Topic: The road to the End of Religion: How sex will kill God - page 21. (Read 37272 times)

Just remember. The world has been around quite a long time. And History shows us that many nations and governments tried to get rid of religion over the last 4,000 years, but failed. There won't be complete success this time either. Religion will always return, stronger than ever, just as it has in the past.

Nanotech is coming, if you're under 60 in 2015, you'll almost certainly see it within your lifetime.

QFT, like eating candy with the wrapper on.

I like this idea, but when will we get rid of all sexually transmitted diseases? we may never see it during our lifetimes. It's a shame, because condon sex just sucks.

I can smell the stink of superstition on you a mile away,  theist. You're only fooling yourself,  no one else. Didn't your priest ever tell you not to talk to atheists? We're a threat because reason is the only antidote to superstition.

It is pretty simple to go around accusing people of being whatever you want. Quote a single theist based argument I made to you. Oh yes, that's right it never happened, so you can't.

Now that yes another baseless personal attack is put aside, would you care to support any of your other baseless claims with scientific evidence? (note: cartoons don't count as scientific evidence)

I know how to use the internet. I am asking you explain your position using scientific method and its studies. You claim your ideology has the backing of science, but so do a lot of religions. The only way you can demonstrate you are any different than a new emerging religious sect is to back your arguments with scientific data.

If you can't even explain your arguments in plain words, and have links to actual scientific studies, why should anyone believe a word you have to say? Because your ideology sounds good superficially? Well sign me up!

In reality I think you haven't even read any of those books, and are just parroting them from a list you found elsewhere. Also I think you know if you actually read the books they would contain no scientific evidence backing your arguments about gender identity.

Why bother? You have at your fingertips the greatest compendium of scientific knowledge ever assembled - a hundred thousand Libraries of Alexandria, all accessible today from a portable computer which fits in the palm of your hand. Relative to every other generation of humans who have ever lived - many of whom measured their knowledge as carefully as their wealth -  we and we alone are Kings. Our knowledge-wealth has reached infinity, today you can be on the internet learning 24/7/365 and you will never run out of new material to learn. With modern science mankind is (collectively) learning new information much faster than any one person could absorb it. Anyway, I digress. My point is, if access to this vast sea of knowledge has not cured you of your superstition, nothing I (or anyone else) could ever write here will.

More science, less personal attacks.

Up to the top, learn my sex-fearing, god-fearing theistards, learn!

Guess that's not coming.... time for you to sit back and relax.

Edit: Oh, he edited his post. Maybe he's coming back with a real response this time.

Still waiting for you to produce the science...

TRUFACTS BROMOSAURUS-REX!

You can selectively edit my comments, aren't you special. Next are you going to tell me that you "are rubber and I am glue and anything I say bounces off me and sticks to you"?

You think it is a character flaw, thanks for supporting my point that you are disingenuous and bigoted. None of this changes the fact that I have made zero theist arguments.

P.S. 'YOU LOSED THE GAME" is not a proper sentence. The word you were looking for is lost, which you clearly are.

Cool pic, too bad there aren't and scientific studies in your reply.

HAH! You just admitted that being a theist is a character flaw! CHECK AND MATE!! YOU JUST LOSED THE GAME!

Please, quote theist based arguments I have made, even one. You just like applying labels like these to people because you think it makes it easier for you to try to marginalize their opinions and assassinate the character of your opponents. At no point did I ever make an argument based on theism with you, but feel free to just keep making up things for lack of a substantive argument.

I ask you for scientific studies to support your argument for stripping children of their gender identities, and all you can do is keep talking about God. I am not here to talk about God. I am here to talk about how your ideology is not only not based on anything even remotely related to scientific reasoning, but it is destructive to the well being of children in general to experiment with their gender identities in any systematic manner. These choices should be left up to individuals and families, schools and the state have no business involving themselves in the personal identity choices of individuals. The state should have nothing to do with it. In the end all you are here to do is spout Marxist theories and ideology that you can't back up with facts.

Furthermore you are a bigot and a totalitarian hiding behind a rainbow flag who wishes to strip individuals of the right to privately practice their own religious beliefs. Regardless if you think it is stupid or not they have that right, and you do not have the right to persecute them for their beliefs, just as other individuals have the right to chose whichever gender identity they wish without being persecuted. Religious groups disapproving of homosexuality is not equivalent to persecution. The vast majority of people (religious or not) would not find such behavior acceptable. You have a right to make those choices concerning your own life, you do not have the right to force others to approve.

I don't need to read your book to know you are completely full of shit. I am still willing to examine any scientific studies you can produce to support your argument, but I look forward to the pictures, videos, personal attacks, and endless discussions about God that will follow in stead of scientific reasoning and empirical data.

And you actually believe it's possible for to have a rational discussion about scientific evidence with a theist? I can't even reach the critical thinking part of your brain, friend, because God is standing in the way.

This thread is going on 4,000 views thanks to you and your friends. So many young minds, I wonder how many will be inoculated against the religion virus by reading arguments on this forum? Thanks for continuing to bump my thread.

Welcome to the information age, theists. Praise be to computer science, for the advent of the internet spells certain doom for religion, and promises decisive victory for reason and science.  



The trends are clear and will only accelerate.



The end of religion is now guaranteed with the same certainty as if it had already happened. Look theists, you had a good run. The dark ages gave us so much to think about, right? We got A Song of Ice and Fire out of that mess!

But your time is over now. After ten thousand years, the age of Violent Civilization is finally coming to a close. Just three centuries old, the infant Reason is all grown up, ready to stretch her legs and take command of Earth.

I know it's scary, theists. I know it must feel like the end times, but it's only the beginning. Religion lost. Accept it. Move on.



Listen theists, I promise everything is going to be great with Reason asserting itself. Rule by Violence and Superstition has been less than pleasant these past few millennia.

Look at the bright side, your orgasms are going to be so much more intense with multiple partners, after monogamy melts away. Read Sex at Dawn.

There you go again, retreating to safety, arguing about God again, a debate that you can never be proven wrong at, and that goes on forever, giving you the opportunity to avoid discussing the flaws in your ideology and the complete lack of scientific evidence to support your argument.

As a scientist, I don't "accept" any scientific theory. On the contrary, I eagerly await any evidence which refutes them! Scientists love any day when old science gets shitcanned, because it means we've gained some new understanding about the universe, some new insight that has altered our perspective to more accurately reflect objective reality. Scientists love being proven wrong! That said, as of this post, modern science has been unable to produce a more probable theory, so the Big Bang theory is an imperfect description which is understood to be incomplete, but is tolerated until a better and more compelling explanation is available to us.

Do you see how this approach to understanding reality is fundamentally different (and diametrically opposed) from religion?

What fight? Would you say im also fighting Unicorns, Smurfs, and Leprechauns? God is an idea lacking any supporting evidence, ergo this idea is simply dismissed out of hand as absurd, the same way I dismiss the moon being made of cheese or Giant Space Squids that attack NASA ships.

You know theists, we're really not so different when you think about it. After all, there are hundreds of Gods which you name fiction, and there are hundreds of Gods I name fiction. It's only a disagreement over a single measly deity which divides us.