I wish I had your ability to ignore unethical idiots. :/
I find it beneficial to the health. :/
You know the aphorism about “wrestling with a pig”; and...
TECSHARE “winning”
...I don’t run on that track.
OK bud - when Techy claims to win because you won't reply, I'll point users to this information.
Thanks. Though I am not exactly afraid of TECSHARE making ten thousand posts on this forum, excitedly announcing that he “won” an Internet Argument because I explicitly refused to waste my time arguing with accusations by a known troll that any reasonable person can see are wrong. LOL.
Anybody whose opinion actually matters will see that I am simply ignoring a pro-grade Internet Arguer who is trying to bully me with high-volume nonsense. That is what an impartial observer will see as for me—unlike suchmoon, who has spent the past nine pages dodging and then ignoring,
inter alia, the iron logic of a simple syllogism, “If ~nullius, then ~Vod; if not ~Vod, then not ~nullius” over the singular tag for which she initially declared she would exclude me. (Her and eddie’s attempts to shift the goalposts notwithstanding.)
Whereas if xolxol and similar creatures declare that TECSHARE “won”, then—well, I couldn’t care less.
Evidently addressing TECSHARE and Vod in the context:Are you guys still fighting behind this? Come on, y'all can forgive and forget.
I mean, Quickseller and Lauda had a dispute for years, and if they could come to terms with each other, you can too.
That’s a quite different situation, not really relevant here; if warranted, I will address it in the pertinent thread. The summary is that it has evidently been a
process of two parties starting from a position of extreme
mutual distrust, and slowly working toward the start of a common understanding with a hopeful future. I must note the
mutual distrust, in fairness to Quickseller: I have obviously and unapologetically always been on Lauda’s side in that dispute; and I must recognize that Quickseller had his own perspective on that, even if I think his perspective was dead wrong.
I really don’t think it is a matter of “Eh,
shrug, ‘forgive and forget’.” Not for either of them—and I would not trivialize it that way. Thus, sorry, I actually don’t see what your point is—unless you are suggesting a forecast that TECSHARE will go through a long period of not attacking Vod, and then suddenly, publicly, unilaterally apologize to Vod for years-old threads, with
no assurance (or even rational expectation) that the reply will not be, “Too little, too late; go die in a fire”? It actually takes some sincerity and courage to do that.
Whereas
this is TECSHARE’s response to
Lauda’s announcement of the new peace between herself and Quickseller:
Trolling with bait to ignite a flamewar by derailing the peace thread into a “dozen or so” other ongoing fights in other threads, i.e. more “winning” in the retarded sense.http://loyce.club/archive/posts/5379/53799851.htmlNow only to get to the other dozen or so people you attack...
Quickseller was never a simple troll. (I always accused him of worse in the sense of “evil mastermind”; but that is beside the point.) And I must remark, although he said earlier in this thread that he disagrees with my tag on TECSHARE, he has been fair here in the way that I can “agree to disagree”. Anyway, pugman, I would not hold out much hope for any kind of peace with TECSHARE when he himself reacts to others’ newfound amicability by trying to start a fight.
That statement wasn't directed at you.
I appreciate the clarification. Sorry I scrolled straight past
a post in almost illegibly bad English by an alleged/putative CH sock in the short span between this...
~
Demanding me to address some "points"
sounds an awful lot like cryptohunter...and this:
Hey cryptocunt, you try two hardy notttalky the inglich good.
I furthermore presumed that insults were directed at me, because I am the topic of this thread, wherein you have previously seen fit to call me a...
complete buffoon
...as part of your life advice to me, which I duly filed in “taken under advisement”. 🗑️
In the future, when cryptohunter has been mentioned, I will try to pay more attention to things that I would otherwise ignore, instead of drawing such inferences as seemed reasonable, but turned out to be in error.
I will edit
this post with an appropriate correction (clearly marked as an edit).
To avoid letting this post run
too long and unwieldy, I must leave other issues for later.
