I trust you with money, 100%. I do not trust your judgement of others anymore. You honestly feel it was ok for Quickseller to escrow, for a fee, trades involving one of his alt accounts. That is messed up man, and you should know it.
Well, then let me educate you how the trust system works since you don't understand. If you trust someone with your money, you leave them a trust rating reflecting as such. If you don't trust their judgement of others, you exclude them from your network. Unless of course your motive is to try and damage someone's reputation and not have an honest trust system, then you troll them on the forum for years and don't leave them trust even though you trust them with your money.
It's a lie that I feel it was ok for Quickseller to escrow. I don't. I think it wasn't as bad as minerjones doxxing Canaryinthemine or minerjones allowing TMAN to manipulate his own auctions minerjones was hosting, so I don't feel he should be trolled for all eternity over it. I don't support what he did, and certainly don't think it was OK. I think it was a misguided attempt to hide his personal info and he's been punished for it. His rep doesn't disappear because I made a deal with him. He also has positive ratings from others, so why am I the only one who is singled out and harassed because of it. The whole thing stinks of ulterior motives and it isn't exactly hard to see for those who take the time to read.
I honestly don't understand why you guys try so hard to connect me to Quickseller to the point you keep spreading these lies. You're blowing smoke up the community's ass and expecting everyone to believe there's fire.
Let me turn the tables on you... Lauda did a non-transparent escrow with minerjones and Blazed that resulted in the claimed losses of millions of dollars for investors. Do you feel that is better than Quickseller trying to hide his address and refunding the users their fees? I'm just trying to understand why some users can rip off the community for millions, be completely non-transparent, make the unilateral decision to release funds to the scammer, give no compensation while profiting from their role in the scam, and that's fine with you. Help me understand.
Now now, boys. Semantics; Maybe OgNasty did say half of his NastyMining income is going to personal expenses, but that's not the same thing as half of NastyMining's income going to OgNasty's personal expenses.
I don't have NastyMining income. I literally receive 0 directly from NastyMining as it all goes to NastyFans, so I know this is a lie by Vod. He doesn't even grasp the structure enough for his lies to make any sense. I'm glad that people are starting to see the lies though.
Please explain how it's possible for NastyFans to lose income. You wouldn't be telling lies that are impossible would you? You are also aware that no new investors are needed to continue paying NastyFans members right? I'm not sure if you're ignorant of what a Ponzi is, or ignorant of what NastyFans does. Who are we kidding, you're just spouting lies to try and get me to give you a negative so you can have justification for your trust and cannot answer my questions proposed here without looking completely foolish. I'd love to see you try though. We'll just get another fingers in the ears crying child post though. That's Vod.
