Topic: The world without leaders? - page 10. (Read 8857 times)
World without a leader is not good because many people have different views in life. Every organization need one people to lead how much more the world. We cannot be all boss we cannot do whatever we want to do in terms of policy and rules. If their is no ruler who will plan for good future for the country. Not all people are concern for others they will prioritize their needs of course their family before others. Their is no goal for the community.
Without these so-called presidents, prime ministers, Kings. Our people should be better off. They are too corrupt.
I have never seen a corrupt official.
I have never seen a corrupt official.
For me, every country should have their leaders to follow; if one country has no leaders like a Government, I think their community or their society will be unorganized always have chaotic lot of crime everywhere. Because they don’t have laws/rules to follow. And it will be like survival of the fittest.
its hard to imagine if the world or country without leaders like president, prime minister and any in their own division. I think it would be chaos any where, no one will in-charge to control all of the regulation or rules. Leaders are necessary only when crowds have to be managed. Crowds or Herds in the name of religion, caste, dogmas, political parties, organizations etc needs Leaders/Shepherds. The need for Herding is a hangover of our past tribal life. Of course we will need people to govern over various functions of the country, but that can done by Facilitators, who are experts drawn from various fields.Public opinion can be gathered from individuals and subject experts, through electronic methods and co-ordinated to frame policies of Government and law-making done by legal experts based on public opinion.
The world without a leader might be a good thing or a bad thing. Firstly when there is a leader rules and regulations are easier to be make. This make me think of bitcoin centralise or decentrelise..........
What do you think will happen to the world without leaders like the President, Prime Ministers, King, Queen,etc.? I mean if we accused our leaders of being corrupt, oppressive and all other things, if they are not in the position, what will happen?
I cannot to imagine that because peoples do whatever want that world is full of murderes,tifth and many other crimes,look now with all sancitions peoples do that.The strongest leader in the world right now is Vladimir Putin of Russia. But look at the incidence of murder and other crimes in Russia and compare them to the western nations. You can see that the crime rate in Russia is much higher. So a leader can only have a minimal influence on these parameters.
The world without leaders is just like survival of the fittest , because without leaders their are no laws to be follow by people. There are conflicts to people and many will suffer because there where no leader . And living in a world where there is no leader is like living in a jungle , those who are weak will suffer more. And those who are strong enough will live.
The state will not know who will follow because the leader is the one who leads all things, then without a leader of a country would be screwed.
What do you think will happen to the world without leaders like the President, Prime Ministers, King, Queen,etc.? I mean if we accused our leaders of being corrupt, oppressive and all other things, if they are not in the position, what will happen?
I cannot to imagine that because peoples do whatever want that world is full of murderes,tifth and many other crimes,look now with all sancitions peoples do that.
Honestly the world without leaders was crowded and all the crimes was exist and it can never be peaceful.The truth is you will die early it's because the war will never be prevented ecause of no leaders.
Leaders is necessary for our sociaty because many peoples just can't leave without being slaves. Religion, politics, sport and many other stuff that require strong leader.
That's a simple but great question. Imagine a company without a President, A home without a father, a person without a head. It will be a disaster I think. But on the other end, if all people is bless with wisdom and love, I think everything will function fine but still guidance from a leader should be there. So we need a leader. period.
Well I think if there would be no leaders to lead, then there are no followers thus making everybody the king of his own right. For sure like many have said, there will be disorder and chaos among men. Everyone would want to attack on anybody and steal what he thinks he could have for his own.
Every country have their own leaders, if that country has no leaders like a Government, there community or there society will be unorganized and no one had give there rules and regulation like laws.
In every society, there' this what we call the head or the leader. Since then during the earlier times, they maybe have different names but they have all functioned as leaders. A group without a leader maybe just peaceful or chaotic, maybe organized or unorganized, maybe progressive or not. We cannot tell because it might depend on the attitude of each member of the group. But we could tell the success of a group if we know what kind of leader they have. So as with the world, if we have great leaders then we will be progressive and peaceful.
What do you think will happen to the world without leaders like the President, Prime Ministers, King, Queen,etc.? I mean if we accused our leaders of being corrupt, oppressive and all other things, if they are not in the position, what will happen?
Somebody has to represent their countries and make important decisions. Today's world can not exist without leaders
Without global leadership, no one can and can punish if a country commits an offense that causes the harmonization of the international order.
encouraging the emergence of demands to reorganize the new world economic order that is not solely dominated by the interests of the state.
no collective action can be expected to solve global problems together.
encouraging the emergence of demands to reorganize the new world economic order that is not solely dominated by the interests of the state.
no collective action can be expected to solve global problems together.
But this needn’t lead to permanent positions of leadership; rather, it can be regarded as more like surges of energy. The danger with any single leader, however able or effective or accountable on paper, is that the individual substitutes for and holds back the capacities of the ‘led’, either through their own desires or the inertia of others.
Short answer, the world would collapse into sheer chaos and anarchy would by everywhere.
The idea of countries without leaders is compelling. However, the challenge with the missing country leader might be the lack of vision
Trash might still being collected and schools might still running - or not. There are examples for both: Belgium did quite well for a while without government, other countries did suffer. There is high risk that over time the lack of vision and strong individuals will lead to deterioration.
Trash might still being collected and schools might still running - or not. There are examples for both: Belgium did quite well for a while without government, other countries did suffer. There is high risk that over time the lack of vision and strong individuals will lead to deterioration.
Jump to: