Topic: Too many ICOs - page 36. (Read 4719 times)
Yes I agree, there are a lot of projects and becomes more and more difficult to choose the right one. But I invested in Ambit Mining and notwithstanding the fact that it is still live I do not regret, as it seems to be very successful, if it will go well I will be able to say that I am always selecting best projects.
In determining the ICO project is great, I just like any other in defining the project. You can see the background team that works, check the website, whitepaper and you should find out whether the token sales already reached the soft cap or not. Achievement of the soft cap I think it is very important if the achieved project will run constantly until the hard cap. Therefore later that determines whether participants get rewards or not.
Yes there are too many ICOs out thre but some of them are scam and some are legit, so it makes you a wiser person which ICO you will choose to invest with.
for that it takes a partner or someone who has long known cryptocurrency. and I have such a person. i learned from people around about ico. what ico is like. for example, ico that implements a wallet, banking, or AI system. Therefore, I prefer ico moving in that field.
Agree.. All of the sectors are becoming saturated with similar ICO announcement in every other day. When in almost every other day, new and more advance project ICO is coming, will it be beneficial to HODL the token you loved?
There are tons and tons of ICOS and yes it's becoming really difficult now to see which ones are going to be huge, but like someone here stated, checking the telegram groups to see how large the customer base is gives you an idea of what participation level is happening and if that ICO is huge and has a big community. I am going to start joining all the ICO telegram groups and will pencil in any that have like over 15k participants in the rooms to check them out.
nowadays, there is more and more new ICO projects and to be honest, I think its very hard to find good project in 2018 than in 2017. But I think some tips of my experience in ICO investing could help you:
1. About product: chose the projects had proof of concept/demo/testnet
Those project are more realistic than those which just have whitepaper only. It makes investors trust in this there project.
2. Roadmap has to be clear and possible:
Personally I will choose a project have atleast 5 years future in roadmap to know what will they do with my invested money and can they done that roadmap.
3. Marketing stratergy:
The most simple way to check it is the number of page on bitcointalk, the number of members on socials and telegram.
That is the 3 keys of my ICO investing stratergy. Can you guys share some tips to improve my stratergy
1. About product: chose the projects had proof of concept/demo/testnet
Those project are more realistic than those which just have whitepaper only. It makes investors trust in this there project.
2. Roadmap has to be clear and possible:
Personally I will choose a project have atleast 5 years future in roadmap to know what will they do with my invested money and can they done that roadmap.
3. Marketing stratergy:
The most simple way to check it is the number of page on bitcointalk, the number of members on socials and telegram.
That is the 3 keys of my ICO investing stratergy. Can you guys share some tips to improve my stratergy
It is too many ICO indeed, I got lost. My last ICO was Morpheus Lab, I whitelisted for Atonomi and wait for a chance to invest in this project. But icobench and similar started to promote whoever pays them, not a trustworthy source anymore. I'm using private telegram's group recommendation for ICO investment, too many shitty ICOs, hard to find a true gem.
I learn about new ICO from the forum and sometimes from special portals that evaluate ICO and give a brief description of the project.
If I'm interested in the idea, I read more about the project, the team and I'm looking at the information on the forum.
If I'm interested in the idea, I read more about the project, the team and I'm looking at the information on the forum.
So far I am looking for a good ICO from the team who join in it and most importantly the concept they give if everything is good then we look for where the ICO rating is registered and the ICO advisor is whether it has a great community If all is fulfilled then it is already being a nice feature of ICO in my opinion, but still remember all the different people in search of ICO.
With so many issuance of ICO, it is very important to evaluate every new cryptocurrency item, but we have to make judgments based on indicators instead of hype and marketing!
Yes ,many ico is just a perfect idea, but it's hard to actually make the application. I think most ico is of no value. Investors should learn to see what is a fraud.
I agree that there are MANY icos right now and its hard to chose one that is good. I always check https://cryptodiffer.com/ and try to get into those ICOs that are at the top. It works fine so far!
I work in a team with people who help me, advise and advise in the choice of ICO. It is difficult to do it on your own so far. But I'm trying to develop in order to become more independent.
What are the ways you guys use to learn about new ICOs and how do you find out the good ones ?
True indeed, i've already lost count how many ICO's happen daily
20 or maybe 50, anyway there are a lot of them on the daily basis.Among this junk of projects there are always 2-3% of projects which are "golden" but how to find them is q good question.
I usually give priority to non start-ups projects who already have a working product, platform, service, app, etc.
By joining a company which is already on the market with real clients, you reduce the risk percentage.
Team of professionals is also very important, you should be able to trace past progress of the team and have access to their Bio's.
Good advisors, with previous success - also a good sign to make a decision towards particular project.
We are pretty much left with a background research. I don't trust ICO rating websites, very often they don't even explain how they got their ratings. So read whitepapers, websites, check out teams, there are often linkedin links provided.
yes in 2018 will be a lot of ICO, and it's a pity that among them a large number of scams. Need regulation of ICO!
so many ICO scam now, and there is no protection for investors and the law for scammers,
if scam projects continue to grow may be the investors do not want to invest in ICO anymore.
It is best to use authoritative sites with a list of upcoming projects and their evaluation. But this is not always effective, because their ratings can be paid. It is necessary at least sometimes to evaluate the most popular projects to understand its prospects. 
yes in 2018 will be a lot of ICO, and it's a pity that among them a large number of scams. Need regulation of ICO!
you can, the only thing you have to do is locate the team and see if they have done some project and try to know if those projects were sucessful then you can pick them up do those project. that is the only way i choose my own project followed by the road map if actually they are doing what is on that same roadmap to keep the project moving.
Jump to: