[Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 167.

wtfc360

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

So tried --gpu-engine 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031 and get : 0 (Sick/dead), 1,009 Kh/s, 1,009Kh/s, 490h/s, 134h/s.
Then I try --gpu-engine 900, 1031, 1031, 900, 900 and get: 0 (Sick/dead), 881h/s, 881h/s, 489h/s, 130h/s
Why is GPU 1 and 2 affected by the GPU 0 engine set?

Quote from: Wirly on January 24, 2015, 09:13:01 AM

Yes

Quote from: wtfc360 on January 24, 2015, 09:08:14 AM

Ok, I'll try that. If it says GPU 0 is sick would that be automatically the first engine to slow down, in your example: --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 and slow that from 1040 to lets say 1000?

Quote from: Wirly on January 24, 2015, 08:54:40 AM

Quote from: wtfc360 on January 24, 2015, 08:33:21 AM

I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs:
C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

From that I get different results for every rig:

5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD

5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD

5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s

Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards?
Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...?

Quote from: barbados-fs on January 24, 2015, 06:22:25 AM

Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be.
Thank U.

Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000
or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128)
or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using

Wirly

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

Yes

Quote from: wtfc360 on January 24, 2015, 09:08:14 AM

Ok, I'll try that. If it says GPU 0 is sick would that be automatically the first engine to slow down, in your example: --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 and slow that from 1040 to lets say 1000?

Quote from: Wirly on January 24, 2015, 08:54:40 AM

Quote from: wtfc360 on January 24, 2015, 08:33:21 AM

I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs:
C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

From that I get different results for every rig:

5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD

5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD

5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s

Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards?
Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...?

Quote from: barbados-fs on January 24, 2015, 06:22:25 AM

Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be.
Thank U.

Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000
or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128)
or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using

wtfc360

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

Ok, I'll try that. If it says GPU 0 is sick would that be automatically the first engine to slow down, in your example: --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 and slow that from 1040 to lets say 1000?

Quote from: Wirly on January 24, 2015, 08:54:40 AM

Quote from: wtfc360 on January 24, 2015, 08:33:21 AM

I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs:
C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

From that I get different results for every rig:

5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD

5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD

5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s

Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards?
Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...?

Quote from: barbados-fs on January 24, 2015, 06:22:25 AM

Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be.
Thank U.

Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000
or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128)
or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using

Wirly

full member

Activity: 136

Merit: 100

Quote from: wtfc360 on January 24, 2015, 08:33:21 AM

I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs:
C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

From that I get different results for every rig:

5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD

5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD

5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s

Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards?
Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...?

Quote from: barbados-fs on January 24, 2015, 06:22:25 AM

Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be.
Thank U.

Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000
or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128)
or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using

Any combination of this worked for my rigs when that happens

wtfc360

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs:
C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600

From that I get different results for every rig:

5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD
5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK
4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD

5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD
4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD

5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s

Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards?
Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...?

Quote from: barbados-fs on January 24, 2015, 06:22:25 AM

Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be.
Thank U.

barbados-fs

hero member

Activity: 837

Merit: 505

Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be.
Thank U.

king_pin

sr. member

Activity: 416

Merit: 250

Someone found good settings for NVIDIA 970 cards?
Autotune makes my rig crash Sad

wtfc360

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

I'm not sure I'm answering your question, but you can clear the orphans in the transaction tab by rightclick on any transaction and a new window will appear, choose "clear orphans" and the orphans will disappear...

Quote from: dan_and_shan on January 24, 2015, 03:09:00 AM

Gday
just a question is there anyway to limit "generated but not accepted".

Regards Dan

dan_and_shan

sr. member

Activity: 433

Merit: 250

Gday
just a question is there anyway to limit "generated but not accepted".

Regards Dan

volyova

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quote from: rapture333 on January 23, 2015, 11:30:26 PM

@SecretsOfCrypto

Rapture has always been my online alias; in the beginning anonymity was important to me, just like many in the crypto word, but it is much less so now that I am doing professional work for Ultracoin and using my full name all the time. I am not a hard target to dox either.

Is it a religious rapture, or just a normal rapture? Tongue

rapture333

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

@SecretsOfCrypto

Rapture has always been my online alias; in the beginning anonymity was important to me, just like many in the crypto word, but it is much less so now that I am doing professional work for Ultracoin and using my full name all the time. I am not a hard target to dox either.

usukan

legendary

Activity: 1590

Merit: 1002

SecretsOfCrypto

sr. member

Activity: 466

Merit: 250

Twitter Follow for no BS crypto: @SecretsOfCrypto

barbados-fs

hero member

Activity: 837

Merit: 505

Quote from: king_pin on January 23, 2015, 01:41:57 PM

280X - 1,2 kH/s is OK

What settings?

king_pin

sr. member

Activity: 416

Merit: 250

I see that ATI cards get around 4 times less than on NF14, but NVIDIA cards go down only 3 times in hashrate, damn wish I had more Nvidias Sad

280X - 1,2 kH/s is OK
290 - 1,4 kH/s is OK

barbados-fs

hero member

Activity: 837

Merit: 505

R9 280x - 1.17kH/s Okay?

Beave162

hero member

Activity: 809

Merit: 501

Quote from: rapture333 on January 23, 2015, 09:51:57 AM

NF15 is going to lower the net hashrate, so it is only relative to the amount of miners on the network as before.

This... This is a concept a lot of people are simply unable to grasp. They look at their hashrate drop by over half, and just assume that they are making less than half in UTC as they were making before. Why do people not understand that hashrate is relative? I do not know. It will have to be reiterated I'm sure.

barbados-fs

hero member

Activity: 837

Merit: 505

Hello everyone. What should be the result at R9 280x and R9 270x?

Youghoor

sr. member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 275

Quote from: jacobshm on January 21, 2015, 10:43:22 AM

according to coinmarketcap, we have 2btc daily volume across all exchanges. anybody have ideas how we can increase that 5X-7X short of manipulation? Not really sure what another exchange will give us, we are already on some good ones...

The Cahseer app sounds promising though, also new devs

good luck

Yes we have 2btc daily volume and it will be more soon.

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Topic: [Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 167. (Read 381021 times)