TECSHARE's explanation of AIDS is completely wrong, and the article regarding vitamin C he quoted is one of the worst pieces of pseudoscientific nonsense I've ever read (but not really surprising since it is published in a quack journal of chiropractic).
Neither of these things makes him more likely to scam someone in a trade. Red trust is unwarranted.
Topic: Trust System Abuse By Nullius - page 2. (Read 5692 times)
Like I have explained before, even when I do something right, you and the rest of the clown car find a way to spin it into a wrong, then you cry cry cry about me being so inflexible to your demands to comply with your own nebulous and ever changing standards.
I'm really not expecting you to comply with my standards but I will laugh at your attempts to define standards for others.
Much like your endless attacks on Quickseller for very important reasons you can't seem to define, but they are super serial promise, you leave me with zero incentive to do anything more than to tell you to go fuck yourself, because that is what I get from you no matter what I do. So go fuck yourself.
Thanks, I will if I want to. Again, I never said I have any intent to feed you (or Quickseller) carrots or hand out participation trophies or whatever incentives you're expecting. I tend to trust people who do the right thing because it's the right thing to do, but that's just my personal preference.
I will continue using my own judgement
Great. I never thought you wouldn't.
because yours is tainted with unyielding obsession and spite over people having the audacity to not agree with you, regardless if they are on the right or wrong side of an argument.
And again, I don't expect you to use my judgement.
Nice straw puppet show. I hope you feel better after getting all that off your chest.
I don't want your carrots. Just don't act surprised when you end up using your stick so much it becomes meaningless and breaks. Then what are you left with? No carrot and no stick.
Like I have explained before, even when I do something right, you and the rest of the clown car find a way to spin it into a wrong, then you cry cry cry about me being so inflexible to your demands to comply with your own nebulous and ever changing standards.
I'm really not expecting you to comply with my standards but I will laugh at your attempts to define standards for others.
Much like your endless attacks on Quickseller for very important reasons you can't seem to define, but they are super serial promise, you leave me with zero incentive to do anything more than to tell you to go fuck yourself, because that is what I get from you no matter what I do. So go fuck yourself.
Thanks, I will if I want to. Again, I never said I have any intent to feed you (or Quickseller) carrots or hand out participation trophies or whatever incentives you're expecting. I tend to trust people who do the right thing because it's the right thing to do, but that's just my personal preference.
I will continue using my own judgement
Great. I never thought you wouldn't.
because yours is tainted with unyielding obsession and spite over people having the audacity to not agree with you, regardless if they are on the right or wrong side of an argument.
And again, I don't expect you to use my judgement.
Nice straw puppet show. I hope you feel better after getting all that off your chest.
You are all sad little people desperately trying to invent any reasons possible to impugn the characters of anyone who commits the high crime of offending you, one way or another. This is a cute little good cop bad cop thing you have going here, but both ultimately pushing in the same direction.
My apologies for being unable to voice my opposition to frivolous trust ratings in a manner acceptable to Your Highness. I will likely do it again in the near future.
Like I have explained before, even when I do something right, you and the rest of the clown car find a way to spin it into a wrong, then you cry cry cry about me being so inflexible to your demands to comply with your own nebulous and ever changing standards.
Much like your endless attacks on Quickseller for very important reasons you can't seem to define, but they are super serial promise, you leave me with zero incentive to do anything more than to tell you to go fuck yourself, because that is what I get from you no matter what I do. So go fuck yourself.
I will continue using my own judgement, because yours is tainted with unyielding obsession and spite over people having the audacity to not agree with you, regardless if they are on the right or wrong side of an argument.
You are all sad little people desperately trying to invent any reasons possible to impugn the characters of anyone who commits the high crime of offending you, one way or another. This is a cute little good cop bad cop thing you have going here, but both ultimately pushing in the same direction.
My apologies for being unable to voice my opposition to frivolous trust ratings in a manner acceptable to Your Highness. I will likely do it again in the near future.
If he's being sincere, then he isn't abusing you. He's doing what he thinks is right.
