Topic: TPTB_need_war Bitcoin Fork in the making! - page 8. (Read 11489 times)

I am just disapointed that its going to be an IPO... thought it would be different this time.....

After all the hate talk of IPO's that TPTHwar has released I guess he will finally become as culpable as the rest.

 Not that i see much wrong in him needing investment money, but he has been holding us all accountable to a higher standard that he now is willing to overlook.

Remind me to come take a look 1 year after its released.

Actually not at all, I'm an admirer of his posts. That's why I made the list.
It's a point of reference to easily find all the material to read. There's plenty.
If you or AnonyMint is not in favor of this list, I'll take it down right away.

I get the impression sir that you vehemently dislike AnonyMint and are waging a vendetta.

Why are you slandering me in the process? Did I slander you. If you are angry at AnonyMint, please do not splatter your anger all over the place on other innocent people.

Think before you post. A friendly reminder from someone who has been on this earth for 6 decades.

Added to the list
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14878646

Almost fell out of my chair reading that.

This is a good question. Why did you choose a bitcoin fork?

Note, Im not saying Monero is the best.

I suggest choosing Monero instead of Bitcoin to begin with.

Choosing inferior technology hardly makes any sense.

Correct.


Incorrect.

You don't know what jl777 James does directly with what so don't talk nonsense.

Anyway, it seems HONCHO is a TPTB_need_war sockpuppet account. God bless TPTB_need_war, he always navigates himself into these messy situations. Since he has been telling everyone for long months that he is not going to do an ICO, he needed to create a sockpuppet to roll an ICO out.

i'm not sure that counts as a sign of life.. what do you guys think ?

Does Dash have anything against me sir? I don't believe we've ever had conflict in the past and been able to co-exist. Dash makes instamine ICOs and I make super ICOs. Dash makes masternodes and I make super nets. What is the problem from your perspective?

Are you against me creating masternodes that do anonymity because this is Dash's feature?

So, yeah, please give us a sign anonymint, like you always did when banned:)

yeah, i did notice HONCHO has rather lengthy replies as well 

Look at the post above yours

Poor TPTB, getting silenced like that in this forum and having someone else do all the talking for him. Something just doesnt feel right,
how can we be sure HONCHO didn't just kill TPTB and took over his life and work ?

TPTB, if you read this please give us a sign of life... pref in the form of a lenghty reply so we know its you  

1. Because users won't have to risk their funds in a centralized exchange.

2. Users can trade directly between acoin and any* other coin and more anonymously with no need to signup an account or provide an identification documents.

3. The trading will be more efficient and robust due to AnonyMint's technological discovery. See the discussion of Bitsquare for more info.

4. Some pairs may be exclusive, e.g. JAMBOX's crypto-currency will be exclusive for a period of time until others are able to copy the op code. Most everything will be open source, but this op code will be closed source until someone reverse engineers it. Generally it is not possible to maintain exclusivity of pairs for decentralized protocol block chains. So exclusivity is ephemeral.

* Some caveats need to be discussed.


Page 3 of the Bitsquare whitepaper says everything we need to know in the following excerpt:

http://i63.tinypic.com/352f3gy.png

Note they are relying on multi-sig and arbitration. So what stops the two trusted signers from stealing the funds. That is not DE. DE is where two parties can do a trade and there is no way third parties could steal the funds. You can find the detailed technical analysis of why it is flawed in the discussion that TPTB_need_war had with David Zimbeck in the Bitbay thread of this Altcoin Discussion subforum.

Also note how Bitsquare is relying on Tor which is known to be a honeypot and compromised, as well often being slow and timing out. And thanks to AnonyMint, I am proposing to offer much more robust and performant anonymity.

* There is no way to do DE directly between two coins that don't have support for some special op code. And even the op code Bitcoin offers which enables TierNolan's DE protocol, doesn't address the fact that it can jammed as AnonyMint (TPTB_need_war) explained. TPTB_need_war offered a pseudo-solution which is to have users of the TierNolan protocol—cut and choose or the first-class variant when both coins support the Bitcoin op code—choose how old the coins need to be that they are willing to trade with. This is intended to rate limit an jam attack, but it is still not really a robust solution. And besides, the TierNolan protocol is extremely slow and thus will be error prone. I don't expect it to be viable/popular in practice at any scale.

So AnonyMint discovered a way to fix that!

AnonyMint is prolific. If you aren't paying attention, that is not his fault.

Lol. Jl777 has absolutely nothing directly to do with Waves, nada, de niente. At least get your info right, little man Your post seems as if jl777 is the creator of Waves

Good luck with the project, I am going to follow it as well.

TPTB_need_war has been telling everyone for long months there won't be any ICO. He said the business model to distribute the coin to the users of JAMBOX without an ICO. You are talking about an ICO. Which one is the case?

Are you jl777 James the chief wanker-scammer of supernet who roll out one money party after another, the latest is the fucking WAVES scam? If yes, don't bother to reply my question.

LoL could be the case.