Topic: The road to the End of Religion: How sex will kill God - page 23. (Read 37219 times)

It isn't - but with a title like "Dr Money and the Boy with no Penis" the makers of this particular documentary knew little of journalistic diplomacy and sensitive subtlety - but a lot about tabloid sensationalism.

Why is it that female genital mutilation is a travesty, but a infant boy getting his penis burnt off is a funny joke?

... brought to you by the director of  "Dr. Penetration and the Girl with Two Quims"

Um, no. Way to not even watch the video and ignore testimony FROM THE OWN BOYS MOUTH DIRECTLY before he killed himeslf. But keep telling yourself you have nothing to learn, because hey, you know it all already right? What could anyone have to teach you? Whatever it takes to make excuses to not address your contradictory ideologies.

Lets try one more time and pretend like you are not intellectually dishonest and actively deceiving yourself and everyone else here.

Dr. Money And The Boy With No Penis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUTcwqR4Q4Y

sci·ence
ˈsīəns/

the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

re·li·gion
rəˈlijən/

the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.

Now you are trying to use the religion of The Force to prove that science is not religion or something.

The two divisions of what is known as science among lay people are, science fact, and science fiction. The problem is that lay people don't know where the division lies. And a lot of scientists fall in the category of lay people regarding areas of science that do not fall within their pet science branch.

Since real science fiction falls outside of the two areas of science expressed above, science is a religion because of all the lay people that believe it to be real when in reality it contains lots of theory that has not been proven. People believe much of science, science which is not fact. Thus, science is religion.

Thank you for drawing us to the Yoda religion to help me show what I mean.

Definitely not.

Hey, folks, do you think he's really serious?   

You're watching a video about it after the event occurred, it is indirect anecdotal third-hand evidence.

Perhaps I'm only proving the point that God didn't provide me with the grace to further tolerate your ignorance.

Thank you. This is quite noble of you.

When you can't rebut the evident points, and you place me on ignore (sticking your head in the sand) you are doing exactly the thing that others must see. You are proving that your science is religion, because you believe it, after it has been shown to be erroneous. You flee when you can't find an answer, and like the universities that know what the truth is but tend to hide it, you would silence me if you could.

Tell you what. It's a lot easier for me to not have to respond to you. And since there are others who will, over the course of time, speak of the things that you and I have spoken of, there will be discussion. The truth of the religious aspect of science and its unholy order of fake high-priest scientists will come out.

Ah, there we go with the ad hominem attacks again. I see how it is, as long as you get to frame the subject in whatever way that puts your ideology in a positive light, you will talk all day, but the moment that your theories are demonstrated to be self contradictory then suddenly it is irrelevant.

The video demonstrates that the originator of your gender theories tested them on a boy who had his penis accidentally burnt off during circumcision. He decided it was a good idea to raise him as a girl, and the result was he blew his brains out, and his twin brother ODed on antidepressants. This is direct evidence, from the boys own mouth that he always felt like a boy in spite of everyone treating him as a girl, and it caused him so much distress he ended his life. This is direct evidence that gender identity also has biological drivers and is not 100% conditioning from society. Tell me more about this being off topic, maybe some one will buy your bullshit.

The problem is trying to conflate sexual preference with religion, theology, divinity, theism and science is they all mean different things to different people.

Terence McKenna - Science is saying give us one free miracle and we'll explain the rest. (the big Bang). Whats flawed with the big Bang? For starters explain how did the Universe expand to its enormous size faster than the speed of Light?

Newton spent more time studying alchemy then he did gravity or light.

Science is just as full of Dogma as religion especially when it comes to cosmology. In many cases science has become is it own religion.

IMHO The easiest way to navigate life, in all cases simply substitute the word God with the word Universe and everything becomes far less complicated or manipulated.

You are part of it and it is part of you, it does not show any fear or favor and anything is possible, you have this life to make with it what you please, so allow others to do the same. Fuck with it and it will fuck you back. It is more alive than we are and it is perfect. Accept that we will never fully comprehend it, that's the mystery of life. It is timeless and yet everything that has and ever will happen only happens in the present.

No two people can occupy the same time and space so it stands to reason that nobody will have matching perspectives, trying to do so only diminishes your reality and makes you someone else's slave.

A brilliant mind shared this wisdom, ``Universe is the aggregate of all humanity's consciously apprehended and communicated non simultaneous and only partially overlapping experiences. `` - Buckminster Fuller

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading

You have now been placed on ignore, because I have come to feel that you are beyond my help. I'm truly sorry.

Please realize that the purpose of my posts is not merely for your benefit, but also for the benefit of the many silent viewers who will read these words.

I am right about everything.

Psuedo-science can at times seem very compelling for the unwary man of reason.

The "Electric Universe" (EU) is an umbrella term that covers various pseudo-scientific cosmological ideas built around the claim that the formation and existence of various features of the universe can be better explained by electromagnetism than by gravity. The exact claims are diverse and vary from crank to crank author to author. A common motif is the insistence that all science should be done in a laboratory — an attempt to throw away gravity from the very beginning, because one can't put a solar system or a galaxy in a laboratory. Most Electric Universe proponents claim some kind of relation to the "plasma cosmology" of the Nobel Prize laureate Hannes Alfvén. Too bad his model was rendered obsolete by the missing observations of the radio emission predicted by his cosmology.[2]

EU advocates can be roughly split into two groups: garden-variety physics cranks who are convinced that they have a legitimate revolutionary scientific theory, and various woo-peddlers who use EU claims to prop their main ideas (because mainstream physics would blow them apart). One subset of the latter comprises some of the more loony global warming deniers (such as Vault-Co), who try to use it to "prove" that climate change is being caused by some process outside human control.

Claims

-Stars do not shine because of internal nuclear fusion caused by gravitational collapse. Rather, they are anodes for galactic discharge currents.
-Impact craters on Venus, Mars and the Moon are not caused by impacts, but by electrical discharges.[3] The same applies to the Valles Marineris (a massive canyon on Mars) and the Grand Canyon on Earth.[4]
-The Sun is negatively charged, and the solar wind is positively charged -- the two systems forming a giant capacitor (this is James McCanney's particular erroneous belief.)

1 http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1540489/pg1#25433260
2 http://www.theplasmaverse.com/pdfs/the-electic-sky-book-by-donaldescott-review-discussion-against.pdf
3 http://dealingwithcreationisminastronomy.blogspot.com/

Perhaps you are right when speaking about science in the "pure" sense. But because there are many times the lay people who use the word "science" as there are real scientists, and because some of the real scientists along with some politicians corrupt pure expression of real science so that the wrong idea is given to the lay people, and because some scientists are dreamers and express their dreams in connection with science, the word "science" has taken on meaning that is different than the thing that you express above.


Stars are nuclear fusion. That is a scientific fact, like evolution, gravity, and the laws of thermodynamics.