He's abusing the trust system, which is what really matters. Posting a negative trust rating for "medical misinformation" is ridiculous no matter how you look at it. This is not a hospital and whatever TECSHARE says on medical topics doesn't matter even if he prescribes us all vitamin C for AIDS treatment.
You are all sad little people desperately trying to invent any reasons possible to impugn the characters of anyone who commits the high crime of offending you, one way or another. This is a cute little good cop bad cop thing you have going here, but both ultimately pushing in the same direction.
Next time I will refrain from posting scientific studies if they upset you so much. I will also skip analogies too unless they are perfectly and exactly medically accurate to absolutely everyone's liking as well. Clearly people get their medical advice from passing mentions of diseases in internet forums, and that is obviously reckless endangerment that could result in the death of millions, possibly billions.
I mean I could have caused the extinction of the human race, I guess I should be executed for crimes against humanity for everyone's safety going forward. The galaxy itself was threatened by my reckless actions, and I should know better than to casually write a one sentence analogy about a disease to illustrate a point about something totally unrelated to medicine.
If he's being sincere, then he isn't abusing you. He's doing what he thinks is right.
He's abusing the trust system, which is what really matters. Posting a negative trust rating for "medical misinformation" is ridiculous no matter how you look at it. This is not a hospital and whatever TECSHARE says on medical topics doesn't matter even if he prescribes us all vitamin C for AIDS treatment.
If he's being sincere, then he isn't abusing you. He's doing what he thinks is right.
Of course it is just a happy coincidence no one can prove what he does or doesn't actually believe right? I might truly believe you are a vampire and stake you through the heart. That doesn't justify it. People believe lots of erroneous things, furthermore he has already demonstrated his desire to abuse the trust system against me even if you all believe these things, which I don't buy for a second.
Funny, you consider it acceptable for him to judge my intents, but not acceptable for me to judge his. This horse shit you are perpetrating certainly isn't an extension of your butthurt over being presented with ideas you can't tolerate in Politics & Society now is it?
Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?
I think nullius is being sincere.He thinks your actions are worthy of negative feedback.
I also think that your endless whining about being abused over the past 5 years has only resulted in you feeling even more abused. You should try stopping for a while.
Run out of things to throw at me in Politics & Society again and out looking for some more ways to settle the butthurt score?
I know you are a big fan of semantics, but a technical analysis of an analogy is beyond asinine and merely serves as a distraction from the point, as well as further excuse for abuse. The question of his sincerity is a non-sequitur. This is not an appropriate use of the trust system.
If he's being sincere, then he isn't abusing you. He's doing what he thinks is right.
Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?
I think nullius is being sincere.He thinks your actions are worthy of negative feedback.
I also think that your endless whining about being abused over the past 5 years has only resulted in you feeling even more abused. You should try stopping for a while.
Run out of things to throw at me in Politics & Society again and out looking for some more ways to settle the butthurt score?
I know you are a big fan of semantics, but a technical analysis of an analogy is beyond asinine and merely serves as a distraction from the point, as well as further excuse for abuse. The question of his sincerity is a non-sequitur. This is not an appropriate use of the trust system.
Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?
I think nullius is being sincere.He thinks your actions are worthy of negative feedback.
I also think that your endless whining about being abused over the past 5 years has only resulted in you feeling even more abused. You should try stopping for a while.
Once again, there is more playing with the trust system like their own personal toy today by the usual suspects. What is really odd is Nullius always seems to leave these ratings for me when I say something that makes Lauda look like an ass. It is almost like Lauda has burned their own reputation so much they are having to resort to using bought/stolen/borrowed reps to fight their battles for them.
I posted this earlier:
Maybe Lauda is just taking it back? This is just another good example of Lauda trying to hide the fact that they are a normie wearing 4chan culture like a suit to camouflage themselves like Steve Buscemi and his skateboard desperately trying to convince his fellow kids he is one of them. The idea of chastising some one for being racist while simultaneously lauding shitposting culture is self contradictory and yet another demonstration of the fact that Lauda exists more as a fabrication than a real personality.
Then later that day...
nullius 2020-03-10 Reference "Spreads objectively false, dangerously misleading medical misinformation that seems as if it spewed forth from some quack site: Describes “the A.I.D.S. virus” as “an over active immune system causing the body to attack its own healthy cells.” ¶ Accuses someone who corrects him of “pointless topic sliding”. Doesn’t admit that he was wrong. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53920023 http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5391/53919747.html http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5392/53920056.html"
nullius 2020-03-10 Reference "A pompous dolt who wreathes his grandiose troll “guild” with a pseudo-Latin motto so ungrammatical, it is obvious that he knows nothing whatsoever about Latin. All pretense and no substance, as usual. ¶ His such incompetence is unsurprising, inasmuch as his username “TECSHARE” mangles the indivisible Latin digraph CH representing X/χ (chi) from τέχνη. "
Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?
I posted this earlier:
~
Maybe Lauda is just taking it back? This is just another good example of Lauda trying to hide the fact that they are a normie wearing 4chan culture like a suit to camouflage themselves like Steve Buscemi and his skateboard desperately trying to convince his fellow kids he is one of them. The idea of chastising some one for being racist while simultaneously lauding shitposting culture is self contradictory and yet another demonstration of the fact that Lauda exists more as a fabrication than a real personality.
Then later that day...
nullius 2020-03-10 Reference "Spreads objectively false, dangerously misleading medical misinformation that seems as if it spewed forth from some quack site: Describes “the A.I.D.S. virus” as “an over active immune system causing the body to attack its own healthy cells.” ¶ Accuses someone who corrects him of “pointless topic sliding”. Doesn’t admit that he was wrong. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53920023 http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5391/53919747.html http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5392/53920056.html"
nullius 2020-03-10 Reference "A pompous dolt who wreathes his grandiose troll “guild” with a pseudo-Latin motto so ungrammatical, it is obvious that he knows nothing whatsoever about Latin. All pretense and no substance, as usual. ¶ His such incompetence is unsurprising, inasmuch as his username “TECSHARE” mangles the indivisible Latin digraph CH representing X/χ (chi) from τέχνη. "
Do I have to get these people live on video explicitly admitting they are abusing the trust system as a form of retribution before these people lose any authority under it, or are some of you just ok with the fact that this abuse of the system happens, as long as it is focused against people who aren't you or your pals?
"I am not lumping you into anything!" [proceeds to make false equivalencies lumping me in with Vod]
HOW?? I am barely insinuating that you and Vod both don't seem to get along well, so move past everything and with your lives. I know its really easy for you as an uninterested observer to just throw your hands up an call it a wash, but if you bothered to look into this at all you would see all of his accusations against me are completely baseless and a transparent attempt at extorting me into removing the very valid and well documented rating I left for him. Him simply repeating me in a refractory manner doesn't make my statements any less valid, and false equivalence is exactly what he hopes to acheive with this childish behavior, eliciting exactly the response you are exhibiting here so he can create the appearance of this being a two sided thing. I did nothing to deserve any of this and there is no reason I should tolerate it. You aren't helping me, you are negating my claims here creating a false equivalence as if I deserve responsibility for his actions.
If you so want this thing to be done with, I suggest you to lock all threads you have opened against Vod(if any, I recall seeing one, i could be wrong), press the ignore button on Vod's profile and move on. There'll be no end to this, if either one of you keeps giving attention to the other. As for the negative rating, I don't think there will ever be a proper answer to it unless there is an adult conversation between you two without mere arguing. No one else can you help you with that. Just as a fun little exercise to demonstrate you are projecting upon me, go back through this thread and count how many times you can see me insulting Vod. Weird... pretty sparse if any. You know why? I have explicitly refrained from doing so to prevent the exact false equivalency you are applying to me right now, of which Vod relies on to escape accountability from his own actions. I am very sorry that you don't like the conflict that results from me calling him out on his abusive behavior. I have tolerated it for over 5 years, and I am done putting up with it. The only thing I have been doing in this thread is making a critical examination of his, and Nullis's abuse of the trust system. Nothing more.
If you don't like Vod's interference in your threads, put a local rule and ask him to not reply to your threads, even better make it self moderated and delete his replies if you don't want to put up with him anymore. Disclaimer: I am still not taking anyone's side in this whole scenario/s, so don't presume random crap.
Like I said, false equivalence:
You're just throwing words at each other at this point, you both aren't willing to have an adult conversation about it, nor are you willing to let it go. Y'all are acting worse than Kindergarten children for goodness sake.
I don't care what rambling Vod does. You are confused. I care that he abused the trust system against me with baseless accusations. There will never be an end to this until Vod loses his authority to abuse the trust system, because Vod doesn't want it to end. I made efforts to simply avoid interaction with him for years. He follows me around and injects himself into everything I do. Some how the drama he creates doing so is my responsibility now? Really, he is low grade entertainment to me at worst, that is until he abuses the trust system against me. That is not acceptable, and again, it is convenient for you as an uninterested observer to just tell me to drop it when I pay the price of his abuse and it costs you nothing to just tell me I should be let go.
I can't force Vod to have a logical discussion. All I can do is produce the facts of the matter that he can't substantiate any of his claims, as I have done here. He wants to avoid a critical discussion of his ratings at all costs because he knows he can't justify them. This is exactly why he is acting this way because he knows people like you will throw their hands up and call it a wash, not willing to dig through his copious amounts of bullshit.
Yes, others can help me with this.
~Vod
It is that simple.
"I am not lumping you into anything!" [proceeds to make false equivalencies lumping me in with Vod]
HOW?? I am barely insinuating that you and Vod both don't seem to get along well, so move past everything and with your lives. I know its really easy for you as an uninterested observer to just throw your hands up an call it a wash, but if you bothered to look into this at all you would see all of his accusations against me are completely baseless and a transparent attempt at extorting me into removing the very valid and well documented rating I left for him. Him simply repeating me in a refractory manner doesn't make my statements any less valid, and false equivalence is exactly what he hopes to acheive with this childish behavior, eliciting exactly the response you are exhibiting here so he can create the appearance of this being a two sided thing. I did nothing to deserve any of this and there is no reason I should tolerate it. You aren't helping me, you are negating my claims here creating a false equivalence as if I deserve responsibility for his actions.
If you so want this thing to be done with, I suggest you to lock all threads you have opened against Vod(if any, I recall seeing one, i could be wrong), press the ignore button on Vod's profile and move on. There'll be no end to this, if either one of you keeps giving attention to the other. As for the negative rating, I don't think there will ever be a proper answer to it unless there is an adult conversation between you two without mere arguing. No one else can you help you with that. Just as a fun little exercise to demonstrate you are projecting upon me, go back through this thread and count how many times you can see me insulting Vod. Weird... pretty sparse if any. You know why? I have explicitly refrained from doing so to prevent the exact false equivalency you are applying to me right now, of which Vod relies on to escape accountability from his own actions. I am very sorry that you don't like the conflict that results from me calling him out on his abusive behavior. I have tolerated it for over 5 years, and I am done putting up with it. The only thing I have been doing in this thread is making a critical examination of his, and Nullis's abuse of the trust system. Nothing more.
If you don't like Vod's interference in your threads, put a local rule and ask him to not reply to your threads, even better make it self moderated and delete his replies if you don't want to put up with him anymore. Disclaimer: I am still not taking anyone's side in this whole scenario/s, so don't presume random crap.
Excuse me. Don't lump me in with that description. I did absolutely NONE of those things. I don't deserve to be lumped in with this garbage false equivalence. Whatever you think about other disputes has nothing to do with Vod's behavior in regard to his rating for me. How much more evidence do you need to demonstrate Vod is abusive and a danger to others here? Does he need to be let off the hook for another 5 years? Ten? I went out of my way to avoid him, he follows me everywhere looking for any possible way to inject himself into a situation, antagonize, and throw accusations around in addition to his repeated and regular abuse of the trust system over a period of years. I would love to have no relationship to Vod whatsoever, but he has made it clear that is not only impossible, but is not what he wants. He can't control his obsessive behavior.
