Pages:
Author

Topic: They found Satoshi? - page 4. (Read 6758 times)

legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1169
April 08, 2017, 09:16:18 AM
#72
I have read carefully what you have post, and by what presumed in your research, but you can not blame us in not believing you right? just because you got a good research at hand to show us some proofs of who really is Satoshi and I salute you by doing so, but you can not blame me if I am very tired in this kind of topic about satoshi! well sorry for that though and I am still here gonna see this article proceeds because deep in my heart I also am curious in what is the real identity of satoshi if he is just a one man or group in depends on him to share the truth about him.

Why was according to an eyewitness, Nash's taxi "firebombed"?

Why was this one month before @traincarswreck's coindesk article came out linking Nash to Satoshi? The implication is that someone was observing that our community was getting closer to DOXXing Satoshi.

Well if we are nearly getting a hunch on who satoshi really is and Coindesk was one that reports about the activity of Nash then Nash might be satoshi and I think a lot of the news on coindesk was really legit, but in terms with the satoshi topic a lot of people are really not buying it. I think because even if they are curious on who satoshi really is, a lot doesn't really care at all but a condolences to Nash family may he rest in peace.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 09:05:09 AM
#71
Also the game theory in Bitcoin is so clever, that it has Nash's fingerprints all over it. He was the world expert in game theory. He won a Nobel prize for it.

So clever that you think they're nash's fingerprints...

Pawns, being pawns...talking about pawns.

Doin' pawn stuff.

Not playing the game but being played by the game.

As intended.

Of course I have considered that possibility but we never got around to discussing interesting perspectives, because (most of) the dumbasses who commented here are still stuck on their ABCs.

Yeah the elite could be trying to make us think that Nash is Satoshi and to take us off our guard. Or generally that Satoshi is any person.

The might be falsefiable though. If any altcoin rises to beat Bitcoin, then Nash succeeded and the elite failed.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
April 08, 2017, 09:02:02 AM
#70
Also the game theory in Bitcoin is so clever, that it has Nash's fingerprints all over it. He was the world expert in game theory. He won a Nobel prize for it.

So clever that you think they're nash's fingerprints...

Pawns, being pawns...talking about pawns.

Doin' pawn stuff.

Not playing the game but being played by the game.

As intended.
Me and trainswreck been the only guys saying nash was satoshi but annonymint did lots of research once he was shown the light
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 501
April 08, 2017, 08:55:03 AM
#69
Also the game theory in Bitcoin is so clever, that it has Nash's fingerprints all over it. He was the world expert in game theory. He won a Nobel prize for it.

So clever that you think they're nash's fingerprints...

Pawns, being pawns...talking about pawns.

Doin' pawn stuff.

Not playing the game but being played by the game.

As intended.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 08:45:59 AM
#68
See? His wife and kids are missing. Lols

His wife was with him on the flight and thus also in the taxi from the airport.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 08:45:13 AM
#67
It ain't research.

You apparently don't know what research is.

So you would have dismissed the speculative research that claimed the earth wasn't flat.

You wouldn't be convinced until you actually sailed around the world. But what if you didn't have any boats that could make that journey yet? So you'd prefer to just remain in ignorance rather than dig into the very strong speculative evidence which I RESEARCHED.

That is your prerogative. It doesn't guarantee you are correct. In fact, I suspect if you and I got into a verbal debate on the facts of this case, I would embarrass the fuck out of you.

You don't seem to understand that Nash's Cooperation in Non-Cooperating Repeated Games research was precisely what Satoshi's PoW is when combined with Szabo's bit gold.

Also the game theory in Bitcoin is so clever, that it has Nash's fingerprints all over it. He was the world expert in game theory. He won a Nobel prize for it.
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 255
April 08, 2017, 08:39:50 AM
#66
See? His wife and kids are missing. Lols , his wife should be in Nash's wake. What kind of family he has. Anyway they must be relaxing in their private island, creating more ICOs. Just waiting bitcoin to land the moon. Cheesy

Yeah right, OP, the story looks like fabricated. Its so easy for a billionaire to buy an unclaimed dead body from mortuary, dress it like satoshi, insert it to a car. And put a lot of explosive materials.

Once the bomb explode, body is very hard to recognize. Bitcoin owner is now free from allegations and death threats.

We can't be sure Nash and his wife aren't still living in hiding.

But that makes no difference whatsoever to the point of this thread.

Nash and his wife have not been seen in public or in their home since.
sr. member
Activity: 343
Merit: 252
April 08, 2017, 08:37:42 AM
#65
@OP you may have put so much time to make that evidence but for me non of them are convincing. And i think many other also feel same about your evidence.

Here we go again! another serious research thing about Satoshi? but your research was quite accepting with the evidence you have presented

{...snip...}
 

{...snip...}

It all fits far too well.

You guys are too lazy to read carefully what I wrote in the linked research.[/size]

I have read carefully what you have post, and by what presumed in your research, but you can not blame us in not believing you right? just because you got a good research at hand to show us some proofs of who really is Satoshi     {...snip...}


It ain't research. And it ain't a good one either. Nor is there any proof.

All it is, is hypothetical and speculation.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 08:31:42 AM
#64
I honestly thought you'd have more evidence than basically he wasn't active with another project during the time that bitcoins were being developed and or implemented. I also wasn't doing any active projects then. Am I satoshi?

Get an education.

The thought process is beyond your level of intellect.

You have not correctly summarized the evidence.

So now we understand that many (most?) of the voters are too lazy and too stupid to vote rationally after spending some hours digging into the evidence.

We live in a soundbite generation where people are more misinformed about everything than cows are about eating grass.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 08:30:49 AM
#63
Yeah right, OP, the story looks like fabricated. Its so easy for a billionaire to buy an unclaimed dead body from mortuary, dress it like satoshi, insert it to a car. And put a lot of explosive materials.

Once the bomb explode, body is very hard to recognize. Bitcoin owner is now free from allegations and death threats.

We can't be sure Nash and his wife aren't still living in hiding.

But that makes no difference whatsoever to the point of this thread.

Nash and his wife have not been seen in public or in their home since.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1042
April 08, 2017, 08:30:42 AM
#62
I honestly thought you'd have more evidence than basically he wasn't active with another project during the time that bitcoins were being developed and or implemented. I also wasn't doing any active projects then. Am I satoshi?
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 500
April 08, 2017, 08:25:34 AM
#61
If i am satoshi nakamoto then i would also say those things. I would also try to make some evidence that it is me even if im not. Tho the case about sat is too broad
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 255
April 08, 2017, 08:22:49 AM
#60
Yeah right, OP, the story looks like fabricated. Its so easy for a billionaire to buy an unclaimed dead body from mortuary, dress it like satoshi, insert it to a car. And put a lot of explosive materials.

Once the bomb explode, body is very hard to recognize. Bitcoin owner is now free from allegations and death threats.
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 251
HELENA
April 08, 2017, 08:12:37 AM
#59
I heard a lot and seen a lot of movies where in the scene, a rich guy proclaimed dead but just hiding to protect and to have his privacy. I dont believe on this drama. The bitcoin creator is alive, just hiding himself.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 08:00:47 AM
#58
im still laughing from when "iamnotback" was arguing with himself "trainscarwreck"

lol.  OP is the same guy as 'traincarwreck' and 'dinofelis'

How much BTC would you like to lose in an escrowed bet on that?

Make the bet, or STFU. Because I am not @traincarswreck nor @dinofelis.

I'll give all the BTC won to @traincarswreck, to entice him to participate and prove he is not me.

You guys can't discern reality from fiction.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
April 08, 2017, 07:59:03 AM
#57
im still laughing from when "iamnotback" was arguing with himself "trainscarwreck"

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 07:56:41 AM
#56
Once you have people on ignore you can't argue about having a true discussion.

I pleaded with Carlton numerous times to stop making insulting ad hominen. I gave him about 10 chances. He will never come off Ignore.


Now from my point of view, every time I hear about CIA  NSA stuff I tend to yawn...
How about we stop.Simply stop.

I want so much to hear a story about satoshi without the CIA NSA 13 bloodfamilies (is tomtom still around?)  and other.
Cause in my humble opinion there is a bigger chance the satoshi saga is in reality a pretty dumb story

You tell me not to Ignore, then you stick your head in the sand. Lol.

As if the CIA and NSA do not exist and do not do such covert shit. It's like their mission orders do covert monitoring.

You guys are so rational.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
April 08, 2017, 07:54:45 AM
#55
Okay but only ultimately with a world central bank. Yes I agree. But not in an unregulated chaos. That short-lived chaos will end up just like what happened to the USA after the 1800s. The banksters will aggregate power as other banks fail with bank runs. The banksters whales can manipulate the public and cause bubbles and busts.

Rothschild created Bitcoin.

One day it's "Rothschild created Bitcoin" the next it's "John Nash was Satoshi"

But There still might be the possibility that John Nash is a Rothschild.

No I already explained how both the elite and Nash are both involved.

You don't really think anything Nash was doing wasn't being monitored by the NSA and/or CIA do you.  Roll Eyes


P.S. I have Carlton on Ignore. He knows that. So I can only read if someone happens to quote his nonsense. You can see once again he failed to read before posting.

This is my personal opinion so you should take it as it is
Once you have people on ignore you can't argue about having a true discussion.

Now from my point of view, every time I hear about CIA  NSA stuff I tend to yawn...
How about we stop.Simply stop.

I want so much to hear a story about satoshi without the CIA NSA 13 bloodfamilies (is tomtom still around?)  and other.
Cause in my humble opinion there is a bigger chance the satoshi saga is in reality a pretty dumb story



sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 07:52:36 AM
#54
Quote
2008 May/Jun   Presented ideal money in Russia.
2008 Aug   Presented ideal money at Nobel Laureates Meeting in Lindau, Germany.
2008 Sept   Presented ideal money at Fordham University in New York.
2010 Feb   Presented ideal money at "Campus for Finance" in Vallendar, Germany.
2010 Oct   Presented ideal money at Lafayette College in Easton, Pennsylvania.
2011 Oct   Presented ideal money in Hong Kong.

First notice the periods of relatively low or no public inactivity for Nash were from May 2004 to Feb 2006, and again Oct 2008 to Feb 2010. Also note how Nash shifted from ideal money focus before 2004 to Agencies game theory research focus and didn't return publicizing ideal money again until summer 2008 wherein he did it very intensively.

Note that Satoshi announced Bitcoin Oct. 31, 2008. And it is also noted that Satoshi basically stopped being involved as of of "mid-2010".

Yeah points noted, bitcoin announced 2008, satoshi stopped being involved with bitcoins since mid-2010. Nash shifted his focus from ideal money to game theory research (April 2006 and then back to ideal money in Feb 2007) Now since 2008 till 2011 Nash was really active (apart from 2009) presenting his concept of ideal money. Bitcoin was made open source in 2009, the point I am missing is if Nash is indeed satoshi why would he go to Germany, Pennsylvania and Hong Kong presenting ideal money, bitcoin has been made open source, what is the purpose of it, might sound illogical, but still Huh

Note that Nash didn't really switch entirely back to ideal money promotion until summer 2008 when he went bezerk promoting it like crazy right before he launched Bitcoin. I can see he was very excited about the Bitcoin he was preparing to unleash onto the world.

You guys still don't understand the cat and mouse game Nash was playing with the elite who knew what he was doing. I already explained it.

So Nash had to promote ideal money so the elite would think that Bitcoin was good for the elite. He was fooling the elite!

Analogously, I had also documented that the scientists had lied to DARPA in order to get the Internet started.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 265
April 08, 2017, 07:45:05 AM
#53
Okay but only ultimately with a world central bank. Yes I agree. But not in an unregulated chaos. That short-lived chaos will end up just like what happened to the USA after the 1800s. The banksters will aggregate power as other banks fail with bank runs. The banksters whales can manipulate the public and cause bubbles and busts.

Rothschild created Bitcoin.

One day it's "Rothschild created Bitcoin" the next it's "John Nash was Satoshi"

But There still might be the possibility that John Nash is a Rothschild.

No I already explained how both the elite and Nash are both involved.

You don't really think anything Nash was doing wasn't being monitored by the NSA and/or CIA do you.  Roll Eyes


P.S. I have Carlton on Ignore. He knows that. So I can only read if someone happens to quote his nonsense. You can see once again he failed to read before posting.
Pages:
Jump to: