Pages:
Author

Topic: Trust system abuse / DT2 member Vod is provably dishonestly rating people - page 10. (Read 5825 times)

legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
currently DT1 members are doing whatever they want and their actions are left unpunished.

Have you PMed the DT1 members yet?

E.g. OgNasty is DT1, and has posted in this thread.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18697
currently DT1 members are doing whatever they want and their actions are left unpunished.

Have you PMed the DT1 members yet?
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
If you see DT2 members are abusing other people and also misusing the trust system and you see no actions taken by DT1 members who'd included them on DT2, you should tag those DT1 members. currently DT1 members are doing whatever they want and their actions are left unpunished.

However this whole thing could be avoided if Vod could give a chance to Anduck in the first place. instead of countering Vod's feedback, ask him to forgive Anduck and let us all to move on.
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 102
I don't want to derail this thread I just want to remind people about his activities, please go on ignoring me and his replies

My trust rating and merit score already do that.  Smiley

Make sure other inmates will know it too
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I don't want to derail this thread I just want to remind people about his activities, please go on ignoring me and his replies

My trust rating and merit score already do that.  Smiley
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 102
Anyhow, Vod what do you have to say on this:
Anduck lies.  :/

Read the PMs again.  Notice where I type "ah, until this point'?  That is when I lost trust for him.  Around a week later, with no further communication from him, I changed my rating.  If you choose a scammer's interpretation of those words over mine, then you will believe him over me.
I did read the PMs. But what I noticed was that you asked him to change his ratings first, otherwise you'd change it, and then only after Anduck said that it would be better if both of you remove the ratings, and only then did you found the rating to be retaliatory.

I am not saying anduck is a scammer but nor am I saying what he did is ethical. The rating was good on its own, the issue here is when you changed it, and it does honestly look like retaliation after reading those conversations.
From the looks of things, vod would rather respond to the trolls in an attempt to derail this thread, likely to avoid others seeing the underlying facts.

I don't want to derail this thread I just want to remind people about his activities, please go on ignoring me and his replies
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
From the looks of things, vod would rather respond to the trolls in an attempt to derail this thread, likely to avoid others seeing the underlying facts.

And right on clue, the other member who likes to use children against other people.  :/
copper member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 2348
Anyhow, Vod what do you have to say on this:
Anduck lies.  :/

Read the PMs again.  Notice where I type "ah, until this point'?  That is when I lost trust for him.  Around a week later, with no further communication from him, I changed my rating.  If you choose a scammer's interpretation of those words over mine, then you will believe him over me.
I did read the PMs. But what I noticed was that you asked him to change his ratings first, otherwise you'd change it, and then only after Anduck said that it would be better if both of you remove the ratings, and only then did you found the rating to be retaliatory.

I am not saying anduck is a scammer but nor am I saying what he did is ethical. The rating was good on its own, the issue here is when you changed it, and it does honestly look like retaliation after reading those conversations.
From the looks of things, vod would rather respond to the trolls in an attempt to derail this thread, likely to avoid others seeing the underlying facts.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Suchmoon is a SHE?? Shocked

Suchmoon does have the female gender symbol as an icon.   Smiley

You tried to rape her as well?

What is with you and the rape fantasies?  Esp your nephew?  That's sick man.  :/


There is a report from one of his (ex)coworkers as well

No, there isn't.  You are just very gullible.  Wink
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 102
DUDE he is an accused PEDOPHILE on some random site, he is doxed and the people who have done it are left unpunished and I am continuing my butthurt vendetta because I have nothing better to do!
FTFY

There is a report from one of his (ex)coworkers as well
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
DUDE he is an accused PEDOPHILE on some random site, he is doxed and the people who have done it are left unpunished and I am continuing my butthurt vendetta because I have nothing better to do!
FTFY
full member
Activity: 241
Merit: 102
Dude.. Talking about rape is not cool man... Seriously, take that shit down.

DUDE he is a PEDOPHILE, he is doxed and left unpunished
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
You tried to rape her as well?
Dude.. Talking about rape is not cool man... Seriously, take that shit down.
Suchmoon is a SHE?? Shocked

Suchmoon does have the female gender symbol as an icon.   Smiley
I never noticed that..  Embarrassed
Anyhow, Vod what do you have to say on this:
Anduck lies.  :/

Read the PMs again.  Notice where I type "ah, until this point'?  That is when I lost trust for him.  Around a week later, with no further communication from him, I changed my rating.  If you choose a scammer's interpretation of those words over mine, then you will believe him over me.
I did read the PMs. But what I noticed was that you asked him to change his ratings first, otherwise you'd change it, and then only after Anduck said that it would be better if both of you remove the ratings, and only then did you found the rating to be retaliatory.

I am not saying anduck is a scammer but nor am I saying what he did is ethical. The rating was good on its own, the issue here is when you changed it, and it does honestly look like retaliation after reading those conversations.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
Suchmoon is a SHE?? Shocked

Suchmoon does have the female gender symbol as an icon.   Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org

Very nice of you to show up in a thread titled "Trust system abuse".

Did you send this message: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32677479

Or how about your petty trust rating on edonkey where you've been proven wrong quite comprehensively? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ognasty-abuse-of-rank-to-ruin-accounts-in-good-standing-2337754

Comments like this are why nobody takes your opinion seriously and why I immediately added you to my exclusion list a long time ago.
suchmoon is a bottom feeder. She will only side with those who she perceives to be more powerful in a dispute as a way for her to gain additional power. She will troll those who she perceives to be less powerful by twisting irrelevant facts/portions of a dispute, and will create a tangent regarding said irrelevant facts, derailing threads. Also similar to Lauda, suchmoon will troll those who she perceives to be weak.   

Thank you, Quicksy, but I feel like you might be projecting a little bit here. The "power" that you speak of appears to be very important to you. Not so much to me. I do perceive you as weak though. Intellectually, ethically, socially weak. Maybe that's why you're so much fun to troll.

Anyway, this is a fairly good attempt to obfuscate Og's shenanigans, I'll give you that. The topic of the thread is "Trust system abuse" BTW. I do believe Og is abusing the trust system by (1) spreading malicious rumors about owlcatz; and (2) refusing to back down for eoakland.

What's your take on that?
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
Suchmoon is a SHE?? Shocked
theymos, you should really reply to this topic..
Anduck lies.  :/

Read the PMs again.  Notice where I type "ah, until this point'?  That is when I lost trust for him.  Around a week later, with no further communication from him, I changed my rating.  If you choose a scammer's interpretation of those words over mine, then you will believe him over me.
I did read the PMs. But what I noticed was that you asked him to change his ratings first, otherwise you'd change it, and then only after Anduck said that it would be better if both of you remove the ratings, and only then did you found the rating to be retaliatory.

I am not saying anduck is a scammer but nor am I saying what he did is ethical. The rating was good on its own, the issue here is when you changed it, and it does honestly look like retaliation after reading those conversations.
Regardless, according to my trust settings both their feedback appear as untrusted so the counter part din't really had any effect.
What you see is as untrusted ratings is not equal to what others see. This is what the concern anduck has.
copper member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 2348

Very nice of you to show up in a thread titled "Trust system abuse".

Did you send this message: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32677479

Or how about your petty trust rating on edonkey where you've been proven wrong quite comprehensively? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ognasty-abuse-of-rank-to-ruin-accounts-in-good-standing-2337754

Comments like this are why nobody takes your opinion seriously and why I immediately added you to my exclusion list a long time ago.
suchmoon is a bottom feeder. She will only side with those who she perceives to be more powerful in a dispute as a way for her to gain additional power. She will troll those who she perceives to be less powerful by twisting irrelevant facts/portions of a dispute, and will create a tangent regarding said irrelevant facts, derailing threads. Also similar to Lauda, suchmoon will troll those who she perceives to be weak.   
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
You highlighted a big reason why the DT system is struggling.  

Politics.  You can have two people with the same morals and same hatred of scammers, but one little cultural slight or misread of a post and BOOM - they are now fighting with each other.

I'm not sure how the system can be changed for the better without letting the multiple account Quickscammer take over.  :/

Unfortunately, I think it will take other DT1 members being attacked the way I was and deciding that they are ok getting hit with a little red in order to be part of the solution instead of the problem.  DT1 members expanding their trust networks to include more trusted longterm members who haven't engaged in shady behavior is a start.
legendary
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
misread of a post and BOOM - they are now fighting with each other.

How about you start by re-reading our PM conversation and try to spot where you misunderstood/misread me. Hints are in the Reputation thread where I explained three times how you illogically misunderstood me and continued to base your accusations on that.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
You highlighted a big reason why the DT system is struggling.  

Politics.  You can have two people with the same morals and same hatred of scammers, but one little cultural slight or misread of a post and BOOM - they are now fighting with each other.

I'm not sure how the system can be changed for the better without letting the multiple account Quickscammer take over.  :/
Pages:
Jump to: