Pages:
Author

Topic: [UniMining.net] UniMining yiimp Mining Pool - page 6. (Read 19849 times)

full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 101
Mining pool operator @ https://www.unimining.net

We have been informed that some network issue occurs on GBX during a couple of hours.

We fixed this issue and mining seems working fine again.

The correct command to mine GBX with a worker name is :

Code:
ccminer-x64 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u wallet.worker -p c=GBX

We apologize for this inconvenient.

No, it's not solved, i just tried an obtained this :

Code:
/home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxoEvjLkDSmBBaUviBVMDB.MINER44 -p c=GBX -i 17
ccminer 8.17-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

[2018-01-10 01:03:26] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
0
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
1
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:29] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:29] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:32] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:32] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:35] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:35] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:36] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:36] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:38] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:38] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:41] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:41] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:44] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:44] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:46] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:46] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:47] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:47] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:50] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:50] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:53] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:53] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:59] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:59] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:04:02] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:04:02] GPU #1: waiting for data

As you can see i am on Linux Ubuntu. I type exactly the same command on another concurrent pool, on por 10000, everything mine well. but i want to mine on your pool ...


OK,I undertood: Pool is fine, hundreds of miners are mining GBX on port 4236. You can mine it also on port 4233.

Now, I'll reply to each of your messages but honestly, it would be easier to discuss on discord on the phone and stop spamming like that.
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE
Quote
I can do it but first I will reply to your other questions. Maybe I made a mistake again. For sure, some other miners use EWBF.

Perhaps, they try, but i think EWBF is more efficient for EQUIHASH algo.
EWBF's thread page : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ewbfs-cuda-zcash-miner-1707546
I think they make mistake in mining neoscrypt with ewbf...

Quote
Can we focus on your problems and don't try to fix problems of everyone ? What is the aim of your conversation ?

Simply, Mining GBX on your pool
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

We have been informed that some network issue occurs on GBX during a couple of hours.

We fixed this issue and mining seems working fine again.

The correct command to mine GBX with a worker name is :

Code:
ccminer-x64 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u wallet.worker -p c=GBX

We apologize for this inconvenient.

No, it's not solved, i just tried an obtained this :

Code:
/home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxoEvjLkDSmBBaUviBVMDB.MINER44 -p c=GBX -i 17
ccminer 8.17-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

[2018-01-10 01:03:26] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
0
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
1
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:26] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:29] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:29] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:32] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:32] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:35] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:35] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:36] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:36] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:38] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:38] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:41] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:41] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:44] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:44] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:46] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:46] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:47] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:47] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:50] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:50] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:53] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:53] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-10 01:03:56] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-10 01:03:59] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:03:59] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:04:02] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-10 01:04:02] GPU #1: waiting for data

As you can see i am on Linux Ubuntu. I type exactly the same command on another concurrent pool, on por 10000, everything mine well. but i want to mine on your pool ...
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 101
Mining pool operator @ https://www.unimining.net
I can do it but first I will reply to your other questions. Maybe I made a mistake again. For sure, some other miners use EWBF.

Can we focus on your problems and don't try to fix problems of everyone ? What is the aim of your conversation ?

Edit : about my link, ok he used other miners and not only EWBF but still what is the aim of all your hate against us ? Do you want to solve problems or find problems ? I don't understand what you are doing
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE
Sorry for inconvenient due to slow front-end. The issue should be solved now. We have reconfigured rules on cloudflare.

For your second problem, difficulty of GBX went up the last few days. Moreover you should take into account the pool luck. So you should make your calculation on a longer period.

But I propose you to send us your wallet id so we can analyse the situation.

Sure thing, here you go:
GPeB6U58YbLLQ8Audm3GTnpJ4w8eKn2SS7

Hi,


We improved the website accessibility few hours ago, you'll see an enhancement.

About earnings, I had a look at your address, payments are fine. I agree that earnings depends on the network difficulty but it also depends on pool luck. We improved pool wallet connectivity and other aspects but pool luck also depends on probability. In theory, on long term, all pools with the same configuration and fee should give the same earnings.

PS: Unimining fee is 0.5% and not 5% as you mentioned previously.


Have a nice mining

Yeah the earning has gone up now, it was around 1 before, now I'm getting about 1.35 GBX now which is still a bit less than what I should be earning (~1.5) but I'm fine with that. You have a great pool, keep up the good work.
I set the fee at 5% because I have 3 miners, so 3x0.5% and 3x1% (I thought dev fee is 1% on EWBF miner) which adds to 4.5%. However I checked today and dev fee on EBWF is 2%, so it's actually 7.5% total.

EWBF is for equihash, not for nescrypt isn't it ? GBX is neoscrypt coin, so i don't understand.

Hi,


I think that EWBF can also be used to mine neoscrypt. But I'm not using it so I'm not sure.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19367311

Where did you saw that EWBF could mine neoscrypt in this post ? Could you quote exactly the line code ?
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE
I post an answer in french in your french forum :
https://forum.unimining.net/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=205&p=308#p308

Please try to really diagnoze and change TCP port for testings in first time, it seems that TCP 4236 Port have many utilization if i look at google request.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b&ei=JVFVWoKiEIOdsgGwqKmQAg&q=TCP+port+4236+utilisation&oq=TCP+port+4236+utilisation&gs_l=psy-ab.3...28523.29251.0.30881.4.4.0.0.0.0.157.511.0j4.4.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..0.0.0....0.ByomcxmZUGk

I propose 4232 or 4240 if you wwant to stay in this port range of 4230-4250

member
Activity: 87
Merit: 11
UniMining.net - EU Mining Pool
I'm lately losing connection while mining GBX on port 4236. It does reconnect quickly but it's annoying to see these dips 6-8 times per day on all 3 of my miners. I haven't noticed my internet going down, so this must be some pool bug?

I'm seeing the some connection issues as well in the last 12 hrs, also on GBX. Not sure if it's related but I noticed some upward spikes on the Neoscrypt pool algo graph, and it seems my dips might be in the same timeframe as the pool spikes.

I'm thinking something needs to be addressed on the pool side?

Same here, mining GBX. Was doing fine last couple of days but now I see many dips per day. Hate to loose coins like this and would not like to go to other pool but will have to if this will not be fixed. Guess pool admin will have to look into this.

So , i see i'm not the only one to have some problems with mining GBX on pool.unimining.net:4236.

May be, you are out of sync from the Gobyte blockchain , or there are NAT / PAT errors in your firewalls and routers. But the nonces are no longer sent by the server and so, we can not send any more hashs or shares.

Please repair your server and/or really diagnose this GBX pool problem.

We have been informed that some network issue occurs on GBX during a couple of hours.

We fixed this issue and mining seems working fine again.

The correct command to mine GBX with a worker name is :

Code:
ccminer-x64 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u wallet.worker -p c=GBX

We apologize for this inconvenient.
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 101
Mining pool operator @ https://www.unimining.net
Sorry for inconvenient due to slow front-end. The issue should be solved now. We have reconfigured rules on cloudflare.

For your second problem, difficulty of GBX went up the last few days. Moreover you should take into account the pool luck. So you should make your calculation on a longer period.

But I propose you to send us your wallet id so we can analyse the situation.

Sure thing, here you go:
GPeB6U58YbLLQ8Audm3GTnpJ4w8eKn2SS7

Hi,


We improved the website accessibility few hours ago, you'll see an enhancement.

About earnings, I had a look at your address, payments are fine. I agree that earnings depends on the network difficulty but it also depends on pool luck. We improved pool wallet connectivity and other aspects but pool luck also depends on probability. In theory, on long term, all pools with the same configuration and fee should give the same earnings.

PS: Unimining fee is 0.5% and not 5% as you mentioned previously.


Have a nice mining

Yeah the earning has gone up now, it was around 1 before, now I'm getting about 1.35 GBX now which is still a bit less than what I should be earning (~1.5) but I'm fine with that. You have a great pool, keep up the good work.
I set the fee at 5% because I have 3 miners, so 3x0.5% and 3x1% (I thought dev fee is 1% on EWBF miner) which adds to 4.5%. However I checked today and dev fee on EBWF is 2%, so it's actually 7.5% total.

EWBF is for equihash, not for nescrypt isn't it ? GBX is neoscrypt coin, so i don't understand.

Hi,


I think that EWBF can also be used to mine neoscrypt. But I'm not using it so I'm not sure.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19367311
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE
So , i see i'm not the only one to have some problems with mining GBX on pool.unimining.net:4236.

May be, you are out of sync from the Gobyte blockchain , or there are NAT / PAT errors in your firewalls and routers. But the nonces are no longer sent by the server and so, we can not send any more hashs or shares.

Please repair your server and/or really diagnose this GBX pool problem.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
I'm lately losing connection while mining GBX on port 4236. It does reconnect quickly but it's annoying to see these dips 6-8 times per day on all 3 of my miners. I haven't noticed my internet going down, so this must be some pool bug?

I'm seeing the some connection issues as well in the last 12 hrs, also on GBX. Not sure if it's related but I noticed some upward spikes on the Neoscrypt pool algo graph, and it seems my dips might be in the same timeframe as the pool spikes.

I'm thinking something needs to be addressed on the pool side?

Same here, mining GBX. Was doing fine last couple of days but now I see many dips per day. Hate to loose coins like this and would not like to go to other pool but will have to if this will not be fixed. Guess pool admin will have to look into this.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
I'm lately losing connection while mining GBX on port 4236. It does reconnect quickly but it's annoying to see these dips 6-8 times per day on all 3 of my miners. I haven't noticed my internet going down, so this must be some pool bug?

I'm seeing the some connection issues as well in the last 12 hrs, also on GBX. Not sure if it's related but I noticed some upward spikes on the Neoscrypt pool algo graph, and it seems my dips might be in the same timeframe as the pool spikes.

I'm thinking something needs to be addressed on the pool side?
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 104
I'm lately losing connection while mining GBX on port 4236. It does reconnect quickly but it's annoying to see these dips 6-8 times per day on all 3 of my miners. I haven't noticed my internet going down, so this must be some pool bug?
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 104
Sorry for inconvenient due to slow front-end. The issue should be solved now. We have reconfigured rules on cloudflare.

For your second problem, difficulty of GBX went up the last few days. Moreover you should take into account the pool luck. So you should make your calculation on a longer period.

But I propose you to send us your wallet id so we can analyse the situation.

Sure thing, here you go:
GPeB6U58YbLLQ8Audm3GTnpJ4w8eKn2SS7

Hi,


We improved the website accessibility few hours ago, you'll see an enhancement.

About earnings, I had a look at your address, payments are fine. I agree that earnings depends on the network difficulty but it also depends on pool luck. We improved pool wallet connectivity and other aspects but pool luck also depends on probability. In theory, on long term, all pools with the same configuration and fee should give the same earnings.

PS: Unimining fee is 0.5% and not 5% as you mentioned previously.


Have a nice mining

Yeah the earning has gone up now, it was around 1 before, now I'm getting about 1.35 GBX now which is still a bit less than what I should be earning (~1.5) but I'm fine with that. You have a great pool, keep up the good work.
I set the fee at 5% because I have 3 miners, so 3x0.5% and 3x1% (I thought dev fee is 1% on EWBF miner) which adds to 4.5%. However I checked today and dev fee on EBWF is 2%, so it's actually 7.5% total.

EWBF is for equihash, not for nescrypt isn't it ? GBX is neoscrypt coin, so i don't understand.

Yeah sorry I'm using ccminer.
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE

Salut,
On vient de voir tes deux messages sur notre forum. Sur notre forum il y a une validation des messages car nous avons beaucoup de spam.
Tous les coins neoscrypt se minent de la meme maniere. Si il y a une erreur dans un tuto pour le TrezarCoin nous allons la corriger.
Je suis dans un magasin je ne sais pas t'aider pour le moment mais bskc va te repondre.
Sur le forum d unimining il y a une section en francais si tu preferes le francais a l anglais.
Bon mining

Ok, je vais utiliser le globish pour que tout le monde puisse lire et tenter de comprendre. Mais comme je fais ça avec google trad ...ça risque de ne pas forcément l'etre tant que ça.

I feel like a form of contradiction between these two messages:

Quote
On our forum there is a message validation because we have a lot of spam.
and
Quote
On the unimining forum there is a section in French if you prefer French to English.

On one side, you invite me to go on the French forum, and on the other you inform me that your forum is slowed down by moderation because of attacks !

What do you mean exactly HuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuhHuh?

I will continue here, it seems to me faster.

Quote
All neoscrypt coins are mined in the same way.


Yes, I agree, I'm well aware and that's why I do not understand why GBX is denied me while TZC goes very well with the same software mining (Klaust ccminer 8.17)

Quote
If there is an error in a tutorial for the TrezarCoin we will correct it.

No, I did not mention an error in the tutorial TZC but in the GBX tutorial .
You write innova for port 4236 while this port is for GBX. Review your post well that I shared here.

I copy again from your forum :

Please don't mine other coins that GBX on port 4236 as it is dedicated to GBX. ....
....
On port 4233, you can mine all neoscrypt coins but port 4236 is dedicated ONLY for Innova.


I did not know what to understand by reading this, even if it was logical that it was inevitably a fright on your part in the text, I see that I can not undermine this port, and I've tried them all ports nothing to do.


I was rather pleased to mine on your pool so far, and I even posted your pool in my posts adding coin mining commands to the WTM and nvOC threads but I start to doubt.
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE
I post a comment here :
https://forum.unimining.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=162&p=274#p274

Copy of it :

    d4v wrote: ↑
    Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:37 am
    Dear miners,


    Our neoscrypt stratum is under heavy load because there are many miners mining neoscrypt coins. If you encounter problems mining GoByte (GBX) on port 4233, please try to mine it on port 4236. The same GBX pool wallet is connected to both stratum (ports 4233 and 4236). Please don't mine other coins that GBX on port 4236 as it is dedicated to GBX.

    On port 4233, you can mine all neoscrypt coins but port 4236 is dedicated ONLY for Innova.

    For nVidia cards (ccminer):

        ccminer-x64 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u Your_GBX_Wallet_Address -p c=GBX --cpu-priority=3

    For AMD cards, please refer to the thread "[nVidia] How to mine GoByte (GBX) ?" using port 4236 instead of 4233.

    Under some conditions, the coin daemon of the pool becomes unreachable. Some miners noticed that under these conditions, some shares are going to another neoscrypt coin. It leads to small earnings in other coins but Yiimp performs a calculation to pay the miner as if he mined the correct coin.

    In order to improve mining of GoByte coin (GBX), a hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte is present on the stratum dedicated to GBX (port 4236). If you are mining GBX on port 4233 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to another coin. But if you are mining GBX on port 4236 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to the hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte so you'll continue to mine GoByte and you'll be paid in GoByte. We prefer to keep the fall-back wallet hidden in order to redure confusion but we'd like to display it on our pool website when it will be possible and easy to understand what is going on.


    For any problem, please report on:
    https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/uniminingnet-unimining-yiimp-mining-pool-2156784
    https://twitter.com/unimining
    https://discord.gg/ZWup8Jx

Je ne comprend pas bien ce que signifie tout ce post.

Peut-on, oui ou non, miner du GBX sur votre pool neoscrypt Huh? Vous l'affichez sur votre pool mais seulement parce que vous payez en GBX Huh?
J'ai du mal a discerner la logique dans ce post.

Autre chose : quand je cherche a regarder mon adresse Gobyte (car quelques shares semblent etre passés, il me renvoie vers un wallet en galactrum, je ne comprend pas ce que vient faire ce coin sur mon adresse GBX...

En tout cas, quand j'essaye de miner GBX sur votre pool, rien a faire, vous ne m'envoyez pas de fraction de block a hasher :

Code: Select all

 /home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxmyaddressmBBaUviBVMDB.MINER44 -p c=GBX -i 17
ccminer 8.17-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

[2018-01-05 18:05:48] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
0
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
1
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #1: waiting for data

J'ai essayé sur le port 4233 ou sur le 4236, même problème. Par ailleurs, dans le post vous écrivez Gobyte et ensuite vous écrivez innova pour le port 4236 !?!? Qu'est-ce que c'est que ce mélange de confusion Huh

Pour une fois que nous avions une pool avec des francophones, je trouve dommage d’être obligé d'aller voir ailleurs mais si les choses continuent, je vais aussi miner le TZC ailleurs.

Salut,

On vient de voir tes deux messages sur notre forum. Sur notre forum il y a une validation des messages car nous avons beaucoup de spam.

Tous les coins neoscrypt se minent de la meme maniere. Si il y a une erreur dans un tuto pour le TrezarCoin nous allons la corriger.

Je suis dans un magasin je ne sais pas t'aider pour le moment mais bskc va te repondre.

Sur le forum d unimining il y a une section en francais si tu preferes le francais a l anglais.

Bon mining

Salut,


Je viens de regarder ton message plus en détails je crois qu il ne faut pas spécifier le worker avec un point après l'adresse.
 Peux-tu essayer avec la ligne suivante ?

 /home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxmyaddressmBBaUviBVMDB -p c=GBX

Je crois que pour ccminer c est un autre parametre pour specifier le worker. Je te reponds depuis mon telephone je n ai pas mon ordi ici.

Bon mining

Donc ce qui marche sur votre pool en TZC pour miner ne marcherait pas en GBX Huh Je suis sceptique.
J'utilise exactement le même commande, port, adresse et passwd différent bien sur) mais je met aussi le nom du worker derrière mon adresse TZC avec un point.

De toute façon, je mine du ZCL jusqu'au fork de demain et après je reprend en profit switching avec nvOC sur Whattomine, je vous dirait si j'arrive a miner sans le nom du mineur derrière. Mais j'en doute fortement. A mon avis c'est plutôt un pb de communication entre le stratum-tcp server et la version ccminer de Klaust (v8.17). Mais je n'ai pas ce pb sur une pool concurrente (eu1.altminer.net pour les nommer)
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE
Sorry for inconvenient due to slow front-end. The issue should be solved now. We have reconfigured rules on cloudflare.

For your second problem, difficulty of GBX went up the last few days. Moreover you should take into account the pool luck. So you should make your calculation on a longer period.

But I propose you to send us your wallet id so we can analyse the situation.

Sure thing, here you go:
GPeB6U58YbLLQ8Audm3GTnpJ4w8eKn2SS7

Hi,


We improved the website accessibility few hours ago, you'll see an enhancement.

About earnings, I had a look at your address, payments are fine. I agree that earnings depends on the network difficulty but it also depends on pool luck. We improved pool wallet connectivity and other aspects but pool luck also depends on probability. In theory, on long term, all pools with the same configuration and fee should give the same earnings.

PS: Unimining fee is 0.5% and not 5% as you mentioned previously.


Have a nice mining

Yeah the earning has gone up now, it was around 1 before, now I'm getting about 1.35 GBX now which is still a bit less than what I should be earning (~1.5) but I'm fine with that. You have a great pool, keep up the good work.
I set the fee at 5% because I have 3 miners, so 3x0.5% and 3x1% (I thought dev fee is 1% on EWBF miner) which adds to 4.5%. However I checked today and dev fee on EBWF is 2%, so it's actually 7.5% total.

EWBF is for equihash, not for nescrypt isn't it ? GBX is neoscrypt coin, so i don't understand.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 104
Sorry for inconvenient due to slow front-end. The issue should be solved now. We have reconfigured rules on cloudflare.

For your second problem, difficulty of GBX went up the last few days. Moreover you should take into account the pool luck. So you should make your calculation on a longer period.

But I propose you to send us your wallet id so we can analyse the situation.

Sure thing, here you go:
GPeB6U58YbLLQ8Audm3GTnpJ4w8eKn2SS7

Hi,


We improved the website accessibility few hours ago, you'll see an enhancement.

About earnings, I had a look at your address, payments are fine. I agree that earnings depends on the network difficulty but it also depends on pool luck. We improved pool wallet connectivity and other aspects but pool luck also depends on probability. In theory, on long term, all pools with the same configuration and fee should give the same earnings.

PS: Unimining fee is 0.5% and not 5% as you mentioned previously.


Have a nice mining

Yeah the earning has gone up now, it was around 1 before, now I'm getting about 1.35 GBX now which is still a bit less than what I should be earning (~1.5) but I'm fine with that. You have a great pool, keep up the good work.
I set the fee at 5% because I have 3 miners, so 3x0.5% and 3x1% (I thought dev fee is 1% on EWBF miner) which adds to 4.5%. However I checked today and dev fee on EBWF is 2%, so it's actually 7.5% total.
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 101
Mining pool operator @ https://www.unimining.net
I post a comment here :
https://forum.unimining.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=162&p=274#p274

Copy of it :

    d4v wrote: ↑
    Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:37 am
    Dear miners,


    Our neoscrypt stratum is under heavy load because there are many miners mining neoscrypt coins. If you encounter problems mining GoByte (GBX) on port 4233, please try to mine it on port 4236. The same GBX pool wallet is connected to both stratum (ports 4233 and 4236). Please don't mine other coins that GBX on port 4236 as it is dedicated to GBX.

    On port 4233, you can mine all neoscrypt coins but port 4236 is dedicated ONLY for Innova.

    For nVidia cards (ccminer):

        ccminer-x64 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u Your_GBX_Wallet_Address -p c=GBX --cpu-priority=3

    For AMD cards, please refer to the thread "[nVidia] How to mine GoByte (GBX) ?" using port 4236 instead of 4233.

    Under some conditions, the coin daemon of the pool becomes unreachable. Some miners noticed that under these conditions, some shares are going to another neoscrypt coin. It leads to small earnings in other coins but Yiimp performs a calculation to pay the miner as if he mined the correct coin.

    In order to improve mining of GoByte coin (GBX), a hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte is present on the stratum dedicated to GBX (port 4236). If you are mining GBX on port 4233 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to another coin. But if you are mining GBX on port 4236 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to the hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte so you'll continue to mine GoByte and you'll be paid in GoByte. We prefer to keep the fall-back wallet hidden in order to redure confusion but we'd like to display it on our pool website when it will be possible and easy to understand what is going on.


    For any problem, please report on:
    https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/uniminingnet-unimining-yiimp-mining-pool-2156784
    https://twitter.com/unimining
    https://discord.gg/ZWup8Jx

Je ne comprend pas bien ce que signifie tout ce post.

Peut-on, oui ou non, miner du GBX sur votre pool neoscrypt Huh? Vous l'affichez sur votre pool mais seulement parce que vous payez en GBX Huh?
J'ai du mal a discerner la logique dans ce post.

Autre chose : quand je cherche a regarder mon adresse Gobyte (car quelques shares semblent etre passés, il me renvoie vers un wallet en galactrum, je ne comprend pas ce que vient faire ce coin sur mon adresse GBX...

En tout cas, quand j'essaye de miner GBX sur votre pool, rien a faire, vous ne m'envoyez pas de fraction de block a hasher :

Code: Select all

 /home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxmyaddressmBBaUviBVMDB.MINER44 -p c=GBX -i 17
ccminer 8.17-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

[2018-01-05 18:05:48] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
0
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
1
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #1: waiting for data

J'ai essayé sur le port 4233 ou sur le 4236, même problème. Par ailleurs, dans le post vous écrivez Gobyte et ensuite vous écrivez innova pour le port 4236 !?!? Qu'est-ce que c'est que ce mélange de confusion Huh

Pour une fois que nous avions une pool avec des francophones, je trouve dommage d’être obligé d'aller voir ailleurs mais si les choses continuent, je vais aussi miner le TZC ailleurs.

Salut,

On vient de voir tes deux messages sur notre forum. Sur notre forum il y a une validation des messages car nous avons beaucoup de spam.

Tous les coins neoscrypt se minent de la meme maniere. Si il y a une erreur dans un tuto pour le TrezarCoin nous allons la corriger.

Je suis dans un magasin je ne sais pas t'aider pour le moment mais bskc va te repondre.

Sur le forum d unimining il y a une section en francais si tu preferes le francais a l anglais.

Bon mining

Salut,


Je viens de regarder ton message plus en details je crois qu il ne faut pas specifier le worker avec un point apres l adresse.
 Peux-tu essayer avec la ligne suivante ?

 /home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxmyaddressmBBaUviBVMDB -p c=GBX

Je crois que pour ccminer c est un autre parametre pour specifier le worker. Je te reponds depuis mon telephone je n ai pas mon ordi ici.

Bon mining
full member
Activity: 172
Merit: 101
Mining pool operator @ https://www.unimining.net
I post a comment here :
https://forum.unimining.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=162&p=274#p274

Copy of it :

    d4v wrote: ↑
    Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:37 am
    Dear miners,


    Our neoscrypt stratum is under heavy load because there are many miners mining neoscrypt coins. If you encounter problems mining GoByte (GBX) on port 4233, please try to mine it on port 4236. The same GBX pool wallet is connected to both stratum (ports 4233 and 4236). Please don't mine other coins that GBX on port 4236 as it is dedicated to GBX.

    On port 4233, you can mine all neoscrypt coins but port 4236 is dedicated ONLY for Innova.

    For nVidia cards (ccminer):

        ccminer-x64 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u Your_GBX_Wallet_Address -p c=GBX --cpu-priority=3

    For AMD cards, please refer to the thread "[nVidia] How to mine GoByte (GBX) ?" using port 4236 instead of 4233.

    Under some conditions, the coin daemon of the pool becomes unreachable. Some miners noticed that under these conditions, some shares are going to another neoscrypt coin. It leads to small earnings in other coins but Yiimp performs a calculation to pay the miner as if he mined the correct coin.

    In order to improve mining of GoByte coin (GBX), a hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte is present on the stratum dedicated to GBX (port 4236). If you are mining GBX on port 4233 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to another coin. But if you are mining GBX on port 4236 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to the hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte so you'll continue to mine GoByte and you'll be paid in GoByte. We prefer to keep the fall-back wallet hidden in order to redure confusion but we'd like to display it on our pool website when it will be possible and easy to understand what is going on.


    For any problem, please report on:
    https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/uniminingnet-unimining-yiimp-mining-pool-2156784
    https://twitter.com/unimining
    https://discord.gg/ZWup8Jx

Je ne comprend pas bien ce que signifie tout ce post.

Peut-on, oui ou non, miner du GBX sur votre pool neoscrypt Huh? Vous l'affichez sur votre pool mais seulement parce que vous payez en GBX Huh?
J'ai du mal a discerner la logique dans ce post.

Autre chose : quand je cherche a regarder mon adresse Gobyte (car quelques shares semblent etre passés, il me renvoie vers un wallet en galactrum, je ne comprend pas ce que vient faire ce coin sur mon adresse GBX...

En tout cas, quand j'essaye de miner GBX sur votre pool, rien a faire, vous ne m'envoyez pas de fraction de block a hasher :

Code: Select all

 /home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxmyaddressmBBaUviBVMDB.MINER44 -p c=GBX -i 17
ccminer 8.17-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

[2018-01-05 18:05:48] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
0
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
1
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #1: waiting for data

J'ai essayé sur le port 4233 ou sur le 4236, même problème. Par ailleurs, dans le post vous écrivez Gobyte et ensuite vous écrivez innova pour le port 4236 !?!? Qu'est-ce que c'est que ce mélange de confusion Huh

Pour une fois que nous avions une pool avec des francophones, je trouve dommage d’être obligé d'aller voir ailleurs mais si les choses continuent, je vais aussi miner le TZC ailleurs.

Salut,

On vient de voir tes deux messages sur notre forum. Sur notre forum il y a une validation des messages car nous avons beaucoup de spam.

Tous les coins neoscrypt se minent de la meme maniere. Si il y a une erreur dans un tuto pour le TrezarCoin nous allons la corriger.

Je suis dans un magasin je ne sais pas t'aider pour le moment mais bskc va te repondre.

Sur le forum d unimining il y a une section en francais si tu preferes le francais a l anglais.

Bon mining
full member
Activity: 340
Merit: 103
It is easier to break an atom than partialities AE
I post a comment here :
https://forum.unimining.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=162&p=274#p274

Copy of it :

    d4v wrote: ↑
    Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:37 am
    Dear miners,


    Our neoscrypt stratum is under heavy load because there are many miners mining neoscrypt coins. If you encounter problems mining GoByte (GBX) on port 4233, please try to mine it on port 4236. The same GBX pool wallet is connected to both stratum (ports 4233 and 4236). Please don't mine other coins that GBX on port 4236 as it is dedicated to GBX.

    On port 4233, you can mine all neoscrypt coins but port 4236 is dedicated ONLY for Innova.

    For nVidia cards (ccminer):

        ccminer-x64 -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u Your_GBX_Wallet_Address -p c=GBX --cpu-priority=3

    For AMD cards, please refer to the thread "[nVidia] How to mine GoByte (GBX) ?" using port 4236 instead of 4233.

    Under some conditions, the coin daemon of the pool becomes unreachable. Some miners noticed that under these conditions, some shares are going to another neoscrypt coin. It leads to small earnings in other coins but Yiimp performs a calculation to pay the miner as if he mined the correct coin.

    In order to improve mining of GoByte coin (GBX), a hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte is present on the stratum dedicated to GBX (port 4236). If you are mining GBX on port 4233 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to another coin. But if you are mining GBX on port 4236 and GBX wallet have a problem, your shares will go to the hidden fall-back wallet of GoByte so you'll continue to mine GoByte and you'll be paid in GoByte. We prefer to keep the fall-back wallet hidden in order to redure confusion but we'd like to display it on our pool website when it will be possible and easy to understand what is going on.


    For any problem, please report on:
    https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/uniminingnet-unimining-yiimp-mining-pool-2156784
    https://twitter.com/unimining
    https://discord.gg/ZWup8Jx

Je ne comprend pas bien ce que signifie tout ce post.

Peut-on, oui ou non, miner du GBX sur votre pool neoscrypt Huh? Vous l'affichez sur votre pool mais seulement parce que vous payez en GBX Huh?
J'ai du mal a discerner la logique dans ce post.

Autre chose : quand je cherche a regarder mon adresse Gobyte (car quelques shares semblent etre passés, il me renvoie vers un wallet en galactrum, je ne comprend pas ce que vient faire ce coin sur mon adresse GBX...

En tout cas, quand j'essaye de miner GBX sur votre pool, rien a faire, vous ne m'envoyez pas de fraction de block a hasher :

Code: Select all

 /home/m1/KTccminer/ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236 -u GTHXsFcNdiDkUxmyaddressmBBaUviBVMDB.MINER44 -p c=GBX -i 17
ccminer 8.17-KlausT (64bit) for nVidia GPUs
Compiled with GCC 5.4 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0

Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp-hash, klaust, tpruvot and tsiv.

[2018-01-05 18:05:48] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Intensity set to 17, 131072 cuda threads
0
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://pool.unimining.net:4236
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] 2 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
1
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] Stratum authentication failed
[2018-01-05 18:05:48] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:51] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:54] GPU #1: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #0: waiting for data
[2018-01-05 18:05:57] GPU #1: waiting for data

J'ai essayé sur le port 4233 ou sur le 4236, même problème. Par ailleurs, dans le post vous écrivez Gobyte et ensuite vous écrivez innova pour le port 4236 !?!? Qu'est-ce que c'est que ce mélange de confusion Huh

Pour une fois que nous avions une pool avec des francophones, je trouve dommage d’être obligé d'aller voir ailleurs mais si les choses continuent, je vais aussi miner le TZC ailleurs.
Pages:
Jump to: