focus of previous comments too wide. Osmiumcoin offered a new wallet design which some of us didn't take to. There's no need to reprimand people for simply offering a valid opinion. I, personally think Osmiumcoin's efforts on wallet design are wasted on TEKcoin - our current design is very pleasing to the eye.
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
I couldn't have stated it better..
I appreciate the community involvement , Tek stability and ongoing activity like everyone else and i wouldn't ever ridicule any contribution of anyone that would help the community as i see my self part of it. I just think as ACNJ stated, let's direct it at something that drives the community forward Tek-powered.
Let's not spread the focus of previous comments too wide. Osmiumcoin offered a new wallet design which some of us didn't take to. There's no need to reprimand people for simply offering a valid opinion. I, personally think Osmiumcoin's efforts on wallet design are wasted on TEKcoin - our current design is very pleasing to the eye.
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
Much better, in my opinion, would be wallet functionality for specific purposes e.g. the offer of a non-staking, lite, mobile wallet. Non-staking because it wouldn't sap mobile resources too much. Staking could be done on our main computers and amounts of TEK could be transferred to the mobile wallet simply for spending.
So, Osmiumcoin, how about it?
Mainframe wallet ... an exchange within a wallet.
Mobile wallet ... non-staking, lite ...
What are the possibilities?
What do the rest of you think?
Yup simple is good . Looking good we are moving forward now ,
maybe Now
I do not mean to be rude... But.... does TEK need the face-lift?
Hey, don't knock it. Third party developer doing things for the coin
Some will want it, some won't. I agree with this, any updates, improvements or additional options made for the community is a good thing.
The more interest and community involvement a coin has the better it is for everyone!
Jump to: