Vod does seem to have left retaliatory feedback and the PM conversation is definitely not helping Vod's side. I had asked
Vod a question a few days ago but it was buried, thanks digaran, so Vod do answer this:
Why did you change your feeback to Anduck from neutral to negative, is it because Anduck said he doesn't trust you, so you wanted to change it?Because he can? I'm not speaking on his behalf but I don't think he exactly owes you an explanation for that question. I used to trust a person somewhat and I don't feel like trusting him anymore, I can always change my feedback from neutral to negative? It's completely fine to do that provided a valid reason is tagged along with it.(which seems to be the case here)
Do you think that he red-rated me, because I didn't change my rating? If you think that's not the reason, why do you think he red-rated me?
6:15 PM: "I decided what you did wasn't untrustworthy"
11:26 PM: Opinion changed 100% after I didn't bend to his threat, following a red rating few days later stating that I'm a scammer and a liar.
What do you think, why did Vod's opinion about me being trustworthy change completely during these ~5 hours? (Note: His threatening/blackmailing and my refusal happened during these hours.)
Current(ly) DT members are largely afraid to do anything -- and I've heard this from several people who are either on DT
Did actual DT (DT1 or DT2) members tell you that or did you make that up?
I don't make stuff up.
People are not willing to do anything, because of the consequences that will likely come to them. You should know, too, as it has happened before. It's not a secret how these things are. You can ask people yourself, or use search.