I will make pool for every coin we mining, and you can check online what we r mining and how much blocks found
universal link for online stats
http://tomostasks.website/tomospool/#
Topic: TomosMining - HIGHEST PAID MINING (BTC->FaucetHub) 5% REF! - page 34. (Read 35660 times)
I built my own pool, and pointed all miners there.. if some1 will send bad shares, i will simply kick him...
will see if that can be profitable or not..
for now it works fine
will see if that can be profitable or not..
for now it works fine
Just press "r" in xmr-stack and you will see 
Hey!
Today, a bit of history;)
I am using xmr-stak 64bit version. In the configuration file I set only the wallet address, so it should be ok. The code looks like this: {"pool_address": "80.211.205.216:3333", "wallet_address": "here sits the address," "pool_password": "x", "use_nicehash ": true," use_tls ": false," tls_fingerprint ":" "," pool_weight ": 1},
If something is wrong or you have any suggestions, tell me.
As for the hardware configuration itself, because I suspect that this is the case, in the cpu file I have for every root: "low_power_mode": false, "no_prefetch": true, "affine_to_cpu": false
However, there is a curiosity in the nvidia file. When I experimented with the data, I noticed that with the bfactor option interesting effects might appear - I had tens of thousands of h / s! Then, in the field Good results, there are no good results;) Maybe someone in the euphoria also set it up. It is impossible to check which address does such a thing do?
Today, a bit of history;)
I am using xmr-stak 64bit version. In the configuration file I set only the wallet address, so it should be ok. The code looks like this: {"pool_address": "80.211.205.216:3333", "wallet_address": "here sits the address," "pool_password": "x", "use_nicehash ": true," use_tls ": false," tls_fingerprint ":" "," pool_weight ": 1},
If something is wrong or you have any suggestions, tell me.
As for the hardware configuration itself, because I suspect that this is the case, in the cpu file I have for every root: "low_power_mode": false, "no_prefetch": true, "affine_to_cpu": false
However, there is a curiosity in the nvidia file. When I experimented with the data, I noticed that with the bfactor option interesting effects might appear - I had tens of thousands of h / s! Then, in the field Good results, there are no good results;) Maybe someone in the euphoria also set it up. It is impossible to check which address does such a thing do?
i checked that address, scroll up 2-3 posts
your code seems to be ok, graphic card owners can tweak a little the parameters, i have no amd or nvidia, so i cannot help with these tweaks
Could this have been the source of the invalid shares?
Hello all my configs we're good....plus thats not my BTC address....any chance u can get unbanned later?....is there a way for u to kick someone if the shares fail?
When I wrote, you already sent a post, so I'll just add that I managed to improve my computer configuration a little bit and now it's 70 h / s more - always something;)
After all, I wish you a good day!
After all, I wish you a good day!
owner of 3PsFyanQeRvj3AjhE2H9Kxrg5NZpBfRoyv BTC address - Check your fucking command line, i was banned from best pool because of your fucking invalid shares!!!!
Have a fail-safe and auto-ban such miner!
in the final destination - in the pool we are acting as 1 user.. because of using proxy.. and the cryptonote universal pools have ban module.. now 10 hours we are mining on second best pool
understood
Hey!
Today, a bit of history;)
I am using xmr-stak 64bit version. In the configuration file I set only the wallet address, so it should be ok. The code looks like this: {"pool_address": "80.211.205.216:3333", "wallet_address": "here sits the address," "pool_password": "x", "use_nicehash ": true," use_tls ": false," tls_fingerprint ":" "," pool_weight ": 1},
If something is wrong or you have any suggestions, tell me.
As for the hardware configuration itself, because I suspect that this is the case, in the cpu file I have for every root: "low_power_mode": false, "no_prefetch": true, "affine_to_cpu": false
However, there is a curiosity in the nvidia file. When I experimented with the data, I noticed that with the bfactor option interesting effects might appear - I had tens of thousands of h / s! Then, in the field Good results, there are no good results;) Maybe someone in the euphoria also set it up. It is impossible to check which address does such a thing do?
Today, a bit of history;)
I am using xmr-stak 64bit version. In the configuration file I set only the wallet address, so it should be ok. The code looks like this: {"pool_address": "80.211.205.216:3333", "wallet_address": "here sits the address," "pool_password": "x", "use_nicehash ": true," use_tls ": false," tls_fingerprint ":" "," pool_weight ": 1},
If something is wrong or you have any suggestions, tell me.
As for the hardware configuration itself, because I suspect that this is the case, in the cpu file I have for every root: "low_power_mode": false, "no_prefetch": true, "affine_to_cpu": false
However, there is a curiosity in the nvidia file. When I experimented with the data, I noticed that with the bfactor option interesting effects might appear - I had tens of thousands of h / s! Then, in the field Good results, there are no good results;) Maybe someone in the euphoria also set it up. It is impossible to check which address does such a thing do?
i checked that address, scroll up 2-3 posts
your code seems to be ok, graphic card owners can tweak a little the parameters, i have no amd or nvidia, so i cannot help with these tweaks
Hey!
Today, a bit of history;)
I am using xmr-stak 64bit version. In the configuration file I set only the wallet address, so it should be ok. The code looks like this: {"pool_address": "80.211.205.216:3333", "wallet_address": "here sits the address," "pool_password": "x", "use_nicehash ": true," use_tls ": false," tls_fingerprint ":" "," pool_weight ": 1},
If something is wrong or you have any suggestions, tell me.
As for the hardware configuration itself, because I suspect that this is the case, in the cpu file I have for every root: "low_power_mode": false, "no_prefetch": true, "affine_to_cpu": false
However, there is a curiosity in the nvidia file. When I experimented with the data, I noticed that with the bfactor option interesting effects might appear - I had tens of thousands of h / s! Then, in the field Good results, there are no good results;) Maybe someone in the euphoria also set it up. It is impossible to check which address does such a thing do?
Today, a bit of history;)
I am using xmr-stak 64bit version. In the configuration file I set only the wallet address, so it should be ok. The code looks like this: {"pool_address": "80.211.205.216:3333", "wallet_address": "here sits the address," "pool_password": "x", "use_nicehash ": true," use_tls ": false," tls_fingerprint ":" "," pool_weight ": 1},
If something is wrong or you have any suggestions, tell me.
As for the hardware configuration itself, because I suspect that this is the case, in the cpu file I have for every root: "low_power_mode": false, "no_prefetch": true, "affine_to_cpu": false
However, there is a curiosity in the nvidia file. When I experimented with the data, I noticed that with the bfactor option interesting effects might appear - I had tens of thousands of h / s! Then, in the field Good results, there are no good results;) Maybe someone in the euphoria also set it up. It is impossible to check which address does such a thing do?
owner of 3PsFyanQeRvj3AjhE2H9Kxrg5NZpBfRoyv BTC address - Check your fucking command line, i was banned from best pool because of your fucking invalid shares!!!!
Have a fail-safe and auto-ban such miner!
in the final destination - in the pool we are acting as 1 user.. because of using proxy.. and the cryptonote universal pools have ban module.. now 10 hours we are mining on second best pool
owner of 3PsFyanQeRvj3AjhE2H9Kxrg5NZpBfRoyv BTC address - Check your fucking command line, i was banned from best pool because of your fucking invalid shares!!!!
Have a fail-safe and auto-ban such miner!
owner of 3PsFyanQeRvj3AjhE2H9Kxrg5NZpBfRoyv BTC address - Check your fucking command line, i was banned from best pool because of your fucking invalid shares!!!!
pls check your command line config - 10% of our shares are rejected, some1 has f*cking wrong configuration..
with this rate, i will be banned from all good pools... omfg
with this rate, i will be banned from all good pools... omfg
Correct cmd NsCpuCNMiner64.exe -o stratum+tcp://80.211.205.216:3333 -nofee 1 -p x -dbg -2 -u 1DgDAXABNCvwKETZN411Kn5UP8oNP4B4Eo -t 3
pls check your command line config - 10% of our shares are rejected, some1 has f*cking wrong configuration..
with this rate, i will be banned from all good pools... omfg
with this rate, i will be banned from all good pools... omfg
so would i run both nscpucnminer and the xmr-stak or just the stak?
xmr-stak can use both at once, however some1 had some hashrate issue (it was slower than before)
so would i run both nscpucnminer and the xmr-stak or just the stak?
Wish I can point ASIC miners to the pool, I have a few 2 pac usb miners.
All pools out there are tough to mine with these.
All pools out there are tough to mine with these.
I guess there is something wrong with the i7 compuer, it goes down to 100h/s on 8 threads. also i wasnt able to set the gpu because it started to ask me questions about addresses and passwords. Plus it said to mine monero or aeon and i just wanted to mine btc. Maybe i am missing something.
you dont need to mine BTC.. just point your miner to my pool , also ask Monero if asking...
I think you are talking about xmr-stak - you will mine on my pool and paid in BTC however you will choose monero in the setup
follow these instructions:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28396744
I guess there is something wrong with the i7 compuer, it goes down to 100h/s on 8 threads. also i wasnt able to set the gpu because it started to ask me questions about addresses and passwords. Plus it said to mine monero or aeon and i just wanted to mine btc. Maybe i am missing something.
Hello, I have a question, does a better cpu make the h/s higher? Would i7 work better than xeon or viceversa? Does operating system matter (eg. win7 vs win10)? Reason I am asking is i tested the program on an old xeon running win7 and was recording about 250h/s on fast mode. Then i tested it on a much newer i7 running win10 and only got 160h/s on fast mode.
Thanks.
PS if this topic was already covered please let me know and i will try to read previous posts.
Thanks.
PS if this topic was already covered please let me know and i will try to read previous posts.
hi there are already benchmarks for CPUs and graphic cards.. here is the link: http://monerobenchmarks.info/index.php
operating system - does not really matters, just do not have garbage processes on background (they are slowing down the CPU - for example shits like adobe updater, google updater etc..)
Jump to: