Topic: They found Satoshi? - page 5. (Read 6744 times)

Wow, excellent find.
But There still might be the possibility that John Nash is a Rothschild.

Now seriously I spent a few minutes on this (to be read wasted) and the amount of evidence is just astonishing, probably one of the worst case about a "Satoshi" persona.

How about we let this guy alone.
Maybe when the time travel machine will be invented we will find out that his mysterious disappearance was a damn car accident (hope not).

You haven't studied the evidence. There is evidence of him doing coding. Also I think you fail to understand how capable Nash was. @traincarswreck documented that his collegues were amazed at how much he gotten into computers lately.

I linked to an evidence where Nash had remarked at the importance of computers in proving Fermet's Last Theorem.

Nash wasn't 86 in 2006. He was in his 70s.

Also Nash's son is also a genius and was in is 40s at that time and lived in the same house with Nash.  

Johnny Nash may hold the key to finding out, but it is purely speculative whether Nash's son would be involved in any way (probably not).

How can John Nash be satoshi? he was too old, I doubt he couldn't even code, he looks like the type of guy that reads a ton of books but doesn't code much. Satoshi was a single guy that combined existing work including by John Nash and then released BTC. I dont buy the conspiracy theories.

Yeah points noted, bitcoin announced 2008, satoshi stopped being involved with bitcoins since mid-2010. Nash shifted his focus from ideal money to game theory research (April 2006 and then back to ideal money in Feb 2007) Now since 2008 till 2011 Nash was really active (apart from 2009) presenting his concept of ideal money. Bitcoin was made open source in 2009, the point I am missing is if Nash is indeed satoshi why would he go to Germany, Pennsylvania and Hong Kong presenting ideal money, bitcoin has been made open source, what is the purpose of it, might sound illogical, but still

It is amazing to me that they now have a great man to assign to the creator of Bitcoin, but they'd rather WHOREship an idol of mysticism (see the reaction I've been getting).

The human race hasn't graduated from being cows managed religion.

Again some little pointers to help the lazy who don't quite grasp the evidence in totality.

Hey mate, nothing against your circumstantial evidence that John Nash is indeed Satoshis, this is not the first time the conclusion has been drawn that Nash is Satoshi. I am not too much familiar with the technical aspects of bitcoins so will point out the basics only.

1. The comparison between Nash and Satoshi is drawn because of Nash's theoretical notion "ideal money"

2. Nash has been working on the mathematical and economical aspects of implementing ideal money.

3. John Nash has made contributions to different fields of math and he might have been well versed in encrypting algorithms or cryptology.

There is a book written by Andreas Antonopoulos, The Internet of Money, it mainly deals with the social and philosophical implications of bitcoin, likewise IMO Nash was more into the mathematical or economical aspects of ideal money or lets assume bitcoin, but not technological/technical.

What should I say about his death due to "firebombed", controversial theory is the most apt way to make our hypothesis sound factual to ourselves first and then others

*ahem*


You've changed your tune since, when was it, less than 2 weeks ago?


One day it's "Rothschild created Bitcoin" the next it's "John Nash was Satoshi"


What's next? I suppose you're going to tell us that Rothschild (the whole family ) is, er, was, John Nash?

I'm genuinely looking forward to your explanation of this, as it's proof positive that you talk so much rubbish that you can't even remember your own nonsense from 2 weeks ago  

Satoshi has never spent a single BTC.

I laugh at the comments people make when they get all their basic facts wrong.

---

As I wrote before as quoted above, I think he'd probably left it as a puzzle to prove that his addresses are a hash of an unspendable public key.

Because he'd want it to be known later, not in the initial stages of Bitcoin. Something people would get around to later, perhaps much later if computation would be intractable now.

My purpose is not to prove or to convince, but rather to measure the behavior of Bitcoin retards. To document it as a form anthropology and market research.

The lack of attention to detailed due diligence and thus the nonsense spoken and voted.

Most of you haven't even begun to scratch surface of analysis of this issue.

My vindication always comes later. Such as when I warned about the centralization of mining in China last year and was told I was crying chicken little. Then I was correct and everyone admits it now.

I have a vindication coming soon on a recent altcoin analysis I made.  

Nash designed Bitcoin so that it would be replaced or competed with.

Murdering Nash (assuming he was murdered and he was Satoshi) would obviously not be to stop Bitcoin, as Bitcoin is already released.

The point of murdering is so that it can't be confirmed who Satoshi was.

The elite think they will control all of the Bitcoin per the math I showed that shows all Bitcoin would become concentrated in one entity if it were the most stable money. So they want the people to think of Satoshi as some mystical God. And they want the people to whoreship Bitcoin as some sort of ideal idolized money. It is part of the NWO plan.

But as I explained in my prior post, I think Nash outsmarted them any way. So the murder of Nash was entirely unnecessary. But the elite aren't so smart.

There is a potentially simpler explanation for why Nash would be murdered before he could be confronted about whether he is Satoshi. That is to prevent any reduction in the mysticism/idealism/idolism that keeps flocks of greater fools coming into Bitcoin.

If we know who Satoshi is, then Bitcoin becomes just another altcoin or blockchain. It is reduced from magical to just technology. I think this is why I've been attacked/vilified for presenting this evidence.

Also murdering him would relieve him of perhaps being kidnapped and tortured and worse things than way he died instantly.


No one is perfect or absolutely undiscoverable when they leave so many information tracks.

I suppose you were one of those who would have killed any one who was intellectually curious about the earth not being flat.


Have you even clicked my signature. I am not being paid anything for posts.

You lie about me, because you are a WHOREshipper of the idol Bitcoin.

You've been manipulated like a dumb cow.

You have not been paying attention. Read on...


You don't seem to understand what Nash meant by asymptotic ideal money.

Nash didn't mean an asymptotically limited money supply.

Bitcoin is Nash's very clever plan of providing a reserve currency for altcoin experimentation, which could have the potential to create asymptotically ideal money. I had stated back in 2014 that I expected Satoshi was so genius that he had outsmarted the elite who were tracking him.

The elite loved what Nash was saying about ideal money because the Rothschilds thought they would be the one to control the weightings of the IPCI which all the nations' currencies will float against. This is why there has been talk of backing the SDRs with a weighting of national currencies, precious metals, and commodities as Nash had written about.

But Nash was fooling them. He knew damn well the IPCI wouldn't be stable in the world empire context. So that is why he wanted an asymptotic number of stable currencies that would develop via an evolutionary process. He wrote those exact words, but the elite weren't exactly understanding that that entailed.

When Nash created Bitcoin, Rothschild rejoiced because of the math I showed that Bitcoin will eventually become concentrated in one entity. But Nash had fooled them, because he had figured that Bitcoin's open source release would set off an evolutionary process in altcoins (guaranteed by the very genius immutable game theory he designed that prevents Bitcoin from being "upgraded").

You guys are failing to read my posts carefully.

Occam's Razor applies.

Take into account the next post I will make in this thread also.

Who would have been genius enough in game theory and then you have the other correspondences in the evidence I supplied.

well if it were nash it would certainly solve the "problem" of the satoshi mined million coins suddenly being sold and crashing the price of bitcoin.

but as someone else pointed out (sorry forgot who) wouldnt nash known of that potential problem and  publicly burned the coins as they were mined. xfer then to an unspendable address or something. i mean if perfect money were the intent it shouldnt have the risk of a price crash built into it.

its as if satoshi didnt realize how important bitcoin would become. nash would of.

"I'm Satoshi, and so's my wife!"

Thank you. At least someone else understands.

The creation of "satoshi nakamoto" was just a distraction anyways...something to keep the fools and children busy to give the adults room to work.

Well, honestly I don't care about where is sathosi nakamoto right now. Who is he, is he dead or still alive or any questions like that. I just want to thank God for created Sathosi and give him intelligence like that to create a new financial technology and made this coin.
I am enjoying what he created, and if he want to disappear and leave the party, we have to respect his decision.

in my opinion, its better that satoshi nakamoto remain in the dark and so no one will know who is he and let it be but we should be thank you to satoshi nakamoto for introduced bitcoin to us. myself is not bothered who is the real satoshi nakamoto and i think he don't want that people will know who is he so he still cover his real identity. there are many reason for satoshi nakamoto itself to remain silence and not introduce his self to public and i am sure that he want to live with peace without any media know.

The prospect of Satoshi being dead wouldn't cause panic on the market.  He didn't partake in Bitcoin development after mid-2010 and stopped posting on the forum around the end of the year, so him dying several years later in 2015 wouldn't affect the market at all.

Regardless, iamnotback is clever enough to realise that his belief that John Nash was Satoshi won't make everyone else believe it.  There was an article on bitcoinpricelive and an an article on CoinDesk arguing that this was a likely possibility years ago, but people didn't jump on the train because the "circumstantial evidence" provided is not, in fact, quite strong enough to prove that he was Satoshi and it can't actually be reasonably proven without Nash himself signing a message with the Genesis block (which he can't - he's dead).

Who is satoshi? Nobody know who he is and where he is living? Perhaps he will never be present at this world . He can live with many many bitcoins which he is owning and just that's enough for him to have a very very rich and beautiful life so nobody can dream like him . The rumors are only rumors and we continue to buy and sell bitcoins everyday.