is Satoshi! 
Topic: They found Satoshi? - page 7. (Read 6744 times)
is Satoshi! 
@OP you may have put so much time to make that evidence but for me non of them are convincing. And i think many other also feel same about your evidence.
Here we go again! another serious research thing about Satoshi? but your research was quite accepting with the evidence you have presented and the number of time he is involve in certain and major transaction between different country that will certainly pump up is idea currency and presenting the good benefits it has with the economy, I think you had a point in your research but there are still a big question mark in these, the real truth if Nash really is Satoshi? well one man can not certainly take a step in saying it and change our beliefs right?
No my evidence is based on the timing that he wasn't active publicly presenting was precisely the timing when Satoshi was active publicly.
And also on the focus of his Agencies game theory research being exactly what was needed to see the way from Szabo and Wei Dai's work to Satoshi's PoW solution.
And also because the timing when he went silent to work on coding Bitcoin was right about the time that Szabo (re-)published his bit gold, which was probably the key development that gave Nash the final insight on how to apply his Agencies research to his ideal money concept. Then the evidence shows he went quiet at that time, until right before he launched Bitcoin.
Nash's Agencies research was on Cooperation in Non-Cooperating Repeated Games, which is precisely what Satoshi's PoW is!
It all fits far too well.
You guys are too lazy to read carefully what I wrote in the linked research.
@OP you may have put so much time to make that evidence but for me none of them are convincing. And i think many other also feel same about your evidence.
Satoshi must remain anonymous, nobody wants him to get detected because that can trigger panic on market.
Satoshi must remain anonymous, nobody wants him to get detected because that can trigger panic on market.
Here we go again! another serious research thing about Satoshi? but your research was quite accepting with the evidence you have presented and the number of time he is involve in certain and major transaction between different country that will certainly pump up is idea currency and presenting the good benefits it has with the economy, I think you had a point in your research but there are still a big question mark in these, the real truth if Nash really is Satoshi? well one man can not certainly take a step in saying it and change our beliefs right?
SELL AHHHHHHHHHHHHH, SELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boo hoo, I can't believe Satoshi is dead.
Boo hoo, I can't believe Satoshi is dead.
But in case that he is the real Nakamoto it will never be the end for bitcoins. The community has survived without even knowing Nakamoto and even if he is gone, which is very sad if it is true, bitcoin will continue to survive.
Satoshi must remain anonymous, nobody wants him to get detected because that can trigger panic on market.
I have a feeling that it's what Iamnotback wants exactly, considering the gist of his posts - to trigger panic on market
Why would Bitcoin suffer if John Nash is Satoshi
I don't understand.
So this means your votes are irrational. Many (or most?) of you are presumably voting not based on the evidence, but based on you are afraid Bitcoin will be affected if you agree the evidence is compelling.
I am sad because Nash was brilliant and was maybe murdered. I wasn't sad about Bitcoin. Bitcoin is an inanimate object.
Friends this isn't a joke...
Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!
Read this!
He is dead, and to me it appears they firebombed his taxi.
Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!
Read this!
He is dead, and to me it appears they firebombed his taxi.
This isnt funny at all and it was shocking. But I dont think John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto at all. Even those evidence are not sufficient enough to back up the claims that he is the real Nakamoto. But in case that he is the real Nakamoto it will never be the end for bitcoins. The community has survived without even knowing Nakamoto and even if he is gone, which is very sad if it is true, bitcoin will continue to survive.
Is it true that Satoshi dissapeared when Gavin Andressen said that he is going to CIA?
SELL AHHHHHHHHHHHHH, SELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Boo hoo, I can't believe Satoshi is dead.
Boo hoo, I can't believe Satoshi is dead.
Oh, noooo... Satoshi is dead?
Bitcoin is going to CRASHHHHHHHH...!!!!!!
SELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL AHHHHH...!!!!!!
Bitcoin is going to CRASHHHHHHHH...!!!!!!
SELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL AHHHHH...!!!!!!
That has nothing to do with why I did the research jackass. Your presumptions of my motives are entirely wrong.
I am intellectually curious.
Oh, noooo... Satoshi is dead?
Bitcoin is going to CRASHHHHHHHH...!!!!!!
SELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL AHHHHH...!!!!!!
Bitcoin is going to CRASHHHHHHHH...!!!!!!
SELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL AHHHHH...!!!!!!
Friends this isn't a joke...
Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!
Read this!
He is dead, and to me it appears they firebombed his taxi.
Very strong circumstantial evidence that John Nash was Satoshi Nakamoto!
Read this!
He is dead, and to me it appears they firebombed his taxi.
Jump to: