Topic: The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected. - page 2. (Read 6473 times)

How in the world dense can you get? Don't you even realize that politics is a religion in itself?

When the government wants to get rid of other religions... get them out of government... it's just so that their religion can stand stronger. Everybody loves the religion that he is in favor of... even government people.

You won't be liking the religion of government after the other religions are gone out of it. The exception is that maybe you are the Anti-Christ.

It is the church dude, mostly the Evangelicals in Brazil or the Methodists in US. Just ask anyone in continental Europe how difficult was to get rid of the massive influence of the church in politics, and it is not over yet in many countries. Nobody voted the priests, yet they think they hold authority on others because their "imaginary friend" tells them so.

Look, many of the people who fled to the former colonies, now the US were being prosecuted for a variety of reasons many times for religion, so they were quite deep into several forms of Christianism. That has stayed, but also now significant part of the church in the US it is no better than the fucking Talibans, they are all about imposing their narrow view of the world on others and particularly telling women what they can and cannot do.

Look, if you think abortion is wrong, you do not do it, but you do not have to impose that on others. It is not stealing, killing people in random shootings or getting a credit falsifying the value of your assets - it is not a crime and should not be treated as such (my own view is that there is a biological timeframe for it in which the foetus is not yet a person as there is no brain activity - just my view).

What specifically should she have done differently?  

Do you mean it was wrong to make up a story and convince people like you that Dominion and Smartmatic had a secret algorithm from Venezuela  that was designed to switch votes, and the only reason it was caught was because Trump got so many votes the algorithm just didn't know what to do and so the evil dems, disguised as honest poll workers, had to swoop in and change the votes themselves?

Should she have not lied?  Or should she have come up with a better lie?

Should you have done a little more critical thinking before spreading her lies?

She has quite a good hand-writting, I'll give that to her.
To be honest, I would have expected a longer apology letter from Miss Powell, I thought the Fulton county would had imposed a minimum number of characters/words. She was supposed to use this chance to legitimately apologize to the people of Georgia for her wrongdoing, but this rather feels like a slap on the face to people who take polítics and democracy seriously.
It may have something to do with her later declarations about her actually behind forced to take plea deal with the prosecutors of Georgia. Hopefully her state of mind is not bad enough for her to stay away from polítics and focus on continue to work as a lawyer instead. Assuming she still has some change to be one after being part of this high profile political scandal.

I learned my lessons long ago. And, I have and am apologizing for my ignorance in the way that I handled things regarding the law. This time I am doing it right.

Powell SHOULD apologize for the mistakes she made in not helping the people of Georgia. She did it wrong, and did not take down the corrupt government of Georgia because she did it wrong. So, she harmed the people by not straightening Georgia out.

I think she knows that she did it wrong. But I don't think that she has learned how to do it right, yet. Perhaps she will learn the right way to do it sometime.

The real question is, will YOU ever even look in the direction of the right way to do it?

I wonder if Queen of the Kraken Sydney Powell has leanred about right and wrong and salvation.  Here's the apology letter she wrote to the citizens of Georgia after pleading guilty to "intentional interference in the execution of an election".



How about you BADecker?

Have you learned any lessons after so many of your claims involving the 2020 election and the Kraken have been proven to be lies?

I am not even sure how the "sovereign citizen" thing became an argument within the United States, by the way. It sounds rather like a legal gimmick which was successfully used once many years ago in a very specific scenario or something like it and since then it has been fruitlessly used by others in order to try to flee their legal issues. I am not a lawyer or a person who lives in the United States, so I could be completely wrong.

Also, the narrative of contraception being a bad thing in the USA is also something I would have not expected to see from a developed country, here in my republic we witness very irrational things happening which are not supposed to happen in any country which is considered to be civilized and yet, we all here agree access to condoms is important.

It is a topic I would need to ask about someone from the USA when I have got the chance.

He thinks wearing a condom makes you a criminal.  Don't worry about his accusations.  Just youtube Sovereign Citizen to see where he gets his argument tactics.   Round and round you go, facts ignored. 

Good points. But they are basic points. If you would follow them, you would be in agreement with me.

Believe in whatever you want - as humans we do not know many things - but do not think that you have some better reason than others base on a belief, because then is when God becomes "your imaginary friend". It is even immoral.

You actually need to prove facts, is just not enough to "believe". For example, I have evidence that you are a dumbass. so I do not need to believe it.

Just like Trump need to proof someone scammed him, it is not enough to "believe it".

I just wanted to thank you for respecting me as much as you do. But don't do it. I am just a man like you (or are you a woman?).

We all have ideas and opinions and desires. And we talk harshly to each other to maintain our ideals in strength within us. So, it's understandable that we are going to pick on each other at times.

However, when one calls God imaginary, God perks up His ears a little, and listens to what that joker is saying. So, don't so it... think of or call God imaginary. God is Almighty. He holds your life in His hands. And He won't put up with your denial of Him. Hope and pray that He wakes you up to His existence gently. But for sure, wakes you up in this life.

All people die. At least it seems that way. In the resurrection at the last day, God will provide us all with the knowledge of why He judges us the way He does. It will be based on what we have thought of Him in this life. For those who have denied Him, the punishment will be great.

So, if you are truly a God-denier, change, while you have time. Get into the Bible to find out about God, and the basics of right and wrong and salvation... before it's too late.

He is not even that smart my friend, he probably thinks I am Ukrainian (which may or may not be true - nationalities come and go).

This dumbass is not accusing me of ignoring reality, he has accused me of being a criminal. I can provide abundant proof of him effectively being a dumbass - so I can perfectly claim that - while he cannot provide any proof of his accusations or, for that mater, for anything else he says.

As far as this forum is concern, I am an AI living in a IP-masked server in a non-mapped Island of the Pacific Ocean. Anyone wanting to argue with me will have to do it with arguments, not attacking who / what I am or where I happen to live at the moment. That's why he is saying all that dumbass shit.

To me it is kind of wacky someone like him would accuse us of ignoring reality or trying to conveniently ignore some political facts because a new Trump presidency would translate to less money to ours respective countries. On one hand, it is true there are some countries which receive economical aid from the United States, specially those in central America... But the wacky parts comes when BADecker points his finger at us without even knowing where we are from.
There is a small chance he believes all the countries around the world receive money from the United States (even sanctioned ones) or perhaps he saw us talking a lil bit of Spanish somewhere else in the forum and only because of that simple observation he extrapolates and assumes we come from a country which would be economical crippled if it was not from USA AID.
Granted, not all the population in USA is that ignorant, but I have found people from that country on the interner who could could not even tell the difference between Mexico and Spain.
Anyways, since Trump does not like to give money away as president (as he implies) I wonder whether Trump will cut social security. I doubt it.

Provide proof.

Hint: "God (my imaginary friend) told me in my dreams", "Trump said it so it is true", "Those voices that speak to me all the time say so", "Tucker Carlson said so", "the Fox said so", "I read it in the (Bible, Koran, Book of Life, Harry Potter books, a documentary on the Aztec empire,...), "The same people that say that COVId does not exist told me so", "the same people who think that aliens assaulted the capitol told me" are NOT considered proof except in you parallel universe and the state of BAdeckdonia, where superman lives.

Go back to kindergarten dumbass.

Maybe you should speed up to stop. No offense meant.

lol

surveilled

The sovereign citizen claim is a mistaken attempt to remain in the private when accosted by the public. Government has authority over the public. They don't have simple authority over the private. They need to get a warrant if they want to enter the private. The warrant if signed by a judge without credible evidence, or a grand jury authorization, can cost a judge his job, and damages.

"Representation" referring to the 'defendant', in any form is something that causes a defendant to essentially lose his case. Why representation at all? If you are present so that you can speak, why would you need to represent yourself? You don't need representing at all.

The judge wants you to represent yourself so that he can allow the prosecution to represent HIS client. Also, accepting representation essentially says that you are the 'person' listed on the indictment, when the person on the indictment is just a name, but is not you the flesh and blood man or woman. Also, you can be limited by the judge regarding what you speak into the record this way. So, don't represent yourself, or be represented. Simply stand present as a man or woman.

Since standing unrepresented, but present is different than most other trials - almost everybody in the recent past has stood represented in some way - case law doesn't apply, except for old case law, from times when little representation was used.

Powell is an attorney. If she was smart like Hillary Clinton, she could have gotten off totally free, by not being represented.


How The Federal-Private Speech Police Operated In Election 2020:

---

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/how-federal-private-speech-police-operated-election-2020-radar-highly-attuned-right
During the 2020 election, the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) partnered with the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), a consortium of groups led by the Stanford Internet Observatory, to track and counter what they considered mis- and dis-information.

EIP surveilled hundreds of millions of social media posts and collected from the cooperating government and non-governmental entities that it calls its "stakeholders" potential violations of social media platforms' policies concerning election speech.

It coordinated its efforts primarily through a digital "ticketing" system. There, one of its as many as 120 analysts or an external partner could highlight a piece of offending social media content, or narrative consisting of many offending posts, by creating a "ticket," and share it with other relevant participants by "tagging" them. Tagged participants could then communicate with each other, in something of a group chat, about the veracity of the flagged content, concerns about its spread, and what actions they might take to combat it.

...

Hemingway concluded with a warning: “The censorship-industrial complex better buckle up, because the days of conservatives taking this lying down are over.”
...

---

I still do not get what the appeal is to claim one is a sovereign citizen or similar stuff in order to try to get some valid defence at court if it has been proven already that such defense is not effective at all in a court. Not even mentioning the mistake representing oneself is if one does not have any kind of legal experience... To me, it seems this person wanted to emulate Darrell Brooks defense, but again, that was a failed defense.
Maybe he was not aware of the outcome of Darells Brooks trial and thought it was a good idea. I don't know.

Also, Powell got a good deal, in my opinion. Being a lawyer herself, she may be very informed of the consequences of her actions had she not taken a deal.

Oh hey that reminds me....


Jan. 6 rioter who used sovereign citizen 'gobbledygook' at trial is found guilty

Such a simplistic view of the US and the world explains a lot why you dump the shit you dump in every post. Any participative regime is based in the separation of power, individual freedom, the rule of law, free press and free expression and many other principles. They ALL work together to provide the right framework for public life, allowing discussion without violence and impositions.

Trump has decided that he can pick and choose which ones of these are applicable to him and guess what... separation of powers, check and balances and rule of law are not the chosen ones.