I am not trying to lump you into anything. If anything, I am trying to help you get rid of this mess or whatever you wanna call it, and make your life here on the forum more easier. I don't know what is up with Vod's rating with regards to you abusing the system, but I do disagree a little bit with Vod's second rating, that rating has more to do with personal agenda than with the trust/trade system. And both of you, stop calling each other mentally ill stalkers, you both are using the term way too much without even knowing the meaning of it. You're just throwing words at each other at this point, you both aren't willing to have an adult conversation about it, nor are you willing to let it go. Y'all are acting worse than Kindergarten children for goodness sake. "I am not lumping you into anything!" [proceeds to make false equivalencies lumping me in with Vod]
I know its really easy for you as an uninterested observer to just throw your hands up an call it a wash, but if you bothered to look into this at all you would see all of his accusations against me are completely baseless and a transparent attempt at extorting me into removing the very valid and well documented rating I left for him. Him simply repeating me in a refractory manner doesn't make my statements any less valid, and false equivalence is exactly what he hopes to acheive with this childish behavior, eliciting exactly the response you are exhibiting here so he can create the appearance of this being a two sided thing. I did nothing to deserve any of this and there is no reason I should tolerate it. You aren't helping me, you are negating my claims here creating a false equivalence as if I deserve responsibility for his actions.
Just as a fun little exercise to demonstrate you are projecting upon me, go back through this thread and count how many times you can see me insulting Vod. Weird... pretty sparse if any. You know why? I have explicitly refrained from doing so to prevent the exact false equivalency you are applying to me right now, of which Vod relies on to escape accountability from his own actions. I am very sorry that you don't like the conflict that results from me calling him out on his abusive behavior. I have tolerated it for over 5 years, and I am done putting up with it. The only thing I have been doing in this thread is making a critical examination of his, and Nullis's abuse of the trust system. Nothing more.
Excuse me. Don't lump me in with that description. I did absolutely NONE of those things. I don't deserve to be lumped in with this garbage false equivalence. Whatever you think about other disputes has nothing to do with Vod's behavior in regard to his rating for me. How much more evidence do you need to demonstrate Vod is abusive and a danger to others here? Does he need to be let off the hook for another 5 years? Ten? I went out of my way to avoid him, he follows me everywhere looking for any possible way to inject himself into a situation, antagonize, and throw accusations around in addition to his repeated and regular abuse of the trust system over a period of years. I would love to have no relationship to Vod whatsoever, but he has made it clear that is not only impossible, but is not what he wants. He can't control his obsessive behavior.
I am not trying to lump you into anything. If anything, I am trying to help you get rid of this mess or whatever you wanna call it, and make your life here on the forum more easier. I don't know what is up with Vod's rating with regards to you abusing the system, but I do disagree a little bit with Vod's second rating, that rating has more to do with personal agenda than with the trust/trade system. And both of you, stop calling each other mentally ill stalkers, you both are using the term way too much without even knowing the meaning of it. You're just throwing words at each other at this point, you both aren't willing to have an adult conversation about it, nor are you willing to let it go. Y'all are acting worse than Kindergarten children for goodness sake. So you don't think leaving Vod a negative rating for doxing and threatening to report OGNasty to the IRS is justified? Some how it always seems the one who should just "let it go" are the ones who have legitimate grievances simply because no one wants to deal with it, not because it is what is right. I would also like to remind you that I had let his past abuse go, but it didn't matter, he just continued his antagonism anyway in spite of being rebuked for it by the community more than once.
I mean, I don't want to judge this whole situation between vod and ognasty, and all the other fuckall disputes there are, its all because of ego and pride that y'all are carrying with you. And over time, that ego has grown into some sort of an unhealthy obsession wherein which some of you decided to hire PIs, contact IRS, offer death threats, bounty to stalk someone, and who knows what else. I am not supporting either parties cause it is stupidly ridiculous the way it is, and no one wants to make amends. If you dont like each other, ignore the person and move for the sake of hell, and remove them from your trust lists. But stirring more drama up has made no positive affect on any of y'alls lives so all of you're winning no oscar here. Excuse me. Don't lump me in with that description. I did absolutely NONE of those things. I don't deserve to be lumped in with this garbage false equivalence. Whatever you think about other disputes has nothing to do with Vod's behavior in regard to his rating for me. How much more evidence do you need to demonstrate Vod is abusive and a danger to others here? Does he need to be let off the hook for another 5 years? Ten? I went out of my way to avoid him, he follows me everywhere looking for any possible way to inject himself into a situation, antagonize, and throw accusations around in addition to his repeated and regular abuse of the trust system over a period of years. I would love to have no relationship to Vod whatsoever, but he has made it clear that is not only impossible, but is not what he wants. He can't control his obsessive behavior.
