It's all coming down to this theory that Nadal was not fully fit to beat Novak in the final. Why are not they are accepting that Novak was playing outstanding and deserved the win?
However Nadal was honest to admit his opponent, “It was unbelievable the way that he played - no doubt about that."
I think we know that Nadal wasn't really 100% fit during the Australian open, but he had some amazing run himself. And we didn't think that he will be able to reach the finals, at least in my opinion because of his injury. I guess there's no explanation here, he really met Djokovic at his peak and really looks unbeatable at that stage. Its a day wherein Djokovic can't do anything wrong and very positive that he will steamrolled Nadal that day.
A loss is a loss and there should be no excuses that Nadal lost because he was not 100% fit. Djokovic played an awesome game and i never see at any point he was at backend or was struggling against Nadal . Djokovic played aggressively and really was a deserving winner on the said date.