[Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 227.

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: drbobbo on October 06, 2014, 04:32:53 AM

Hi,

I am trying out the multipool and it seems to work fine. Do anyone know of a way to calculate the number of expected UTC / MHs for the different multi switching ports? I am trying to figure out which miners will be best to point here, i.e which algo will be most profitable ....

Thanks

/

The updated front end will have a conversion to BTC/MH-Hour, but I suppose it wouldn't be too difficult to come up with a further conversion to UTC. I'll look into it. I'm also planning on adding payouts by worker ID (wallet address) with txids and a discovered blocks page too.

It would be hard to come up with the best algo unless we were to come up with average hash rates for a particular card. Something like whattomine.com would probably give you the best idea for algorithm choice.

Here's a sneak peak at the the new interface:

wtfc360

full member

Activity: 137

Merit: 100

BTC down, UTC stable...

drbobbo

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Quote from: Kracko on October 05, 2014, 07:17:05 PM

Quote from: rapture333 on October 05, 2014, 01:09:06 PM

Quote from: tc61 on October 04, 2014, 01:13:43 PM

I hope the coin spikes up after the conference, at this point its not worth mining, and once the miners dry up, it spells bad times for a coin...keeping my fingers crossed.

People have been saying that for months and we still get consistant miners, businesses, investors, volume and developments. So I wouldn't be too concerned, and we are still high on what to mine: http://www.whattomine.com/

GPU mining is indeed going downhill. I'm only making around $3/day over energy costs of with my 12 750tis I'm getting close to turning off the rigs. The funny part is that UTC is at the top of the list on whattomine. We really need BTC to climb back up as otherwise the whole asic-resistant altcoin market is going to tank with it too.

What I think is interesting is that when BTC goes down, the Alts go down as well. At some point you would assume the Alts, at least the bigger ones, should be uncoupled to the BTC price. What I am thinking is that when BTC goes down 50%, for example LTC should be twice as expensive in relation to BTC but unchanged in relation to Fiat, but that is not what we are seeing now, it's rather BTC down -> everything else is down (in relation to Fiat).

I wish for an energy company where I can pay my bills in BTC .....

Qxw

full member

Activity: 203

Merit: 100

Block chain Explorer down? Yesterday I try and today.
These kind of things need be reliable. Lot of hype about marketing but basic things need also care.
Block chain Explorer is one very basic thing.

Quote from: http://ultracha.in/

Service Temporarily Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.

How many days is temporary?

I want invest to this coin but basic things need work reliable.
Marketing peoples do hard and nice work but technical things/services need also be on the same level.

drbobbo

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Hi,

I am trying out the multipool and it seems to work fine. Do anyone know of a way to calculate the number of expected UTC / MHs for the different multi switching ports? I am trying to figure out which miners will be best to point here, i.e which algo will be most profitable ....

Thanks

/

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: rapture333 on October 05, 2014, 01:09:06 PM

Quote from: tc61 on October 04, 2014, 01:13:43 PM

I hope the coin spikes up after the conference, at this point its not worth mining, and once the miners dry up, it spells bad times for a coin...keeping my fingers crossed.

People have been saying that for months and we still get consistant miners, businesses, investors, volume and developments. So I wouldn't be too concerned, and we are still high on what to mine: http://www.whattomine.com/

GPU mining is indeed going downhill. I'm only making around $3/day over energy costs of with my 12 750tis I'm getting close to turning off the rigs. The funny part is that UTC is at the top of the list on whattomine. We really need BTC to climb back up as otherwise the whole asic-resistant altcoin market is going to tank with it too.

rapture333

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Remember to spread useultracoin.com, the new business directory for Ultracoin!

Uggle

full member

Activity: 228

Merit: 100

Quote from: Valpe on October 05, 2014, 03:01:44 PM

We have working multipool thanks to Kracko.

Now its time to give support to UTC and point some miners to multipool.
Mining there will do good UTC value.

Join with me to multipool and give UTC our support.

Valpe

http://multi.tumblingblock.com:8080/

Looks great, I will try it out soon ! Cheesy

Valpe

full member

Activity: 307

Merit: 100

We have working multipool thanks to Kracko.

Now its time to give support to UTC and point some miners to multipool.
Mining there will do good UTC value.

Join with me to multipool and give UTC our support.

Valpe

http://multi.tumblingblock.com:8080/

rapture333

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: tc61 on October 04, 2014, 01:13:43 PM

I hope the coin spikes up after the conference, at this point its not worth mining, and once the miners dry up, it spells bad times for a coin...keeping my fingers crossed.

People have been saying that for months and we still get consistant miners, businesses, investors, volume and developments. So I wouldn't be too concerned, and we are still high on what to mine: http://www.whattomine.com/

rapture333

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: king_pin on October 05, 2014, 06:39:51 AM

How many people are there going to be at that conference?

There is going to be around an estimated 300 people in attendance, plus members of the press.

volyova

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

oh noes! everyting crash!! Cool

Qxw

full member

Activity: 203

Merit: 100

Is it possible to adjust pools(s) so that diff do not drop under 1. Or is it possible find other solution, example so that user can set minimum.

It looks like yacminer is somehow in troubles with <1 diff's.

Here Thirtybird comment about pool diff and yacminer: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9041513

(it is in YAC thread because there peoples find lot of problems after change to N16 and miners who use yacminer. After then some YAC pool change diff to 1 and it was solution for this problem.
This is also some kind of problem with UTC if use yacminer and small workers. I just made tests with one testing machine what have only one test GPU (this time R7 240 4Gb) and soon pool drops diff under 1 and after then yacminer do not take these to accepted shares counting.

Edit/Add:

This info I did not see before: (I have used ultracoins.info and after then http://ultracoinpool.info )

Pool: http://ultracoiners.info/
Static Diff on port 3333 (Yacminer) <===
Vardiff on port 4444.

Also what nice surprice, some kind people have moved my account from ultracoins.info to this ultracoiners.info. Well done.

Now I can make tests with static diff.

longyenthanh

sr. member

Activity: 1221

Merit: 250

what's wrong with btc Shocked

300$

king_pin

sr. member

Activity: 416

Merit: 250

How many people are there going to be at that conference?

pizadrama

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 0

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

Quote from: tc61 on October 04, 2014, 05:06:54 PM

Krako, what did you start with?

Quote from: Kracko on October 04, 2014, 03:24:46 PM

I managed a 20-25% increase in output than with the best I can get with the default lookup gap of 1, going from around 2.6-2.8 to 3.1-3.6 mh/s each card.

About 2.6-2.8 kh/sec per card. Getting around 16+kh/sec per rig total. Now it's 19-20khash/sec per rig.

The energy expenditure went up for each rig also, burning another 100w each. My total at the wall between my two rigs was ~620W. Now it's around 830W.

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

Krako, what did you start with?

Kracko

sr. member

Activity: 456

Merit: 250

I've been experimenting with the lookup gap with CudaMiner and I came up with a few Scrypt-Jane settings at N14 that might work better for those with a 750ti. I'm using both of these configs as each appears to work best with the rig its on. One has 4 ACX cards with the 6pin adapter and the other has 3 ACX cards- the rest are the non-ACX cards that are dependent on the powered risers.

I managed a 20-25% increase in output than with the best I can get with the default lookup gap of 1, going from around 2.6-2.8 to 3.1-3.6 mh/s each card. It's takes quite a lot longer to autotune with the higher lookup gaps, but it appears that it is worth it to find that sweet spot for kernel configuration. A lookup gap of 3 or 4 seems to bring the most gains.

Each rig has a Asrock PRO H81 mobo, 4GB RAM with USB 3.0 Powered Risers and 550W PSU, running on Ubuntu Server 14.04 with Cuda Tools/Library 6.0.37 installed. All cards with stock tuning. I tried flashing a overclock modded bios on each with a hefty overclock and a moderate overclock and the stability loss wasn't worth the gains. I might revisit this again though.

Code:

cudaminer -L 3 -l t5x20 => 19.5mh/s  (6 card rig)

[2014-10-04 12:14:24] Stratum detected new block
[2014-10-04 12:14:24] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.19 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:14:24]         Temp:  51C  Fan speed:  44%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:14:24] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.21 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:14:24]         Temp:  53C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:14:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.61 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:14:24]         Temp:  52C  Fan speed:  44%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:14:24] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.16 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:14:24]         Temp:  52C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:14:24] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.17 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:14:24]         Temp:  52C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:14:24] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.18 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:14:24]         Temp:  44C  Fan speed:  42%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:14:34] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.22 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:14:34]         Temp:  52C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:14:34] accepted: 122/122 (100.00%), 19.56 khash/s (yay!!!)

cudaminer -L 4 -l t35x4 => 19.7mh/s   (6 card rig)

[2014-10-04 12:15:18] Stratum detected new block
[2014-10-04 12:15:18] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.30 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:15:18]         Temp:  53C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:15:18] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.37 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:15:18]         Temp:  53C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:15:18] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.37 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:15:18]         Temp:  58C  Fan speed:  49%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:15:18] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.39 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:15:18]         Temp:  53C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:15:18] GPU #5: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2.95 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:15:18]         Temp:  54C  Fan speed:  46%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:15:18] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.32 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:15:18]         Temp:  54C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:15:25] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 3.39 khash/s
[2014-10-04 12:15:25]         Temp:  54C  Fan speed:  45%  Power:  N/A
[2014-10-04 12:15:25] accepted: 75/75 (100.00%), 19.76 khash/s (yay!!!)

I also messed with YAC a bit. The best gains there were at a lookup gap of 4 and also about the same at 8, with the lower lookup gap taking less wattage at the wall.

tc61

hero member

Activity: 494

Merit: 500

I hope the coin spikes up after the conference, at this point its not worth mining, and once the miners dry up, it spells bad times for a coin...keeping my fingers crossed.

Topic: [Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions! - page 227. (Read 381007 times)