So you don't think leaving Vod a negative rating for doxing and threatening to report OGNasty to the IRS is justified? Some how it always seems the one who should just "let it go" are the ones who have legitimate grievances simply because no one wants to deal with it, not because it is what is right. I would also like to remind you that I had let his past abuse go, but it didn't matter, he just continued his antagonism anyway in spite of being rebuked for it by the community more than once.
I mean, I don't want to judge this whole situation between vod and ognasty, and all the other fuckall disputes there are, its all because of ego and pride that y'all are carrying with you. And over time, that ego has grown into some sort of an unhealthy obsession wherein which some of you decided to hire PIs, contact IRS, offer death threats, bounty to stalk someone, and who knows what else. I am not supporting either parties cause it is stupidly ridiculous the way it is, and no one wants to make amends. If you dont like each other, ignore the person and move for the sake of hell, and remove them from your trust lists. But stirring more drama up has made no positive affect on any of y'alls lives so all of you're winning no oscar here. Part of what you say is true. The solution you offer is not going to fix the problem long term.
There is ego, but there are financial considerations and power plays here. While there is room within the trust system to game and manipulate for personal financial gain, you will always find this bile and venom being spat at one another.
It will drive people to extraordinary lengths and to construct webs of deception.
This abuse by Nullius or the nullius account anyway, against a flawless 8 year trader here is all part of that.
Move to an objective standard of trust feedback.
So you don't think leaving Vod a negative rating for doxing and threatening to report OGNasty to the IRS is justified? Some how it always seems the one who should just "let it go" are the ones who have legitimate grievances simply because no one wants to deal with it, not because it is what is right. I would also like to remind you that I had let his past abuse go, but it didn't matter, he just continued his antagonism anyway in spite of being rebuked for it by the community more than once.
I mean, I don't want to judge this whole situation between vod and ognasty, and all the other fuckall disputes there are, its all because of ego and pride that y'all are carrying with you. And over time, that ego has grown into some sort of an unhealthy obsession wherein which some of you decided to hire PIs, contact IRS, offer death threats, bounty to stalk someone, and who knows what else. I am not supporting either parties cause it is stupidly ridiculous the way it is, and no one wants to make amends. If you dont like each other, ignore the person and move for the sake of hell, and remove them from your trust lists. But stirring more drama up has made no positive affect on any of y'alls lives so all of you're winning no oscar here. We should just let him throw his temper tantrums and stop responding to his cries for attention
good call dude, its obvious to all that Nullius is a net benefit to the forum and contributes far more that TS, so TS and Truth or dare are on ignore for me. bet it makes my day more pleasant!
Nullius or rather the new incarnation of nullius has been incredibly net negative. Tecshare is clearly more intelligent. Nullius is likely female and to my eye, English is not their first language. There are a few clues within the fluffy pompous pretentious walls of nonsense that one can spot. His arguments have gaping holes. I notice one abrasive member who interests me greatky, pointed this out almost immediately upon his resurrection
The endless quoting and urgency to demonstrate they are well read (self schooled I suspect) are key traits of peasant stock. That is no insult if taken alone.
However, the newly formed allegiance with other members that are devaluing our forum with spiteful trust abuse and stiring up trouble can not be ignored. This form of targeted abuse was not present during his previous form. This looks to be a member setting out to push the agenda of a known and documented scammer and extortionist.
You can not start to compare a solid dependable member like tecshare with his abuser Nullius. Please do not expect to be given free reign to mob and abuse members unanswered. I will remain and support any member that finds themselves being vilified for matters not related to scamming.
You give a member a red tag then you will need compelling evidence they are financially dangerous. Anything else will be compiled and used as clear evidence tagging is no longer of benefit to this forum.
The trust abuse from Nullius is useful in as much as it will serve as a clear example of how red tags can devalue the trust system while destroying our free speech.
Jump to: